U.K & JAPAN

what's difference between British Empire and Dainippon Co-Prosperity Sphere

none because both collapsed

we don't have a bastard while UK does

well india was granted independence thus losing their imperial status by "giving" it away
japan is a constitutional monarch with an emperor, that is it doesn't need to invade china or korea or vietnam or indonesia to be an empire they did it just because they want to kill people for fun

America gives a shit about Japan.

are you talking about this?

no, it did not cause the collapse of the empire

they are both actually the same.

One is White, and mine.
The other is only honorary White, and not mine.

nice quads joao

one is retarded the other is not

*honorary aryan

...

wow, now i hate Korean.

...

Is this some American trying to be funny or a legit Japanese autist?

he is a known japanese retarded guy in "japanese thread"

>we don't have a bastard
Do you forget Yukio Hatoyama, previous prime minister? he was, is absolutely madman.

we need this

no we don't

Brits didn't lose so their crimes were forgotten.

and don't forget Spain.

:3

In Europe maybe, India and a lot of Africa still aren't very happy about it.

Crimes? What crimes? It was only good business.

How cute you are Spain chan(^^)＼(^_^)

We have kawaii culture

There is only a case that it's an island country to be common.

One probably had less rape.

Probably.

Americans love Britain, Obama just has an agenda against them

The America people do, but not the America government.

*American

ffs phone

The Japanese Empire was a defensive reflex by a country that considered itself a great power but felt this position under threat by the larger powers around it. The expansion was aggressive and successful at first but did not have strong fundamentals. It was driven by militarism more than anything else.

The British Empire was driven by commerce and built up much more slowly. It relied on co-operation with locals in its colonies (except the settler colonies where natives were often aggressively marginalised). Unlike Japan, the British never needed a large strong army to build their empire, and the vast majority of the soldiers who policed the British Empire were not British.

This tbqh
Japs see themselves as objectively superior to their colonial holdings while brits had more of a patronizing tone.

white and honory white

Island monkeys stick together.

I believe Japan are making a game about one of their most important and influential historical figures in the English sailor and demon slaying samurai William Adams.

The Japs aren't being forced to self-reproach and make amends by allowing their country to be flooded with blacks and muslims.

They still have an identifiable culture and are proud of it.

Britain is the Japan of Europe and Japan is the Britain of East Asia.

in other words their both the fucking same

bully

well, it's fucking true, you are basically the Japan of Europe, stop denying it

>tfw no NZ bf
>tfw they're all just bullys anyway

>in other words their both the fucking same

Not really. In a way Britain and Japan are opposites.

Japan is traditionally insular, even its attempt at an empire was to create defensive buffers around Japan and secure resources. Britain has always been more open to the world and more willing to get involved in the world as well.

Because although they are both islands, Japan is very far from the continental mainland and also larger, while Britain is very close to its continental mainland. Also Japan's larger population meant it could rely more on its domestic market to have a strong economy, whereas Britain needed foreign markets more.

In other words you're completely wrong