How valid is this image?

how valid is this image?

Pretty accurate, although technically i7 cores are slightly more powerful than Ryzen cores.

Outdated shit.

You forgot about EPYC

>Intel Coffee Lake should be 6 M-Charizard X's
>AMD Ryzen should be 8 M-Charizard Y's

Maybe, but my office workstation was routine-"upgraded" from an i7 4700 to a Xeon and I'm feeling panels 6 and 8.

Looks pretty accurate to me.
Those 7th gen i3's were something to be reckoned with, considering how high they clocked.
Definitely one of the better options if you needed single-threaded performance over multi-threaded.

damn i miss my a10 setup it was terrible but it was the first time i built a pc ;__;

Intel i3 8th gen is 4 charizards to.

no. The 8th gen i3 has no multithreading. 4 Charmeleons maybe, but not charizards

only at higher clocks

There needs to be 8 more charizards for ryzen

kek i'm on an amd a8 and i'm posting on Cred Forums

Not valid at all. The speed-to-benefit cap has already been hit. The "slowest" on the list is just as good as the rest, but cheaper.

whats my a10 7850k on par with then

its accurate, albeit you are retarded for treating xeons as similar to core series. They are generally lowest clock speed most cores, not consumer shit like rice-en ayylemaoD or whatever.

>The "slowest" on the list is just as good as the rest, but cheaper.
Except Core-m
Shit and costs as much as i5

AMD FX are not equivalent to a kaby lake i5.

>hurr durr fire pokemon
Ryzens are total trash thanks to coffee lake.

What does this even mean? I'm so confused.

how valid is this image?