Listen you gun grabbing, shill posting, cock sucking, nigger worshippers

Listen you gun grabbing, shill posting, cock sucking, nigger worshippers.
SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED
The reality is that there are more guns than people in the USA.
Period.
You won’t win. Ever.
Every time I see antifa get btfo I see you people. Weak with no real skill.
I don’t know how you tie your fucking shoes honestly.
Notice how ANONYMOUS kinda went away? Why is that?
Well because you faggots bought the meme and started using it.
If you want civil war 2.0 you’re in for a surprise. Cops will defend the constitution regardless of what they are ordered to do on a grand scale.
Same for the military, especially if you nigger cock gobbling commies are out in force attempting to intimidate the law abiding citizens.
Stop while you are ahead.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_school_massacre
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akihabara_massacre
youtube.com/watch?v=Kt3oZ-BSqMQ&t=3s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

This won't get many posts because it isn't b8 but bump anyway

agree

*repeals your amendment*
nothing personal, kid

These slide threads are pissing me off to a level previously unknown.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution
SHALL
DEEM
IT
NECESSARY
SHALL
PROPOSE
AMENDMENTS

Nope. Because then free speech is up for grabs and that means the actual end of the American experiment.
We will go to war before that happens.

>two thirds of both houses
Yeah, good luck with that.

Nobody should be prevented from owning a firearm. Every little thing they implement to limit who is allowed to own a firearm slowly erodes the 2nd amendment. The right to defend yourself is a right given by God and should never be taken away. Criminals with long records should just be made to stay in prison, mental hospitals for the criminally insane. Every person that has their right to a firearm stripped has been made vulnerable to the criminal element and is forced to hope the police are quick enough to respond before you get murdered. With average response times of 12-15 minutes, you are completely at the mercy of the criminals.

>redneck screeching
Common sense gun control has widespread popular support, and insurgent nutters like yourself will be made an example of

The sheer enormities of forcible consification is just not possible.
To do it through legislation will never happen and people will start being openly killed for their treason.
Watch and see.

The sheer enormities of forcible consification is just not possible.
To do it through legislation will never happen and people will start being openly killed for their treason.
Watch and see.

If that was true then it would have happened a long time ago but it doesn't so it hasn't. Late night tv (((comedians))), hollywood and the news media aren't representative. They just shill to a certain slackjaw market that loves to hear all this shit over and over.

Define commen sense.
We already have laws.
You can’t fuck goats by law yet here you are.

Widespread popular support is a myth. The left just screeches incredibly loudly while the left controlled MSM only pushes that viewpoint in order to make it appear as though it is the popular opinion. We need to fix the Smith-Mundt act.

Correct, because common sense having people who believe in god and country don’t shout out about their guns.
We have discipline and take the wait and see approach.
When we have had enough the world will take note.

You people have lived in relative peace while posting from your iPhone about the pleasure of communist life while being protected by the very system you oppose.
DIAF
DIAF

>common sense
This is such a disingenuous qualifier. The question is whether disarmament or deterrence is the correct prophylactic measure for addressing mass murder. Correctly answering this question (or understanding the dynamics involved well enough) is one of the most difficult questions we face as a society (or species, if you think about it in terms of nuclear warfare).

Empirical evidence does not suggest that taking guns away will actually prevent mass murders, precisely because humans are unfortunately inventive creatures and can use nearly anything to kill other human beings.
Technologically, we are well past the point where physical or intellectual superiority is necessary to do this, as jihadist invaders in Europe routinely demonstrate.

If you examine active responses to mass murder scenarios, they all involve sending in "good guys" with superior firepower. Our passive measures perhaps should be in accordance with this, rather than naively hoping that restricting access to something will prevent determined crazies from accessing it.

But of course, you know this. You are myopic enough to try to bring about a society where "control" can prevent these things. Think it through, and actually ask yourself what control measures would be necessary in order to prevent random psychos from shooting up clearly labeled defenseless zones. The societies depicted in dystopian science-fiction novels from the previous century would be amusement parks compared to what you would need. Take all the guns away, and you'll just get poison, explosives, automobiles, and God knows what else. The "insurgent nutters" you hold in such disdain are trying to save you from yourself, you blind fool.

russia and china would love to see USA disarm the majority of anti gun posts and tweets are shill bots flooding the internet with fake statistics. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. 95% of mental hospitals have been closed since the 50's people should start there for solutions.

Blacks, indians, mexicans, and Jews were never the militia.
Just ban them from firearms and 90% of shootings could stop.

How do the expect to defend myself?

I gotta smoke, swear and carry a gun, fuck.

Bump.

>Jews
>just ban them
Problem solved

This is now pasta.

Bumping because all I've heard irl since the shooting is how great it is we banned guns and getting shouted down when pointing out that criminals still have guns here. So many yugoslav and ira weapons flow where I live but everyone plugs there ears when they hear about gun crime rising.

This is such a disingenuous qualifier. The question is whether disarmament or deterrence is the correct prophylactic measure for addressing mass murder. Correctly answering this question (or understanding the dynamics involved well enough) is one of the most difficult questions we face as a society (or species, if you think about it in terms of nuclear warfare).

Empirical evidence does not suggest that taking guns away will actually prevent mass murders, precisely because humans are unfortunately inventive creatures and can use nearly anything to kill other human beings.
Technologically, we are well past the point where physical or intellectual superiority is necessary to do this, as jihadist invaders in Europe routinely demonstrate.

If you examine active responses to mass murder scenarios, they all involve sending in "good guys" with superior firepower. Our passive measures perhaps should be in accordance with this, rather than naively hoping that restricting access to something will prevent determined crazies from accessing it.

But of course, you know this. You are myopic enough to try to bring about a society where "control" can prevent these things. Think it through, and actually ask yourself what control measures would be necessary in order to prevent random psychos from shooting up clearly labeled defenseless zones. The societies depicted in dystopian science-fiction novels from the previous century would be amusement parks compared to what you would need. Take all the guns away, and you'll just get poison, explosives, automobiles, and God knows what else. The "insurgent nutters" you hold in such disdain are trying to save you from yourself, you blind fool.

Nice pasta

I stole it and so should you.

arms back then were muskets
times have changed.
If the 2nd amendment was supposed to be taken so literally, it would be longer and more detailed about what is allowed and what isn't. But that's all left out. So it is open to interpretation. if the founders were alive today, they would absolutely support banning military rifles to top these massacres.

SeeAnd then go to

Obviously bait. But....
Never mind.
I fully expect you to turn in your laptop for the quill.

How do you know what the founders would say?

Bump

This thread will die because shills have no valid argument or plan.

>the founding fathers.
Most of those guys were cool. The omission of economic and anti-jew measures (like in the Magna Carta) in the Constitution are troubling.

Then why aren't there as many lone wolf mass killers in other countries? Why didn't the mass stabers in Japan use a more effective weapons? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osaka_school_massacre en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akihabara_massacre

Please let this happen

If they were alive today they would round you up and give you a good old fashioned lynching

Japan has the highest suiside rate in the world.

So? What's your point? Not addressing my arguments.

>They used muskets.

So you’re saying we need to upgrade to anti-tank and anti-aircraft weaponry in order to be able to combat modern day tyrannical governments.

I like where you’re going with this user.

>Cops will defend the constitution regardless of what they are ordered to do on a grand scale.
Same for the military,

Dumb ass burgers actually believe this.

NO YOU TURDBRAIN, THEY ARE PAID MERCENARIES, THEY WILL DO AS TOLD OR GET FIRED OR WORSE. YOU DUMB AMERINIGGERS ARE ALL IN DENIAL, YOR COUNTRY WANZS YOU DEAD, PERIOD. A MIXED-MONGREL MUTT RACE, GOOD ENOUGH TO SHOUT HOORAY AND WORK BUT TOO STUPID FOR ANYTHING ELSE.

THAT

IS YOUR DESTINY!!!

I don't necessarily agree with gun control but if you think the entire military and police force will disobey the law (if it's changed) simultaneously you are actually retarded

In a world ruled by law, law will rule the people, regardless of what that law is

Get educated and go home fag.
You are an embarrassment

...

america has like 50 million more guns than cars yet cars kill more people. time to ban sober drivers to prevent drunk driving accidents

...

speeking of the second ammendment and florida schools. Did you faggots see this yet? Skip to 27:00 and meet jordan jareb or however the fuck you spell that faggots name.

youtube.com/watch?v=Kt3oZ-BSqMQ&t=3s

The reason they fear the trained personal after deployment is obvious.
However when the deployed feel abandoned are they really willing to shoot their neighbors?

it would splinter and be very messy, probably ending in mass desertion due to lack of cohesive leadership

Ok, let's ban guns.
But only if becomes illegal for politicians to have private security of any type. If there's some sort of problem they can just call the police and wait till they show up like everyone else :^). What's the worst that could happen?