Thank you for electing me! Now, starting today, we're going to impose strong restrictions on civilian encryption use...

Posessing encrypted data and not decrypting it when told to will get you charged with prevention of investigation

/thread, it's literally just math.

Vote? You know they let any fucking idiot into a polling booth ?

Don't look at me, I think all countries (except for the few non-free ones like North Korea) should.

... which only reinforces my point: how come any American idiot gets a vote but we Europeans don't?

One world government is already a reality, might as well just make it official already.

Watch americunts crying on Cred Forums and laugh at them

Because I'm sure he is going to focus all his time on getting something along those lines through Congress because that is certainly the single most important issue in this election and he will have a lot of free time to do so as it will be easy to get all the other things he wants to do done because everyone agrees with him and there would be no opposition to doing things like building a wall along the Mexican border.

That makes sense

But that's already a reality user.

In actuality, just posessing strongly encrypted data will be anough to get charged. Any encryption without gov't backdoors will be banned.

Only basement-dwelling autists will cry, the absolute majority of public opinion is in favour of this.

What are legislative and judicial branch???

Accept that some compromises have to be made in order to save the white race.

Cucks like this aren't going to do it.

That's why I said "Cred Forums". Normies gotta be dumb as aways.

carry on

enforcing a ban on encryption is a fool's endeavor

that's just noise boss, there's no data there

I just like to fill files with /dev/random

>the absolute majority of public opinion is in favour of this.
the absolute majority of public opinion is "don't know/care"

if presented with all the proper information, the majority of them would be against a ban on encryption. just like the majority are pro free-speech, pro net neutrality, etc.

your viral campaign is a complete and utter failure. find another career user.

>europoors
>vote
Topkek

>americunts
>free
Topkek

Yes it is bitch

You go to prison for sending mean tweets or speaking out against islam

At least I don't get arrested for calling someone a nigger. And, we can own guns.

Because Eurocuckolds are brainwashed morons who let in millions of migrant rapists

We don't trust them

>tfw none of this bullshit in my country
>yet

Look to Russia and the Slavs

They are the only hope left for Yuroland

Chile here, ww can do this and a lot more. Also the classic:

>be American
>go for a walk
>get raped/shot

I don't live in Detroit.

Swiss here, there are no niggers here and we can care guns. Life is good®

Use top-tier steganography: First, encrypt your data using good encryption. Next, encrypt it using weak government-approved ROT13 or something. When the government monitors see your data, they'll assume it's ordinary, law-abiding traffic and ignore it.

Starting to appreciate Russian policies more and more, as an American.

As if Trump knows what encryption is. He'll just sign whatever is proposed to combat "cyber terrorism".

>not storing everything on a zip file with password

I'm Canadian

best western country, deal with it americunts

>his country legalized bestiality
>still no legal weed
Wew

>Americans think finding a nigger in a country outside Africa is an usual think
kek stay delusional

It is in the UK :^)

who are you voting for, Cred Forums?

I said outside Africa

Whoever fires up my neurons
Kek

It's a frozen shithole, and major cities like Toronto are filled with Sweden tier retards. Not to mention the frenchies.

try to type trump with one hand + pressing down all the keys at the same time

hard mode: use right hand

rpm0

wew

Really makes you think

Both candidates will do this. I'm voting for johnson.

What did he mean by this?

Try torrenting in Germany or saying Muslim rapists aren't paragons of virtue in Sweden and get back to me

Is there a meme free version of this post? Preferably with citations and actual points

>Claims to be a lolbertarian
>Wants to restrict guns
You couldn't be more of a retard if you tried

> be chile
> go for a walk
> killed by earthquake or altitude sickness

t. Redditor.

Laugh at pedophiles getting arrested.

And proud

You should stay there.

>Amerifats actually believe this

Been here longer than you squirt. You leave.

>I'll just call him underage!
Topkek, have my upvote!

There was actual points there retard.

>citations for a fucking Cred Forums post

Lol, get real. You prove me wrong then if you're so sure

>you prove me wrong

>le americans are brainwashed! Yuroland has more online freedom!
>provide examples to the contrary
>I-I need a citation how dare you make such a claim, Reddit told me differently!

Why are Yuropoors so dumb? Do they teach anything in school there besides radical feminism and Islam

They still earn more than you do, rushit

I'm pretty sure you'd get arrested for calling a black guy a nigger if he reported it.

No, he's not. Stop perpetuating this bullshit.
Please die immediately.

>implying anyone in Western Europe is even employed these days

>Chile here, ww can do this and a lot more.
No, you can't.

I live in Sweden and I shitpost and torrent at max speed all day long, my dude

Even NEETs earn more than you lel
How does it feel to be a wageslave in slavlands?

You'd probably get beaten to death, nobody would get charged, and the media would use it to talk about the evils of racism. So in that sense, the current US is probably not too different from europe.

>implying

>implying the opposite

thankfully we have whats called a bill of rights

But can you carry ammunition >?

>implying i care

I have nothing to hide. i dont even use encryptation.

...which doesn't say anything about "right to privacy".

>tfw legal assault rifles and no school shootings like in burgerstan

What country

Uruguay

That's not an assault rifle.

Trump is amazed by how much a 10 year old knows about cybers.

Is that, like, an actual country? Aren't you part of Brazil or something?

i assault your ass with it that's for sure

Uruguay is pretty fucking cool.

t. Argentinian

Nice

>hillary 2016 will make online hate speech like this illegal

Hillary is paid off by Google, Facebook, and Apple

Really makes you think

Yes, Trump is going to be venomous for technological progress.

>lobysm is legal in Americlap

to be fair it's also legal in Europe, lobbyists even get an ID card that they can use to sit in the European parliament and watch sessions

>Sanders will never be POTUS

If you think the tech corporations vision of the internet is a desirable future you deserve everything they'll do.

When net neutrality is a distant memory, we'll have retards like you to thank.

Wait, wait, wait.

Is that chart trying to argue that taking lobbyists money is a GOOD thing?

That's the VP you stupid nigger.

Trump taking down Google and Facebook would be beneficial for the technology sector though as establishment corporations are what most stifle it currently

>people with a lot of money never have good intentions
>... so lets elect a very rich guy

lol wut?

No? It's a chart.

Trump IS establishment corporations though.

Reminder that he's a millionaire business magnate. Money talks, he already has plenty of power, why should we give him even more?

Democracy was created to level the field, give power to the little, not even more power to the big. People like Trump shouldn't even be allowed to run!

Let me explain this in a way you'll understand

Do you think these corporations pay Hillary $500000 speaking fees per hour out of the kindness of their hearts? Or do you think they want something in return? And how is this method of financing a campaign similar to a rich guy paying for himself?

... is she going to be legally obliged to give them something in return?

Or is it maybe possible, even if just remotely, that they are looking after the tech industry's own interests by supporting the candidate that will do the least harm to it?

America is not a democracy, idiot.

Trump is an American hero who wants to bring jobs back to America which enrages the rest of the corporate elite. Shillary is the true corporate puppet/globalist who only sees "little" people as stepping stones to power.

It takes someone like trump to beat her, Bernie tried to run a campaign of average donors and she conspired with her party to crush him unfairly

Is this a new meme?

Hillary 2016! More H1B! Intelligence Surge! War with Russia! Reparations for blacks! Women in every field get raises by law!

>Trump is an American hero who wants to bring jobs back to America
OH GOD PLEASE STOP MY SIDES CAN ONLY TAKE SO MUCH

Lol I want everyone in the thread to pause and look at this guy.

Just stop for a second and look at what's happening here.

He is unironically trying to build the argument that corporations paying politicians directly is a good thing while also trying to argue that these bribes are out of the goodness of their hearts and have no effects on legislation.

Yes. We've reached the point where HRC supporters don't even deny that she paid off, they try to argue that it's no big deal to take bribes. Sad!

>no counter arguments, just parroting what I already said with a reaction maymay

Nice chat my dude, better luck next time

It's a constitutional republic, not a democracy.

The United States is a constitutionally limited republic

Look who's talking, you're arguing Trump is an American hero. You're arguing that, even though he's admittedly been corrupt and used his power for his own benefit in detriment of all others, suddenly he wants to do good for America, and despite the fact that he already has plenty of power because of all the money he's got, he's decided he needs some more, and we should give him because he only wants it to use for our good.

cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B

He is self financing his campaign which means he doesn't answer to the corporations like HRC

>despite the fact that he already has plenty of power because of all the money he's got, he's decided he needs some more, and we should give him because he only wants it to use for our good.
Doesn't this hold true for everyone who has ever run for office, anywhere? When was the last time a major US party put up a "poor person" as a candidate? Even Bernie is a millionaire, no?

What are you even rambling on about, America is the definition of democracy.

>actually taking POL ERECTUS seriously

Chupame el orto no la podés sacar de la casa y a la mínima que le pegues un tiro a un chorro de mierda nos cogen, dejá de hacerte el capo.

>America is a failed democracy
No shit!

Make a full disk encryption system that resembles a crypto locker virus. If asked to decrypt anything, you can easily say that your computer was recently compromised. Plausible deniability.

>The POTUS is leader of the free world. Europeans are subject to his orders as well.
In Italy I can download half hollywood illegally and nobody does shit while you risk your ass if you do that without a vpn
LMAOing at burgers

Excuse me, are you retarded?

B-but I thought corporations were good, user...

Stop being naïve.

> The Constitution explicitly assigns to the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of his Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors. The president may make treaties which need to be ratified by two thirds of the Senate. The president may also appoint Article III judges and some officers with advice and consent of the Senate (consent being by simple majority) and if there is a Senate recess, he may make temporary appointments.

:^)

>No tiene licencia de coleccionista
Callate tarado, salgo a cazar con semiautomaticas todos los meses

Can confirm

The US isn't a democracy you shit eating retard, it is a republic by definition

And stop responding to your own posts

He controlled millions in capital during his election

Anyway he's been earning $200k for 30 years and his networth is 500k? What a fucking idiot

>The personal asset disclosure forms do not list properties held by Bernie and Jane Sanders, which include a home in the Washington D.C. neighborhood of Capitol Hill where the median home price is roughly $726,000 and a home in Vermont that realtor.com values at approximately $320,000.
Tell me more about how retarded I am.

>The US isn't a democracy you shit eating retard, it is a republic by definition
Why do you keep implying both are mutually-exclusive?

>I measure people by how much money they make

No wonder you're voting Drumpf.

Says the HRC voter

Lol if you think she'll put you over her sponsors.

At least if she wins I get to be the trendy opposition for four years as she bombs yet another middle eastern brown country to give them "democracy"

you're 100% right

don't come here, it's shit anyway ;)

yeah, and it hasn't meant a fucking thing since everyone started to flip out over terrorism and school shootings

Please Lord make this meme die. Amen.

washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/13/is-the-united-states-of-america-a-republic-or-a-democracy/?utm_term=.f2025c0fb612

I meant it's representative of his money management skills and your post is representative of your lack of reading skills

No wonder you're a shillary supporter

No it isn't, it's representative of his luck. He inherited all that, and his money management skills are shit: had he put it in a savings account he'd have more by now. Again, stop being naïve, you're becoming a textbook example of a useful idiot.

>Washington post opinion piece

Damn, surely this is an unbiased and well researched article!

>in a republic you vote for representatives who will support your interests in the government
>in a democracy citizens directly vote on measures

You are literally one hundred (100) per-cent wrong by definition

>He inherited all that, and his money management skills are shit
Kill yourself you absolute retard.

...

>genetic fallacy
Thanks for playing, better luck next time! ;)

you're confusing "democracy" and "direct democracy".

a system in which voters elect representatives is technically a democracy.

>nomitated with several of the best cities to live in the world
>frozen shithole

And that's coming from someone who lives in a country infested by latinos, muslims, white guilt autists and homosexual degenerates. USA is the nest of everything that's killing the western world.

Stop feeding trolls.

>No encryption
>Enjoy your credit card get stolen by packet sniffers

He has to honor his words in some way, restricting encryption is much easier than building a wall, just saying..

We're not banning encryption, only implementing secure asymmetric backdoors. Stop scaremongering, you idiot.

>he has to honor his words in some way

Um, I was talking about Bernie Sanders net worth, not Trumps. Haha are you unable to even follow a two post train of thought? I was making fun of how his net worth was very very low for 30 years of earning over 200k in congress and the first time this basic mathematic principle escaped you. Now you forgot who I was even talking about two posts ago, it's pretty sad dude.

>he'd have more if he invested it

Not true, and even if he was what an asshole employing thousands of people instead of keeping it all in a bank right? What's he thinking creating jobs and shit?

I can't even call you a useful idiot because you're making HRC look worse by being her supporter. Anyone who has been following this thread can see how you've failed to piece together basic points several times.

You're *just* an idiot my man.

The ideal Shillary voter.

Trump was "lended" one million dollars (over 4 million in today money) straight out of the gate. try to get that as a regular Joe. you can't.

given his business of buying and selling real estate, you'll have to accept that he was comfortably put at the foot of the exponential curve. it would take an equally competent businessman decades before they had that kind of liquidity.

in short, Trump is a competent businessman, but without his father injecting money, he would NOT be a billionaire today. he'd be a Porsche driving upper class man.

>restricting encryption is much easier than building a wall
it absolutely isn't.

banning encryption is unfeasible.

I've been to Toronto it's full of SJW retards.

>best cities

Lol it's all frozen tundras

Enjoy your DUDE WEED MIGRANTS AND FEMINISM prime minister, I'm sure the next one will be even worse

(Note everyone sees Canadians as passive pussies)

>doesnt have any evidence to support what he is saying
>y-you prove me wron senpai

>I was making fun of how his net worth was very very low for 30 years of earning over 200k in congress
But that's an idiotic criterion to judge a human being by, you fucking moron. He could have donated money to the poor/an NGO/whatever.

>What's he thinking creating jobs and shit?
You say that as if he was doing a favor by doing that and not actually getting anything out of it. The more you talk, the more you embarrassing yourself by showing everyone how naive you are.

>You're *just* an idiot my man.
Said the increasingly nervous Drumpf supporter for the 7th time ITT.

we have migrants, sure, especially in the big cities.

except unlike you fat shits they actually work and improve the place. crime rates are super low across the board.

face it, your country is a shitty failure in every measurable way.

So is building a 1,989-mile long wall.

Pol erectus is an edgy teenager. For him, exploiting minimum wage workers is doing literal charity work, but not having a massive net worth because you've done actual charity is being bad with money.

The shilling is real. There are agents making these anti-encryption threads on sites like this. Don't fall for the memes. Memes truly are mind control. Keep seeing the same thing over and over and you start to believe it if you can't think critically.

>Wat do?
Nothing, because he doesn't have that power. The president has basically no power whatsoever.

lel tell me which country you live in and I'll show you.
t. not american.

Public opinion is against encryption and so are most politicians - including both presidential candidates. It's only a matter of time now until encryption is regulated and secure backdoors enforced. This thread attempts to address that.

Encrypt all my drives for shits and giggles even though there's nothing of value on them

Like I said, the shilling is real. Read his post. The masses are a bunch of unthinking, dumbed down retards.

Are there any pol-fags here who think encryption shouldn't be banned

regardless of who the president is, what power he or she has etc, just on principle and as a personal belief

Cred Forums is a government psyop. There's a mass of agents who post threads and then a bunch of retards conform to whatever they're influenced to think. They're all a bunch of useful idiots.

>how a politician invests money is a bad way to determine their money management skills
>lol Drumpf is so stupid! He's bad at managing money

Once again you fail to keep your posts consistent even five minutes apart.

It's like arguing with a child, I'm almost embarrassed for you.

By the way, Sanders has said he doesn't believe in charity, do a little research before you make assumptions. Youll just end up looking like an uninformed idiot.

>this post has the exact same writing style to the post it was responding to

Really makes you think....

When does your schizophrenia medicine get refilled?

msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/snowden_cyber_offensive1_nbc_document.pdf

theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

theintercept.com/document/2014/02/24/art-deception-training-new-generation-online-covert-operations/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Threat_Research_Intelligence_Group

Why am I not surprised you resort to ad hominem? Next tactic you use are straw man arguments, I predict it. More ad hom and straw man arguments, you shills, agents, wannabes, cucks, all say the same things.

>It's only a matter of time now until encryption is regulated and secure backdoors enforced.
this will be completely uneffective on those that really need encryption

>jtrig

...

>DUDE Cred Forums IS SO SERIOUS, THERE ARE GOVERNMENT AGENTS HERE TRYING TO BRAINWASH US
>stay woke!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

Stay dumb kid.

Yep, I love not being from the colonies.

...

Nothing, because I'm a Canadian, and literally every elected official is fucking retarded when it comes to encryption

You wish you lived in Austrialia cunt

Everyone does

21stcenturywire.com/2014/02/25/snowden-training-guide-for-gchq-nsa-agents-infiltrating-and-disrupting-alternative-media-online/

thank god we didn't elect hillary since she'd get rid of it completely for civilian use

Thanks for proving me right, you did and will continue to do exactly what I said you would do.
See:

>Why am I not surprised you resort to ad hominem? Next tactic you use are straw man arguments, I predict it. More ad hom and straw man arguments, you shills, agents, wannabes, cucks, all say the same things.

Yep, this is one of two reasons that makes me consider staying in Italy instead of leaving.

I love how we are basically still in a digital far west.

Hillary is paid off by Time Warner Cable, Wells Fargo, and Saudi Arabia.

Nothing will happen.

What will stop someone from hosting or uploading an apk of an encryption app to a cyberlocker or torrent?

You'll simply get v& if you do.

>There are kikes and CTR shills posting on Cred Forums.

>No, there are no NSA shills trying to subvert opinion and turn people against encryption.

>Wanting to live on a prison island with shitty internet

>There are no ISIS and NAMBLA shills speading the myth that asymmetric backdoors are impossible and making everybody fall for le privacy meem.

>le privacy meem.

underrated post

For what though? I don't think any program has been banned. Why can't you do it on public wifi?

Get fucked, you filthy pedo.

Is there any logical reason why you would fucking say that post is underrated? Has anybody expressed any kind of dissatisfaction or criticism at all against it? Are you delusional? Are you reading replies that are nonexistant? Maybe you come from communities with voting systems, but there is literally no way that you could know what other people think of that post you just replied to here. Maybe it's psychological. Maybe it's your own post you're replying to, like a 12 year old fucktard liking his own facebook posts thinking his swelling autism is going unnoticed. Maybe your self esteem depends on you tricking yourself into thinking someone out there thinks your post is worth something. Or maybe you are just a retard, the worst kind of retard, the one who thinks he's smart, the one who thinks he's the only one to have gotten the joke, to have understood the post. Well, guess what, faggot, that post is under no definition underrated so why don't you do the world a favor and go check out what the bottom of your toilet smells like?

rymp

Whoa, someone got triggered.

You sound very frustrated, kid.

What?? Do you know US schools are proverbial for being shit, right?

Hi there! You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of Cred Forums are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making! Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!

You mean you're ok showing your preferences in porn publicly?

I don't have any preferences in porn because porn is haram, my friend.

Serious question: would you be okay showing your porn preferences publicly if you were also able to see everyone else's if you wanted to?

I like this new pasta!

no.
I actually don't care about other people private stuff, but I don't want my boss to know if I like simpson hentai or some other weird stuff.

Ok, but you still must have some information you want to keep to yourself even if that's legal...