This is why Apple wins

>making earphones small and round, not protruding from the ear
>both earphones need to communicate for things such as audio sync
>signals have to pass through the brain which is very, very inefficient due the density of brain tissue and fluid inside it
>this causes frequent fuckups
>Bluetooth signal to either left or right earphone cut out completely due to the average position of a phone, below your head to the left or right, needing to pass through more than your brain's dense material

Apple solved this easily; put the antenna on the downward stalk and pass signals though where there is no brain matter. Flawless connection from phone and L&R earphones. Conveniently also great position to put microphones right at the end.

How the fuck did no other manufacturer see the biggest flaw in truly wireless earphones after all these years?

bump

Curious to see whether anyone here has any properly wireless headphone woes. I bet this thread will go ignored because it's a deeply painful truth.

All other wireless headphones don't have that issue. It's just an Apple problem.

What are you talking about? Apple haven't even made wireless headphones before.

What's wrong with having a FUCKING CABLE tying both of those earpieces together ?

Because it's not iHip, Apple sets all the trends

Wireless headphones and earphones.

apple could sell you a freeze dried piece of shit and you would come up with some reason why they are ahead of the curve

"the way the turd fits in your hand is superior to any phone, it forces you to wash your hands constantly thus making you healthier and increasing life expectancy."

>having a cable on the back of your neck the whole time
>having a point of failure, cable strips or gets damaged and you're fucked
>wanting to take a phone call while in bed, put in one earbud and have one dangling around

Semi-wireless earphones are fucking shit and objectively inferior.

ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY NINE DOLLARS

>Battery craps out
>$159

>lose one earpiece
>$159

>lose charging case
>$159

I 

THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS

>$300 to make uncomfortable calls
>$300 to have your connection constantly cut out
>$300 for a charging case which is the same size as a child's classes case

Ill take beats by dr dre for 500

>>Apple have solved the biggest issue in wireless earphones
>>"only Apple have this problem"
>>Apple haven't even made them before
>>"wireless headphones and earphones"

Are you a Pajeet or legitimately a special needs person?

This is actually very true. For example, removing the headphone jack was a good thing because it forced you to a) either use an active adapter, which is retarded or b) buy wireless headphones, thus propelling wireless headphones further. There is absolutely no correlation between using wireless and the headphone jack, they could have invented a new wireless standard and kept the jack, but somehow losing a feature was good because it forced you to do something you could already do.

What's wrong with that?
You clearly don't have any courage.

Points 1 and 3 happen with semi-wired headphones as well. He's not saying wireless headphones are better, he's saying semi-wired are worse than wireless.

What? It's just 2 separate headpieces connected via bluetooth. Bluetooth radiates for like 20 meters and can pass through pretty much everything.

>expecting replacable batteries on BT earphones
0/10 not even you believe that.
>I lost something, its Apple's fault
actually $69 for individual buds.
>I lost something even harder to lose, Apple is to blame, not me, who's already lost 8 things this year.
0/10.

Not an Apple in-house design. Apple bought the beats brand and they continued operation normally.

>lose one earpiece
>$159

Objectively untrue. Apple has stated their intention to sell individual replacement units.

Are you retarded? Do you not know the biggest complaint of wireless earbuds? They're defective by design because bud-to-bud signals don't pass through the brain very well. Try reading the OP next time you ADHD sperg.

>>"only Apple have this problem"
>Apple solved a problem that wasn't a problem for anyone else.
>>"wireless headphones and earphones"
>makes a topic about headphones and earphones then denies mentioning headphones
nice try shill

You're the one who's not getting his point. You/OP said there was a problem and Apple fixed it. Someone mentioned that other companies don't have this problem - which is true, there are other wireless headphones that don't protrude down. So you mentioned that Apple never produced headphones - right after saying they fixed a problem in their design - with the false implication that anyone said they fixed a problem in their previous model.
I'd advise some improvement on your reading comprehension before insulting others.

Wired headphones do not have these problems though (at least not at all on the same scale).

I'm talking about ALL Bluetooth audio you retarded fuck. Try and tell me that Bluetooth headphone connections have never been a major point of complaint for years. Go ahead I'll wait.

these headphones are going to make you a jamal target

>Try and tell me that Bluetooth headphone connections have never been a major point of complaint for years. Go ahead I'll wait.
This is your claim, so it's your job to prove it.

>So you mentioned that Apple never produced headphones - right after saying they fixed a problem in their design
>their design
>their design

Where did I say 'their design'? I said 'in wireless headphones'. Does that mean they are theirs? Might want to take some more English classes in the evenings Pajeet.

ITT: SPOT THE IMEME 7 BUYERS

So you don't understand the concept of a design phase. Ok then. Still waiting for you to prove your claim, and by the looks of your goalpost shifting I think I'll be here for a while.

>prove to me that BT audio has had problems

Are you even trying anymore? Who do you think you're fooling? Are you this much of a blinded anti-Apple sperg? You want me to prove to you a common as fuck problem everyone knows about? This is delicious, framing yourself like this.

No you're correct, BT audio has always been flawless. No complaints about signal drops ever.

>talks only about earphones and headsets
>claims it's about all bluetooth audio

>"Bluetooth headphone connections have never been a major point of complaint for years"
>implying people complain about the thickness of their brain matter blocking the signals

So, no proof? Well that was quick.
>BT audio has always been flawless.
I never said this. Not even wired audio is flawless. I asked for you to prove that the claim "Bluetooth headphone connections have been a major point of complaint for years."

I am discussing it.

Why would you ask him to prove a claim that no one was discussing?

I think that it should have had a cord between them.

>signals have to pass through the brain which is very, very inefficient due the density of brain tissue and fluid inside it
Are you out of your fucking mind?

> I asked for you to prove that the claim "Bluetooth headphone connections have been a major point of complaint for years."

Nah mate I have no proof.

There's no proof that the biggest complaint of BT headphones has been connection issues. Do we agree on that?

>>making earphones small and round, not protruding from the ear
>Apple solved this easily; put the antenna on the downward stalk
>put the antenna on the thing that protrudes from the ear
Do you retarded faggots even bother looking at what you write?

The only reason Apple sells their shit anymore is brand recognition. Its literally gold-plated feces

Not even the guy but it's "their design" as in "the design of earphones", not as "the design from Apple"

You're probably the pajeet here

why would I want to look like I have a bent q-tip sticking out of my ear?

And that's how you lose your 150$ earphones and kill your battery life

It's the exact same way they keep passing ios as something revolutionary with vague shit such as "i-it w-werks!", even though when you started citing actual features and not just PR mumbo jumbo and rumors from 6 years ago, in which case android clearly gets way above, then the ishills will start going "I d-don't c-care anyway!" or "what are you, poor?". It's even more hilarious when you may have an android device that is more expensive than their ancient iphone 5s or some shit.

So... revolutionary....... woooooww

In other words, you like being Cook's bitchboy.

Why would brain matter be a problem? Your head's empty if you actually buy these.

Really, they win because of the W1 chip.

If they start licensing it to manufacturers, we'll have a new generation of proper bluetooth/wireless headphones that won't shit the bed, and Apple can make serious bank on it.

These look way better than the white cum drips coming out of each ear

>Apple has stated their intention to sell individual replacement units

>only $89.99 per ear tampon

...

>wanting any wireless signals going through your brain

HUEHUEHUEHEUEHUEUEHUE

supersymmetry

Implying brain matter is dense

Implying there's brain matter between the ears anyway.

[citation needed]

so retarded looking
whomever allowed this product to come to fruition should be anally raped

things things are part of a DARPA black project

enjoy hooking up your brain straight into a botnet

Yeah it's not like detachable cable earphones are a thing

>>$1000

Sorry poorfag

Just how poor are you? If you want to be able to afford good stuff just get out of mommy's basement and start your own company.

>>making earphones small and round, not protruding from the ear
literally protruding from the ear in your picture

dropped

>5 hours of battery life

Just imagine how little time it'll take for that battery to turn into shit.

Just look at laptop batteries and how bad they become after 1 year of use. Those 5 hours would turn into 3 hours 12 months later.

I fucking love that movie so much.

I feel like someday that'll be me... just another average lonely guy who's given up hope for women, and just settles for an AI bot to keep me warm company. It sounds like a super cozy future where leisure is more prominent.

>200hz

They have cheaper ones, broski.

Almost, bro

Unfortunately, Android phones actually have touch lag. I would get an Android if not for this (and all the bloatware that comes on most of them). Next phone I'll get is iPhone SE. Keeps your pocket's looking /fa/ while having a good quality, fast-capturing camera

Where do technology illiterate mactoddlers get the false impression they or their fruity toddler toys are welcome much less belong on a technology board?

What's the matter? You bought an iPhone, you shouldn't have problems buying premium earphones. Or are you one of those hobos who take payday loans to buy Apple products?

I thought touch lag was gone since android 4?

>they don't block out at least 30 dB of sound while not sounding like utter shit
into the trash it goes

what's wrong with that is that it has all the problems listed in the OP regarding signal quality and a big fat sack of water being in the way.

also
>kikestarter

might as well just light your money on fire.

I'm no apple shill so I have no idea if apple's rendition works any better however. In general, wireless audio is just shit tier and I don't think apple have magically found the cure.

They really look like the IconX from Samsung. Which look way better then the apple earbuds if you ask me

except it wont because its apple and not some chinkshit like other companies crapout