Which is better?

Which is better?

They're all shit. All online games are shit, nothing but children and edgy faggots ruining things. It's no wonder co-op is becoming more and more popular

Overwatch by far.

R6S is the blue balls of games, the most unfun piece of shit I've ever played.

>OH WOW DUDE I SHOT YOU THOUGH A TINY GAP A MILE AWAY WERE YOU COULD NEVER KILL ME
>AND I ONLY TOOK ONE SHOT SO YOU COULD NEVER HAVE EVEN FOUGHT BACK!

Yeah nah, fuck that friends.

CS:GO and TF2

>killed AGAIN by some prone bastard aiming through a 2cm hole in the wall

i don't even like overwatch that much but it's better than siege. it could've been a really fun game but it isn't. i even pre-ordered it lol

Overwatch is a casual shooter.
Rainbow six is a tactical hardcore shooter.
It depends on what you want.

>they're all shit. All online games are shit
>nothing but children and edgy faggots
Lol fagottist faggot

Funny you're comparing these two, they're the only multiplayer games I still play. Probably because they're immense fun with a group of friends.

>what are drones?

Nice meme.

any online game is fun if you play with friends

Don't listen to this idiot, rainbow is no more "hardcore" then overwatch is
Get overwatch

Not really, only those that require coordination are for me.

No Man's Sky.

git gud

Why would I want to get good at a boring game?

Call of Duty

Paladins.

Enjoy throwing yourself into a meat grind for 10 minutes to move a cart forward. Kill, respawn, die, rinse repeat, at least everything you do in Siege is important.

Why live your life breathing then m8 ;^)
>REKT.MOM.GET.THE.CAMERA.WOID,mpeg

I really hope you're being sarcastic right now with that webm.

>rainbow is no more "hardcore"
Overwatch is a causal game for people who like cartoons and need thiers hands held. It's more about jumping around and quick shooting then any kind of tactical play. The extent of the team work is "hey guys let's all use our ults all at once." Stop it fanboy

Like uninstall the game?

Your way of shitting on Overwatch is to highlight the fact that you do the same thing over and over again, which is funny because that's literally the exact same as the way R6S plays.
Either destroy the bomb or protect the hostage, which boils down to just a simple shoot out between characters who are nearly all exactly the same.

At least Overwatch has a little bit of variety, instead of being just bland shooter for pseudo intellectuals.

...

>overwatch is a casual game
Stopped reading there, rainbow six is for fucking noobs bro
You know this

This one.

Overwatch is a overhyped re-skin of TF2 masquerading as a hardcore skill based competetive game.

Both the game and the fanbase are as cancerous as TF2 post-f2p.

git gud :^)

>fucking noobs bro
You know how I know your 16?
Some people like causal games like that. Don't fucking kid your self. Cod is more hardcore the overwatch.

Learn to spell before spouting retarded opinions, retard.

The one without microtransactions that affect gameplay.

>Both the game and the fanbase are as cancerous

I hear this a hell of a lot, but most of the people playing are pretty nice, you get some dickheads but not many.

I actually see more cancer from people who hate the game, the majority of the threads consist of

>OVERWATCH IS CANCER
>U R CANCER FOR LIKING IT
>GIVE ME ATTENTION

I think we all know who the cancer is.

:^)

Overwatch is more hardcore then both, you dumb fucking newb
Get a real game

>Cod is more hardcore the overwatch.
>regenerating health
>killstreaks
>perks
>SMGs and shotguns as always OP as fuck
>they let you put normal assault rifle sights on fucking sniper rifles
>on the fucking semi-automatic sniper rifle with 20 sounds that kills in two shots
>automatic shotguns

No, Call of Duty is a casualized piece of shit and every single addition since COD3 has only casualized it even more.

Overwatch.

Rainbow Six is just an even more tacticool CoD.

>getting baited this hard

the one that have less hacker

>something i never said
>something i never said
>grammar bashing
>implying attention whore

Ha ha friends, you should switch to a more skill based actual competetive game if you want to be taken seriously :^)

>Call of Duty is a casualized piece of shit
Yes but so is overwatch.
The game is 50% pick the op characters and 50% how well is your twitch. People arguing that overwatch is a hardcore tactical game are fucking casuals.

>has Borderlands 2 installed
Murk yourself, my man :o)

It is casualized, but CoD is the peak of casualism in shooters.
Every single element in it is made to make you pay more, or to make the game easier.

Ehh, the CD Keys were for sale for 3€ for the GOTY version, so why not.
Boring as fuck though, dropped it the day I bought it.

>Rainbow Six is just an even more tacticool CoD
>I didn't play the game

...

>I didn't play the game
Ah yes, the same Cred Forumsedditor argument of ''If I don't like your opinion, you haven't played it''
I just said what I feel about it, it's a completely average shooter that wanted to be eSports, and failed.
At least I only paid $8 for it.

Overwatch is the cod/csgo replacement
R6 is a niche shooter

You decide OP

Dont watch this.

>csgo replacement

OH WOW, MY SIDES

Siege

Blizzard fanboys will say that their press Q to win shooter is better though

Neither are really good.

Meanwhile in Overwatch

>Oh boy, I defended this point really well for 4 minutes! Coordinated with my team, healed a bunch, tank is doing really well! Ten seconds for the game to end!
>Some random fag on the other team decides to press the Q key on his keyboard
>DEFEAT

Nah.

OW is casual. If you want something better play DB or something, at least that takes skill and not hitting Q when you're somewhat protected and there's plenty of people on screen.

A bit of variety from pressing Q to pressing Q?

>something i never said
>something i never said

I literally copied the quote from your post, here it is again with a link!

>Both the game and the fanbase are as cancerous as TF2 post-f2p.


What else didn't you say? Fucking retard.

Name 1 (one) Overwatch ultimate ability that has absolutely no form of counterplay.
Protip: you can't

>Siege
>press M1 five times
>win game
woooooooooooow casual shit

wow that sounds like something a noob would say

Yes, because you can counter everything in every situation. Games shouldn't have to be played based around countering some fag pressing one button.

>wanted to be eSports, and failed.
The game's currently in season 3 of their esports. Good job on the Cred Forumsedditor argument, "It failed because I said so."

Just wait for BF1. It will be better then both of these games.

Meanwhile in R6S:

>I found the objective guys lets go
>First guy shot through a door
>Second guy grenaded himself and other guy
>Fourth guy shoots the hostage

Yeah that sounds fun user, enjoy your neutered COD game.

>Ubisoft shill thinks anyone played Siege

And in those situations that you picked everyone died for being idiots, not because one guy remembered he had a letter of the alphabet on his keyboard.

>you are cancer for liking it
>give me attention

Okay, maybe i put one line too many there chump :^)

t. assmad blizzard shill

I play it with at least 3 friends every day for a few hours.

>shit hitboxes vs shit netcode

...

When you first play the game, everyone dies to an ultimate. As you level up and play with better people, you'll find that ultimates only take out one or two people on average, three if they're lucky, four if your team really was too retarded.

D.Va's ultimate, the one everyone says is overpowered when they first play the game, ends up being the least likely to kill anyone at all. Its point becomes breaking up the enemy team instead of actually killing them.

Overwatch has shitty waifus
Seige has taciticool waifus

I'm level 101 and mostly play healer and tank. A game shouldn't be designed where a press of one button can destroy built up effort for an entire game.

>Cancerous
>Fanbase is cancerous

>Cancerous
>Meaning the fanbase has qualities likening it to cancer.

Are you really so dumb?
These are the R6S players, everyone.

Did you even play the beta?

>Just wait for BF1. It will be better then both of these games.

This, riding around a horse capping negro britbongs is fun as hell.

Underage pls go

Not the person you're responding to, but are you fucking stupid?

>There are the R6S players
Based on what some user said on your chink picture board?

Most of the counterplay to ults is to counter with your own ult or very reliant on having certain characters in the team comp.

For example, Zarya's ult + d.v'as is a guaranteed wipe against a team that doesn't have reinhardt or winston ready to shield it. And even then their team will still mostly be dead because Reinhardt had to block the bomb and not protect his teammates from being shot.

It typically doesn't though. The offense team usually uses theirs all at once, but one or two counter-ultimates from defense usually works.

It can become a bit of a clusterfuck on KOTH, but the walk-back times aren't nearly as long as a payload map so dying isn't as big a deal.

>George Lucas invented deserts

>me and my friends are bad at the game so the game is bad: the autobiography

Siege is a unique team-based shooter with nothing else like it out.

Overwatch is a f2p game being sold for full price while also being a patch job of multiple different shooters and with a marketing budget greater than R6's dev cost.

So does siege have a mode to play with bots or something? I like overwatch and all but siege seems more like the kind of game my dad and I would play split-screen
shut up I'm 23 and I love my dad

^ Proof that Overwatch players are casual scrublords

>because you can counter everything in every situation
Yes.

>Games shouldn't have to be played based around countering some fag pressing one button.
Nice opinion

You'd have to be an idiot to get killed by ults too.

Your kind don't count as people.

>Setting is 100% of a video game

>Hey guys let us compare 2 VERY different games just because they both have a class system xD
God you're teh same kind of cancer that compared Call of Duty to Battlefield
Even that comparison makes more sense than Siege vs Overwatch.
At least do the usual meme comparison TF2 vs Overwatch

You can play Terrorist Hunt which is you vs bots
No split-screen tho

Yeah, and it's relevancy is at the same level.

You are the one that compared the settings and nothing else.

>damage control

anyone can pick up overwatch and go 60-1 spamming OP abilities, in R6 you will get absolutely demolished by any half-decent player that played the game for some time and knows his shit. Either you only played casual and found retards in the other team, or you didn't even try the game.

Don't listen to this idiot. Get Battleborn.

It's the truth.
Rainbow Six has failed to have a long lasting impact in anything.

>he's still going

>overwatch is $40 with free maps and heroes
>Cred Forums hates it

>siege is $60 with pay2notgrind operators and DLC operators
>Cred Forums loves it

Should have just said you've never played the game

>Siege is a unique team-based shooter with nothing else like it out.

Excepting for CS:GO, CoD, BC2, Dirty Bomb, Insurgency...

In Zarya's case, the counter play is to spread out so she can only get one person at a time.

D.Va bomb can also be entirely blocked by sound barrier if you somehow all get caught.

Overwatch
>Fast paced cartoon like shooter
>Very generic gameplay
>Disgusting women
Seige
>Slow paced (Kinda) realistic shooter
>Not very generic
>Amazing women

Overwatch is fun
R6 is for faggots who try to be hardcore and like casual games

It's almost as if Cred Forums cares more about being contrarian than the games themselves.

It's the contrarian meme user. To be fair though, RS6 does have a really cool concept to it despite it's poor execution and Overwatch has a myriad of problems with it that will most likely never be fixed because blizzard.

I really like then both

They're very different, its weird to compare them at all.

This. Siege is so good and when you've got a team that you regularly play with everything comes together.

Based on the beta, BF1 is nothing like Battlefront thankfully.

>$60
what flyover country do you live in?

>DLC operators
>pay2notgrind operators
you can unlock all the base game operators in a week.
>DLC operators
except they're free and you can unlock them just like the other operators, just a lot slower

signed

Siege has free maps and operators, retard

>Casualwatch or Siege


wow, such a hard choice

Siege, obviously.
It actually requires skill and teamwork and its earned its reputation by being good, not by being made by a fanboyed developer

Can buy the seige starter edition which literally gives you free characters.
>Grind it should take two matches to unlock a character

I don't know, Luke but I will be calling the cops on you for those warrants you have cause you're such a piece of shit.

Spotted the 14 year old redditor.

Get Overwatch OP or you'll be playing with fat faggots like this

edgy

Both good games but completely different

>Both images featured desert so the only implications made by the images can be desert related because setting is 100% of a video game

nice

so what is the point you're trying to make good user

That BF1 is going to draw so heavily from Battlefront that it'll likely effectively be a reskin and will probably be just as disappointing for many of the same reasons.

>Same dev
>Same pub
>Same genre
>Same shit

Lost to the glaz one

Did you play the beta?

A bit, I went to a friend's house to try it out and wasn't impressed. That said, BF's betas are never not broken.

Both cost me £30 on launch, both get free maps and characters. Fuck off faggot.

>tfw no data center in Israel or somewhere close

>counterplay is to have already been in a spread formation
Any decent fucking Q suffers from that, retard.

I stopped playing overwatch after a couple days.
Still playing siege though. Its not that overwatch is bad, But I enjoy the gameplay of siege more. I cant say I've ever had 2 matches that felt the same in siege.

All my friends stopped playing overwatch, even the guy who was massively hyped for it and preordered it. We still play siege.

both are not playable. absolute hacks shit hole. I cant wait till this type of game is made to its potential.

None of them. They both suck.

Didn't know Siege came out.
Still playing OW though.

The beta came out and it showed that it's just a Battlefield 4 reskin.
The only similiarity with Battlefront is that you need points to unlock weapons.

Battlefield 4.

Literally the whole purpose of drones and shit is so that doesn't happen. Git gud shitter.

>Same dev
>Same pub
>Same genre
>Same shit

OK.

>completely different games
>WHICH IS BETTER!?!?!?
the answer is siege

And the same dev, same pub, same genre of Battelfield 4.

Not to mention we already had the beta which showed precisely that.

Cav is best waifu

but shes no IQ
Too bad IQs ability is really only good agaisnt pulse

>And the same dev, same pub, same genre of Battelfield 4.

And the same dev, same pub, same genre of Battlefield 3.

Do you have a point to go with all this?

He thinks pressing Q is always a game changer

Yes, that they only do rehashes, and BF1 will be a rehash of BF4.
Didn't see too much about Battlefront aside from, as I said, the point system to unlock weapons.
That, and that the main menu looks similar, with all those boxes.

This. Selling my overwatch for more single player games.

>they only do rehashes

That's what I've been saying this whole time.