What are some Cred Forums-core albums that aren't also pitchfork-core

What are some Cred Forums-core albums that aren't also pitchfork-core.

pic related is a good example. I see it on here every now and then and p4k never gave it BNM.

...

Also a good example.

>It got BNM but it's not exactly pitchfork-core.

MBDTF

If im correct, i dont think pitchfork even reviewed it

I'll give it a listen.

Nice try shill.

>got BNM
>not pitchfork-core

This absolutely should be mu-core!

That's right. BNM doesn't make it p4k core, especially not an 8.4.

wtf

...

>underrated.

wasn't it in their top forty of the last decade?

Probably. got any better examples.

Not even reviewed

Well do you consider albums that were considered classics before pitchfork even existed because if so then there are many. If not it becomes a much harder process.

This is really good. not mu-core. but I appreciate the contribution.

p4k will review a re-issue.

babby's first electronic


P4k-core is not assigned by "whether they reviewed it", it's assigned more by whether the people that faun over the album are specifically into spoon-fed hipster music without a developed, individual taste.
That's not to say they aren't GOOD ALBUMS, because they are, but they're part of a western-hipster-bubble fanbase.

Duster
Sweet Trip
Fishmans
Jason Aldean

If it's from before pitchfork, and they never circle jerked it in a reissue, or best albums of the decade list, then it's good.

>Jason Aldean
of course

Not sure whether this belongs in worst or best album cover threads, tbqh.

>Duster
Forgot about duster. Thanks a bunch!

Madchester isn't discussed enough on Cred Forums

Definitely should be

Here's one.

This is literally the definition of pitchfork-core user

God that album was bad

>not p4k core
wat? Not only BNM, but it was at least on their best of 00s list, and pretty high iirc

Frances the mute

They gave the reissue an 8.6 though