Which city should I drop a nuke to cause maximum casualty?

Dhaka

not as many as central tokyo

Karachi

Greenland

if that happens, maybe they creat neo tokio

I could be cool

New York or Washington

Poor Portugal.

You'll never be cool

just drop it one of the poles

>said the dumb white supremacist frog poster
kys

i bombed new dehli and got around 11 million dead poo's

I'll white supremacisize your ass Argiefriend

>implying slowpoke bombers to carry a big-ass nuke can infiltrate into japanese airspace which is one of the world's most tightly protected areas, slipping through thousands of SAMs and swarms of these badboys

No more Hiroshima
One more Nagasaki

New York
imagine all the butthurt

that's a good choice not only due to butthurt but due to complete destruction of murrican financial system and consequent failure of their economy and dominance

why would do that when we intercontinental ballistic missiles?

Cringe

You cant deliver a Tsar Bomba with ICBMs.

Oh, I did not look at the photo.

br00tal

A single ruaaian SS-18 Satan with a 25 mt warhead could destroy all of Tokyo.
And Russia has at least 50 of them pointed at japan

I think hong kong is more dense but I'd still drop it in tokyo

A single minuteman with a standard nuclear warhead can annihilate moscow, and americans have at least 200 of them pointed at russia.

anonhq.com/russia-test-unstoppable-satan-2-stealth-nuke-capable-wiping-entire-nation/
The SS-18 Satan 2 has a single stealth reentry vehicle capable of defeating every anti missile system the west has. The minutemen only carries three tiny nukes and could be intercepted by Russian anti missile systems.

That's not much of an compliment, given how missile defence is a joke. Nobody seriously expects them to perform beyond 14-20 missiles. A single minutemen-III can carriers five MIRV with penetration aids, which each carry a set of three warheads.