Game based on the Crusades

That's accurate
Instead of defending their people they used "the mussies attacked us" as an excuse to rape and pillage across europe and accomplish nothing. Everything was an exuse for them to do some raping and pillaging with a sanction from the church.
Also not video games, sage etc

People hate Christians meanwhile Islam cockroaches literally ruin every country they are in that's not their own. And Obama refuses to do anything about the jihad in America.

The world needs another Crusade.

>Ma'arra was not as rich as the crusaders had hoped and they were still short of supplies and food as December progressed. Most of the soldiers and knights preferred to continue the march to Jerusalem, caring little for the political dispute between Bohemond and Raymond, and Raymond tried to buy the support of the other leaders. While the leaders negotiated away from the city, some of the starving crusaders at Maarat reportedly resorted to cannibalism, feeding on the dead bodies of Muslims.

>Europeans invading Arabian land under a religious pretense to rape and loot aren't the bad guys
>Arabians invading European land under an economic pretense pretense to rape and loot are the bad guys

Whoa, really makes you think.

Gib me title so I can find developer so I can never play any of their games

Play Crusader Kings 2, they're the good guys there

Yea nah. No one talks about the reason why the crusades were nessecary.

The muslims poured out Saudi Arabia during the 8th century and raped and murdered and conquered the north Africa, Palestine, Egypt, Iran, Afgan areas. Mainly because the Byzantine empire had a costly war with the Sassind persians an both empires were exhausted to face the Muslims horde and failed to win the few key battles nessecary to send them back to the sands they come from.

Then for the next three hundred years the Muslims would continue to try invade Europe getting almost half of Spain and we're beaten back by a French King Charles the Hammer.

But then the muslims had the started to to do raids on Europe lands and kidnap people to sell them. Look up Barbary Slave Trade.

So Europe as a whole had enough and the byzantInes were on a downward slope as a boulder state they launched the crusades. Which only the first one would be succesful and the 4th Crusade basically ruined the Byzantines who were too busy playing game of thrones over the Throne. Basically what happened in GoT happend in Constantinope to a T.

But at no point in history were muslims having any sort of high ground. The whole religion of peace thing is a joke.

Crusaders are heroes for the europeons. Maybe evil for the Muslims who cares about the invaders.

Check this dumbass.

Islam was spread by the sword into every area not Saudi Arabia. Christianity was spread slowly relatively peacefully.

Muslims deserved it.

>2000
MUSLIMS ARE RUINING THE COUNTRY/WORLD I DON'T WANT THEM HERE
>1950
BLACKS THAT WANT RIGHTS ARE RUINING THE COUNTRY
I DON'T WANT THEM HERE
>1920
IRISH ARE RUINING THE COUNTRY
I DON'T WANT THEM HERE
>1860
NIGGERS THAT WANT TO BE FREE ARE RUINING THIS COUNTRY I DON'T WANT THEM HERE
Have you ever considered that maybe the world and all humanity just sucks and it has nothing to do with race or creed?

Dumb kafir

One group is white and the other group are heathen savages.

Well Muslims should be more butthurt about the Mongols & Ottomans, but they blame the Crusaders, kek, i don't mind really

based francis gonna reorganize the knights templar

>humanity

buzzword

also

>irish didn't fuck everything up as niggers

lel oh lel

what in the fuck are you on about

>Christianity was spread peacefully
Matthew 10:34
Do not think that I have come to spread peace to the world! I have come not to bring peace, but a sword.
The crusades are literally an example of christianity trying to spread through force. As was the Roman empire. And the hundred of other examples of violence by christians.
But right your religion is much better than filthy mussies. You're not both delusional faggots clinging to something and taking it so seriously that it warps your view on reality to the point where you would kill for it.

You think American history applies to the world.

You ever wonder how the Muslims came to be such a force? Did no one teach they inVader raped and pillaged relatively unguarded areas that is now the mile east thay used to be wholly christian?
Islam is a religion of war and alway has been.

Someone post it

>Christianity is a relgion of peace guys!

Cred Forums GET THE FUCK OFF OF Cred Forums
You lonely bastards don't belong here

>Christianity was spread slowly relatively peacefully.
Yep, the Teutonic Knights did stuff pretty peacefully, Cortez and his men too, pretty peacefully (isn't that right Las Casas?). Colonialism and evangelism in the 19th century, peace incarnate!

>forgets the "relatively" in peacefully.

Yes your right Christians poured out Jerusalem and conquered the Roman Empire with swords. Listening to the Son of God they raped and murdered and killed until everybody was christian.

No dumb ass that never happend. Christianity was spread by word of mouth. Violence did occur later of course.

However islam was spread by the sword. Completly. They poured out Saudia Arabia took the Middle East and would keep trying to Invade Europe. And then Set up the Barbary Slave Trade. And basically kill anyone who did not convert.

Your a dumb fuck if you don't know history.

he is saying that muslims is the new scapegoat of anglo politics

which is missing the point entirely and it's stupid liberal training to make them appear intelligent

>Muslims and Christians will never come together as brothers in their mutual hate of the Jews

>they raped and murdered and killed until everybody was christian.
Charlemagne against the saxons was pretty much this as a matter of fact. Oh and they destroyed all the holy sites of the saxons they could get their hands on too... lovely people.

We are talking about the crusades era and the Roman Era leading up to the muslims. And before that Christianity was a religion of peace.

But please go on and go out of Era to prove something true wrong.

BTW Cortez all he did was take the the tribes that hated the Aztec rulership and made them rebel. They been rebelling and getting stopped for years until he helped out.

enemy of your enemy is not your friend, bub

>OP is sure to use the word 'Game' when he makes a thread
>but he obviously wants to talk about non-vidya topics

>the church is evil

uh of course these bigoted white males are bad. They were opressing innocent muslim people

you are not some sort of nazi-frog Cred Forums poster are you, user?

...

>European game set in 2016
>Muslims are the good guys

Yeah, killing women and children is so good, just because their relatives did some bad shit.

Stupid duck posters.

>Protestant heresy intensifies

Deus Vult.

I sincerely can't think of any recent games at all where this happens, the closest is the original Asssassin's Creed and even then the bad guys are just Templars.

finmark was right

>We are talking about the crusades era and the Roman Era leading up to the muslims. And before that Christianity was a religion of peace.
Charlemagne's actions against the saxons and the Teutonic campaign happened in your correct time period and they were slaughters.

Maybe before 330, Christianity was a "religion of peace", but that was before they weren't supported by sovereigns. As soon as that happened, goodbye peace and hello religious wars (following the Council of Nicea for a start).

People with a lack of understanding of people and history will more than often press their own morality into a subject.

Most people who vilify the Christian armies have no idea what led to the crusades but only understand that

Christians= Religion I grew up with and am comfortable criticizing + They were the invaders at that specific part of time.

vs

Islam= Religion I did not grow up with and am uncomfortable criticizing+ It's exotic and different and therefore culturally superior.

A modern pope would never call a Crusade, if you guys really want to start shit, then it would be better if you started stitching red crosses into flak jackets and form Christian military orders rather than LARPing about DEUS VULT!!! over the internet.

>why do people hate invading armies waaaaah waaaaaah

What's also interesting is all the Cred Forums fags who ignore the crusaders fighting amongst each other, raiding and capturing Christian cities in the Middle East and then after miraculously having a successful first crusade, start warring with each other in their newly captured territories. Continuing the good Christian tradition of murdering their fellow men and believers just like they used to in Europe.

Religionfags are literally the biggest hypocrites, also not vidya.

The crusaders killed thousands when they entered Jerusalem. The siege had been very difficult, crusaders even had to resort to cannibalism to keep going because all of their logistic was fucked, but they won.

Imagine the reputation the Franks had after that

>Protestants
>Christian
Pick one.

Considering that the crusades failed i would say gay

The crusades should have gone on for longer honestly, then we wouldn't be saddled with this terrible moslem problem we have now

>What's also interesting is all the Cred Forums fags who ignore the crusaders fighting amongst each other, raiding and capturing Christian cities in the Middle East and then after miraculously having a successful first crusade, start warring with each other in their newly captured territories.

Which is exactly what the Muslims did when they conquered the Middle East from the Sassinids and several other Persian and Roman factions not long after they took land.
Not to mention the Crusades were retaliation for non-stop Islamic aggression against the West that was only halted by Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours after the Umayyad Caliphate happily raped, tortured, and butchered Spanish Christians after their conquest of the Iberian peninsula.

>Also not Vidya.

Ass-is-red, Stronghold:Crusaders, Cursed Crusader, Medieval II: Kingdoms, and numerous other video games use the first, or one of the other Crusades as a back drop.
You sound like you'd get booty bothered if someone talked about WW2 in a Company of Heroes thread.

>Cred Forumsfags
You don't need to be from Cred Forums to understand history.

Christians who brag about Crusaders never tell how many Crusades were successful.
First Crusade: Won by Christians
People's Crusade: Won by Muslims
Crusade of 1101: Won by Muslims
Second Crusade: Won by Muslims
Third Crusade: Won by Muslims
Fourth Crusade: Christians raped other Christians in Constantinople, weakening it to the point were the Byzantine Empire couldn't recover from (Fetih Mehmet II™ would thank them 300 years later for that ;-))
Fifth Crusade: Muslims won. Hard.
Sixth Crusade Won by Christians
Eighth Crusade: Won by Muslims
Ninth Crusade: Won by Muslims
Wew. Please change your profile picture to a Crusader to show how much of a cuck you are.

may allah destroy the munafiqeen and kuffar and strengthen the foundation of Islam