Now that we've watched all the streams and YouTube videos, what went wrong?

Now that we've watched all the streams and YouTube videos, what went wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FueoV-7ar0w&list=PLHQyGGzRHYIazgWAlJqLPf8xZ_oyK8OvO&index=3
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomyris
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgo,_Queen_of_Sparta
lmddgtfy.net/
youtube.com/watch?v=DiclqIOlhVo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It seems great apart from cartoon leaders.

beyond earth had more depth than this abomination

Its been really good so far, the music and the ui are pleasing, new mechanics are a god-send, but contrarian faggots like will still disagree

>ui
>pleasing
it looks like concentrated diarrhea to be honest

Going wide is the best strategy for everything

It looks far better than expected. It seems to be fixing most of the shit that made Civ5 a step back.

Looks good.

One thing that does bother me is the notification spam. It took up like half the screen in one playthrough I saw. That shit needs to be fixed.

Tbh the biggest problem is that streamers get to play it right now and I'm stuck watching them on YouTube

New mechanics seem cool but they didn't design the AI to account for the new mechanics. No one told the AI that you can't defend cities without walls anymore so scout + range units WILL rape civs.

What's wrong with it?
Looks clean and sharp, shows all the information, why are you so negative?

feminist shit game.

Wait for the inevitable expansions when it goes from okay to legendary

Care to elaborate?

>It seems great apart from cartoon leaders.
Thats the future of gaming and allows for a more realistic portrayal of the past gamers can relate too, it is impossible for any game to remain the same.

There are female leaders.

If it's not the Empire State Building in icon form these precious V-only babbus will complain themselves to death

>Doesn't want more civ waifus
It'd be funny if it weren't so sad

>civ waifus
But the female characters all look worse than the males.

This
>can't play as hitler, mao, or pol pot
>no slavery mechanic

>waifus
>this shit

you sure love tranies m8

Doesn't look too bad, I'll just mod the way the leaders look.

They removed the buttchin.

catherine de medici a cute tho

...

She's one of the best designs though.
The weird "we're trying to make them look attractive, but we also need to keep them in line with the caricaturey male designs" thing on the other female leaders looks fucking weird.

Still failing to see how the game is 'feminist'.

>She's one of the best designs though.

Are you american right?

that's because you're dangerously retarded user

>Are you american right?
This is prime EU posting time, what do you think?

No, you have yet to provide a single argument or piece of evidence suggesting that the game is 'feminist'

Say what you want but I absolutely would a Tomyris.

No Sweden.

Not all videos are out yet.

Not him but I was scrolling through the first page of Cred Forums and saw this image and immeadietly thought. Wow she looks like a tumblrina.

I came in here to see who he was replying to and saw it was you, and yeah I think that other user did his job and provided an example, you're just being stubborn.

>All leaders look look retarded faggots and trannies
>UI is a messy clustefuck
Day 1 pirate so I can shitpost about it on Cred Forums tbqh

What the fuck man.

I would love for her to pillage my improvements

those are shoops right?

She's such a weird choice. Weirder than even Medici.

>that other user did his job and provided an example, you're just being stubborn
Except he completely didn't, you're basing your argument around the fact that a girl has dyed hair, how the hell does that make the game 'feminist' at all?

>posts the pre-buttchin revision

You want to know how I know you're baiting?

>his waifu is not Clopatra

>Cred Forums judges a civ game by how the characters/leaders look, not by the quality of the gameplay

Absolutely no waifu material so far. Maybe I'll just get all leaders replaced with good static images again.

"we want the mobile audience"

SLUT
L
U
T

is that anita?

Still ugly as shit

>clepatra
>beauty

that shit looks like a man.

Victoria is way way better.

>sexy VA
>pale exposed shoulders
>fans herself when she likes you
>blatant desire for world domination

they kept building from civ5, a bad game

Sluts are the best!

Looks exactly like my aunt

...

better than Civ V with the Brave New World expansion pack.

Such potential. Instead she just looks so wacky.

>being a tsunderefag

How do you make fucking Cleopatra ugly

Totally looks like her

Gorgo is very obviously shoe-horning diversity in there.

i'm actually kind of excited for the game. i wasn't even super into civ before and i just liked dicking around once every few months

the first shots were comically bad looking but i think it looks less bad in motion, plus all the actual mechanic changes seem great

look forward to day 1 pirate and might buy it if it remains good

How was Civ5 a step back? Civ5 was good. You better not think stacks of doom were good.

Post husbandos

They used too many female leaders. Females aren't capable of leading.

Tomirys in partciular but most of the girls look """"realistically beautiful"""" and it is kind of dumb.

At least most of the guys look cool

but she is the best waifu user.

Pedro looks like ass though.

(you)

Most of the appeal of the civ series is its historical flavor. Civ is for ultra casuals.

I love this game, I did not know they were making a 6th one so soon can't wait!

>You will never be a rough rider, leading your nation to great heights and finally securing a lasting alliance with your neighbor by marrying Cleopatra.

Man I would actually pay 60 dollars if they released BnW again but spent all that money developing Civ6 to make a competent AI. Watching the streams make the AI look even more lackluster than 5.

>I play Civ for the graphics and the leaders

I hope these people leave the game.

I said most. Plus I think he looks decent, since they're going with the super cartoony look.

bad ai unescorted settles, stolen settlers stay as settlers and ai doesn't upgrade units much at all so you see slingers/warriors on turn 200

city states build x10 more units than civs (prince ai thing but still dumb ai)

barbs literally roll over civs i've seen barbs with x4 builders ai can never ever defend its own units


you can have unimproved tiles in capital for literally the whole game game and be fine with food/production


theres NO reason ever to go tall science etc bonuses are flat bonuses no % boosts and theres barely anything stopping you except for space going wide good thing they increased map size from civ 5...

Everything is great, the game looks more balanced and fun than civ v.

The only negatives are:
>AI is shit
>No World Congress

I remember this precious maymay quite well from V's launch.

More of the people saying it then were joking. Or at least had a functional sense of humour.

I'm hoping this game doesn't turn into an AI fuck fest where it just plays like a board game instead of being a cool alternate history game, but I doubt it. Other nations are going to insult you for no reason. Going to war is going to harm your science instead of helping it. Multiplayer is going to be an afterthought.

The part that kills me the most that they're not bringing back in civ VI is those fuckin great leader backgrounds from V

every single one is like a piece of art on its own and the ones in 6 look so muddled and shit

My friend's an EU4 nut so i know some amount of the game, most of the new features just seem like rips from it.

Which isn't a bad thing, i think.

Not a lot! I love it! :3::3 but if you don't that's AWESOME! Not everyone has to like everything and thats OK! It's what gives us the SPICE of life that is variety! ;-) Just play what you LOVE and most importantly have FUN! :3 :3 :3

>Watching the streams make the AI look even more lackluster than 5.

The AI didn't look that bad in the stream I watched. At least not any worse than V's.

The AI actually made its wounded units retreat and hide with the army instead of trying to kill the human's weakened units.

looks fucking great fuck off reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

V has some questionable leader choices but VI's has way more as a whole IMO.

Assalam aleykum slutboi

>Moving unguarded settlers around
>In a game where settlers actually remain settlers post capture
>AI didn't look that bad

You sure m8? I can name at least 5 other flaws in the AI.

>be voice director for narrator in Civ game
>don't tell him how to pronounce the foreign names
Sean Bean calls the Japanese leader "Tokey moon", William Morgan Sheppard mispronounced Gajah Mada two different ways in the same intro. This really triggers my autism.

Deal with it friendo :3 LIterally NOTHING you can do about it. LOL. Just sit there thinking about that. Something is going to be going to millions of people. All wrong. And you just have to sit there.. and think that there is literally objectively nothing you can do about it at all. LOL.

>Tokey moon
>not triforce man

kek

>Saladin
>Portrayed as a shitskin
>He was a kurd

BRAVO

...

They remove Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan from the game because their cultures promoted rape. I'm just mad they replaced him with Scythia, a no-name no one cares about

Referring specifically to battle AI.

The worst part of Civ V's AI was its inability to compete tactically because it wasn't adapted to 1UPT. It could only compete at all in higher levels because of its production bonus.

In the Civ VI playthroughs I've seen, there weren't any units committing suicide or other weird moves, which is what I'm most concerned about.

The other stuff is bad but more easily fixable.

>They remove Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan from the game because their cultures promoted rape.
Stop believing every fucking shitpost you read on Cred Forums.

>Referring specifically to battle AI
Fuck off. I made a complain about the AI and you made a post to reply mine and somehow I was supposed to read your mind that it was about Battle AI? Up yours m8.

Source on these claims?

>They remove Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan from the game because their cultures promoted rape
you have no source for this
more likely they removed Attila because why the fuck would the Huns be in the base game, and you should expect to see Mongolia later. Scythia was added for the sake of having new civs, similar to how Norway is in instead of Vikings or Denmark.

>The other stuff is bad but more easily fixable

Is that why diplomacy is still fucking borked even in BnW? And in the short interactions I have seen on stream, I have seen holy war declared between civs with the same religion?

>I'm just mad they replaced him with Scythia, a no-name no one cares about
who's famous for beheading people and fucking with the heads

>theres NO reason ever to go tall science etc bonuses are flat bonuses no % boosts and theres barely anything stopping you except for space going wide good thing they increased map size from civ 5...

Much like how there was never any reason to go wide in civ 5 as it was always a weak play that either gave you a slim chance of winning or literally made you and the guy you attacked (because >building more than 4 cities) lose the game immediately.

>Is that why diplomacy is still fucking borked even in BnW?

Diplomacy is borked in CiV/BNW because they decided having AIs play like human players is preferable to them having historical personalities.

Shouldn't you be playing Europa Universalis, Victoria or Crusader Kings?

Do you even know what a Civilization game is?

Not only Civ is literally a digital board game, but it's also a competition game with one single winner.

>Other nations are going to insult you for no reason

Of course they are, they don't want to lose, so they will undermine you at all points.

I bet you are one of those guys who says "wow I was an allied to America for 500 years then they suddenly denounced me and declared war!".

Pro-tip, America was an adversary, he wasn't going to let you win so he would be a loser, he is not your butt buddy.

Looks like the trend is continuing in 6
Hurray

>hexagons
>no unit stacking
>no leonard nimoy
Is shit.

>>no leonard nimoy
I don't know how to tell you this user.

This would work better if the game didn't try to tread a middle ground between players and historical characters. It's probably going to be worse now because they have agendas that no player would have.

Actually yeah, I've got hundreds of hours in CK2 and EU4. I'm saying that digital board game simulators aren't as entertaining as simulations. The fact that you can never have a truly loyal ally, and the fact that civs will call you up to laugh at the size of your army (when it's10x the size of theirs) makes it stupid.

>The fact that you can never have a truly loyal ally

There has never been a case of truly loyal allies. It always comes down to interests.

Stacks of doom were far more practical than moving every single unit each turn. And no, the size of the stack wasn't the only thing that mattered.

>competing with dumb AIs is actually a good thing guize

I'm glad we agree! How is that fun though?

Then don't play it friendo! :3 It's awesome that you enjoy different things! Hahah. but some people enjoy these types of games. but its great that you like other things. Just play what you LOVE and most importantly have FUN! People enjoying this game does nothing to harm you friendo! :3 :3 :3

(You)

Because it's realistic in that your ally is only using you to get something?

Unless you just want to hugbox with some AI and use them as a beatstick.

You could get a permanent alliance in Civ IV.

It's realistic that a shit nation who is getting stomped on by everyone else and dependent on you to survive will declare war on you cause you're close to victory?

It's impossible to have a truly loyal ally in these games because of what the other dude said.

In CK2 and EU4 it's possible because time goes on and people actually grow old and die. In CIV there's only avatars.

Yes? Since this might keep you from winning, or just delay your winning so they can have time to do something?

How many hours do you have in the Civ series?

>that's the future of gaming
How and why?
>more realistic
>cartoons
Were you dropped on your head as a child?

>Because it's realistic
Civ diplomacy is anything BUT realistic.
Like literally I could roll a dice for AI behavior and have it be more realistic than AI diplomacy in Civ.

That doesn't happens in EU tho.

>I have over 200 hours
>I have only won the Cultural, Diplomatic and Technological victories
>I have the "win in the hardest mode" achievement by playing in an edited map

Feels weird.

Although I really find it comfy to be a peaceful nation that builds a lot of stuff.

For some reason they made a mobile game for the PC.

I mostly only played V a bit when I was really sick a few years ago, but 6 actually has me wanting to play it.

I don't know if I actually will though.

Deepak Chopra, is that you? Because I can't even parse that shit.

Realism doesn't equal fun.

Civ V's "science > all" approach is very realistic but not fun or interesting.

I need to know if my nigga Dandolo will be in Civ6. Venice was best tiny civ

I'm talking about Civ.
But it only helps the *other* nations who are close to victory.
As much as you like to pretend otherwise, Civ against AIs is not "every player competing against everyone else", it is "every AI trying to fuck you over".

I agree, they're worse

Considering this game looks about exactly the same as civ 5 in terms of visuals, I assume it has the exact same system requirements and isn't bloated for no reason?

It is a firaxis game

>Diplomacy is borked in CiV/BNW because they decided having AIs play like human players is preferable to them having historical personalities.
Maybe because Civ series aren't history simulators, they are history flavored 4x games

That's been a feature of Civ since it's inception. It's not a recent thing.

I used to play it a lot. Haven't touched in in a while though.
I do plan on getting Civ6 at launch. It looks like it'll be a fine game.

Diplomacy AI isn't bad because it isn't historically accurate, it's bad because the AI is retarded and holds grudges for no reason over everything, doesn't understand alliances and doesn't understand how to make good trade deals beyond making retarded demands

>But it only helps the *other* nations who are close to victory.

What else are they supposed to do? The game is about to end anyways and they're coded in a way that they try to fuck up the highest scorer.

And usually when the game is at that point, literally everyone will declare war against you anyway since you're fucking winning. And early on they try to fuck you over if they see that you make for an excellent expansion of their empire, which is usually the case because the AI's drop off really fast even on higher difficulties if you know how to play.

It's completely logical to remove a competing opponent.

this

kill yourself. you must be a teenager

Don't forget warmonger penalties don't apply to the AI

take your tumbr-tier triggered personality and GTFO kiddo

That's one manly fucking jaw.

>Don't forget warmonger penalties don't apply to the AI
wait, really?

>It's completely logical to remove a competing HUMAN opponent.

FTFY

it does, but at drastically reduced values, and there are specific penalties that only the player can ever get.

she was ugly

At reduced amounts but anything above Prince difficulty and the amount might as well be zero.

Good diplomacy doesn't mean making Civ into a history simulator.

As it is, there is no reason to try to do anything with the AI because they're always in cunt mode. And if there's no reason, the option might as well not be there.

>almost always offer you bad deals, meaning there's no reason to trade except to sell off extra luxuries or get something specific
>never honor "don't settle near me" or other demands, meaning there's no reason to ever choose that option. they shouldn't even exist.

Good thing I'm a massive casual.

i've got easily 2k hours in IV, half before steam, and god knows how many in III

That is my main beef with Civ AI. Above prince the AI doesn't improve. They just get more bonuses to fuck you over with. If they made a competent AI, it will easily be GOTY but instead they throw in new fancy features but the AI is still fucking pants on head retard and multiplayer is borked.

Even a massive casual who understand gameplay mechanics will beast prince. You really have to be retarded to lose at any difficulty below Emperor. Like really fucking stupid. And the only reason to lose on Emperor is cause you rolled Zulu or some warmonger next to your starting location.

>Above prince the AI doesn't improve.

This is literally every strategy AI.

>never honor "don't settle near me" or other demands, meaning there's no reason to ever choose that option. they shouldn't even exist.

Don't forget that you also can't call them out on it when they dishonor promises to give them penalties, like they do to you all the fucking time

I'd say in all likelihood Venice won't return.

By her looks, it's obvious she's looking for a rough rider.

>almost always offer you bad deals, meaning there's no reason to trade except to sell off extra luxuries or get something specific
Good that you can offer them your own deals, and they will almost always accept even a 1:1 deal as long as they are friendly towards you, even when it will benefit you more then them. For example, they will trade a luxury for luxury even when they don't have any happiness problems while you do.

>As it is, there is no reason to try to do anything with the AI because they're always in cunt mode. And if there's no reason, the option might as well not be there.
You can pay the AI to attack other AI
You can get trades and research agreements

Cleopatra was notoriously homely. People valued her for her personality.

The difference is most strategy AI are competent. Or at least not fucking stupid enough to make basic errors.

Don't the AI on the hardest difficulty start with an extra settler or two? That's not a harder AI, that's a fucking handicap.

Oh I wasn't saying I was gonna lose. I did a run in civ v where I just made an empire on like the easiest or second easiest mode and then killed everyone when i got bored

reminder that IV diplomacy was vastly superior to V diplomacy

She was ugly, but she had some tight holes

You're happy with the trade deals with the AI? God damn I want to live on your planet.

Yeah, that's another problem. There are a ton of diplo penalties that only apply to the human player.

At least there's CBP.

Bets are they are just as fucking retarded. I can't wait for the declare war against some retard who can't reach you across the map and then 10 turns later, he negotiates peace and gives you free cities / gold / luxury meme again. Now you can do it with Casus belli so you get no warmonger penalties.

You're right, but good luck keeping them friendly with you past renaissance. After that they don't give a fuck and refuse 1:1 trades even if they benefit them far more than they benefit you.

There should be an RP mode where AI is heavily tied to achieving non-game winning agendas and a hardcore mode where winning is the #1 priority.
There will always be complaints if they only focus on one of the above.

I just bought V on Steam because it was on sale but I'm having some financial troubles at the moment so I can't afford the DLC. Should I refund it and wait until I can get the DLC?

Scythia isn't famous for anything, they're literally whos

>You're happy with the trade deals with the AI? God damn I want to live on your planet.
I've explained my reasoning and provided examples of why trade deal AI isn't that bad.

AI will accept 1:1 deals. Just think about it. They will accept equal, symmetrical deals. Equal. What else do you even expect? That AI will trade off their last luxuries for pennies?

>Casus belli
I have no idea why they give you more diplomacy tools to abuse when the AI can't handle basic diplomacy. It is like they want people to beat the AI dead.

Just the base game, neither of the expacs?

If so refund that shit for now.

I mean she's not "actually" famous but her defining trait is "beheaded people and fucked around with the heads"

Realistic AI is just one example of an AI that wouldn't be as fucking stupid as the one in Civ5. That's a good idea though, for that one dickhead in the thread who thinks everything is fine because winning a competition trumps everything.

After industrialization, the AI will hate you no matter what if you are different ideology than them, that's a game design that is supposed to make late game more dynamic and aggressive.

You can still be good friends with AIs that follow the same ideology.

Is there a strategy game that has you forge alliances with female leaders with your dick?

Man I just want an AI who isn't fucking retarded. Is that so much to ask?

>as long as they are friendly towards you

Which is almost impossible, because the AIs are cunts who will hate you for existing. There are also very few ways of improving their disposition towards you while there are a million different negative modifiers.

Yeah just the base game, it was £5, the DLC bundle was £30 which I can't afford at the moment. Whta's wrong with the base game?

Yeah. It is called Rance. Pretty good game if you ask me.

You sound like you haven't even played the game, son. I wish I could find that image where Sweden refuses to vote for itself in the congress because fuck the human player.

Saying you just don't want a braindead AI only reveals that you are braindead yourself.
How exactly do you define an AI as "not braindead?"
Is it an AI that anticipates your every move? Is it one that tries to go for the quickest victory possible? Is it one that ensures you have an exciting game? Is it one that keeps with the priorities of the civ's leader?
There are so many questions that need to be answered by how you even define what a proper AI is, even in this simple context. Yet people will just go online and say the AI is shit without even considering any of the above.

>Whta's wrong with the base game?
Lacking in a lot of features that make the game feel more complete. It is not unplayable but if you play with the DLC and go back, you will immediately see what you are missing.

It will be the same for Civ 6. They have to sell DLC expansions after all.

...

Nah, that's just the spoils of war. Also the rance translation is somehow still super shitty.

I would be satisfied with an AI that understand how basic diplomacy works. Start with that and then we can build up alright?

>How exactly do you define an AI as "not braindead?"

One that won't destroy its entire army by continually embarking near enemies.

>Which is almost impossible
As long as you don't conquer any cities, AI will usually leave you alone unless it's a:
1) warmonger AI like Huns or Shaka
2) you aren't falling behind on military strength

After industrialization and ideologies pop up, AI of opposing ideologies won't like you, which is reasonable.

On higher difficulties (settler 7 or above), AI will attack you because it will almost always have much larger army than you as they receive massive production bonuses.

No, it sound like you haven't played the game.

>AI that understand how basic diplomacy works
Once again you prove that you don't have even the most basic understanding of AI.
HOW DO YOU DEFINE THAT THE AI UNDERSTANDS THIS? An AI that will only go to war when it is absolutely necessary would be bad, but that's how an AI that "understands basic diplomacy" would operate.

By not making her kawaii uguu

Lol no, my hundreds of hours in every Civ game has taught me that the AI giving you a fair trade deal is about 1:100 chance per game.

>How exactly do you define an AI as "not braindead?"

Well for one, I would like an AI who has no means of reaching me from across the map to NOT declare war on me.

>Try to play peaceful culture France in Civ 5
>Neighbors are Greece and Japan, beyond Japan are Rome and Aztecs
>Make alliances with Aztecs, Greeks, and Romans
>Japan keeps settling near me and denouncing me no matter my attempts to win his favor
>Everyone declares war on him, I do as well because I need a city he put near my capital
>During the war, Rome declares war on me for literally no reason, turning it into s three way battle that Greece benefits from because he only has one enemy, leading him to win all of Japan's cities except Kyoto
>Rome offers peace only if I give him all of my luxury resources and a city
>Meanwhile the Russians make contact via boat and immediately denounce me as the Greeks start to press in near me and become less friendly
>The single most reasonable and peaceful group is the Aztecs
These games drive me insane.

holy shit is this real

the graphics looks like cell shaded shit.

Here you go Why are you so obsessed with complex AI thinking when Civ 5 AI has proven itself stupid beyond means.

I mean Civ 5 AI can't even do basic self preservation.
>Annihilate his army completely
>Don't want to take his cities cause warmonger penalties
>Ask for peace
>He refuses
>mfw

You must be terrible at the game then, despite those hundreds of hours, if you can't trade a luxury for another luxury with the AI.

You say it's a 1:100 chance, but it took me less than one minute to go on Youtube and find an example of equal trade deal from the first Civ 5 LP I stumbled upon.
youtube.com/watch?v=FueoV-7ar0w&list=PLHQyGGzRHYIazgWAlJqLPf8xZ_oyK8OvO&index=3
Go to 10:40

wanna conquer that aztec

Man I have ran into this situation so many fucking times over so many playt throughs and it still fucking pisses me off how incompetent the AI is. I outnumber him 50 to 0 and by 50 to 0 i mean I have 50 units and he has 0. And the cheeky cunt still says no to peace.

Once again you prove how fucking dumb you are.
Let's say it's montezuma fighting you. Maybe his AI was programmed to sooner lead his civ to annihilation before making peace not on his own terms?
The question of AI heavily depends on your priorities. "braindead" AI is probably just the developers not having the same priorities as you personally.

asdf

you have no clue what you're talking about

Wrong, most strategy AI is notoriously mediocre. Don't try and convince people of that because it's simply not true.

You obviously are fucking stupid so i'll explain it very clearly so you can understand dipshit.

1:1 ratio deals are possible, but the AI will even if they're friendly demand from you the player an unreasonable sum MOST of the time, even if they're friendly toward you.

God how fucking stupid are you if you think diplomacy in Civ games is decent. I but you're one of those dumb cunts who walks into a Wallmart and haggles with the cashier.

>Maybe his AI was programmed to sooner lead his civ to annihilation before making peace not on his own terms?

The AIs are all the same. They only differ in their flavors.

that's intentional. the ai is set to never give up once you push them past a certain point, depending on leader personality

the designers made the call that it was more fun that way

the designers of civ5 were fucking retards

>Maybe his AI was programmed to sooner lead his civ to annihilation before making peace not on his own terms

Go fuck yourself. Man I can take the programming to win excuses. But the programming to lose 100% suicidal AI is "intentional"? Yeah. That is definitely good AI programming. An enemy AI with no sense of self preservation. Sounds like a good idea to me.

Maybe what I described is his "flavor" then

>the designers of civ5 were fucking retards

I fully expect this feature to be in Civ 6 as well.

same

Yes, but is just a generic MMO with some Civ flavor
the girls though

You seriously either need to explicitly define your criteria for successful AI or stop fucking posting.
It's easy to criticize a game when you can make up your criteria as you go along to match whatever they aren't doing.

>It's an AI with no means of reaching you declares war on you episode
>It's a shill try to explain this behavior as intentional episode

I can't wait

>1:1 ratio deals are possible, but the AI will even if they're friendly demand from you the player an unreasonable sum MOST of the time, even if they're friendly toward you.
That's simply incorrect, you dumb fucking retard, this almost never happens. And still, even if it offers you a bad deal, you can just reject it, you won't get any penalties for it.

>people complaining about diversity in a game where you are literally playing as leaders from all over the world

It doesn't mean they will invade, it is just declaring a "shoot on sight" mentality towards your soldiers.
It could be a defensive war. This will be cleared up in Civ 6, as there are multiple types of wars.

Civ VI has BNW's devs. So it's possible.

Aren't they all stuck with Prince difficulty?

>Shills defending leaders being chosen for their gender and skin color over their actual accomplishments

oh god, i thought they fired those clowns

Go fuck yourself. Here are a list of things Civ 5 AI can't do

>Self preservation
>Good trade deals because you of something you did to another Civ 100 turns ago
>Not get fucked by embarking and disembarking in combat and getting ass reamed
>Not declare war on you when they have no means to reach you or across the map
>Combat with terrain modifiers

These are just off the top of my head. You would know this if you played Civ 5. I fully expect these things to be an issue in Civ 6 and await your post on how AI can't do combat with terrain modifiers is considered "me not understanding what is good AI"

And then why do they try to sue for peace 20 turns later and offer me free shit when I have no remotely looked in their direction?

Don't forget the "Rush Petra even though we only have 2 tiles that benefit from Petra but we can do it cause we cheat"

>it's a "Cred Forums gets triggered because there are female characters" episode

>no slavery mechanic
You can steal enemy workers

So the AI shouldn't take advantage of the difficulty modifier you gave it? Am I reading this correctly?

She looks hot as fuck desu lads

Not even joking

Go ahead and defend tomyris. I'll wait.

They make good reaction fuel

AI should get other wonders that benefit them more instead of getting petra. Because the AI doesn't build wonders based on situation, they build wonders based off a fucking TIER LIST.

You still have to pay the same upkeep as any other unit, it's not like slavery is an actual mechanic.

>start game
>decide to give AI bonuses so it can somehow compete against my human mind and imagination
>AI uses those bonuses I decided to give them
>"WOOOW what the fuck how can they build shit this quickly fucking cheater AI"

Read

>I won't buy this game because it seems great aside from the one aspect of the game that is trivial to fix via mods
Retards

>I won't buy this game because of Beyond Earth

FTFY senpai

You can pinpoint the second his honor is broken

>they build wonders based off a fucking TIER LIST
How do you know?

Defend from what exactly? That she is put into game? Here, take a look:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomyris
It appears that she, in fact, was a ruler of Scythians at some point.

Now, your turn, explain what's wrong with Tomyris

Maybe it's because I'm from a small irrelevant country but I like the fact that the Civ series is trying to go for some not so well known Civs and leaders.

Not that my country will ever get a moment to shine in the series.

Maybe they were wonder sniped for everything else, how the fuck would you know? They could have also been starved for growth there and needed what food they could get.

Because we know how the AI works?

The AI doesn't have any comprehension of what buildings do. It decides what to build based off the flavor values of its leader and the flavor value of the buildings (e.g., leader has a wonder value of 10 and decides to build x because it has a wonder value of 8).

>It appears that she, in fact, was a ruler of Scythians at some point.
That CANNOT be your only criteria. I refuse to believe you're actually this retarded.

This is civ 5 ai. They operate off a bunch of if else statements at best?

>she was a ruler of scythians
end? How's that enough? You have folk with as much historical impact as alexander or cleopatra and what not, you have the audacity to say that
>ruled scythians at some point
deserves equal footing? You, swine.

>Because we know how the AI works?
I don't. Explain it to me.
>The AI doesn't have any comprehension of what buildings do
And how it this different from other strategy games? What do you mean by AI having comprehension? What proof do you have to back up the claim AI builds off of a checklist?

Which who country are you from

Why do people care so much? Is it really worth your time to feel personally attacked by a fucking video game? Isn't this what you decry when people try to get video games censored?

Ok then:
>Many Greek historians recorded that she "defeated and killed" the Persian ruler Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Achaemenid Empire, during his invasion and attempted conquest of her country. Herodotus, who lived from approximately 484 to 425 BC, is the earliest of the classical writers to give an account of her career, writing almost one hundred years later. Her history was well known and became legendary. Strabo, Polyaenus, Cassiodorus, and Jordanes also wrote of her, in De origine actibusque Getarum ("The origin and deeds of the Goths/Getae").
>The history of Tomyris has been incorporated into the tradition of Western art; Rubens,[13] Allegrini,[14] Luca Ferrari,[15] Mattia Preti, Gustave Moreau and the sculptor Severo Calzetta da Ravenna[16] are among the many artists who have portrayed events in the life of Tahm-Rayiš and her defeat of Cyrus and his armies. She is one of the subjects grouped under the Power of Women topos by art historians.
She led her people to victory against much more powerful adversary.
Now, tell me why you think she shouldn't be the leader of Scythians, who would be the better choice and why.

>game looks worse
>system requirements double

Feels bad mang

also

>8Gb of RAM

Finland

>Civ 5 AI is retarded
>Why?
>It doesn't understand what it's doing, it has a very simplistic way to decide its production queue
>How do you know
>Dude, because civ 5 AI is retarded!
Weakest bait I've ever seen, but Cred Forums is probably retarded enough to be convinced by it.

*8 GB+

i guess not having memory leaks is just unreasonable

You think that makes her as an impactful a figure as alexander? Victoria? Cleopatra? Catherine? Churchill? Roosevelt? You think a wiki quote shows her to be as well known and relevant?

Show me a post that calls for censorship, double-nigger.

>Killed a great man and was in some art
Gavrilo Princip confirmed?

Who is the qtest civ?

This nigga's lying.

Holy shit, 'sperg harder.

>8Go ram
>7970+ or 770+
>for a fucking turn based strategy game

>Show me a post that calls for censorship, double-nigger.

You obviously didn't read my post properly. It's the old "politics in games are only fine if I agree with them"

>arguing is sperging
You can always return to facebook.

japan

Civilization VI: Play-Doh Edition

>We're not allowed to disagree with the decisions a dev made and discuss what we would prefer
Pack it in boys, Cred Forums is officially over because this SJW is triggered.

So should i buy this day 1 or wait for the expansions

Only Mannerheim could probably be as civ leader, but they wouldnt add him because
>muh fascists.

Even though they had stalin...

You know what bugged me about civ 5?

How fucking annoying barbarians were. They're just constantly spammed at you. They're not a real threat, just a thorn constantly poking in your side. Even if you've got a big army and wipe out three, four barbarian encampments a turn, they just pop right back up again. It's like they only thing good for is forcing the player to make more turns in early to mid game.

I know there's an option to turn them off, but the AI doesn't compensate for it, and that only solves one problem by making another. In previous games, I thought there were sliders that controls barb spawn rates. So you could get occasional barb incursions or nightmare levels where they zerg rush you. Civ V has just on or off, and on is too much.

I hope Civ 6 fixes that. According to the LPers, barbs are even worse, but they haven't made map options available yet.

That's a terrible comparison. Beyond Earth had a million warning flags raised from the word 'go'. Civ VI doesn't look nearly as bad, even when you take all the negative stuff that's been said about it into account.

>didn't read my post properly
here>Isn't this what you decry when people try to get video games censored?

What I decry when people try to get vidya censored is people trying to get vidya censored.

And even in your last post
>politics in games are only fine if I agree with them
Yeah, this is fine, in the sense that I don't think it's morally wrong to put said leaders in and I don't think the game should be censored/banned/people who play it are worse than hitler/etc.

I think it's mighty stupid, at the very least.
But not that it should be censored. Because just because I feel a certain way, it doesn't mean a company should please me. I can call them out on their shit if I want to, but I don't think they should care for it, or worse, that a third party should intervene on my behalf and censor them.

See the difference?

It's not the arguing, it's the getting mad. Comically so. Because someone disagrees with you about video games.

Also, only two types of people use "swine" as an insult unironically: Cred Forumsacks, and people who take ren faire way too seriously. Both are probably autistic.

Wait, there was a skeleton inside stalin? :O

Lot of people are saying day 1 will be playable unlike civ 5, Civ 6 DLC will probably be a joke anyway, I don't see what they could add that isn't confirmed to be in anyway. Unless they wanna go full BE on us.

By all means discuss it, but why get so upset? Why work yourself up into the "fucking SJWs ruining vidya" Just don't buy it and move on with your life.

The AI is going to be horrendous and the UI is going not going to be intuitive.

Beside that it looks fine. It might even come close to being enjoyable.

>You think that makes her as an impactful a figure as alexander? Victoria? Cleopatra? Catherine? Churchill? Roosevelt? You think a wiki quote shows her to be as well known and relevant?
By your logic, more than a half of Civ leaders shouldn't be in game in the first place.

Leaders aren't chosen based on their powerlevel. That's why we have leaders that accomplished relatively nothing, like Moctezuma, Hiawatha, Harald etc., in game. They try to make the series more varied instead of having the same civs and leaders in every single game.
(You)

The worst part is that barbs stop giving you experience very quickly, so there is literally no incentive unless you went honor.

Even worse.

There's a skeleton inside you.

>I can tell you're mad over the internet
>guilt by association
Alternatively, it seems tumblr also works for you, if facebook isn't your thing.

Post that one webm

I'm a fan of the civ series and don't like some decisions they've made with it. It's not black and white. I'm allowed to be caught between buying it and not buying it.

I'm watching someone play Civ 6 and I'm wondering why it feels like I'm watching a Civ 5 stream.

Pro tip, barb camps cannot spawn on tiles you have vision of, or tiles that have a resource on them (unless it's a hidden resource requiring a tech that you don't have like horses, iron, uranium) so position cheap units like scouts or warriors on hills to grant vision, set them to alert and you're golden.

>Turning off barbs
Casual

It might have something to do with a fact that you are watching someone play a Civilization game.

They won't be satisfied until all civs are European save one USA civ and one China civ.

>I don't. Explain it to me.

I just did.

>And how it this different from other strategy games?

I never said it was different.

>What do you mean by AI having comprehension?

The AI doesn't understand any of the mechanics. It doesn't "decide" to build Petra or whatever to "take advantage" of its better production or to prevent other players from getting it. That's silly.

>proof

Just try modding the game. Create a simple mod that makes all the flavors of the Great Library be 0. The AI will never ever build it because it won't be able to understand its value.

>fucking up punctuation that badly
>calling your interlocutor swine
>not even mad

lel

I'm guessing it would be shittons of new civs, resources, wonders, etc. Maybe some old fashioned and well done scenarios like in old civ games.

It seems like they've got the core mechanics fleshed out, yeah. That's a good thing.

>save one USA civ and one China civ.
Unless they add like the confederacy or something I don't see how they'd have more than 1 USA civ

They won't be satisfied until Hitler is the leader of Germany, and he's objectively more powerful than all the other civs in the game.

Yes, user. People can call you an idiot without being mad.

WTF are you talking about? Previous games have had multiple leaders from the same nation.

european civs
one usa civ
one aztec/inka/something of that sort for south america
egypt civ
south affrica civ
china, japan, mongols, persians, arabs
the end

Yea I realized that as I made that post.

>Unless they add like the confederacy or something
lmao can you imagine the butthurt?

Sir, this is the scariest moment of my life.

>I don't see what they could add that isn't confirmed to be in anyway.

Probably diplomatic victory/world congress stuff. They're already hinting at it.

I like the characters.
Features being exaggerated somehow makes them feel more human with their expressions.

They can't call you swine without being 'spergs, though.

Which is ironic because Germany was awful under Hitler. Germany was a stronger nation at the outset of WW1 than it was at the outset of WW2. The only reason Hitler is such a meme is because the French had less experience with modern war and rolled over when they realized that fact.

Because you say so?

>AI sees I have less military units
>declares war
>doesn't take into account the mountains and my archers camping at the choke point
>take 3 cities without losing a single unit
>I'm now literally worse than Hitler and everyone denounces me as a warmongering bastard

>civ thread
>Cred Forums retard comes in and randomly starts accusing everyone of being SJW
>forgets that he is no longer in his safe-space hugbox and gets BTFO
>goes back to his containment board
EVERY fucking civ thread

Just trying to help you out, bruh. There's no way to say that shit in earnest without looking like you're playing a Nazi or some kinda old timey gentleman. Either way, pretty fedoracore.

Just because you CAN take a city doesn't mean you should. Not from a diplomatic perspective that is. If you want to be the good guy then fight them until they are willing to cede you a city or two.

don-quixoteism is bad for you

If you weren't a warmongering bastard you would have been content just decimating the attackers armies.

Instead you went ahead and wreaked havoc in their cities full of innocent civilians.

:^)

I'm still waiting for my review copy. This is suffering

>CIV IV praised to death on Cred Forums for mechanics
>looks like ass.
>CIV V looks decent
>People hate it for shit mechanics.

No pleasing people.

Does Cleopatra speak Greek, Demotic-Coptic, Liturgical-Coptic, or Arabic? What language do all other leaders speak, for the dead ones?

Also why the fuck did they make England bitch sound American, where's the fucking Received Pronounciation?

Yup. In old civ games, when you retired from the game it would rank you on a scale of history's famous leaders. Augustus Caesar on top. Infamous losers like Neville Chamberlain on the bottom. Hitler would be down there at the bottom.

>implying Civ 6 isn't just a poor man's copy of Endless Legend

lmao

wow it's like you can't do both at once

Volunteer at your local church or for habitat for humanity or something while you wait.

Or if you are a lazy fuck give blood.

If you fight your enemies, they win
On an unrelated note, Canada civ ever?

>guilt by association yet again
Breh

How did you swing a review copy?

>women in this game aren't sexy, thus its a feminist game, thus the gameplay is bad

I can't follow neo-Cred Forums logic. Seems so arbitrary to me, almost as if you are full of shit.

I have a YouTube channel and have played a lot of Civ 5 on it

>be a just and caring ruler
>some fuckers attack my borders
>beat them and occupy in retaliation so that they don't pose any more threat
>somehow entire world hates me now
>mfw
fucking bullshit AI

>Scythia
>which wasn't even a confederation of tribes like the Turkic ones that would follow and conquer "their lands" but literal steppe niggers that would band together and raid and pillage whenever they felt like it while not even giving a shit about the lands they lived on in the sense of them just giving it up and migrating wherever they wanted as long as no opposition was faced so the persians/greeks called anyone from that area "Saka/Scythians" no matter ethnicity or affiliation
>then have Tomyris as their leader, whom Herodotos heard from a friend from heard it from a merchant whom heard it from a giant indian gold-digging ant that she killed some big-shot persian and apparenlty that made her famous enough to be included
Why not just add Jesus for the Kingdom of Judea or does it have to be a woman?

There was a super popular civ IV mod that had one.

I hope Civ VI brings back modders. They made some really great shit for Civ IV.

Link?

>Jesus for the Kingdom of Judea
Jesus was not a ruler, you retard although having civ with him as a ruler would be fucking rad

Who are you quoting?
People are complaining for cartoon-y, less impressive aesthetics than the previous installments, who's saying that it's bad because the chicks aren't hot?

>does it have to be a woman
Yes

There's a lot less evidence that Jesus was a real person.

Gonna be shit at release as usual but will be good after some expansions

>Scythia shouldn't be a civilization, because, based on my personal criteria which are different to traditional Civilization series criteria, they don't qualify as such
>Tomyris shouldn't be a leader, because Greek historians are obviously full of shit and just made all that stuff up

What would Jesus' unique ability be?

Wheat and fish tiles would yield infinite food.

Will have that god mode where you can give yourself stealth fighters in the Iron Age like it did in IV? That was so fun to fuck around with in middle school

I was going to make a joke like but since religion seems to be more of a big deal in 6 probably something focused on that.

Probably something to do with wheat and fish though, too.

Land units can cross water tiles without embarking

Glad you missed the point.
Exactly, there is more evidence that he existed than Tomyris.
Other than Strabo and Polyaenus parroting Herodotos story about her 500 years after he died we got much more evidence on Jesus or even fucking Moses.

>Going to war is going to harm your science instead of helping it.

Everything wrong with the school system.

>Exactly, there is more evidence that he existed than Tomyris.
Yeah, I wonder why there is not much evidence of the leader of an ancient nomadic tribe that didn't practice writing.

Hardly sounds like a "civilization" to me

Well, good that your personal feelings don't matter to anyone, because most of the players like to see new civilization instead of the same set of staple civs in every single entry.

You have the unpopular opinion here, not me. Nobody has heard of Tomyris and a lot of people are butthurt that their favorite civ didn't make it in over literally whos added purely for diversity.

Except Scythia was the name of the entire area inhabited by Indo-Iranian "civilizations".

Tomyris was the leader of the Massagetae's, while there were Sarmatians, Alans and Däae whom also were considered Scythians.
Hell, the Parthian empire have Scythian origin cause of the migration they did from Parni lands.

So why not just fucking call her "civilization" Massagetae then cause it would be like to name Gilgamesh king of Mesopotamia and disregard all the city-states?

After I actually get it I'll talk about it in a Civ 6 thread, don't really want to throw out my channel right now

Why not just have a parthian civ? That would be much better than some tribe NOBODY has ever heard of.

Agreed since Sura of Parthia was actually considered a military genius and lead the Parthian army.

>So why not just fucking call her "civilization" Massagetae then
Now you are just arguing semantics.

>You have the unpopular opinion here, not me.
I don't think so. Check out Civilization threads on /vg/, nobody is complaining about Scythia there. People who play Civ series like variety.
>a lot of people are butthurt that their favorite civ didn't make it in over literally whos added purely for diversity.
Everyone would want their country to be a civ, and developers have limited resources. Devs said that they wanted to have a horse/horde civ, and Mongols and Huns have been already in previous title so they wanted some more variety. It's a good reason to include it.

Is Parthia more recognisable than Scythia? Most likely. Does it mean that Scythia shouldn't be in the game? I don't think so, neither do developers.

they should've stop after bnv.
but MONNAY

stop shilling this shit

>So why not just fucking call her "civilization" Massagetae then cause it would be like to name Gilgamesh king of Mesopotamia and disregard all the city-states?
That would be almost as bad as making Gilgamesh the leader of Sumer. Oh wait, he actually is the leader of Sumer in Civ6, despite not being one in real life.

Stop using buzzwords.

How is it semantics to call them by their rightful name that were given to them by the greeks?
They didn't rule or influence all of the "Scythian lands" but a small portion of Central asia while other tribes had ruling Kings.

It's modern scholars that clumped them all together as Saka/Scythians.

Literally millions of people disagree.
Sorry, but your "i no like thing" post is so wrong I just had to reply.

If Carthage becomes a civ they should get a housing bonus, like a large bonus for the city tile or just plus one or two for every district to represent the vertical nature of the city of Carthage.

Carthage took pride in building very tall buildings for the time and keeping everything within its city walls.

Boooo!!

Were not baddies!

It still has the board game mode right?

>You will never see ancient Carthage
>You will never get to walk around the ancient military wharf
>You will never live in an alternate reality where Carthage won over Rome and became THE super power.

Except Greece was the name of the entire area inhabited by Indo-European "city states"

Pericles was the leader of the Athenians, while there were Spartans, Corinthians, and Thesalonnians whom also were considered Greek.

So why not just fucking call his "civilization" Athens then cause it would be like to name Gilgamesh king of Mesopotamia and disregard all the city-states?

DELENDA EST

For the same reason you have Sumer instead of Ur, or you had Byzantium as a separate civ instead of just one Roman Empire, or you had Hannibal as a leader of Carthage, or you had Ragnar and his Viking civilization etc. The reason is: Civilization series don't, and never did, care too much about historical accuracy. It's a 4x game with some historical flavor.

I hope mods will improve the UI

>Carthage wins and dominates he Mediterranean
>Western civilization becomes defined by trade rather than conquest
>Jews never conquered so Christianity and Islam never become a thing
>Northern Europe stays barbaric longer
>Greek sensibilities and value of science persist and technology develops more quickly
>Eurocentrism never happens, replaced by Mediteranean centrism.
Sounds like it could have been better than what actually happened.

Good thing Pericles turned the Delian league, which was an alliance between almost 300 city-states into an Athenian empire spreading across the Aegan sea and Ionia.

I am sure Gilgamesh created a Mesopotamian alliance while Tomyris had her super-mega Scythian confederation of Eastern-Iranian people that lived close together but as part of their culture had different kings but still obeyed her, cause female leader.

It actually looks about as good as Civ5, content-wise, which gives the game huge potential if you take into account future expansions.

>Civilization series don't, and never did, care too much about historical accuracy. It's a 4x game with some historical flavor.
oh cool, so there is hope a Atlantis faction

Also, Athenians, Spartans and the rest actually considered themselves Hellas while the Saka was the collected term Persians gave the Eastern-Iranian speakers without regarding their cultural differences or actual languages.

More leaders, probably

I want some contemporary leaders like Bill Clinton or Gordon Brown playable

Well, I'm glad you finally understand
Wouldn't put my hopes on Atlantis though

>Byzantium

>Atlantis
No that's dumb. They just have some fictional leaders for real civilizations, not fictional civilizations.

>fictional civilizations.
might be cool

That's what mods are for.

Are there golden ages in this game? My favorite Civ in V was based around them and I'll be a little bumflustered if VI doesn't end up having a similar Civ

What kind of abilities will Sumeria have?

Gorgo is worse than Tomyris.

Leader: Gilgamesh
Leader Ability: Adventures with Enkidu. This ability has 3 parts:
He can declare war on anyone at war with one of his allies without any warmonger penalties.
When at war with a common foe, Sumeria and its allies share pillage rewards and share combat experience gains with the closest allied unit within 5 tiles.
Gilgamesh can levy City-State military forces at 50% of cost.

Unique Ability: Epic Quest. Whenever you capture a Barbarian outpost, you also get a tribal village reward.
Unique Unit: War Cart. It's very strong, suffers no penalty versus Spearmen or other anti-cavalry units, and gets extra movement points if it starts its turn in open terrain.
Unique Improvement: The Ziggurat. It provides Science and Culture when adjacent to a river (Note: it provides the Science all the time, but the Culture only when adjacent to a river). Can't be built on hills.

Gilgamesh = Bro-Op mode

can someone wplease explain to me why Cleopatra is white?????

are you ready for Greek's second leader?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgo,_Queen_of_Sparta

>White
how's brazil going

ummm
egypt is in africa

africa is not white.

Yes

I'm ok with this as long as she's a qt

and neither is that image

????

it was an observation

>Gorgo
>when Cratesipolis or Bouboulina the fucking Naval hero of the Greek war of independence exists
I know they want to include more women cause "current year", but why pick the ones that didn't actually do jack shit?

>Tomyris is mentioned by several ancient writers, among whom the first is Herodotus
>Gorgo is noted as one of the few female historical figures actually named by Herodotus, and was known for her political judgement and wisdom.

>you will never be a Greek historian, making up stories about your imagined waifus, and have your fanfiction to be considered "history" 2500 years later

>Cleopatra?

you stupid faggot

What the fuck did Cleopatra do besides convincing people not to obliterate her by banging them, and killing herself to avoid getting fucked by Octavian? I'd say killing Cyrus the Great is at least equal to that.

They should have picked Hatshepsut if they wanted a real female pharaoh

because she was in 300

Its like they took the art style from V and dumbed it down 1000 times

Same reason Boudica and Joanna D'arc were leaders in the past, people know them

I'm glad the heads of the Olmec are showing up in Civ 6.

just like in real life...whoa...

She also single handedly brought about the demise of Rome

that fucking cunt

> You will never write a fanfiction that this considered the world's first piece of literature
> Your self-insert who could totally beat up the bullies in school will never be considered an actual person thousands of years after you're dead.

guys i ran it through valgrind its fine

cleopatra destroyed two of histories greatest civilizations

good leader desu

No Sweden, no buy.

>wanting to play as a nation of sjw cuck libtards

Kongo is already ingame

>because they have agendas that no player would have

"Yo, don't fuck my religion"
"THESE CITY STATES ARE MINE!"
"If you're gonna be my neighbor, be peaceful"
"WTF? Those were my wonders! REEE"

Sweden only has few more decades before it becomes Swedistan. It really doesn't deserve a spot.

...

kek

Why does an expansive civ like Rome prefer other players to take up valuable space?

Because fuck tallfags

Because clearly you're not uncivilized barbarians if you have an actual empire.

Are Canadians glad that their nation is finally showing up in Civ 6?

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

>I'm just mad they replaced him with Scythia, a no-name no one cares about
>Scythia isn't famous for anything, they're literally whos
I feel bad that you got to the egg cell first

>What the fuck did Cleopatra do besides convincing people not to obliterate her by banging them

Honestly, that's a fucking stellar foreign policy, and cost effective.

You forgot numale.

Great People being unique is awesome

she's Greek not Egyptian you uneducated pleb

I'm sure you could fit more buzzwords in there if you put your back into it.

>Great people can run out
How many GP are in each category?

That's Great Prophets that ran out

He knows that. He was baiting.

Post pics/webm of the leaders please

They look awesome in motion

muh dik

...

...

...

Teddy is such a great lad

Am I gonna make it?

Needs boob physics.

dude looks like a tweaker

Have you ever, EVER seen the AI build the Neuschwanstein Castle?

In CBP, yes.
In vanilla, not really, no.

You're in your capital and this guy declares war on your gf's ass

What do

nice redditfrog
le upvote!

I'd be very jealous of her

they're pretty jiggly for such a stiff top

I already hate this asshole.

I can play it yet
here's what's wrong

easily hold him off with three composite bowmen

...

Stiff? It's literally just a hanging piece of fabric.Her boobs have no support.

So when Teddy says "gg" he genuinely means it and isn't being a cunt?

Didn't you tell me newfags can't triforce?

look closer

kys

What else would you expect from the paragons of virtue that are Americans?

Nigga, I've seen that video dozens of times and every single time I'm staring at her boobs. They shift but they don't jiggle and they don't react to her arms nudging them.

T H I C K E Y E B R O W S

H

I

C

K

E

Y

E

B

R

O

W

S

If anyone we have had lead us would do it it would be him.

How come I'm never able to do much if anything at all till Artillery?

it's because you're bad and won't trade units for cities

>Buying every civilization since civilization V
>Never played previous games
>Best game ever
>Best DLCs
>Best expansions
>Best same games
>Blind

igoshgobvuzbwe

...

Fuck I forgot to resize.

I kind of want to get it but at the same time I want to hold out until a sale happens

how long did it take for Civ V to go onto a steam christmas?

Wasn't this game TB's approved? Guess it's gonna be good for sure.

just pirate it

smd desu senpai I liked civ games in the past

If only promotions weren't a thing.

where tho

you're hugely overvaluing them

same but then they made V

lmddgtfy.net/

I will never play as Spain because of Phillip "Top Kek" II's face.

Quantity is its own quality.

child please

But if you're the brain, aren't you inside the skeleton?

She's not terribly attractive...but at 3am she is.

should have built up your army so they wouldn't bully you

>picking absolute shit

Uhhhhh why?

youtube.com/watch?v=DiclqIOlhVo

>Colin/Kanbei

eyraaaaRRAAAAAAAAAAAAGGHRGKADLG

Why is this guy in a dress? Brits explain yourself.

What country is this guy representing?

Scythia, ie the new Mongols.

You do realize even though Colin is Broken Tier, Kanbei is literally right at its doorstep, right?

Especially if in Dual Strike, where he gets fat defense and counterattack bonuses in his COP/SCOP.

So really, just tag them together

Everyone is a caricature and then Tojo looks normal

The fuck?

>Why is this guy in a dress? Brits explain yourself.

that's just what english women look like

Needs one where he's denouncing you and waving his sword around.

Japaneses are perfect, there's nothing to make a caricature out of.

Can you play mods with friends? If not game is total shit.

I hope the people who make AI mods for civ v are going to work on vi quickly. Maybe even port their work from the previous game?

I don't understand why firaxis hasn't hired those dudes.

Lay down the greatest mixtape since the age of Aristoteles

perikles lived a hundred years before aristoteles

Civ VI has coalitions winning together.

The idea is you build barrack buildings and whatever else adds xp on units
Then you overwhelm your opponent with a constant stream of solid units against their few top tier upgraded ones

Fuck if you have Alhambra you can spawn units with March iirc.

>hiring people who already work for free

Close enough

shamefur dispray

I dropped out of history for a reason

the correct response would have been to boast that your beats are that fresh

i just hope they make it easier to create your own/mod civilisations

>Tojo looks normal
He is based on an actor instead of actual Hojo

...

>not wanting more civ rule 34
pleb

Depends on the leader.
I might have a fit if its Pearson or Trudeau.

I feel strange when I see other people talking about Civ type games.

I never declare war on anyone, and focus entirely on making my nation great. Land grab early, then build up, a minimal military, waste of resources unless they're actively being used.

Get a strong enough economy to barf out military units I might need in case someone decides I'm a soft target.

But almost everyone else is content with taking what others have instead of working for themselves.

yours is the most common playstyle, the bitchass scrub

>Greek historians are obviously full of shit and just made all that stuff up

this statement is truer than you know

Unless you're playing against nine Venice or on Settler you'll almost always end up needing to conquer shit eventually.

I usually play on Emperor in Civ V, once I hit that stride after unlocking Rationalism I outpace all the other civs like crazy in tech.

I can play and win in Immortal, but it's just too frustrating how much advantage the AI has over you.

just gonna quote this for emphasis because lol ancient chroniclers

Are you telling me black Egyptians didn't have black semen?

one of the lost works of roman historian suetonius is titled Lives of Famous Whores

one day we'll find a copy stuffed away in a library somewhere, god willing. probably the vatican's.

>implying british royalty unnatractive aren't inbred monsters in real life

How does this make you feel?

>then have Tomyris as their leader, whom Herodotos heard from a friend from heard it from a merchant whom heard it from a giant indian gold-digging ant that she killed some big-shot persian and apparenlty that made her famous enough to be included
You see, Herodotus was a Hollywood scriptwriter.

there are no british royalty. the british crown is held by germans

The artstyle could be better but I don't mind it. I like the cartoony effect but it still feels lazy to me.

Game overall seems to have taken a page out of Endless Legend with the district zoning.

Looks good so far. I'll probably wait until the first expansion comes out before I even try vanilla.

mentally ill

>durr cartoon leaders
have you faggots not played civ 4?

Woah so this is the power of PC

that looks much better than civ6

Browser games are so fucking shit.