Post some good reasons why you haven't installed/don't use/run Manjaro

Post some good reasons why you haven't installed/don't use/run Manjaro

Other urls found in this thread:

distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=manjaro
sourceforge.net/projects/manjaro-openrc/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Why would I use 'Arch for babies' when I can just use Arch?

I used to use manjaro before I started using Arch

This.
What's the point?

I do use Manjaro, familia.

It's not antergos

>"familia" people use Manjaro

Installing Arch is kind of fun.

>Can't be bothered to renew their SSL certs, what else can't they be bothered to do?

>Fails to push security updates for the sake of "stability".

>I like Debian, and if I want to run something Arch based, it's usually just Arch. I'm not a fan of the 3rd party Arch installers either because the official install isn't as difficult as some people want to make it out to be.

Congratulations, you read the beginners guide. Here's your (You)

Bad screen tearing when I used it

Running smooth as aways, Antergos is kinda nice.

I prefer OpenBSD

ther installer always fucks up and hang for me

botnet

Arch-Anywhere is better

It's made by frenchies.

i am happy with my debian system thank you very much

Not a greasy Italian.


ON CUP OF LINUX

Och no problem mate

Where is muh GPG keyring?

>SSL certificates

Weird, never had problems

i forbid systemD to be on any of my computers

manjaro has systemD
distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=manjaro

Enjoy your FBI backdoors my man

Enjoy your FUD

>i forbid systemD to be on any of my computers
Sorry, I ran out of fucks to give. Do you accept credits?

sourceforge.net/projects/manjaro-openrc/

hth

>fork of a fork
Sounds great user!

Is this bait

A low quality one.

Because i can install arch.

You asked him for his reason and he gave you it, dumb faggot.

I am poting this from fuckmothring cinnamon manjaro

filtered

I'm about to dual boot it with windows 10

Why use the foolproof version of a shitty distro of a shitty Open Source attempt at a 70's operating system?

I don't want to install it.

No need for more of a reason than that.

>muh sysvinit
>muh minimalism

Don't use any computer, then.

I use Haiku : ^)

this

>ive never heard of it

This. Only retards say, that the installation is hard

What's the point?

how's Haiku these days? Long time since I've messed around with it.

Froze all the time on my netbook.

same for me that's why I used

So many manjaro shills lately.

ease of installation

I've been using it as erryday os for some time now, and everything was good, until it started to shit itself randomly when playing random video / stream. Fuck this shit, the computer freezes and i have to hard reset....
Going to install Arch tommorow

Because Arch-based distros are inherently unstable.

For this reason I use Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS.

Much better. I am considering (don't laugh) Linux Mint.

I don't understand why anyone goes for Manjaro over Antergos

because I'm running MATE 16.10 right now

Ubuntu won't fix your x-org bugs and neither will debian

If you can't install arch you should probably stick to ubuntu or windows.

There's no point in installing Arch the real way for the second time

I don't trust distros maintained by people who do it for free.

I don't trust distros maintained by people who do it for 5 rupees as well.

Name is shitty
Icon is shitty

What's easier about it?

Why not? If you're already so experienced, you know that it's nothing much more than typing pacstrap and chroot.
You've already read the few lines needed to know how to press the ridiculously difficult combination of letters that is "pacstrap /mnt base", yet you'd rather take the long route of downloading, then clicking a bunch of times?

Again, there's no point in Manjaro. It tries to do Ubuntu's job, but then apparently for people who have too much difficulty installing Arch a second time?

>Manjaro
>Manwhoro

>soundforge

That's mpv fucking xfce.

More or less stable. The guys need help, tough

Fuck pacman.

AUR is even more shitty.
One line and you end up

>Post some good reasons why you haven't installed/don't use/run Manjaro
Pip not installed

I literally can´t install Manjaro on my laptop.

Nobody has yet given a good reason as to why systemd sucks.

Nobody has had an actual problem with systemd.

They can still prefer OpenRC.

>implying that's all there is to getting a usable installation
Man I use arch and I love it but get real there is more to it than that. ESPECIALLY when dealing with specific hardware configs (thanks broadcom)

I ask this every thread - in terms of package updates, how does Manjaro compare to Debian? Is it more like testing? And then would that make Debian sid akin to Manjaro testing?

Like what was that? Simple AUR package bw-wireless, or bw-wireless-dkms?
How can your second time installing Arch be slower than downloading and installing Manjaro, then dealing with green on black until you configure that?

not easier but quicker than arch, get most packages i want ready plus proprietary drivers

manjaro doesnt use proprietary drivers by default also more DE options and i personally prefer manjaro packages

>DE
>Drivers
>basic utilities like sudo, network manager, the likes

Unless Manjaro doesn't come with this shit either at which point just fuck me in the ass. But the broadcom-wl will definitely be a problem for me in the future because I don't have a wired connection for my desktop.

It's not like it's any faster or slower than arch install I imagine. And you get a little more stability at the cost of delayed packages. I don't see what's the problem. I notice the arch community is really against anything that isn't pure arch.

I use an android phone so I don't have any issues with internet for installing.

>Fails to push security updates for the sake of "stability"
To be fair, they fixed this after they were publicly shamed about it.

Would anyone recommend Manjaro over Architect to install Arch or is there a better installer?

I currently have Arch running on my laptop, had no issue following the guide and getting everything set up. Was easier to install than gentoo.
As I said, I have Arch running, however, I have no idea what the fuck I'm doing.
Should I scrap it and install Antergos/Manjaro?

Nah just keep going with arch until you encounter a critical system error.

Ive used arch for about six months and after the initial setup there is legitimately no big difference between Ubuntu and other things. It's still Linux with some different ideas.

I like ElementaryOS. I always liked the look and feel of OS X. I mean, I could probably rice Manjaro to the point where it looks like OS X, but why waste time doing that? ElementaryOS just werks

Saves time, comes with useful software so you don't have to fucking pacman everything you need for hours after installing it.

I use Kali Linux because I'm not some wannabe bad ass who uses a shitty distro.

Because I already use Fedora

Does Elementary's lack of function not bug you?

I've been running it on one of my laptops for a few weeks, and it does work, but it's sort of annoying how limited it is. This is coming from someone who is not elitist at all - I own six computers, two are Windows one is OSX one is Elementary and two are Manjaro.

Sub-distros are 99% of the time garbage. I'd rather just go with the main distro. I don't need some retard deciding that x or y security update is necessary or not.

/thread

>Nobody has yet given a good reason as to why systemd sucks.
Reasons you don't like =/= "bad" reasons

Not him, but I haven't seen a reason, period.

THIS

I installed Manjaro KDE a few weeks ago, and it's pretty comfy. Why is it getting so much hype though?

It's useless.

Because I use Arch because I'm not a child

the whole fucking point of using arch is to do this you plebeian

literally this

Yeah, still not sure why you would want Arch without doing any of that scary Arch stuff. What does it offer over Ubuntu?

Your a man child.