Why haven't you replaced an American worker yet?

How would you how Mexicans are Ahmed? Seriously doubt you've met many over in your island m8.

He's probably seen the Latino halfbreed images.

Answer the question

Why should a global company be obligated to hire people that are more expensive yet work the exact same job? It's not like they have any obligation to America, they already pay taxes.

Oh okay, so I can assume anything about the British after seeing your inbred Anglo pics then,yh?

The title never implied that they should, it just stated a fact

Please hire our accountants

>believing Cred Forums
>thinks mexicans are lazy and unintelligent
>does work 100x better than any American
>have tons of plumbing and construction experience
>won't cry about "muh benefits" "muh $15 an hour" "muh healthcare"
>will work for $5 a day

I hire tons of illegals on my farm in Texas, they all do a way better job than any American ever would do and for $5 a day and some leftover food I have. It's called capitalism you UKIP cuck

I was joking friend, calm down. Have you even seen the images I'm talking about?

Then why are you asking if it's wrong?

Great.
>But it's not fair!
It's a knowledge economy. Learn a trade. Leave the unskilled labor to the Chinese.
>But it's not fair!
We don't need filth that whine like this, white, brown, or black, in our country.
You won't have long to cry, however. Machines are going to replace all of you in due time.

>our accountants
you mean Chinese who studied accounting and wish to use it as a "special" skill to gain citizenships in Oz.

>chicano pretends to a capitalist just to win an argument on internet.

>projecting this hard
I'm not Latino lol.

If mexicans are so fantastically amasing, why is Mexico a shithole?

We all know you're a spic, you're not a very good liar
And considering you can't even give a yes or no answer to a simple question I'd say Mexicans are pretty fucking stupid

Same in Argentina.
Disty latinos are replacing argentinian workers in Subway.

>those backs will never be dry and you know it. now get back to pluck more oranges, Pedro.

Because you have disgusting immigration system, it's a lottery even if I am qualified worker with 5+ years of experience and two degrees. Fuck you. Canada is a way better country for immigration.

Because the spic is trying to imply that the article is false and can't even admit that nothing about said title was incorrect

>all these Cred Forumstards thinking I'm mexican
Because the CIA runs a covert drug traffiking operation there?

I'm literally not Mexican, top kek. Yes the article is wrong, like I originally said.

But I do, I replace Swedish, British and American workers.

>makes fun of Cred Forums for blaming the Jews for ruining Europe
>muh CIA ruined Mexico
Explain why Mexican neighbourhoods are shit compared to white neighbourhoods then

How is the article wrong?
Did they lie?
Did McDonald's not fire 70 American staff to hire foriegners?

Are you mentally ill? Of course he's not talking about the title, he's talking about how hiring foreign workers isn't wrong, it's a vital part of capitalism.

That's not what i asked
I asked if the title was wrong and he was unable to answer
He tried to discredit the source as if it was a fabricated story

>whites will only work for $15+ an hour
>Mexicans will work for $5 an hour

Do people like you just think that places with only white people have no McDonalds, or agriculture?

A Bigmac costs the same in Maine as it does in California, but only white people work at McDonalds in Maine.

I never said Jews weren't ruining Europe, I just said they were reddit cancer.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking#Mexico

>The oldest Mexican Cartel, the Guadalajara cartel, was benefited by the CIA for having connections with the Honduran drug lord Juan Matta-Ballesteros.[21][22] a CIA asset,[23] Juan was the head of SETCO, an airline used for smuggling drugs into the US[24] and also used to transport military supplies and personnel for the Nicaraguan Contras, using funds from the accounts established by Oliver North.[25]

>It is also alleged that the DFS, the main Mexican intelligence agency, which is in part a CIA creation and later became the Mexican Center for Research and National Security(CISEN), had among its members the CIA's closest government allies in Mexico. DFS badges, "handed out to top-level Mexican drug-traffickers, have been labelled by DEA agents a virtual 'license to traffic.'".[26]

>It is also known that the Guadalajara Cartel, Mexico's most powerful drug-trafficking network in the early 1980s, prospered largely, among other reasons, because it enjoyed the protection of the DFS, under its chief Miguel Nazar Haro, a CIA asset.[26]

There are shitty white neighborhoods too.
>pic related, it's mexico

The same answer for any other shithole: a combination of politicians with vested self-interests, perpetually gullible electorate and exploitation by foreign corporations, but it's mostly irresponsible income management.

>If mexicans are so fantastically amasing, why is Mexico a shithole?

>Why is a place with jungles, deserts, and mountains harder to colonise than a place that's mostly flat and hospitable?
>Why is a place that was colonised to exploit the natives and land less prosperous than a place that was colonised to develop the land and import workers to gain tax money?

HMMMMM

So what? Kikebart asserts there is something wrong with that, that capitalism is bad when whitey is fired.

No I'm saying a mexican will work for pennies or even just a bag of leftover food, when a white person will demand $20 an hour + benefits

So it's economically more viable to hire a Mexican and save $200,000 a year in salaries

>That's not what i asked
ctrl+f "Is the title wrong?" 0 results
ctrl+f "Is the article wrong?" 5 results

HMM I WONDER WHAT YOU SAID

m8 I'd take a Mexican worker over a British worker any day. In my experience they are pleasant to work with, do their job well and have a sense of humor.

Seems to me it correlates with ethnicity aswell
>implying america has one kind of landscape

>exploit the natives
Same happened in the US
>exploit the land
>develop the land
So white settlers developed a better nation that non-white inhabitants?
Hmmmmm
The title was completely unbiased and simply stated a fact
Same thing m8
The article is not wrong
Show me where in the article it says that this is morally wrong

So basically the plot of outsourced
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outsourced_(TV_series)

should replace military as well

t. Beaner

I'm talking about the article, have you read it? Kikebart is always alt-right cancer, are you autistic or something.

>>implying america has one kind of landscape
Spread out over the entire continent, have you even seen maps of Mexico? There's barely any flat land at all compared to America.

>Same happened in the US
Exploited how? By stealing their land and making them fuck off? Mexico made the natives work.

>So white settlers developed a better nation that non-white inhabitants?
Yes, people with thousands of years of combined knowledge developed a hospitable land better than some natives in a mountainy jungle did, what a surprise!

>Same thing m8
Not at all.

>The article is not wrong
>Show me where in the article it says that this is morally wrong

It doesn't outright state it but Breitbart is obviously against it because daddy Trump is, look at the comments too.

>there's barely any flatland at all
So why is Norway better than Mexico? Hmmmm
>mexico made the natives work
>having more workers was somehow a bad thing for the prosperity of the nation
Hmmmm
>people with thousands of years of combined knowledge
And? Why didn't the natives have this knowledge?
If they lack this knowledge then perhaps they are stupid
>it doesn't outright state it
Thank you, that'll be all

>So why is Norway better than Mexico?
Because they're European with hundreds of years of development and trade.

>>having more workers was somehow a bad thing for the prosperity of the nation
I didn't say that but what Mexico did hurt the prosperity somewhat since they worked the natives to the bone.

>And? Why didn't the natives have this knowledge?
Because they're not time travellers?

>If they lack this knowledge then perhaps they are stupid
Why didn't Europeans have tomatoes and potatoes before the 1500s? Were they stupid?

>Thank you, that'll be all
(You)

desu Mexico has twice the GDP of Norway

Not him but GDP is a meme

>desu Mexico has twice the GDP of Norway
Yet has 22 times the population.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

But I have

>capitalism and profit maximization is all that matters

WTF i hate neoliberals now

Britanon never asked that

They also don't know English and are illegal

obviously that isn't true, or places with no mexicans wouldn't be able to sell big macs for the same price, as the other user previously stated

What? They'd just have more profits in the place with the Mexicans.

this what gets me about amerridumbs.

They cry foul as soon as the word mexican is next to some job related thing, even if its legit like the article with H-1B visas, yet they say nothing when pajeet takes over engineering and stem related jobs for pennies.

Like, you just know the people complaining about some mcdonalds shit gig are fucking retarded and have no education.

Pajeet stealing all the high paying jobs under their nose, but no its the mexicans fault.

if that were true then places with cheap mexican labor would drop their prices to compete with one another

It's Mcdonalds, I doubt they'd lower their prices when they can just get customers by virtue of being Mcdonalds.

Capitalism isn't bad, the issue is the free market. It's idiotic to have completely open borders unless the situation on both sides is the same.

It extends to other areas. In places like California they pretend that there are jobs that white people won't do, and yet in places like Maine, with only white people, these jobs are still getting done.

Blueberries harvested by Mexicans in Oregon don't cost substantially less than blueberries harvested by whites in Maine.

That's not how McDonald work, they don't have to lower their prices because McDonalds aren't competing against one another they're a single corporation.

For example in NYC, BigMacs are more expensive in Manhattan and Times Square than in a place like Brooklyn.

If people are still willing to pay a higher price for something, the price won't get lower. The only thing is that you now pay your employees less.

It's called arbitrage and usually big corporations can make it work.

I live in San Francisco, which has a 13 dollar an hour minimum wage. They are desperate to hire anyone, even with such a high wage like this. Guess what? The prices are still the same.

>>implying globalism = capitalism
Well its true buddy
that why national socialism is the way forward

t. Wagecuck

>Kikebart asserts there is something wrong with that,
[Citation needed]