I spent alot of time thinking about how to program in a more lazy way and here it is: forth.com/starting-forth/ repl.it/languages/forth >This shit is easy as fuck to learn >This shit is fast as fuck >This shit can run on any computer, even old computers from the 1980's. You can get it down to less than a kilobyte. This is some zen monk shit I pulled from the mountains, ok. Don't ask me how I found out about it. Just learn this shit and you will master a computer very quickly. Google is your friend kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/?nick=newuser|?#forth That link right up there ^ is the chatroom. These are some old dudes with beards. Just ask them shit.
I cam for a hot rei and there was none what a letdown
Nathan Gomez
Very interested, thanks for the irc link.
David Rivera
TOILET THREAD JUST LIKE YOUR WAIFU REI A SHIT AND LITERALLY A TOILET asuka a best GIRL
Aiden Barnes
you needa do you dingus
Jackson Barnes
SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH YOU GODDAMN COMMUNIST YOU ARE THE REASON WHY WE DONT HAVE THE LINUX DESKTOP YOU ABSOLUTE TRASH REI IS CLEARLY THE BEST WAIFU
Kevin Perez
I love forth
What is forth
Zachary Hall
BOTH REI AND ASUKA ARE WAIFUS YOU COCKSUCKERS RESPECT THEM
Owen Cooper
LISPfag back again, never had my questions answered in the last thread
why forth vs lisp or assembly?
what are some cool examples of programs, papers, or libraries where forth is explicitly necessary, beneficial, or changes the way you think about programming?
Jayden Brooks
It's been scientifically PROVEN BEYOND SHADOW OF A DOUBT THAT SNAEK IS BEST GIRL
Dylan Gonzalez
p..please senpai I don't wanna be chocked to death while sexing
Justin Lee
Son, there are things a man must endure, when he has the GREATEST WAIFU to ever hit the manga.
being choked while sexting is the least of these. some men would die to have their waifu choke them while sexting. some men, if you can call such sad, empty husks, have no waifu at all.
suck it up buttercup.
Jason Jackson
I...I will endure the choking, senpai!
Ryan Lewis
you, and your trips have brought great honor to our clan kohai.
Elijah Miller
what is forth
I dont get it
Mason Butler
arigato senpai ;___;
Colton Morris
It looks like modern Fortran
Adrian Harris
Not OP, but Forth is a very low level language, even though its an interpreted language, it does not run on a VM, it is very easy to implement a Forth interpreter in a few hundred lines of code that will run directly on hardware and will manipulate hardware directly. This is why it is still used in electronics testing. It is very lispy, almost all the syntax is functions, so it is sort of a functional language except you have to manage return function arguments and return values on a stack. This is the main reason that Forth is not commonly used anymore is because this juggling of stack values gets tedious. Forth would have been the perfect shell language for personal computers in the 70s and 80s, you can thank Bill Gates for polluting the personal computer world with his shitty BASIC interpreters.
Juan Sullivan
This is a really good tutorial on how to build a Forth compiler in x86 assembly. The tutorial itself can be compiled into a Forth Compiler as the tutorial text is written as comments in the source code eecs.wsu.edu/~hauser/teaching/Arch-F07/handouts/jonesforth.s.txt
Owen Roberts
forth is bad
Chase Powell
>push >pop >push >pop
Is stack big enough to handle all these operations?
Michael Barnes
you can do it if you try hard and understand polish notation
Dylan Robinson
I understand Polish notation, but I don't know how it relates to the stack. I remember stack being like... 64 bytes? It too little!
Asher Gomez
it depends on what your forth is bootstrapped on top of. If it is on raw assembler then sure it might have some constraints, but there are also c forths. Or what you can do is write a very simple forth that uses those basic low level stacks and build another forth right on top of that that abstracts it from you or even makes it purely functional. From something written in such a low level way a small amount of bootstrapping means nothing.
Christian Ward
>Or what you can do is write a very simple forth that uses those basic low level stacks and build another forth Just like a meme, really. >or even makes it purely functional Does it relate to functional programming?
David Bailey
I've heard people talk about really tall bases to purely functional virtual machines. THere is one famous one called SECD and another one called krivine. I think lisp uses one too.
