He doesnt own a 144hz monitor with free/gsync

>buying Dell

Waiting to upgrade my GPU.
Which, thanks to cryptofuckers, is not gonna happen for a long fucking while. Hope crypto crashes soon.

Why are you whining? New gtx series is just around the corner, and you're in a great position to save up.

>buying anyone but dell for monitors

asus is shit
acer is shit at everything
samsung has no gsync
and all other Korean brands are invalid
who else is there?

if you had gotten into crypto, you could afford a new gpu by now

>$479
>can just get a 1080p 120hz 60" TV for less than that

Yall PCbros insane.

True, but I have a bad feeling the new series will also be quickly absorbed by miners and scalpers.

>what does any of that have to do with sync
It's as if free-G-sync weren't shit for 120-144hz displays and weren't proprietary. Also, works on all video-cards/chips.

nvidia is making cards specifically made for crypto that they hope will stop the GPU market from being so insane

Better be quick then, bud

times like these are the times where I wish hardware pre-orders were a thing

>buying gpus at more than double msrp
>ever
yeah no thanks tard

You gotta remember the now mandatory +25% price increase Nvidia makes with each generation.

>1080p
>60 inches

do you want eye strain?

except you don't need 1440p
just get a Samsung CFG70

>what is angle of vision

ya? and where are the monitors with this technology? are you being a wait fag?

Very rarely is a TV the actual Hz it advertises. Does a bunch of bullshit to make it technically a higher rate while not actually inputting and outputting anything over 60 Hz. I've witnessed a TV trying to pretend 24 Hz was 240 Hz, was complete eye rape.
I only have a 60 Hz monitor for the record, just speaking from experience from my "240 Hz" TV that just plays content at 60 Hz in reality.

what the hell does that have to do with pixels the size of cats?

Have $800 to spend on a monitor. What should I get?

your distance to the screen, you moron

distance to the screen is not angle

Don't want 144hz, since otherwise I'm going to need even more GPU power.

72hz@1440p + freesync is fine for me.

I still use a 9800gt user, what makes you think I can afford that?

>Very rarely is a TV the actual Hz it advertises.
They do, 100% of the time
>bbut I can't input 240hz
No one said you could. the panel is doing 240hz though.

>$479 for 144hz

Just get a 240 for $500.

>$480 on a tn panel
also ultrawide > 144hz

yeah, it is

Anyone using Nvidia with non-gsync monitor? Is there sutter and tear? From all I've seen freesync/gsync are pointless in 99% of games and any old 144hz monitor will do regardless of tech e.g. Nvidia with freesync monitor

>21:9
>pillarboxes everywhere
yeah no thanks

Only so much though.
nVidia's changes will stop Miners from eating the Ampere cards (since they'll use too much power to be worthwhile for mining) but ultimately the big bottleneck is still DRAM - not GPU dies.

>tfw finally bought myself a (cheap) 144hz monitor a few days ago
It's 10/10 when it can do it's work and the game isn't slow as shit. Only issue I'm having is that it doesn't fully wants to work in window mode and gives me more issues than anything for some reason.

>tfw no oled, 1080p, 144hz, dolby vision HDR panel

>dolby vision HDR
>Not wanting simple HDR10 for the highest usage since no one will use Dolby for PC Gaming
>Not wanting a 1440p 144hz HDR10 Monitor with GSync on top of it

which forum can i go to ask which monitor i should get?

>get 1440 144 machine
>only play AoE2
>use ps4 for rest
Fuck me right

>getting a monitor after what was shown at CES
>Not getting the Asus ROG PG27UQ
Jesus christ user. At least tell me it has HDR.

This seems like a good place to ask. If I was looking for a budget gaming monitor in the low $300s range, any recommendations?

>HDR10

>getting anything with uneeded LEDs on it

Samsung CFG70

You act like it can't be turned off.

That's why you have to avoid anything like TruMotion, RealMotion, etc. A bunch of marketing crap to tell people their 60hz TV is doing 120hz.

You can test it online once you plug in the TV to a PC.

Is HDR 10 even good? The new monitor I want doesn't even have it.

Gysnc sucks. I bought the asus mg278q . 144hz 1440p with free sync COSTING 200 euro less than the gsync one

>Bait

no, its shit

>1080p
ok
>120hz TV
Post/link please.

>Gysnc sucks
Stopped reading there

>COSTING 200 euro less than the gsync one
Yes, and literally not usable if you're an Nvidia fag cuz they refuse to support it since they got their own shit.

Oh interesting, I thought I'd need to get a TN panel for sure at that price range. I'll keep this one on my radar. Thanks

>F
jokes aside user, you will still benefit, even if you can't run games at max fps. it's a noticeable difference, even at 60fps in every game. would have been better if it was straight up 1080p though.

Anyone ?

that image is comparing sdr with dolby vision

Same senpai, I put a couple bucks aside for a few months to pick up a 1080ti around now-ish and oh look at that crypto fucked up everything and now they're ludicrously expensive.

>Want to buy new Gayzor™ Gaymen chair
>crypto miners have inflated prices
>have to sit on dragon dildos

Thanks Dobson

There isn't a single TV panel that is actually above 120hz, they just claim shit like 240hz and 480hz by putting words like 'TruMotion' in front of it so mongs like you go OH IT'S TRUMOTION 240hz THAT MEANS IT'S 240hz

It's 120 max, and it's usually just 60.

viewsonic.com/us/xg2703-gs.html

Got myself one of these the other day.

I do though and I'm getting another with my tax refund

Viewsonic? Mine seems fairly decent.

the only reason you'd get a TN is if you're a CS pro but you're terrible at video games so there's no point to you having one

>viewsonic

it literally sounds like a budget brand

It's good for the 1080p 144hz I wanted at the time. Probably be getting a 1440p soon though.

What about 1440p/144hz monitor
with a 670

I have only Dell IPS monitors and you're being a fag
Asus and Benq have great monitors

>almost $500 for that piece of shit because of sync meme
>when you could just buy pic related and use toastyx strobelight for crt strobing

blurbusters.com/faq/60vs120vslb/

>TN panel
into the trash it goes

enjoy your back light bleed

There is none on an OLED pannel you fucking poor nigger.

and to get an asus with gsync i have to buy the faggy ROG horseshit i dont even think benq has gsync monitors

enjoy your nocolors

Would 1080p 144hz be ok for a 1060? I know I wouldn't be able to push 144 on some games but are there any benefits in regard to screen tearing?

>oled for a pc monitor

enjoy your taskbar burn in

Technically you don't either yours is in the mail

and i paid for it so i own it what dont you understand about that?

>le burn in meme

iPhone faggot detected

>bought two of the same monitor when it was on sale for 400$

feels good man

Then post a picture of it with timestamp faggot

i will when it comes in tomorrow are you trying to imply it wont?

i own an s8 oleds are nice for screens that blank constantly pc screens do not

why are you running them at 60hz?

>bought 144hz monitor 6 months ago
>decided to upgrade gpu to volta when it was released
>mfw Q1 2018

Nooo I’ll definitely climb out of silver if I get 1ms response time!

>1080p
>No VRR
Fucking garbage, actually using strobelight is also even more garbage.

I've said this again and again. I'll buy a 144hz monitor as soon as it's possible to consistently play TF2 144+fps while in the middle of a 12v12. Till then, there is no reason for me to get one.

>Got mine coming tomorrow
>Got coming tomorrow
>Got tomorrow
>Tomorrow
Point at him and laugh

can my asus 1070 handle doing 1440p 144h ultra?

>implying it wont

Depends what game

>he doesn't turn of goysync and turns on ulmb instead
lmaoing@yourmotionblur

everything ever

lolno

gay. so i should stick with getting a 1080p 120-144?

>there are people who buy monitors with more than 2 ms of response time

yes. i have a 980ti, which is almost as good as a 1070 and it struggles in most recent games at 1440p. i mostly play tf2, though, so i don't really care.

>he didn't buy it when it was $350

...

>CS
>Pro

HAHAHAHAHAHA

>caring about response times below the refresh time (e.g. 16.6ms for 60Hz)

Is it worth going for 165hz over 144hz?

i didnt have my tax refund back then and i NEVER take any loan

I have that monitor but I don't use strobing because it creates a ton of input lag.

I'd prefer 144Hz since it's a multiple of 24Hz, which most TV and films play at, meaning no interpolation is needed

lmaoing@yourinputlag

probably not, try it in a store. for me anything above 100hz is fine. motion blur reduction (strobing backlights/ulmb) is way more important to me

there is no input lag with ulmb.

>tax refund

Jesus christ no wonder you're poor. Educate yourself and stop giving the government free loans every year.

1440p is neat and 144hz is really nice, yeah.
But at what point does it stop mattering?
Imagine in the future when 4k monitors become more commonplace, as well as 240 hz monitors.
Would those really be worth getting over 1440p 144hz monitors?

When does diminishing returns start kicking in and increases start becoming ridiculous to consider?

>When does diminishing returns start kicking in and increases start becoming ridiculous to consider
~600dpi/ppi

Wrong.

but then i wouldn't be able to buy more expensive things

show me your source, i'd like to see how this 'stobing backlights has input lag' meme started.

Why would I want that when the main games I play are locked to 60FPS?

How the fuck would turning the backlight on and off rapidly create any sort of input lag? Are you thinking of v-sync or something else?

4k is about twice the resolution of 1440p.

ULMB actually DECREASES input lag you dumbfuck
forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16

To add, if the headset meme ever properly takes off, they'll go through to ~2400ppi.

For a monitor though, 600dpi is about the highest you'll ever need (typical print managzine DPI, some Magazines are 1200DPI though)
TV's never need exceed 300DPI.

Ah, good to know, thanks

>fell for both the IPS and the ultrawide meme
now if I want to get a 144hz or 4K monitor that's also IPS and ultrawide I'll have to spend $1000

>Still stuck as a 1080p pleb with a 1080ti
>Want to upgrade to a 1440p/144hz monitor with gsync
>$1000
I guess I'll upgrade when 16k monitors are a thing then.

i just bought a 4k monitor for my 670, can't wait to play solitare

user, your stats are wonky. Current/last gen vive and rift ppi is in the 2400s, and to get close to life-like quality you'd need about 30 their resolution. 300ppi for TVs is already overkill considering typical TV viewing distance.

the monitor i posted is literally that

Eh, you could probably play 'last-gen' and light stuff at 30fps without issues.

IPS are shit because of the awful black levels and backlight bleed. VA panels are the best for picture quality. TN are the best for 144hz.

>dell gaming
Why not just their Ultrasharp series for maximum eyegasm?

Vive is ~440ppi...

>tfw monitor burn in.

500 dollar monitor that probably can't be fixed

take it to louis rossman

Well that was dumb of me.

I have a R9 390 and a 720p monitor. I swear I'm not joking.

I will buy a 1440p soon, but ive been playing with this monitor for over a year

I don't really get this meme. The 3ms difference between ips and tn is of no consequence to almost everyone who plays video games. Unless you're making loads of money playing professionally, you don't have a great reason unless you just really hate ips glow.

because i was mainly planning to play games on it

>paying more for a worse gaming experience because muh IPS

4k ips is so much better than 1080 that 60hz is worth the trade off

144hz 1440p is a meme and worse than 4k performance

>better colour reproduction
>worse gaming experience

>144hz 1440p is a meme and worse than 4k performance
how so?
got a 1070ti recently and I'm looking to add a new main screen to my setup, still undecided though

Do you need shit tacked with gaming advertisement to use with gaming?

Would you buy my gaming TV?

its a lot harder to hit 100+ fps on 1440 than 60fps on 4k

>worse input lag
>glow
lower refresh rate

none of them had 144hz or gsync

>how so?
You're pushing more pixels.
2560*1440*144hz = 530841600 pixels per second
3840*2160*60hz = 497664000 pixels per second

It’s better than having a constant piss filter on your screen

>i cant use basic settings

Except the fact that 60hz looks like shit compared to 144hz.

I tested my 1440p 144hz monitor on overwatch

>refresh rate makes a game look like shit even though it has no bearing on graphic fidelity

Holy shit I'm amazed at how retarded you kids are. Somehow you've completely misconstrued what BB is saying and got it completely backwards. One of you even linked him literally demonstrating the added input lag, but used it as evidence that it improves input lag.

Persistence is NOT input lag and BB's argument is that improved motion clarity from strobing can be beneficial for improving reaction time but the added input lag is not good for aiming/tracking which is why high level players do not use it.

>frames per second has nothing to do with graphic fidelity

No amount of settings are going to make a TN panel color accurate

...

>more frames make graphic betr youtub coments teld me

and color accuracy is only important if you are doing photo work or video editing or some other work i am doing non of that i am only playing games

Stop spending so much time in screenshot threads. They're rotting your brain.

>smoother motion doesnt make graphics look better

feels good man, I even got my 1080ti before the crypto craze jacked up all the prices

retard

dont be so hard on yourself

>ULMB actually DECREASES input lag you dumbfuck
>Links to Chief saying the exact opposite
How red are your cheeks right now?

naisu, i need to upgrade my other 2 monitors still.

I hate how dark it makes my screen, would probably use it otherwise though

>seeing more of the same image makes the image look better

>gpu prices are too high
>only the 70 series and 50 are high the original 80s and ti's are perfectly normal price

yeah maybe dont be poor or just get a 1080

>27"

lol what a joke. I'll always use a huge 4k60z display with my PC

>i play games to stare at still images

ok do this for me go play og quake and then play dark places engine and tell me the og animations look better than the ones with much more frames

wat do for $200-300? Nothing larger than 27".

Why are things like
amazon.com/VS248H-P-1920x1080-DVI-D-Back-lit-Monitor/dp/B005S0XYKK/?tag=logicaincrem-20&th=1

Cheaper as IPS/Full HD compared to just Full HD?

>get a new monitor
>all the colors look like shit
AAAAAAAAAAAA

1440p seems like the filler monitor to go for when 4k will soon be the go to monitor especially when the new gpus come out.

Are TN panels just not even worth it? I don't play FPS often.