Encryptards will defend this

>encryptards will defend this

scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/when-encryption-baffles-the-police-a-collection-of-cases/

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M
huffingtonpost.com/d-robert-worley/judicial-activism-and-the_b_2412471.html
cnbc.com/2016/02/23/public-still-divided-on-apples-encryption-stance.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_infancy
abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91901&page=1
madewithcode.com/projects/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You're shilling hard over this encryption and terrorism bullshit. Wonder how much they pay you or maybe you're just a volun-
You're shilling hard over this encryption and terrorism bullshit. Wonder how much they pay you or maybe you're just a volunteertard.

>if you don't agree with me, then you must be a shill

t. mad pedo

>the pedophiles are still getting detected and jailed
>somehow encryption is still bad

lol, so you don't want encryption for your online banking? No, the theme of the articles are leading to backdoor encryption. Everyone being vulnerable to bad actors all while not being secure at all.

I don't give a shit

The real problem is not that pedos are acquiring CP, the real problem is that it's being produced

But LE would rather shit all over my rights just so that they can go after the low hanging fruit and convince themselves they're helping

>muh you'll be vulnerable to bad actors meme
lrn2asymmetric backdoors, you fucking moron

>implying you have supply without demand

Nothing but fear mongering and buzzwords. Like how people used to think tabletop games lead to witchcraft unironically.

"Surveillance" and "privacy" are buzzwords. Stay mad.

>implying that going after the demand works at all
decades of failed war on drugs should have thought you clowns something

well, the demand will always be there

>the real problem is that it's being produced

Maybe not give 14 yo old kids smartphones and live video streaming software like periscope so they can produce and broadcast their own cp with a couple clicks on a screen?

>blaming the victim

There's a secret embedded in this picture.

>victim
A child being raped is the victim. 14, 15 and 16yo whores are not victims.

Yeah but you brought those up, moron.

I'm not the guy you first answered to. You said they were victims. They aren't.

Yes they are, even if they're producing it themselves, in which case they're victims of systemic societal sexual objectification of children.

You have obviously never studied the subject and are just talking out of your own ass.

The idea of forcing you to hand over your encryption keys fails when you either never memorised the key, or you've legitimately lost the key.

Innocent people are jailed for legitimately forgetting their keys. If that isn't a problem with the justice system, I don't know what is.

while we're at it can we ban guns already? imagine how much worse off criminals and terrorists would be if they had none.

not this shit meme you shils are now spamming in every thread...
Do you really enjoy being that retarded?

>MUH CURRENT SOCIETY
bitches were fucked at the age of 14 since the dawn of time retard. keep acting like some of them arent fuckable

Not a real thing

>being attracted to 14-year olds

You just admitted you're a pedophile. Now we know what you're trying to hide from law enforcement.

There is no way you can ban encryption. Anyone can claim his encrypted files are just random binary sequences.

Except I don't have anything encrypted. They can come and suck my dick if they want.

>random binary sequences now illegal

define random

You could tell by the headers, and the law does not operate on the principles of common sense or logic, it operates based on what the government and judiciary says. If it looks like an encrypted volume or file (and the people whom the police employ can usually tell), then as far as they are concerned it's an encrypted volume.

Even if they can't tell what it is, the judge can say that it is - and that makes it so as far as the law is concerned.

14 isn't pedo range at all, not that you would know anything outside of the rhetoric fed to you by the media.

Paedophilia refers to sexual attraction to preteens.

>10 cents have been deposited into your account

Fuck off, paid ISIS encryptard shill.

>5 cents have been deposited into your account

We should ban guns too while we're at it. And cars, blunt or sharp opjects, masks. Actually just ban storage media, that CP has gotta be stored on something right?

>We should ban guns too while we're at it
But we actually should, user.

But the ones trying to ban guns are defending our privacy rights [1], and the ones trying to protect our supposed "2nd amendment rights" (which is a lie, the second amendment doesn't give anyone the right to have guns [2]) are trampling all over the 4th amendment. Funny, right?

1- youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M
2- huffingtonpost.com/d-robert-worley/judicial-activism-and-the_b_2412471.html

Paid shills are so pathetic. I seriously hope you consider killing yourself. How can you live with the misery of your life?

I know right, how can someone possibly accept money to defend terrorists and child pornographers by shilling for cryptography?

If you actually did your job, and protected the constitution, you would know that the burder of proof lies with the accuser. You are a shitty minimum wage federal lacky however and you wouldn't understand that.

There will always be techniques and devices that protect criminals, its your fucking job to get around them you cunt.

Please kill yourself. I hope your daughters get raped and killed by pedophiles who fuck their rotten corpses afterwards.

Well, encryption benefits everybody. Banning encryption only benefits those who work in law enforcement, by making their job slightly easier (sort of).

No one suggested banning encryption, shithead!

We just think it should have secure backdoors.

law enforcement has such an imaculate track record that they would be trusted with that kind of skellaton key...
get your head out of your ass

>government is too incompetent to be trusted with asymmetric backdoors
>government is competent enough to be conspiring to surveil and control us

Do you have any arguments or do you think fitting in just works?

freedom > security

>Secure backdoors
Not a thing

this man gets it.

It wouldn't work. Smart people who actually wanted to hurt someone would write their own software and implement the publicly algorithms. Weakening algorithms to weaken encryption for the bad guys (who are just CIA controlled or false flags like ISIS) will hurt everyone.

>no one suggested locks on your doors, all we are suggesting is an open door to your house that only the police are allowed to use.

>if we keep repeating it, everyone will believe it

>expecting logic from minimum wage paid shills who attack the constitution for their jewish overlords

Photo of your credit card (both sides). No need to worry, encryption is for isis and pedos anyway.

Spying on people != creating new 100% secure encryption method out of inherently insecure encryption method

The backdoors won't break the 4th amendment if they can only be used with a warrant, you fucktard.

Sure. Show me the warrant.

>nice strawman

Fortunately, not everybody lives in a shithole (USA, UK etc.).

Most countries in Europe don't have such a stupid law.

>implying the NSA cares about warrants

George Carlin was right again. Government doesn't want well informed educated citizens who can think for themselves without the media hammering in what to think. It goes against their self interest. They want obedient workers just smart enough to work the machines and just dumb enough to passively accept every government and jew lie. If citizens began thinking, they would begin realizing how hard they're being fucked over and we wouldn't want that, now would we?

> secure backdoor

isn't it called a warrant

Why do you assume that warrants have any meaning beyond "do what we say"? Warrants would be a good idea if they weren't so trivial to obtain.

>indecent cartoon images
nsatards will defend this

it sounds stupid, but I listended to loveline for years in the late 90s. At least one caller every night was an abuse storey. The overwhelming majority of abuse to minors is done by people close to them and building a surveillance structure is not going to stop it.

yes the judicial system is 100% functioning its meant to be isnt it?
>crooked hillary
>nsa
>justice department
the law isn't black and white in the us anymore, shill

they aren't trivial to obtain. technological convenience and laziness and a breakdown of judicial oversight are the reasons.

The point of encryption is total impermeability, 'secure backdoors' render the entire idea totally useless. Like a partially watertight boat.

2 gunshots to the back, suicide

Fuck this bullshit.

Being sexually attracted to people under the age of 18 isn't some modern virus. And banning encryption isn't going to make it go away. It's old as humanity.

Drugs are illegal to consume, produce and transport and that's really had a massive impact on their usage. Fuck the moral panic. Fuck the idea that the law has any impact.

If you want to reduce harmful pedophilia then stop demonising those who are attracted to young people. Let there be an open dialogue so these people can address their """""issues""""" and seek help.

While I don't support guns, I don't believe banning guns would actually lower death/crime rates by much. Im comepletely fine with banning guns if it makes people feel safer.

>encryption protects pedophiles
So do seatbelts.

I agree. Pedophiles are mentally ill, they are not evil. However, it will be a while before public sentiment on the subject changes - perhaps even a few decades. So it is easy for the government to use pedophiles as a buzzword for "scary thing" in order to more easily influence the public and degrade their rights, all in the name of stopping "scary thing". It's the oldest trick in the book.

Eventually (hopefully) people will realize that the chances of themselves or their own families being affected by those two specific issues are so minute that they will see the agenda of those in power. Nobody really thinks that "terrorism" and "pedophiles" really pose a threat to their own families without being brainwashed into thinking so.

>If your secure communications platform isn't being used by terrorists and pedophiles, you're probably doing it wrong.
He's right you know.

furthermore, both terrorists AND pedophiles are a direct result of the incompetence of those in power. Terrorism is a failure in forgien policy, and pedophila is a failure in mental health. but no, the people must further pay for the incompetance of their government.

It's exhaustingly illogical. Making something illegal I'd just away to make the majority feel better and fantasise about how the string arm of the law is somehow combating all the complex sides of humanity. Sweep it under the carpet and stick your head in the sand rather than actually addressing the matters on hand. Why do people take drugs? If we decide there is an age limit on sexual activity how are we going to help those who can't control themselves? Locking people up and degrading the rights of the individual is not going to ever change anything.

Holy typos batman. But you're smart, you can all work it out.

>If your fast, efficient postal service isn't being used to deliver illegal drugs then you're doing wrong.
Replace keywords to twist statement on your favour.

Do people send drugs via USPS? Seems retarded.

By removing the keyword you have also destroyed the meaning. Good job.

Keyword: “secure”

Let me put that keyword back into your shitty analogy:

>If your secure postal service isn't being used to deliver illegal drugs, then you're doing it wrong
There you go. If it can't be used to deliver drugs, it isn't secure.

Simple as that.

>Terrorism is a failure in forgien policy

More like cultural indoctrination and theological governments. Pre-Islam Middle East used to house some of the most progressive cultures and ideals, and then came the spread of Islam.

Unless you were referring to a more domestic sense of terrorism.

>and pedophila is a failure in mental health

I'm really not sure about the causation of pedophilia, but given the lack of success with rehabilitation programs, pedophilia could possibly be a hardwired behavior. Psychopathy is hardwired, so why not pedophilia as well?

al-qaida, and isis are both cia creations
100+ life time sentences for posetion of images of cp instead of rehabilitation
thats what i meant.

>Psychopathy is hardwired
Actually I don't know that that's true.
See: some dutch fmri study which proved psychopaths can employ empathy when prompted to.

it is not about the employment but the salience of using it. empathy only means being able to feel what others would feel in a certain situation, not stating your attitude towards somebody feeling pain etc.
since psychopaths are highly effective on a social level (at least on short term), those studies/finds seem very intuitive to me.

to the hardwire thing: to my mind: at least partly it is. however I think that it is possible to have cognitive insight into the wrongness of delinquent acts that violate the spheres of others solely for one's own pleasure.

>it is not about the employment but the salience of using it.
Indeed. Personally I think psychopathy is just the tail end of a normal male trait (reduced tendency for empathy)

>pedos were created by tge cosmic rays in the Y2K and once all of them are imprisoned there will never be more again

Yepo, and royal mail, private courier firms, it works well enough for the dark web drug dealers to use. Not just domestic either.

>decide to decrypt some documents I saved in an encfs folder a few years back
>can't decrypt them because I didn't save the key

God damnit encryption!

See, if we had backdoors you could just call the NSA right now and have your problem solved!

The US government gives weapons to ISIS, paid for by our tax dollars.
Encrypting my tv shows on a USB drive makes me as bad as ISIS according to the US government.

Dude, where the fuck's my free tank?

MS made a "secure backdoor". What came out of it? Thousands of compromised devices with not-so-secure boot.

IBM made a "secure cypher". What came out of it? Thousands of compromised devices with exposed data!.

>We
Who?

>Thousands of compromised devices with exposed data!.
That was literally not a problem with the cipher, it was a problem with people using said cipher well past its expiration date.

Even today, there are web devs who think MD5 is the state of the art in hashing, despite MD5 being known broken for over 20 years. The algorithms aren't the problem, the people using them are.

The majority.

cnbc.com/2016/02/23/public-still-divided-on-apples-encryption-stance.html

>Data released Monday indicated that 51 percent of adults surveyed think Apple should unlock the iPhone to assist the ongoing FBI investigation, compared with 38 percent who agree with Apple's defense of encryption, according to nonpartisan think tank Pew Research Center.

Everyone knew that DES will be eventually cracked, and same applies to virtually any cypher except one-time pads. The vuln wasn't intentional - just the computational power grew big enough to crack it.

Cars are for pedophiles. They help a pedophile go from one place to another in private. Cars can be used to transport children from one location to a child porn shoot.

Cars can be used for various other crimes. Most bank robberies involve a car for getaway.

Carfags will defend this.

This is the only right answer

Hi NSA and GCHQ.
The last 6 months strange activities are going on Cred Forums, I will start monitors the times and types of shill.

I don't think the masses should have access to encrypted communication, it ought to be limited to upstanding citizens. It is too easy to hide criminal activity behind encryption. Our sacred blazing rights were written in an era where such things did not exist on such a massive scale. Encryption as we know it ought to be a privilege instead of a right.

The only problem is enforcability, any nerd can write an encryption algorithm, then again, not everyone has access to the same amount of computer power. Maybe that ought to be controlled as well.

...

>backdoors
>secure
What

Re: backdoors

Cars let drive-bys happen.
>automobiletards will defend this

>missouri law

>You have obviously never studied the subject and are just talking out of your own ass.

Go back to your gender studies class

SAVAGE

>Be stone age me
>First knife created
>Used to cook & kill prey
Tyrone from the other tribe shank'd my cousin
>knifetards will defend this
Get the fuck over it, encryption is a tool not a ideology

>be chieftain
>not feel powerful enough
>scared of rival men with silex knives
>promise tyrone 3 sheep to stab random man
>tyrone stab random man for sheep
>tell matriarchs silex knife dangerous
>tribe women scared of men with silex knives
>men disarmed
>no man can have silex knife but me
>I reign supreme

...

So if two 10 year old kids are playing doctor, they get sent to jail?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_infancy

>USA
>6-12
So if two 13-year old kids are having sex, both get sent to jail? What about a 14-and-one-month year old boy with his 13-and-11-months year old “girlfriend”? Is it immediately rape?

>secure backdoors
Oh yeah, perhaps with some intentional bugs made by neo-nazi jews

>intentional bug
There's a name for that, it's called a "feature".

>John Oliver
>HuffPost
Just go back to shill on reddit, you won't get many (You)'s with such low quality b8

because trusting that works

People will abuse that shit if they can, needs to be LOCKED FUCKING DOWN no FISA bullshit or anything else.

Encryption can help pedos yea that fucking sucks. But you can't actually ban encryption. It can be fairly easily implemented by hand, with pen and paper, and simple mental math.

Magic isn't real, stop wishing for magical solutions when there are none. Technology and ideas are, lets fucking use them to make the world a better place.

>pedos actually attempting to defend themselves
>actually implying that pedophilia is remotely OK
>being bitchy about age (seriously who the fuck wants to even be around someone under 18, unless you're under 18 yourself)

what are you doing in Cred Forums, or in Cred Forums?

Far less competence is required for surveillance, so...yes, you get it.

>hey a minuscule minority of people are committing a crime
>lets take the rights of everybody as as a result
Almost as obvious as gun grabbers

what stenography tool?

They probably already have a backdoor. I bet if you called the NSA and asked nicely they'd decrypt it for you. I mean they are supposed to serve the American people right?

steghide

Ahh yes the secure backdoors. They sell those right next to the dry water and cold fires right?

>stenography
i think you mean steganography

turnto23 com /news/your-neighborhood /north-river-county/ could-a-model-airplane-be-used-for-a-terrorist-attack-

Books can be used to encrypt messages, ban all books.

abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91901&page=1

Nice cat user, too bad it was posted in such a shitty thread.

Holy fuck, you can't be THIS FUCKING RETARDED.

I don't care about children, so I don't give a shit if some sicko uses there encryption to hide there kiddy porn

#NotAllPeople

>let's just make simple math illegal!

>this is just a purely random mathematical sequence that by mere accident produces a moving picture that photo-realistically resembles the image of a 10-year old girl having sex with a 42-year old man

I don't think it should be illegal but if someone refuses to decrypt their device we should make simple beatings, nothing unusual, legal until they do.

~IMPORTANT SPAM~
REDDIT LOST THE WAR AGAINST Cred Forums

10 out of fucking 10, that cunt is done

What the fuck are you trying to imply?

>>>/reddit/

As someone from the UK, I actually had a nasty thought regarding the "jail for failing to hand over a password."

What's stopping the gestapo making a file called CHILD_PORN.encrypted with TrueCrypt with a really complex password, then indefinitely jailing you for failing to hand over a password you don't even know in the first place?

there is literally nothing wrong with child porn

>nobody is suggesting taking away your guns, shithead
>we just want common sense gun control
I know you're probably memeing, but if you aren't, fuck you. It's thanks to bootlicking statists like you that law-abiding Canadians who like Stargate can't own P90s purely for shits and giggles.

This is the level of effort it takes to troll 2016 neo-Cred Forums

Also, here's a you`

Mad pedos everywhere

How the fuck is that any different?

encryptards deserve to get hit with a wrench

The government should drop encryption too, it's not like they have anything to hide, right?

FUCK ALL DA PEDOS

>Pedophiles
>Proper OPSEC
Pick one and only one, this is a non-issue.

I propose closed circuit TV cameras inside every house.

Gotta protect the children, AMIRITE?

>government subpoenas of the FBI, their own investigation unit, intensify

Don't worry you are probably already on a watchlist. Just ask mr. government to help you.

>implying the government can decrypt software

>yfw certain sequences of binary numbers can get you 40 years in jail

>Im completely fine with banning guns if it makes people feel safer.
lol

Some people are just that retarded.

That said, gun control only works on functional societies.

Heres your reply. Next time, make it more convincing.

>jailing people for failing to hand over a password

Why are the British so fucking retarded?

Maybe they should stop contaminating the gene pool and do the world a favor.

>implying that is an issue
In the decade plus it takes for mr. government's slow ass to respond to you your files will be long gone, and non-backdoored encryption will be made illegal.

Don't worry though you won't be using the internet as much then either because all offensive content will be banned, and websites will have real name policies backed by your government issued internet id.

Ban guns first before encryption.

These wanky fantasies are fucking retarded. It only takes a new network to circumvent whatever cyberpunk shit is this.

>random: any binary sequence generated by an rng that isn't owned by the nsa.
In the future non nsa rngs will be illegal.

>idiots actually fucking believe sensationalism in media
Go fuck yourself, OP. Go fuck yourself with the longest, sharpest stick you can fucking find.

u mad kid?

>kid
I'm old enough to be your father, kid. I swear to fuck, if you really was my kid and posted bullshit like this, you'd get a fucking beating you'd never forget.

>It only takes a new network to circumvent whatever cyberpunk shit is this.
Depending on the legal risk to do so that might never happen. My scenario is exactly what would happen if the masses who know nothing about technology got their way.

>If I change the argument so it's easy to attack, I can win!!

when did the tech board became the main containment place for conspiratards and george carlin-types?

Since 12 hours ago.

...

At some point I'm sure there will be laws in place that force you to reveal passwords/keys to data that has been obtained with a warrant. If you don't comply they'll throw some bullshit charge at you and lock you up. You can't get rid of encryption, and if it's done right you probably can't break it either. It's a sad thought but it's inevitable.

>Maybe not give 14 yo old kids smartphones and live video streaming software like periscope so they can produce and broadcast their own cp with a couple clicks on a screen?
Hey, if it gets them out of the basements and makes it into statutory rape instead of knife and zipties rape, that's an improvement isn't it?

>guilty of possession of indecent cartoon image.
>possession of indecent cartoon image
>indecent cartoon image
>cartoon image
>cartoon
>guilty

>Fear mongering news makes it to Cred Forums
OMG PEDOPHILES ARE EVERYWHERE ANAON, DONT YOU SEE DONT U GET IT THEYRE ALL AROUND US MAAAAAN

>madewithcode.com/projects/
>the west
Good. I'm glad terror groups are benefiting from encryption. Hope another fag bar is shot up

> Civilians have more secrets than governments

there's nothing to defend
the whole point of encryption is to keep shit away from anyone you don't want snooping on your data

emphasis on anyone

>What's stopping the gestapo making a file called CHILD_PORN.encrypted with TrueCrypt with a really complex password, then indefinitely jailing you for failing to hand over a password you don't even know in the first place?
Effectively, nothing.

>secure
>backdoors

You wrote this for a (You), didn't you?

A backdoor is a deliberate weakening of security, full stop.
A "secure backdoor" would at best be equivalent to using slightly weaker encryption than what the user intended, which wouldn't help LEA or whoever get at your shit terribly much, since the encryption still has to be considered secure.

and when it comes down to it, more vulnerabilities than intended tend to be introduced when backdoors are implemented in a system, so your "secure backdoor" isn't even secure (and it's insecure in a way that you don't know of, but someone else will probably figure out and take advantage of it)

This. I don't care about children because I don't have any and would rather not in the future.

Incorrect. The UK government has more CP than it's subjects.

>Breaking of encryption successful: no
:) FUCK THE GOVERNMENT

> Money is not being used to support CP and terrorism

> Don't ban the Coin!

What is singapore?

>if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear
This meme got stale a long time ago. Fuck off.

So what? Bad people will use tools...

Someone killed another person with a hammer - Therefore hammers should be banned.
Someone took unwarranted creepshots of a girl with his camera - Therefore cameras should be banned.

And so on and so forth.

Singapore executes the suppliers.

post pics of yourself taking a dump
nothing to hide nothing to fear

>Nearly all of the criminals get convicted anyways despite not being able to decrypt their files
What is your point, user?

Impossible. Not even Microsoft can keep their own goddamned secureboot key from being leaked, and they don't even have nearly as many corrupt employees as the US Government.

user, people were raping children before the concept of CP existed. They will continue to rape children whether or not they have people to watch them do so.

If the FBI would like to take this problem seriously, they should go after human traffickers. They'll stop both the rape of children and the rape of numerous adults. But human trafficking isn't an "easy" job.

>lets ban walls behind TERRORISTS used to hide behind some!

We are not on Cred Forums, friendo.

I sure hope all the encryptards ITT actually defending pedophiles and terrorists is just satire.

Nasa go home

Reminder that the FBI took over a CP site and ran it for a year and even made improvements to the site so they could serve more CP

state cucks will ban mathematical algorithms :^)

>"easy" job
That's a major reason why the government is pushing the cp agenda. It's really easy to catch people, it's really easy to get plea deals, and it makes everyone involved look like a major hero even though they've actually accomplished nothing at all.

When did Cred Forums get so full of paid NAMBLA shills shilling for encryption?

should I?

I'd rather protect pedophiles than have a society where hackers can just obtain whatever the fuck they want because there's backdoors into every encryption.

says the shill

>on Cred Forums arguing against the use of tech

Daily reminder encryption is technology and everyone should use it. My normal everyday internet traffic is encrypted just to shit in the NSA servers

>I don't know how encryption works: The Post

Enjoy being on several watchlists.

Fear mongering bullshit propagated by the government so they have an excuse to ban encryption

Good enough for pedos/terrorists is good enough for me.

>Enjoy being on several watchlists.

>being on a watchlist and not using encryption

it's like you want to help the people violating your privacy

You're also on a watchllst , being a good unencrypted goy doesn't save you from it.

>straight white male
FBI watchlist
>visits Cred Forums
CIA watchlist
>uses internet
NSA watchlist

>this strawman again
No one's suggesting we not encrypt anything, just that we use cryptography with openings towards law enforcement. This is nothing but common sense.

No, it's not. YOU DON'T ACTUALLY KNOW HOW THIS WORKS! YOU ARE A MORON!

Whoa, someone's mad.

Law enforcement is 90% incompetent just like every other group of people. If you backdoor and weaken encryption just for them, actual hostile state actors can take advantage of it (as just one example).

The point is, there's no reason to weaken encryption just for what is basically the modern day equivalent of a bunch of police eating donuts and looking out of a window with binoculars

I do, read up on asymmetric backdoors, you idiot.

>the state is too incompetent to use this
>the state is competent enough to take advantage of it

>FBI has the same competence level as the NSA

>Anna Chapman

Where do I find a encryption waifu like this?

The FBI is basically a group of bluepilled 5th graders pic related

We should dumb everything down just for them, that's a great idea. Encryption is too hard for them, we should just not have it anymore. Now lets reflect on the 6 gajillion before nap time.

(Honestly, they don't even know what atrocity propaganda is or that it was used in WWII. I guess that's around ~10thgrade when most people realize that)

>encryptards
a word which could only be invented here at Cred Forums

>Where do I find a encryption waifu like this?

Her snatch is roast beef

R O A S T . B E E F
O
A
S
T

B
E
E
F

>gajillion

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers

pics or it didn't happen

fuck is going on here?

It was only vulnerable to linear cryptanalysis which, as a field, DIDN'T EVEN FUCKING EXIST when they were designing the s-boxes for DES. DES was known to be broken as early as 1992 and yet it kept getting reapproved for use through 1998 because of pressure from banks who didn't want to rewrite their whole backend

Land of the fucking free mate. Encryption is freedom. Fuck you if you think different.

...

No, they are just put on the public listvof sex offenders iirc

Hah, Microsoft, which is way bigger than the FBI cant even keep their keys secure, what makes you think the FBI could prevent another Snowden from leaking the key to Russia dumbass?

Read up on kleptography before you go spouting retardation you stupid fuck.

HC, yes absolutely something wrong.

tbqh my man, SC and Modeling should be totally legal.

I'll dumb down what said for you: to filter out low-IQ retards who get distracted by format or presentation like yourself and just stick with those high-IQ ones who actually care about content.

What if that stops them from acting out?

Fuck I really wonder about the people on the other side of the keyboard sometimes.

Perfectly normal my man, I can assure you that.