I fell for the VR meme

I fell for the VR meme too
>tfw getting close to girl's face and she closes her eyes and puckers her lips

>Hundreds of dollars for shitty minigames with crap graphics

>Fanservice games unlikely to ever be good, let alone come out in the west

0% interest in VR

Absolutely nothing.

>you fell for the VR meme
>you fell for the PS4 Pro meme
>you fell for the No Man's Sky meme
>you fell for the GTAV meme
>you fell for the Sexy Beach Premium Resort meme
>you fell for the 4k gaming meme
>you fell for the GTX960 meme
>you fell for the wage meme
>you fell for the 3D gf meme

end my life

>he hasn't tried Dolphin VR/DiRT Rally/Adventure Time 3D Anime/etc.

youtube.com/watch?v=_V2sBURgUBI

hahaha cuckkk!!!! Hahahah cuck maymay~!!!!

>I'm a retard
That's nice OP. Everyone who actually paid attention knows and can see that VR has a ton of promise in very specific areas, but it's also in standard early adopter phase right now. It's out of the lab, it's no longer hyper bleeding edge territory with basically alpha/beta hardware/support, but it's also years away from getting refined into a more general consumer experience. Kits are still new, resolution/graphics card stuff still has a ways to go, nothing is really standardized yet, developer frameworks are all really 1.0 stuff, devs need to experiment, some of the very best games types for VR (like mech games) aren't getting a lot of attention right now etc.

Also unless you're new or retarded you'd know that standard game dev cycles for something quality tend to be at least 2-4 years. Which means if some dev got working on a game day 1 of the Occulus release (to take one "big" hardware example that itself is plenty flawed) then there is no way we'd actually see the game appear until 2018 at the earliest.

In short: what the fuck were you expecting you dumb faggot? Or are you just shitposting and haven't actually touched VR.

>>you fell for the 3D gf meme
How could you, user?

>VR headset costs me $1,000 equivalent where i live

...

i was desperate but now i instantly regret it
all she does is nag and i hear the shit she talks about me behind my back
and now i'm too much of a beta to break up and there's nothing to comfort me except for a "virtual reality" headset and a bunch of games that don't even work
fucking kill me

I think there is only one reason to get VR and that is why I am asking...how is the porn?

Is it just POV or more? Does it feel like you´re really in the room ?

You forgot fallout 4

'Social idea' I'd guess

>Too much of a beta to break up
There's beta ways to do it.

Try sending a text.

>what vrcucks thought they were getting

I'm sorry to hear that, user. Just remember, 2dqts will always be here for you!
Have you tried breaking up with her passively, by just ignoring her hard enough she wants to break up with you?
Alternatively, try pushing her into harder and harder sex

Yeah, this is the one thing that I see puts VR in every household, but it hasn't seemed to take effect yet.

>What they actually got

Yes, and? It's early days. I remember in the early 90s when the first "cheaper, consumer" CD burners came out and were only $1000 or so. Or the first color screens for thousands of dollars. Anyone else remember when you had to make tradeoffs between the resolution and color depth of your screen, like you could run 640x480 at 16-bit color but had to drop down to 8-bit to run 800x600 because not enough vram?

Stuff never debuts cheap, because cheap is a function of mass manufacturing and lots of refinement and iteration in engineering, and you can only get "mass" and "iteration" after going through a bunch of generations. Why are so many fags on this site surprised when this happens every single fucking time?

the pov giantess porn is god tier

>you have to wear your glasses while using the VR headset

It's literally the one and only sign you need to know to know VR still isn't ready for the consumer market.

>i hear the shit she talks about me behind my back
Break with her. Even if you're so beta you think you'll never get another girl, break with her. If you don't, that shit will follow you the rest of your life and kill your soul.

even better, just move hundreds of miles away rushing to get all your stuff out when she's out of the house and leave no forwarding information and never communicate with her or acknowledge her existence ever again!

user.. Both of those pictures are the same. The holodeck just uses space wizardry AS well so you don't walk into walls.

Love my Oculus, I develop with it, and still hype for touch controllers

The same shit it always meant. An idea or behavior that spreads from person to person through communication.

People were fooled into thinking VR was the future of gaming and they joined the pyramid scheme and started fooling others to waste their money as well. In other words, they fell for the VR meme.

I'm waiting for retinal direct projection myself. That seems like a much better solution, completely avoids issues with the lens entirely, and should work with AR too. Wearable displays need to be capable of hybrid VR/AR and reasonably small/light IMO to really take off, retinal projection can do that in a way that sticking a screen in front of your eyes cannot. I know I'll be waiting until the 2020s though, I have no illusions.

>MFW this guy fell for the VR meme

Same. I hear it's gonna be for $200, and looks way more comfy and functional than Vive controllers.

So why did everyone give up on the idea of VR headsets just being really nice head-tracking 3D monitors?

Didn't see all that may complaints about motion sickness before all of this motion control stuff got lumped in with VR.

>vr costs $2600 where i live

VR will be great in the future. We'll probably all be old and dying though

>People were fooled into thinking VR was the future of gaming
VR is the future of gaming, or more accurately wearable displays are (which may or may not be used by a dev for "VR"). To the extent anyone are fools it's being so retarded to think that "future" means "6 months from now because that's forever XD" . DVD was clearly the future of video in 1996, HDTV was clearly the future too when it first started broadcasting in the USA also in 1996. When did you get your first DVD player or HDTV? It probably wasn't 1996 or even the 1990s at all. I think I got my first computer DVD drive in 1999 or 2000, and back then it required a special bit of extra hardware or enabled video card to play back and was a somewhat expensive (though no longer insanely so) optional add-on.

5-10 year adoption cycles have been very normal for the entire history of tech, it comes directly out of silicon fabrication and consumer electronics mass manufacturing basics. I mean jesus fuck this has always been true even just of CONSOLES, every single fucking time the launch library is so-so to mediocre and it takes years for devs to figure out the hardware and get ramped up and start really making the libraries shine, even for the biggest ones. Anyone who thought "VR" would go from zero to a hundred in a fucking year or less wasn't "fooled" they were flat out retarded.

I was thinking of buying a Google cardboard, since they go even for just 5€

But then again, is there anything do with it? I can only think of VR porn and those small sceneries to explore on google's app

...

dumb frog poster

But VR already had a huge shitty false start in the 90s, and its cousin 3D was a fad in the 60s, a fad in the early 00s, and a fad yet again 5 or 6 years ago.

People just don't like wearing shit on their eyes to watch shit.

>bought a vive
>remember its PC only
>no games

>2 years ago
>tell my friends this exact same thing
>tell them vr wouldn't be mainstream or high-quality for the next 7 - 10 years
>everyone just tells me I'm being a cynical fuck
>mfw I'm right

this guy bought an oculus

Viral thoughtform

It means "fad" in this context.

Even better version

>People just don't like wearing shit on their eyes
How many people wear glasses user? People don't like wearing big, bulky stuff that gets in the way, but objectively billions of people are completely fine with wearing shit on their eyes. There is a difference between technological limitations and inherent human biological dislikes that people like you somehow constantly forget, despite endless, endless examples. Apple introduced the Newton, ie., "a handheld digital rectangle screen thing that you carry around and does shit for you" in 1993, and even that was only the first "consumer" one, the concept had been played with for way longer. False starts and decades and decades of lag don't make for a bad concept, and the fundamental strengths of wearables are undeniable.

Maybe your confusion is that me saying this means I think any of the stuff right now is there or like it or that you should buy it or whatever. I don't. I didn't get a Newton or a Palm Pilot either. I did get a Handspring and it served me well, but I know I was still in very early adopter territory and it had plenty of limitations. Check back in another 10 years.

Hell, I remember the gamegear chugging through batteries vs the gameboy, and there was a Nintendo guy that said color was a waste and pointless in handheld and that people would never settle for the battery hit. Most of us knew he was a retard though.

...

>599$
Where?

official oculus website

You were right, though that doesn't mean anyone who actually thinks about their decision would be wrong to get into it now either. Some people just really like living on the bleeding edge, or are professionals and NEED to get started long before it hits mainstream so that they're ready for it. And bless their hearts because they blaze the trail for the rest of us. These are the same types of people I think who actually volunteer and do a lot of beta work in vidya, something I've almost never been willing to do (I've had alpha/beta access for a bunch of KS for example, never touch it, I just want the finished product).

But it's definitely irritating to see lots of people who clearly are not bleeding-edge or even early-adopter types jump on something too early. It hurts in at least three respects actually: first, of course it just sucks for them, but also means you've got a group who won't be ready and able to give good feedback and help things along. Second, it can result in a big backlash despite 1.0 issues being totally unavoidable, which then poisons the well years down the line. Third, it invites in faggot mass marketing slow shit companies like Facebook early in the process rather then later after good technical standardization is decided on. Megacorps always want to patent and control the shit out of everything, which you can deal with later when there is a good foundation geeks and such have made early. But what we see now is what happens without those foundations: companies try to do lock-in and all their normal shit without limit.

Wearable displays SHOULD simply be like standard desktop monitors: you've got a connection standard that everyone agrees to, and you can buy any screen you want and any card/system you want and plug them in and never even have to think about it. If both sides of DVI/DP/HDMI that's that, you're golden. Software has zero connection. If one thing could really set back WD ages, it'd be fucking up that basic principle.

Stylus PDAs never took off because they were cumbersome and unnecessary, and, to this day, people don't really use smartphones like PDA manufacturers expected people to use PDAs. Smartphones are pretty much a different device.

So, yes, PDAs were a bad concept. They were tried multiple times and never caught on. You can't tell me a smartphone is a PDA, because it isn't. It doesn't have the same applications or anticipated use cases, the interface is different, the essential features are different. It's not cumbersome.

Similarly, wearing prescription glasses is a fundamentally different situation than wearing entertainment glasses. When you wear entertainment glasses, you have to make sure everyone experiencing the media is wearing them, and you have to wear and then remove them.

And those are lightweight glasses.

VR has fundamental unsolvable problems that deeply limit its application. The first is nausea, which happens subtly with even the best equipment, and gives people an unpleasant experience they don't want to repeat. The second is control limitation. You can't really control yourself to the degree you need to without causing severe nausea. This is a limit of the human visual processing system, not the hardware.

The big brick strapped to your head makes it completely DOA, but that's not even the really big problem, which is the nausea. Even subtle nausea burns a deep Pavlovian impression into your brain of "boy, that was unpleasant. I don't want to do that again."

So VR as-is is a nonstarter, and human limitations make VR going forward a nonstarter. Maybe retinal 3D will be decent, but headtracking is just crap unless you want to take 6 hours accomplishing a task by wandering around a huge safe empty field and be a little queasy the whole time.

Let us know what it feels like to waste hundreds of days on a dead platform that won't matter once the investment bubble pops.

If you're still alive.

nice maymay may friend

I paid full price for No Man's Sky and never got a refund.

cuck

I'll like VR a lot more when it's a reasonable price.

Is VR good for porn or at least has potential there? Because that's what matters for me.

I am sorry for your lots op

>You can't really control yourself to the degree you need to without causing severe nausea.
That's not true though. Onward allows you to freely move around in the virtual environment, without moving your body, without inducing nausea.

Your entire argument against VR is "VR is bad because it makes you sick, so it's not worth dealing with all the other issues.", yet that problem has already been solved. A fix was found entirely in software, via better image processing techniques.

It hasn't. Try playing a game for more than 15 minutes instead of repeating PR blurbs.

>I haven't played Onward, so I'm just gonna assume it's the same as all other VR games!

>Early generation technology is riddled with problems and lacking in content

holy shit what a fucking revelation

you all act like such enlightened dickheads for spouting shit that anyone with a brain already knew.

Oh this thread again. OP I am sorry your mom is still saying no to buying you a VR set so you make these threads. But hey at least you are able to use it to gather all the other poor children who will never be able to afford into one place so you can all say shit that shows you never have tried it. At least you don't feel alone OP. There are a lot of poor kids like you.

I look forward to tomorrows VR meme thread. I love seeing you guys all get together and whine collectively.

>facebook machine

fucking laff riot

>hurr durr people dont want to look dumb while in their rooms, headsets look dumb and are heavy, heavy headset dumb dumb, look dumb neck hurt heavy dumb look

fucking off yourself mate

Very believable. Would find plausible again.

Gee VRcucks sure get mad!

I have more money than you loooool

You got thoroughly BTFO'd. Enjoy your meme platform.

>you fell for the GTAV meme
>you fell for the GTX960 meme

but that's wrong you fucking retard

>he paid $1k+ for an alpha version of "the future of gaming"

haha...don't worry kid, we are. Notice we do not make threads whining about VR like the poor of Cred Forums, we just enjoy our cool toys.

I can afford to spend money on such things. Maybe one day, you will be able...oh what am I saying, you will never be able to afford things.
I am sorry man.

>poor kid who can't afford to live in the future like me is a redditor memespouter

What a shocking turn of events!

Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without VR.

VR is just a gimmick that strives to "immerse" you into the experience, when the brain is already really good at projecting itself into an experience like reading, watching a movie or playing.

t. uncreative autist who can't think of ways to make his own novel experiences

feels good to be a developer and have an IQ over 95 :]

meme is anything known and shared

it will be good when its wireless, thinner, lighter, cheaper, and higher res

lol..you really don't have any clue because you have never tried it. And your post makes that clear. Sorry you are not able to. But you should really stop trying to act like you have any useful opinion on something that you have never tried. Because you don't have a useful or valid opinion currently.

I "fell" for it, but I was aware it would/could fail.

I have quite a bit of disposable income, and I feel VR -WILL BE- the future, in time. Throwing $800 at a Vive to help push the industry forward is a small price to pay for all of us to get the brain-jack and Ghost In The Shell.

Not if, not when, but how soon?

Good luck with that barf fest, asshole. I'm also a developer, and you should know by now (obviously not, you're hopeless) that gimmick tech is not necessary to make creative experiences.

Of course you're defending this shit because you're making a game with it, and you're too close-minded to realize its flaws.

>How many people wear glasses user? People don't like wearing big, bulky stuff that gets in the way, but objectively billions of people are completely fine with wearing shit on their eyes.

>actually comparing fuck huge vr goggles to glasses

>kid takes class in middle school
>now calls himself a dev

I can tell you have a lot of dev exp under your belt.

>I have money so I can wipe my ass with it.

I suppose you can do it and no one can stop you, but it's not like you're going to look cool.

Are you seriously comparing lightweight frames meant to fix vision for everyday use to wearing a brick that blocks off your vision?

Actually 3D was a fad in the 50's 80's and late 00's.

80's were fucking full of movie series where the third installment always was "MOVE 3D".

What a comeback. Totally avoiding the point and making random guesses at my profession and age. You've proven your point, good sir. Have a nice day.

Name a title you created or worked on...I will wait. Mr. Dev.

I want to fall for the meme. I want a rift really badly.

4K and VR are only useful for porn.

So, what exatly is wrong with VR? It looks like shit or something? Or you can't play for hours because you'll get sick?

ps VR games are looking great desu

It's an expensive tool to play a library of games consisting 95% of the times in glorified tech demos.
Dunno about the sickness, but having that thing strapped on your face for let's say even half hour will surely leave some mark on it.

store.steampowered.com/app/517710/?snr=1_7_15__13
Has anyone played this with VR?

That speed with VR seems like it'd be the fucking tits

Hell, VR with racing games as a whole seems like it would be awesome.

>Yeah, posting tips to my identity in an anonymous board. Nice idea.

I've made a couple of casual games for mobile and handhelds, and I'm currently working on a game for PS4. I may not have a lot of experience, but I do have games out there and definitely have done my "homework" (research, prototyping and also failing).

I have nothing to prove to you, but if you're so butthurt because of a random post on the internet about your precious VR game, maybe it's because you may already know all this, and you're on denial. Don't put all your eggs in the same basket.

So, technically thing is good? Problems are price and lack of content, right?

I don't care about that other shit. What genre of games have you made? Puzzle? Racing? Was it well received?

As far as I've sunderstood the tool in itself seems legit.
Leaving aside all the other problems, I think it's main limitation is how to implement mobility in the games, and that's why half of the games are "arrow shooting #8234"

>yes, PDAs were a bad concept
and yet they sold competitively enough that there's tons of different models and they're still being produced today

Yeah I have been in the industry myself for more yrs than most here have been alive. I started at Sierra-Online in 98, and have been in this industry since. so I too have some exp in this space. I am not butthurt at all. I do not make threads whining I have no use or value out of my VR sets(I own them all) I just find these gathering of the poor threads funny as they feed off each others misinformation and lack of exp with the tech. 95+% who post in these threads have never even tried it. And they do not see being able to due the cost restriction. So they just talk out their uninformed asses.

I don't keep all my eggs in the same basket. I can afford to have a few baskets.

Everyone gets nauseous the first few times they play first person shooters.

Never stopped me from playing doom though.

If you are as ancient as you claim to be, how come is your grammar so damn broken?

He's one of them fucking aussie cunts dude.

Real shitty folk.

Can't talk right.

Sorry I left out a period and did not capitalize a letter at the start of a sentence. Terrible, terrible I know.

Perhaps your calling is being a teacher vs a software dev. Something to consider.

Meh, a few puzzle games for a casual company that doesn't value any creativity. I had the chance to make a small game, but it wasn't well received. By myself, I made a shitty platformer (of course I didn't think so at the time) that bombed hard. But somehow I managed to get my company as a Sony dev. I was planning to make another platformer, and wanted to take advantage of the controller's features. However, it didn't have the spark, and it was hard and boring. Currently I'm making a beat 'em up that actually tries to stir things a little each level (they tend to be repetitive as hell). It's taken so long that I wouldn't be surprised if Sony gets tired of my shit and retires its support.

Maybe there's a reason a lot of people haven't tried it yet? Heck, even I do think VR would be great to market to the mainstream for photos, videos and live events. But it's not for gaming. Except for Project CARS, that shit looks nice, but I won't pay $800+ for a single game. VR, for now, is not just that appealing as you may think. You're not supposed to be doing games for "people that get it". Indies may have the chance to make games with that attitude, but indies won't push VR too far.

>He fell for the fell for the --- meme meme

By any chance, are you the anti-Unity guy from every dev thread?

>Are you seriously comparing lightweight frames meant to fix vision for everyday use to wearing a brick that blocks off your vision?
Are you faggots genuinely retarded? Do you have basic reading comprehension issues? The post you're responding to explicitly states in the second fucking sentence:
>People don't like wearing big, bulky stuff that gets in the way
But there is nothing inherent preventing VR/AR from eventually becoming lightweight frames, that's the whole fucking point. The other guy said "people don't like to wear stuff on their eyes" period, but that's wrong. What was being argued supporting the CONCEPT of VR down the road was that like tons of tech beforehand we're still really in the early stages with tons of miniaturization and refinement to come. As I said, the tech I think will be the real one will be direct retinal projection, not LCD/OLED. That's been in the lab and has been showed in prototype units, there's nothing technically infeasible about it, but I'm sure it'll be the 2020s before it starts going to mass market.

I don't think the stuff now is something that everyone should be hopping on, but I think you're retards for asserting that how things are now is the inevitable final end point of the tech, just like someone saying computers would always necessarily be big and not portable was also retarded. This isn't a complex concept. Wearable displays are the future, just like smartphones were clearly the future in the early 00s, but while tech evolves "very fast" that's by historical industrial standards not shitty social media standards. It still takes years to decades. We'll see what you say about wearable displays in 2026.

Damn user. Well, fuck. Not a dev but business management is pretty stressful work. I did want to dev myself but with a FT job and two tiny businesses, I probably never will. I wish you the best of luck and that you finally make it big. Hopefully I manage to buy your game instinctively in the future.

Sure it is for gaming, You just haven't experienced it yet to know. I have pCars, it is awesome, so is Assetto Corsa, Dirt Rally, Elite Dangerous, iRacing, DCS(truly amazing), Warthunder, Detached, and a bunch of others with more coming. But until you try it, you just won't know.

>being stupid enough to fall for memes
IDIOTS. the only meme to fall for is the boyfriend memeit's a good one.

A buzzword for something that I don't like.

>Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without VR.
>Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without 4K
>Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without 60 fps
>Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without 1080p
>Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without 720p
>Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without 24-bit color
>Funny how you use a screenshot from a game that you can play, perfectly fine, right now, without 256 colors
Oh, it's the faggot contrarian autist making an argument against the entire history of progression in vidya episode.

Nope, i don't even know who you're talking about

What made you think i was? the terrible joke, the filename, or the image?

The image

>>you fell for the GTAV meme
Fuck off NIGGER.

Thanks user. Best of luck for you too.

vr porn is nice though

>tfw porn
>tfw SoundStage
>tfw Raw Data and Onward already play well.

I'm using mine at least 2-4 times a week, so whatever, but people should wait for at least second gen.

Guys, it's impossible to argue with VR friends. They plonked $599 to $799 dollars on the damn thing.

The investment will be defended until the end of time. Under no circumstances will they accept that they bought the 2010s equivalent of the 3DO.

Seriously, though?
It's a relatively common reaction image
Someone might be inclined to ask how long you've been on this website

this shit is not even vr its just wearing fucking monitor goggles

this

vr apologists are basically just sonyggers in the sense that they're willing to do mental gymnastics in order to try to rationalize their shitty purchase in any way they can

Yeah, or maybe the know what thay are talking about, because you know... they actually own the thing ?

But if I am wrong, by all mean, please continue to give your thoughs about a product you certainly didn't even try yet.

>he fell for the vr maymay

>"The investment will be defended until the end of time. Under no circumstances will they accept that they bought the 2010s equivalent of the 3DO."

you mean the Virtual Boy

>Guys, it's impossible to argue with VR friends. They plonked $599 to $799 dollars on the damn thing.
>implying believing in AR/VR long term in any way means you've spent a dime on it now or think the tech has done more then get over the most basic hurdles
It'd be nice if you guys were only pretending to be retarded.

>bought a VR device for a PC full of indieshit instead of sony's VR which many devs are already making great games for it
you are the one to blame

i can't fap to 2D porn anymore,
Yeah that's the selling point

So your goal is to convince people that have bought/tried something, with arguments based on not having tried the same thing yourself.

Something tells me you aren't considered a top student at school.

I've tried the oculus cv, the vive and i can say that the vive is a much better overall experience for gaming, buy a dk 2 for porn.
I've had no problem of motion sickness with both, bust that's subjective

>not even know how to exaggerate correctly , and how to use photochop

let me help you faggot

Dk2? Isn't that the dev version?

VS not being able to afford something so you convince yourself it is just pure shit and make it a crusade to convince others the same.

I cannot afford a private plane or a yacht. But I do not go and talk shit about them on plane and yacht forums because I can't afford them. I wish I could though.Just like you wish you could afford VR or whatever else you can't obviously.

Amazing. These not even mention worthy pressure marks got more red with each VR hater post by adding more and more Photoshop to it.

This one can not be topped any more.

True.
True.

Which is better Vive or Oculus Rift?

VR is just TV goggles with kinect

shit or poo
i guess shit since it doesn't have facebook stickers plastered all over it

I fell for NONE of these, NONE.
>poorfag masterrace

wrong quote buddy

>not increasing contrast until you just have the red line on a white background

Depends on usage. I would go with Vive overall, if heavy simmer, Rift due to ATW.

You are fucktard with 0 time of any kind. Why even post shithead? Hopefully one day you will actually get to try it, and at that moment you realize what a little idiot punk you have been, and that will be a nice moment for you I am sure. But being an idiot punk is your default setting probably so perhaps not.

>Don't be a retard with your money
>"U MUST B POOR!"

It is quite literally the other way around. Lots of people are poor because they are retarded when it comes to manage their income. i.e "paying 1k for an alpha version of VR"

Whose opinions do I trust, those who have tried VR headsets or those who haven't?

Reminder that the ones defending VR are experiencing Buyer's remorse

It's a meme.

I got an Oculus Rift 2 years ago as a Christmas present.

Recently I got fucked out of using it:
When they created the "hub" software, it immediately blocks me from using my rift, because apparently my hardware does not meet the standard required to use it, even though I had no issue rendering games prior.

SLI GTX 780
i7 4790k

Can render Shitfield 4 @ 60fps with max settings.
60-65fps is headache inducing cancer for VR.

Reminder that the ones dismissing VR never actually tried a Rift or Vive before.

Dumbass

i did at my friend's house

it was fun but not 599$ worth for long-term

>buy Vive
>one of the controllers is faulty (rattling noise)
>RMA it
>get it back weeks later
>original issue is fixed, but tracking position is fucked
>RMA it again
>wait a week for courier to pick it up
>have to wait another week after repair was set to complete for courier to bring it back
>tracking not fixed, rattle is back
>waiting for courier again
>it's been two fucking months since buying my Vive and I've yet to make decent use of it
T-thanks HTC.
I did check out the 3D model viewer with lewd Triss, Ciri and Yennefer models though. Dick was diamonds.

>a rift before
you mean the Oculus piece of shit?

Just curious, who here actually thinks VR will be saved by PSVR?

I like this one.

Then good on you. It's not for everybody, especially since it's still its early stages.
I'm quite enjoying mine though.

I'll buy it :3 I want a rift to add to my autistic collection

If anyone has read this thread or any of these threads all the way through. You will see there are 2 clear messages.

One side, the seeming majority, say it is shit, do not buy it, meme, waste of money..etc. They almost universally have never tried it themselves nor probably will simply because they make the statements they do makes it clear, they have already decided.

The other side is the ones that actually have it, or have actually had a chance to try it for a bit and they say, just that the other side is speaking without 1st hand knowledge and most said is just shit based off of no experience. They do not tell anyone to spend their money, do not tell others to buy it. They just point out how the other side speaks from zero experience. And they are right.

Who do you trust more? Emotional have nots and will nots, or those who can actually answer questions based on knowledge?

This version is best.

Doesn't he threaten to take down the video because people cherrypicked it to make vr look bad?

yep

>ITT: People who fell for VR

If you get a fat guy to test something of course it's going to look bad

Hey i can do that irl too!

I'm like 99% positive no one in this thread has even touched a VR headset.

...

I have. AMA

the actual original without the garbage lighting effects is best

Why is this thread still alive? Cred Forums is getting slow.

>AMA
Kill yourself.

The best game Rez Vr is exclusive to PS4

never ever

>tfw you fell for the video game meme
Ruined my life tbqh

>The best game Rez Vr is exclusive to PS4
But that's not Custom Maid 3D 2.

Its a term coined by Darwin, its the behavioral equivalent of genetics

Then what do you call me who got a Vive Pre for free?