Why is Grand Theft Auto 3 so fucking horrible?
>gmod has better driving physics
>no fucking map
>too
>many
>polygons
>shooting mechanics are horrible, if you're exposed for more than 5 seconds, you WILL die
>gta games are known to be excellent story wise, but this game has a boring Mafia "crime does pay" story
How could Vice City be so much better? What the fuck this game is disgusting
>gmod has better driving physics
You haven't played gmod, right?
>underage who has never played GTA 1 & 2
>man, I'm so bored, what should I do?
>ooh, I know!
>I'll shitpost about a 15 year old game that nobody gives a fuck about!
drive around in gta 3 for 10 minutes and count how many times you flip your car over
Don't you, like, have a No Man's Sky thread to make or something?
>>gmod has better driving physics
Nice bait but 90 percent of Cred Forums only plays gmod and tf2.
>Why is Grand Theft Auto 3 so fucking horrible?
gee, I don't know... maybe 'cause it's a 2001 game?
gee that was a good excuse
it was shit back then
still shit now
>too
>many
>polygons
what?
yeah no shit
worst part is that there's no jazz station
daww, old games are too tough for you?
git gud.
i dont even think you can name a single gta mission outside of the portland arch
but youll just google it anyway so that was a stupid question to begin with
Please OP, tell us about all the other, superior, 3D open world, narrative driven games with the same level of scope that came out in 2001.
We'll wait.
Stop flipping your car you moron.
exactly so why did your retard ass come up with it?
>Why is an old groundbreaking 3D game not as good as its sequel made a couple of years later by the same developers who had a better grasp of what they wanted put into the game.
You might as well be asking why old 1950s cars are not as good as newer cars.
Define good.
...
>too many polygons
Are you retarded or something.
The complaint you're probably looking for is "not enough polygons"
Will this make GTA 3 look any less shit?
>San Andreas and even Vice City, though its still noticably more dated than SA is still a fucking top notch GTA game that manages to stand on its own even today
>GTA III feels like ass
>Guys a 15 year old game looks like shit.
Not many games back then looked better, and the ones that did didn't have the same scope.
And this is coming from someone who, at the time, hated GTA 3 because I was jelly it wasn't on my Gamecube.
Either this thread is bait or OP is retarded. Actually either way he's retarded, because even his bait points are ridiculously stupid and far-fetched. Too many polygons? That is the exact opposite of what is going on.
When I said "look less shit" I meant "would naming a better game (or not in my case) make gta 3 any less of a terrible fucking game?"
>when user can't into-reading comprehension
>games that were shit can magically become unshitty in the future