Anyone else practically throwing their money at the screen?

Anyone else practically throwing their money at the screen?

youtube.com/shared?ci=Y4pOlABDp6o

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=vMWHJDr8fxE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Is the San Andreas remake?

Damn....2016 PC exclusives look like that?...woah...

This is the future of gaming. No, literally. This is the real future we all face. Soon, gaming will be like all other forms of media. There will be requirements that must be met before a game is released. A narrative will need to be pushed and it just meet a quota of how many minorities, gays, and cripples must be in the work. We are already seeing the precedent being set with games like Halo 5 and battlefield. Now developers like this are going to pop up and have endless budgets to produce shit like this.

>Budget

What budget? This shit looks like it was made in Poser 7.

>privileged white kid
>explains his game about growing up in Chicago ghettos
>to black interviewer

Man, that was uncomfortable to watch

I love how soft his voice is too

>that californication tier running animation

Literally fucking nothing.

Were you the faggot linking this in the NX thread? Are your feelings still hurt by that one guy who called you a Cred Forumsack?

What the fuck are you talking about, retard?

Detroit expansion pack when?

youtube.com/watch?v=vMWHJDr8fxE

saints row 2 looks better

Omg niggers are taking over this board. Sad.

Someone I follow on YouTube who reads the hilarious "gaming" magazine that game stop pushes out and it was shilling this game hard in the last subscription.

What a shithole

Looks like a pretty adventuress place to live though

Why is it always a white guy making this shit?

Capitalism - great success!

black people dont have the work ethic or ability to handle complex code to create videogames

Yes comrade, you tell him! Everyone should live in a shithole, it's only fair!

Spoken like a white kid who makes games about living in black ghettos.

Thanks liberals!

Now enjoy the mess you've made.

go live in a socialist country then, it is paradise is it not?

Sadly this is just the alpha testing of government sponsored gaming companies. They are only getting their feet wet. As someone already said, gaming studios will officially have minority and gay quotas to fill, and an agenda will be pushed through every game. This of course after the gaming crash.

>that didge caliber at the end of the video
pfft

...

What socialist country? There have never been any socialist countries. You can tell because the people have never seized and democratically controlled the means of production.

>that bicycle modding gang

>made by a white person
Every time.

>the businesses that were the backbone of the city crumble
>state doesn't try to get the property the moment everyone abandons them
>city won't demolish condemned areas
>state abd city started to late try8ng to bring businesses in

Shit city ran by retards

oh fuck you're actually serious.


>not true socialism!! It will work if it's the "real" thing

It's a fucking ruse to trick the poor, lazy, and envious that they deserve free shit.

I got out of a shithole fueled with this kind of thinking. surprise surprise the country is literally starving and is the murder capital of the world. meanwhile you get people living in capitalist societies saying how incredible socialism is.


fuck off you commie piece of shit, it will never be a thing.

I think I might join their faction once their DLC drops.

>socialism
>being the same as communism
American detected, lol

You lived in either a pre-socialist state capitalist society or a politically-authoritarian country that called itself socialist and had welfare programs in order to pacify the people. Socialism is economic democracy, and it is the only way for human civilization to move forward. Capitalism is a dead-end that will only lead to endless war and the ecologically-driven collapse of our society.

Same end of the spectrum cuck.

But if you think that socialism is social democracy's capitalism plus welfare, you've missed the point as well. Socialism happens after the people seize the means of production and put an end to the private control of capital, and communism happens in the distant future of a socialist society when the state and social classes no longer exist. A "communist state", in particular, is impossible.

>that car that came back trying to run the guy over again
wonder what happened next

>Socialism is economic democracy, and it is the only way for human civilization to move forward


Yes because it's 100% the answer right? nope

In order for that to work you need people to be 100% on the same page, which knowing humanity's track record that will never happen.

may I ask, do you consider yourself to be poor, middle-class, or rich?

>Low income neighborhoods
>We're poor so that's why we're violent

These fucking niggers are still Americans with probably 5 times my purchasing power, yet they still justify their shit with "MUH LOW INCOME", fuck them so much. I grew up with not even ten percent of what I see these hood rats flaunting all over the place, and somehow I have to be sorry for them.

If we were talking about anything else, your way of arguing would be considered absolutely absurd.

That's not a rebuttal and you didn't answer the question.

Oh, right - I'm supposed to give a flawless, logical response to "Nope, human nature, also tu quoque". Give me a break. I'd rather have an intelligent conversation with people who aren't theologically invested in capitalism.

>Cred Forums getting btfo by a socialist

Not him, but don't get mad. Relish in the fact that you're right and he's wrong. The world will see, even if it's not now.

>I'd rather have an intelligent conversation with people who aren't theologically invested in capitalism.

says the guy that stated "socialism is the ONLY way to move forward", a little dogmatic yourself.

If you want to forfeit your argument, that's fine.

I'm also quite drunk, so bonus points for me!

It's ok. If you're a class-conscious socialist you hear the same thing 10,000 times a day and no longer get mad about it. But I take heart in the realization that more and more people are seeing the truth, comrade.

>everything is a false equivalence because I don't engage in any analysis that might threaten my ideology

I have to be honest, you disgust me. Coming from a country that fell for the socialism meme, it irritates me to see people that have never experienced what it's like.

If you ever have a chance please seek out one of these places, meet the people that support socialism. You'll find they're more selfish than most capitalists. You earn things in this life, you don't get things for free.

I'd rather have an obscene amount of money to spend on nonesense than be given rations and the same pay as a mcdonald's worker.

Your argument is flawed from the illogical bigotry of its neck down.

so this is what an exclusive pc game looks like thats not held back by console hardware.

looks like i should get that gtx1080 now.

Pretty smart post honestly.

This shit looks like Stalker/Mad Max: nigger edition. Dem bikes with lights, dat comfy bon fire out of nowhere, those prostitutes shaking their asses for traffic.

Shit's neat.

>Socialism is economic democracy
No, that's capitalism, you fuckwit.

What you think is capitalism is actually cronyism. Cronyism is just a different shade of fascism/socialism/communism, where the government steps in and regulates how businesses can operate, and who can join those businesses.

Trying to gussy up your socialist ideals with capitalist trappings does not disguise how your system is fundamentally flawed. Socialism does not promote competition and therefore does not promote innovation, and it demands an authoritarian hand to keep abusers in line; it is therefore completely undemocratic.

Either bother to actually educate yourself on the flaws of socialism, or go wank off to your impossible post-scarcity society dreams somewhere else.

>Coming from a country that fell for the socialism meme

lmao stfu ramon

It's a great idea, gonna be horribly executed though

Jesus fucking christ this exchange was goddamn cruel

its like i just watched an injured gazelle get fucking savaged by a lion, only the lion is a fatass nerd

kek

Even at risk of sounding "more" like someone whose never been there, I must admit that I fall in love with the logic and ideology, and find that the people behind the perfect concepts such as Democracy, Socialism, Capitalism and Communism, always tend to ruin it. Humans are inefficient beings that always carry with them human error and dumb opinions.

America ruined Socialism for everyone, and now it's ruining Capitalism for itself what with the Meme of Trickle Down Economics ruining their whole country in a single generation. Regardless, a logically set robotic Communism would be far more efficient- and viable- than a logically set robotic Capitalism.

Romanian here with family who's experianced the god awful ruling of Nicolae.
They don't outright condone socialism but they can agree that capitalism is much better.
>sent any opposition to his power to jail
>firing squads on criminals and random civilians
>taking absolutely everything from the people
>food and water shortages
>debt
>turns communist when he becomes president
It doesn't work when every leader who uses Socialism or Communism as a system is a power hungry bastard.
The pros of Communism and Socialism are just a pipe dream written from Marx.

You feel that way because you don't understand the difference between socialism as developed for centuries by great thinkers and societies that call themselves "socialist" but fail to have anything to do with socialism because post-industrial historical conditions have not yet been reached or because petty tyrants want to pretend they are doing good for the people. Socialist revolution will lead to a democratic society - one whose economic and political decisions are ACTUALLY made by the people and in which all ruling classes, kings, capitalists, or bourgeois state bureaucrats, are a thing of the past.

I knew I saved this gif for a reason.

>several people witness a hit and run
>that annoying red haired lady
>no one else cares
>not even the guy that got run over

>No, that's capitalism, you fuckwit.

No, capitalism is authoritarian in economic structure despite having a superficially "democratic" form of government (which is usually just a managed democracy run by the economic elite). You can tell because your boss owns your ass - there is no democracy in the workplace within capitalism.

>What you think is capitalism is actually cronyism.

The bourgeois state and the capitalist economic elite have always been inextricably linked in power and interests. "Crony capitalism" is just the inevitable result of any form of capitalism.

>robots ruling the country
>those robots are programmed by humans
>able to be reprogrammed at any given moment
>if they have a defense mechanism for tampering then they will be destroyed because no one would build a self sentient robot with defenses against creator tampering
Nah. All forms have their pros and cons and arguing "who does it better" is a joke in itself. There has never been a political system that has surpassed the entirety of the years and managed to stay successful.

It's not like the black kids in ghetto would bother to develop a game and instead focus on either being a welfare kingdom, criminal or some dead end job that lets them barely eat. And this fag is from Ohio

>Venezuela
>people have seized the means of production

Cred Forums-tier memes LOL

Sure, close enough I guess. It is a hispanic country.

sorry to hear that.


>>sent any opposition to his power to jail
>firing squads on criminals and random civilians
>taking absolutely everything from the people
>food and water shortages
>debt

literally all of these are happening to my country of origin. I remember the scheduled power outages, and the food shortages.
My uncle owned a fairly large farm and one day the government just waltzed right in and took it from him. Claimed it was to become a property for the people.

It is a pipedream, it always fails to take into account that the people that want it are selfish and envious bastards.

Untaxed drug based income can get you a fuckton of money. That's the real issue honestly, a LOT of them make decent money doing crime and the only legit jobs they can get would leave them with like 15% of their current income.

Does anyone think we should just use one pure ideology? Everything has flaws and some systems clearly work better in some areas.

But they did. Keep being delusional.

It is the white man keeping the black man down like always.

>Everything has flaws and some systems clearly work better in some areas.
That's what people don't realise.

Capitalism will always be the best driver for smaller nation-states, as long as the trading from the international community is fair.

But our bigger nations? They should be some real mix of ideologies that will work with the different nations.

You don't understand that socialism is a fundamentally different society, not capitalist society plus total economic control by the currently-existing bourgeois state.

because of this games will never be art

>That pic

nope nope nope, don't want any of that filth near me.

>shared wealth
great now we can all be miserable equally!

Fucking lel. You redditors sure are delusional. The people elected a party called the socialist party to sieze the means of production for them since they themselves cannot all do it so they can share in the benefits. Yeah bud, that's not socialism at all.

>I can slip through the cracks and exploit my way to an easy comfortable life in capitalism
>society is completely totally fucked
Still worth it

...

It looks like one of those tv shows where they present Second Life with a bunch of skins and pretend that it's a game.

Black kid from the ghetto grew up to develop/fix KI S2 and S3 and that is one of the most bug free fighter on the market. Black people like to work on fighting and shooting games. I'm pretty sure Naughty Dog got a black dev the moment they started making Uncharted.

And these are the people who spam "not an argument" incessantly

>that's not socialism at all

Indeed it is not. You'd know that if you were willing to actually learn something instead of being emotionally committed to being a jihadist for the economic system that provides you with a suitable lifestyle at the expense of the global poor.

Neat. I guess they are just short in the documentary adventure games.

Sadly it has to be whitey to bring it up as some fucking soapbox.

I guess it could be your argument, I just posted that because I don't like it in the slightest. I don't want that thinking near me, the whole sharing of wealth is a huge turn off for me. I earn my living because I work hard, why do I owe anyone else a piece of the pie.

Hey at least the liquor stores are open.

To be fair, social documentaries usually are soapboxes. And it makes sense for the times, people are talking about these issues whether we like it or not, so, easy to market.

Socialism is not about "sharing of [personal] wealth". Odds are you own virtually zero private property of the kind socialists are concerned with. A socialist society is one in which everyone works and in which there is no capitalist ruling class that get virtually ALL of the wealth for doing ZERO work. The poor you criticize for being parasites get next to nothing compared to the capitalist elite. We want to share all necessary labor and provide everyone with the material necessities so that they can all work hard, self-actualize, and contribute to the progress of human civilization.

>I earn my living because I work hard

Someone else makes a better living not working as hard, stop sucking capitalism's dick and realise that it's exploitable. Become consciousness of where you are in the system.

This is always my favorite part. So who gets to decide what's necessary for the state, and who gets to organize it?

Also, people make a much, much worse living working far, far harder.

yea that's a no go for me. My line of work thrives in a capitalist world, do you think people would make vidya for fun? what would be the incentive to make a entertainment? it would be an echo chamber of sameness.
My work wouldn't be considered valuable so I would be against it.

I can "self-actualize" without the need of a socialist state.

>Someone else makes a better living not working as hard

and that is true, it's a beautiful thing. I'd rather live in a world that can give me the opportunities to be that rich than just live in one that I can never move up in.

You can also be there if you'd like, or you can choose not to.

>do you think people would make vidya for fun?

Yeah, video games that are made just to earn maximum profits for gigantic publishers are always great! Oh, wait - that's the opposite of reality.

If making games is really what you enjoy doing, socialism will FREE you to spend the vast majority of your time making them with others because you'll be freed from the material necessities that obligate you to work for the owners of capital and earn profit for them.

>Becoming richer is a choice

It's not, Neptoism keeps the people that come from rich families rich. The opportunities for the middle and working class are lower.

Someone is making money off you, which could go to you. Or someone else that provides a service and works just as hard. Mechanics wouldn't rip people off so much if they earnt a bit more for thier trade, which in my opinion should be worth a bit more but there's no wealth to go toward it due to the money being held by the rich.

>So who gets to decide what's necessary for the state, and who gets to organize it?

The people, obviously. Are you against democracy or something?

This. It's fucking great.

>and cripples must be in the work.
What's wrong with that?

>Nepotism keeps the people that come from rich families rich.

There is literally nothing wrong with that. I want to make sure that my children will be financially stable. I earned the money for my family, why couldn't I give it to my offspring?

You don't get entertainment, it is driven by competition. without the need to make money they wouldn't be a necessary addition to society. This goes for a lot of forms of entertainment.

The black guy was pretty effeminate and well spoken. He probably came from a middle class family himself and doesn't know any more about the ghetto than the white cuck.

BECAUSE ZE CRIPPLES POLLUTE ZE GENETIC PURITY OF OUR RACE AND MUST BE SENT TO THE FURNACES WHICH VILL BURN DAY AND NIGHT...

Oh, *ahem*, sorry about that. As I was saying, racism is gone and these minorities are just trying to leech off of ZE WEALTH WHICH BELONGS TO THE WHITE RACE AND - NEIN, NEIN. *Ahem*, sorry again.

>without the need to make money they wouldn't be a necessary addition to society

Oh, that's weird. And here I am just playing games for fun. It's strange how art existed long. long before capitalism, though - don't you think?

Nepotism isn't nessesarliy about earning money. In fact people in lower income households have more of a tenancy to save money or invest in property for thier offspring.

The problem is that we value the class system too much, you must go to the most prestigious university and come from a rich area otherwise you cannot become the best. We all know that intelligence comes in different shapes and forms and our point of origin should never determine that.

It's not about taking money away from the rich, that is not fair no matter how they got the money or what system they obtained it. It's about equalizing the opportunities from the classes. (Stigma of upper class children wanting to do menial jobs should be an issue here too, money made shouldn't get in the way of working a dream job.)

You don't see any inherent connection between class advantages and wealth?

Art has existed long before capitalism, of course. But Art as entertainment is a fairly modern concept.

statues were commissioned for temples of worship. Paintings were commissioned by patrons of the arts. Plays were written for the general public.

None of them did it for free. Those that were, were starving artists.

The problem is that with no competition you're already losing most of the market for entertainment. That means less jobs in that field. I really don't see why games would still be around if they don't serve the future of humanity.


My country has many social programs to give low-income families to help their children go to a good school.

>None of them did it for free. Those that were, were starving artists.

And that is precisely what socialism will remedy. If what you love doing is not economically necessary, then you spend some time doing necessary labor and get all your necessary needs fulfilled. Your remaining time can be spent, for example, cooperating in making your dream game with a community of like-minded people. You can release your game to the internet for free, because there is no need to make any profit from it. There isn't even a market on which to exchange the game for profit - you just release it and let people enjoy. The reward is getting to develop yourself and enjoy doing what you really love instead of slaving away for a capitalist master. This is the radically different world promised by socialism - as radically different a world from capitalism as capitalism was from feudalism.

>The problem is that with no competition you're already losing most of the market for entertainment.

This is the extraordinary claim that I think you must justify and explain. In a world without competition, the people will no longer want entertainment? I find that very hard to believe - in fact, the people will likely have much more time on their hands to enjoy entertainment with the yoke of economic exploitation lifted.

>showing your game on a laptop, an apple one at that

Upvoted

What, no love for Dr. Strangelove?