Why wont Nintendo use Peach's superior Smash design instead of this ugly thing they always use?
Why wont Nintendo use Peach's superior Smash design instead of this ugly thing they always use?
Jace Wood
Other urls found in this thread:
Nicholas Torres
they are terrified of creating more porn
Tyler Hernandez
They should just let a fan artist redesign her.
Adrian Jackson
...
Dylan Sullivan
best redesign comin through
Andrew Diaz
Because that's THEIR version, the canon one. Not so hard to understand.
Carter Lewis
You had your shitty peachy threads deleted for a reason. Fuck off to one of the porn boards.
Anthony Barnes
You again.
Those thighs are thick and those hips don't quit.
Noah Wilson
I like how Peach looks cuter and more realistic in each Smash game and yet Mario and Luigi still look very cartoonish.
Nathaniel Sanders
I agree that that the Smash model fixes all the head/facial problems that the regular Peach always has. But sadly the dress had to much detail and don't match with the current 3D Mario design.
Matthew Murphy
She looked best in Super Mario 64.
Jordan Harris
So you want this
gamebanana.com
Ryder Foster
Her current look is a bastardization of her 2D art that's why. They're not going to use actual mildly attractive peach in a game aimed at little kids.
Luis Gray
Because its too sexual for an all ages game. Anything supervised by Miyamoto will b ethe most safe shit ever.
Gabriel Fisher
meanwhile in Pokemon
John Wilson
Pokemon isn't for kids, it's for people who were kids in the late 90's/early 00's and never stopped playing them. Just look at the pokemon go audience.
Parker Bailey
it's aimed at both user.
Nathan Brooks
>Pokemon isn't for kids
Levi Thompson
...
Christopher Foster
Pinning this shit so I can stroke my weiner later tonight
Jack Bailey
This.
No, it's JUST for kids. If it was for both, we'd have Pokemon designs that WEREN'T just catered for toys and shit. Back during Gen 2? Maybe. But once Gen 5 hit, there was no turning back.
Caleb Davis
not even in a lewd way, this picture is just pleasing to look at.
Joseph Clark
Here's a concept. It's a family oriented game that anyone can enjoy but it's core demographic is children since they are more likely to want Pokemon merchandise
Henry Sanchez
And that somehow means it's not just for kids, how? Cartoons from the 40s were more "general" to the public than the squeaky clean shit of today, despite adult COULD watch it anyways.
Catered to /= allowed for. Pokemon is ALWAYS going to be seen as "a kid thing" when a parent has something to say about it.