Thoughts on Alex Jones?

You are gay

Have some anti degenerate pills faggot

Met him. Is a dick. In it for the money

Just wants to sell that Beta Male Vitality to betas

Alex is a stupid nigger

Alex Jones: Making money off tinfoil nutters

So, i am sexually attracted to men because i don't like Alex Jones?
Also, they don't make a high enough dose of anti degenerate pills to make a difference

did you tell him that?

Useful tool

tinfoil confirmed

I'll bet you think Clinton rigged the election too don't you faggot

I heard somewhere that his show started going crazy and off the rails when he started endorsing and taking this supplement he always prescribes, I don't know which but I heard it had like Metals in it and shit. makes you go crazy.

I have heard him say some straightforward things though.

His main stick is running on the fear of Republicans and right-leaning Democrats, and probably anybody in between who thinks they're "in the know about what's really going on"

this says everything:

youtube.com/watch?v=ODZE5peUfWQ

Either a fisherman with a GREAT ROD and bait or an absolute retard

>Thoughts on Alex Jones?

Is he CIA or what? I can't figure out who he's working for.

Da fuc's wrong wit tchu?!

He's too dumb to be cia. Besides, he suspects Glenn Beck of being CIA so i doubt he's part of any of that

fucking love him

It is funny the "illuminati" trading card game from the 90's shows an image of two people labeled "disinfo agents", one looks like Jones.

oh look faggot is so triggered by this

Protip: you have zero proof and I mean ZERO that Clinton rigged the process to get nominated

ZERO

>illuminati trading card game
Holy fuck dude, go outside.

...

Why? I'm going to be a Lord in the New Order.

Controlled opposition/agent . No history between highschool and when he shows up at Waco as a radio personality

Maybe not rigged but the party definitely used unethical tactics. But that's just democrats being democrats.

He's a major tard but his voice is pretty great.

Hillary called him out directly, it just shows you who's the real threat this election. They went from pretending he didn't exist to taking him head on.
youtube.com/watch?v=2cfEW9av2XU

That's cuz he was a loser after HS. Also, if he was, he's terribly ineffective. His ratings are shit and everyone in the business thinks he's a wacko

Who is he?

right wing nutjob and fear-monger for the feeble minded.

??

Why? I happened to see this browsing before and thought it was relevant to the post I responded to.

Newsflash: Politics is a dirty business and what was found in the Wikileaks hack is a blip compared to what's been done in the past, guaranteed.

"AUUUUUGHHAAAAAAAAAHAHAAAAAAAAAHHHHH"

More important than some "conspiracy" thread.

Please explain how conservatives are racist and sexist.

Based on your speculation. Wikileaks provided proof. Where's yours?

>not wanting to trade conspiracy cards
>not protected in underground lair underneath house
>not wearing protective tinfoil

Wake up sheeple

Proof of what?

So Hillary and company were mean to Bernie.

That isn't illegal. It's politics.

Grow the fuck up before you reply again.

Thats cuz he was in training . Supposed to be a wacko , so if people look into conspiracy theories.....this is the kind of people they find .
It's called 'Gate-keeping'.

Jones and M. Savage are the most entertaining and
informative examples of their field, the rest are
insincere, tired sell-outs.

>They just are. : )

There is no logic to be found in that statement, to have conservative or liberal values does not inherently change the way they perceive race or sex.

He's a living meme.

>Thoughts on Alex Jones?

This is what I love about conspiracy theorists. There's always an explanation for everything.

He is a hero and his Infowars is one of the few, if not the only, honest and non propagandistic media in this country. The liberals/socialists/commies are trying to depict him as a fool but that's only to distract us. How dare they do that,when they're so dumb that their main argiments are:"ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? IT'S CURRENT YEAR! LOL DRUMPF XDXDXD"

Just as stupid as any atheist

he sounds like what I assume a pit bull with throat cancer would sound like

CIA disinformation shill

after Trump finishes his 2 terms, he will be the next potus

and everything is now 6 degrees separation of Hillary Clinton

either she or her Jew/Saudi Overlords are behind shit

>this is what I links about theoretical physicists, there is always an explanation for everything.

You are dumb.

Proof that the party isn't interested in what their party members want. It further shows the unethical ways of what is basically a lite communist group

Voice to text. Fack off

You dont think the US is involved in corrupt acts and employ their CIA agency to keep things from being exposed?

I do I just don't think that retard Alex Jones is part of it

COINTELPRO. Controlled opposition. At least he's entertaining but shouldn't be seen as a news source, just entertainment.

No, I am typing.

Theoretical physicists and other theorists are the same in many regards.

That was my point which you missed completely.

Hillary saying everything bad that happens to her is Russia's fault seems like a tin foil conspiracy theory to me. Did you know Alex Jones and the Alt-Right originated from the Kremlin? She also blames Russia for the hacked emails.

he's sick. Fuck the globalist pedophiles! david icke is awesome too and of coarse matt drudge

I was referring to tin foil hat conspiracy nuts

Yeah well welcome to politics.

Imagine if there had been servers to hack during the 1972 Election or in the 1960s when Richard Daley was Warlord of Chicago.
Or even in 2000.

>Alex Jones is from the Kremlin.
Lol nah hes Bill Hicks

Sorry but I had a classical education.

Step One is Burden of Proof.

You don't go beyond Step 1 unless this condition is satisfied.

You faggots ignore this and go to the last step hoping it will all come out in the wash.

i don't believe that . when people start exposing the pedophile rings going on, and why the occult do this..that's really the last thing the globalist satanist want people to know

Exactly, it is the war these monsters are trying to create which brings them to blame russia.

He's a HUMAN and he's CUMMIN

youtube.com/watch?v=JM5WqJp7tUQ

You can imagine in one hand and shit in the other and at the end of it, you just have a bunch of democrat spores on your hands. Try and stick to what we know as fact, ok kid?

your joking right? alex jones was only 23 when hicks passed away, and they look different

Fair enough , but there are agents employed as gate-keepers , limited-hangouts , agent provacteurs .
Fuck man , even Gloria Steinem admitted that she worked for the CIA

You've got a real hardon against the Dems m8.

>kid
I'm 50. How old are you? :)

I know it's as far-fetched as him being from the kremlin but the Hicks conspiracy makes me lol

He seemed to mean well initially, but then decided to let the money distract him.

I do, you're right. That's not all i have a hard on for. It's just what is being me going today. I have plenty to say about repubs too. Also, I'm 37.

Try to get your money back from from your shitty education friend .
Just look up the US' history of 'Nation Building'.

Many people labeled as such have valid claims too, ad homonym attacks to shut down real discussions are proof of ignorance in the hierarchy of society.

We should be able to discuss any idea without fear or rejection.

Yeah i don't think I'd trust Gloria at anything that cunt says

controlled opposition

mixes retarded conspiracy theories with true conspiracy theories to discredit the true theories

I try to avoid jumping to conclusions about shit when the person bringing the information is this self-important asstard with an agenda like Julian Assange.

Look I got a family to feed, just buy the damm water filters.

These

Sometimes yes.

This is why I have little to no trust in him.

So, like, in a safe place? Fuck off.nowhere is safe

Oh yeah , tell me..why would she lie?

Basically a slightly more truthful version of Faux News.

The conspiracies are real, but he doesn't give any useful information on them. Half of what he says is disinfo, and anybody who gets really deep into the conspiracy theory scene is being watched in case they stumble onto something that's actually true.

So stay away from him, Icke, all the online conspiracy forums, etc.

No, I've handed more than my share of asses to faggots like you thinking you're above shit like basic Prima Facie evidence, thanks.

>look it up

not my job to do yours

Say what you want about Julian. He presents facts.

My Americans and Fellow Memers I'll have you know that Pepe the frog who we cultivate dank keks from is none other than a White Supremacist Icon.
hillaryclinton.com/post/donald-trump-pepe-the-frog-and-white-supremacists-an-explainer/
As listed on my website you will learn how this green terror is more sinister than you may realize.

Lol are you fucking serious?

Preach.

No. As in discussion without dismissal.

You jump to conclusions without considering the layered meanings to words, look at everything from multiple perspectives before reaching a conclusion.

He keeps bringing on guests that are exposed time after time. Really hurts his credibility. Do your research, as Jones suggests himself.

Fucking community college loser . You never even heard of the term 'Nation Building'.

>facts

nah

and anyone who denies climate change is an instant dealbreaker

faggot

That's cuz the world isn't that complicated. There's no need to analyze every little thing down to minutia

>Nation Building

Yes I have. You have never heard of "Burden of Proof" sorry they don't teach it in 8th grade.

Something you can thank a Republican for/

Lol consider the deal broken. Climate change is a massive fraud

The climate has always, and will always be in a perpetual state of change.

Every scientist which has studied the climate has come to a different conclusion.

Go shill somewhere else Alex

Thank you for proving my point.

Climate change deniers are just below Truthers in the Great Lulz.

Holy fuck , you're that stupid that you're still hung up on 'Dems vs Repubs'.
Go be stupid somewhere else

haha no faggot

enjoy thinking the Lizard People control us thru Hillary

massive douche bag

guy sounds lika a ghoul from fallout NV

Such an Amerifat it hurts. Clearly never got passed 10th grade

The world is more complex than you can grasp. The inner workings of the human body have not even been fully understood by biologists let alone the entire world.

Study more please

Libs have to have someone to blame for shit. Look at any liberal controlled city in America. That's the fruit of their labor

motherboard.vice.com/read/hillary-clinton-is-right-pepe-is-a-white-supremacist
Here we have a false flag Ku Klux Pepe attempting to subvert the Clinton narrative by evoking the Cred Forums boogieman card this is no laughing matter.

You must be confusing me with another user.

I made no such comment.

Doesn't matter. Keep using the Pepe meme and you are going to be flipped tons of shit.

It's a symbol of racism now.

So i should study anatomy and physiology to understand how liberals lie? More, some things are simple and easy to understand

The climate changes every day.

lol you have literally no idea what you're talking about

hahaha shitty troll faggot

You're so brain dead , you can't even remember what you posted .

>CTR is attacking alternative media now too.
>$0.9 has been deposited into your account.

Could you provide some examples of this?

>how liberals lie?

funny how everything you believe in here is a lie, and yet you fingerpoint at others simply because they annoy you and pass laws you don't like

more like you're doing shit-tier damage control because I schooled your ass on your stupid CIA comment

he would be an almost credible media person, if hed drop the screeching and spit-shouting

To rationalize a persons actions and motives can be a tricky thing to accomplish, when other influences are involved it may impossible to know exactly why an individual acts as they do.

zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-29/msnbc-host-admits-democratic-primary-rigged-while-station-simultaneously-rigs-covera

Jones screeches because without the distraction of his shtick people would examine his "evidence" and laugh.

Really? Enlighten me then.

>zerohedge.com
not a source
>>msnbc-host-admits
no one cares

Problem is he may not even be a troll, that's why his country is fucked

Name calling, great rebuttal.

"school me' .
Funny , you're fucking moron

don't post shitty trolls then

I might respect you

Watch him for long enough while studying the subjects he reports on and you may come to the same conclusion.

Here's the problem, I'm not interested in WHY they do things. I'm only interested in WHAT they do. And if what they do is unethical or wrong, it's simple. Trying to understand why is simply looking for a justification for wrong doing.

Conservatives keep pushing the argument that "climate change" is just code for "higher taxes" and sadly it works.

At least Obama was the first President to admit it's real and that we need to do something about it.

I wasted you faggot.

Keep your shit-tier replies coming.

Still no response to the post you mocked.

It is as though you do not possess any knowledge, and instead are trying to discredit any view which contradicts your own.

? Is this true?

But higher taxes is their solution so conservatives aren't wrong. Making energy more expensive isn't the solution. It will just take us backwards in quality of life. We need fracking and nuclear. Of course this is based on man made climate change being real, which it isn't

rt.com/usa/356067-wasserman-schultz-boasts-clinton/

nypost.com/2016/07/22/leaked-emails-show-how-democrats-screwed-sanders/

>inb4 all sources that even have video showing her admitting that she cheated are not valid sources.

Cool story.

Yeah I don't possess the knowledge needed to be a climate change denier troll like you two.

I'm still waiting for your reply , why she told the Washington Post that she was employed by the CIA?
C'mon bitch

If we know our star produces light yet do not know why we can never truly understand it.

To know why something acts as it does tells us what it may do next, and give us a better understanding of how it effects us.

So you don't have anything specific to actually prove what you're saying about him. We are just suppose to take your word on it. Got it.

Yeah but no. There is no proof that switching to greener energy sources would raise taxes. It's a con to demonize progress.

>It will just take us backwards in quality of life
bullshit

>we need fracking and nuclear
no we don't
and what's more, it's thankfully not going to happen

>man made climate change being real, which it isn't

but it is, and you've gone full tinfoil

You're talking about the sun. I'm talking about people. If a man murders someone, it doesn't matter why. It only matters that he did it.

I said the climate has and always will be in a perpetual state of change.

You deny this while slandering me with ad homonym attacks.

Tell me more

Neither of those "sources" are reputable

really faggot it would be so much easier to just admit you don't have any credible information to bolster your argument.

I don't care to stroke your conspiracy penis, thanks.

You've done nothing but prove my point in

Nobody cares faggot

a handful of "scientists" employed by oil companies agree with you

I have watched, and still watch occasionally. I am only asking that you search the things he reports on and come to your own conclusion as I did.

What i mean is, the first "solution" they go to is cap and trade. Raise the cost of doing business for coal fired plants to deincentivise getting into the coal business. What I'm saying is there are other ways to become energy independent and cleaner. Just because you say it's real, doesn't make it so. It's highly disputed

This. Thanks m8 thread was going to shit

get that fat fuck off my board

Not really as angry as he makes out or he'd have dropped dead by now.

Yeah but faggot you don't even acknowledge man made climate change is real.

Why am I replying to you again?

Motive is important in murder cases.

Was it self defense? Was it an act of premeditated murder? These things matter.

The sun was an analogy for any issue we may discuss in the world/universe/beyond.

Listen; 99% of climate scientists (the people that ACTUALLY study the climate, not just parrot whatever dumb shit they've heard from other fucking idiots) are in agreement that humans are having a negative impact on our climate. They bicker about exactly what can be attributed to it, and to what extent, but to pretend that this means they are in disagreement is fallacious and shows you are either
a) dishonest
b) an idiot
c) both.

Gonna go with c.

Because you can't stand that someone believes something different from you. This is also why you're a liberal. Fuck off. Man made climate change isn't real and it's arrogant to think we insignificant humans could cause it.

So you are denying the fact the climate is changing, and the fact it has changed before?

Nice!

>$0.05 has been deposited to your account.
>Recorded video of someone isn't a reliable source of what occurred and what was said.
CBS had a debate with Tim Canova and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. She admits to cheating while debating Tim Canova.

youtube.com/watch?v=T1qAGAYm-4M

Thank you too user.

Yeah , so I win the debate . I presented evidence of media personalities employed by the CIA....and you? Refused to acknowledge it .
'cause you're a bitch

No I'm enjoying tearing your tinfoil ass apart faggot.

>Man made climate change isn't real

keep pounding your tiny fists some more and maybe this will be true :^)

Pray to St. Alex
lol

This is literally contrary to the very definition of "climate." You don't know what you are talking about, just hush.

Alex Jones is great. I never realised she had tig ol bitties

Not relevant to the discussion.

Incorrect. They all agree there is climate change. They do not all agree it's caused by man. The earth has been here for 4 billion years, asshat. It'll be here long after humans are extinct. We couldn't change the climate id we tried. The earth would recover from any attempt to do so, it's humans that would perish. Not the earth

99%?

What deems them qualified, while you consider the majority of climatologists unqualified?

How can anyone believe this fool.
"I'M TRYING TO SAVE YOUR FROM THE GLOBELISTS THAT ARE TAKING AWAY YOUR INTERDIMENTIONAL TRAVEL SO YOU CANT FIGHT SPACE SATAN"

m.youtube.com/watch?v=usCDxSr3sUA

...

Right. I'll bet you've got some YouTube vids that prove jet fuel can't melt steel beams either.

Thank you for proving my point again. And again. And again.

I bet you're an atheist too

bill hicks, we know you.

How so? The worlds climate does change very slightly every day.

Do you have proof to the contrary?

You mean Bill Hicks?

if I were that wouldn't make you any less of a climate change denier retard

Shill detected

Climate change is not relevant to the topic of climate change?

WAT

It would however explain your arrogance

These are the kind of kafkatraps climate denialists have to use, and the fact that they think this is compelling speaks to the depth of their delusion.

The climate changes constantly, to deny that is laughable. It always has been in a state of change and will continue to change with or without us.

That said, I am in total agreement that we should find as many new sources of power production as possible.

Right, your shit argument falls like a house of cards, must mean someone's being paid to shill for Hillary.

Stupid faggot.

...

I know, right?

This is a total rejection of logic, though I think some of the ones in this this thread are having a fun time playing the game of Troll.

Insane

Natural cycles of the earth have nothing to do with scientific consensus that man is adversely affecting climate, yes. But you've already gone full retard about this and these are just placeholder posts now.

You sound like some little kid who just got scolded by his parents fam.

Alright, if that is the case, you should easily be able to disprove all the data indicating the planet is warming at an ever accelerating rate, and the correlation between industrialization, increasing human activity, and increasing rates of warming? All just a big coincidence? And one compelling enough to convince 99% of climate scientists (all save those in the employ of the industries doing some of the most damage) who just somehow happen to be wrong while one dumb asshole on Cred Forums is smarter than all of 'em? You live in a very magical ridiculous unrealistic place, which is definitely not Earth.

>Ad hominem

Trying to attack me or change the subject because you were proven wrong.

Nice work.

>laughable
your argument is
>a many new sources of power

like nuclear and fracking

yes we already knew you were a retard afraid of green energy

>fam
Only kids say stupid shit like this

He's a fear-mongering profiteering COINTELPRO douchebag

I'm sorry , what was my argument again? And how did your paranoid mind jump to "shill for Hillary"?

Wrong. Read either of the latest reports issued by the EPA or the UN. The consensus in the scientific community worldwide is overwhelming, but of course a denialist like you couldn't possibly accept that. What would be reasonably compelling proof that we are impacting the climate for you?

>you were proven wrong.

sorry but your weakass denial of overwhelming scientific consensus isn't me being "proven wrong."

You sound like a fundie dipshit or an anti-vaxxer.

when in Rome 37 year old climate change denier faggot :^)

Wow, you are really confused there buddy.

Lol there are no records of earth's climate from the industrial revolution period and if there were, are they accurate? Why does a scientist employed by an oil company have less credibility than one employed by environmentalists? Who is to say our planet is warming "at an increased rate" when there isn't anything accurate to compare it to? If you all me to disprove it, i ask you to prove it.

Actually , the burden of proof lies with the status quo on matters like this .
>do you need to look up what 'status quo'means?

You were trying to post an edited video made by We Don't Know Jack for We Don't Know What Reason in some weakass attempt to prove your point that DWS/Clinton "rigged" the election.

Please proceed Governor.

I love it when faggots like you pretend the person handing you your ass needs to "look up something."
kek

"CLIMATE" refers to the trends of WEATHER over EXTREMELY LONG PERIODS OF TIME. You can't even be assed to know the terms before you dismiss the entire body of proof showing you're a fucking retard. You climate deniers are really funny, if not for the fact that you're allowed to vote like a normal/real person.

WEATHER changes every day.
Climate is measured on a geological time scale.

which is why it's more likely user is just some buttmad right-winger who finds liberals annoying.

All the damning info about climate change has been available for a good decade now.

>epa
>un
Check your sources

Let's review the chain of comments.

Again instead of sticking to the argument about Debbie Wasserman Schultz you keep going off on random tangents about conspiracies.

Please elaborate what overwhelming scientific consensus tells us that Debbie Wasserman Schultz did not rig the DNC. Even though, she, herself admits to doing it. Please, by all means radiate your overwhelming scientific consensus about her innocence.

Apparently you need to "look something up" or you wouldn't be pushing logical fallacies like "Oh the burden of proof is on yoos guys"!

humans have been recording temperatures for less than 400 years. earth is 4.5 billion years old.

we don't know fucking shit on a "geological time scale."

In just the last century, Earth's temperature has increased more, than the sum of all the time before that. Fucking google it, and look at the charts yourself; it's alarming to say the least (unless you're a braindead mongoloid.) You'ld have to be an idiot to not realize what has changed, or purposefully obstinate. I'm guessing it is more likely the latter, it's easier than acknowledging that there is a problem.

Your entire premise is a conspiracy.
>Even though, she, herself admits to doing it.

Admits to what? "Rigging the DNC?" What the fuck does that even mean? You're getting buttmad.

Thank you good sir. These enviro libderps know everything tho

Why wouldn't scientists working for an oil company be as credible in determining if oil is harmful for the environment? Are you literally retarded? Ever heard of a conflict of interest?

you are a retard and I have no idea what you're referring to

Butt out of discussions that have nothing to do with you.

>Google it
Yes, the all knowing Google which has been taking data for multiple millenia. Are you really this thick?

samefag

And a scientist working for the epa or Greenpeace is totally legit, right...

More like you probably think Google is controlled by the Jews you flat-earther

kek

youtube.com/watch?v=TPK8ul4En3U

Sure it is.

Highly disputed among lay people, maybe. Not among climate scientists or anyone who actually studied the subject longer than watching a YouTube video or reading a blog.

Get fucked you retard.

tired shit tier trolling is tired

Lol

we've been though this

I could make that fucking video and manipulate it to mean what I want, honestly.

You have absolutely no proof that DWS or anyone "rigged" the election.

This is conspiracy garbage and you deserve to have your ass kicked in this thread as I've been doing.

I'm still waiting for you to respond to ; Gloria Steinem's comments to the Washington Post .
Stop being an evasive cunt

No, there can't possibly be two climate change denying retards in here.

You're either using another computer or a mobile.

Mfw Eric Schmidt is Jewish

Fuck off samefag.

I don't have to do anything.

You're the one making these stupid claims and not even posting your sources.

Hyup

are you making the hunching sounds while you type that?

Its a conspiracy!!

Right, because unless fox news says it, it's a liberal hoax.

Yeah sometimes I keep forgetting the climate change denier virus hasn't been eradicated yet.

feelsbadman

SeeFaggot

My sources?! Lol! The WASHINGTONPOST , you slimey fucking cunt
>the burden of proof is on you

confirmed for 12 year old

are you quoting the wrong user again?

I've made no claims here.

...

Yup. There are no forensic techniques scientists can use to piece together a very clear picture of the past. Haven't heard anything like that on fox news so it must be a liberal hoax. You people are hilarious.

Again, 37 but that's ok. Stay mad friendo. :)))

...

lol every climatoligist works for the EPA and greenpeace lol

are you this dumb?

>friendo.

You might consider having your prostate gland check, js

I don't even have cable so, no, i don't watch fox news

Climate change is a fraud... Not for the science, but for the way the government want to impose control regarding the outcome. The answer: Carbon Tax. All it would do is punish the poor, as carbon fuels are what is affordable. There are no governments in power trustworthy enough to handle self imposed taxes on carbon, without funneling collections to serve their own interest.

Discuss...

so why do you post like a 12 year old?

Are you youthful at heart?

Except for your cringing right-wing faggotry?

>Climate change is a fraud...
hahaha no

...

Bravo Shill . Brilliant display of obfuscation

Who?

You are a sad, strange, little man.

look here

No, we mean intellectually.

I already tried explaining this. These envirowackos just attack personally. It's to no avail so i troll troll troll

>The answer: Carbon Tax. All it would do is punish the poor, as carbon fuels are what is affordable.

Which is bullshit. Carbon taxes would be for big polluters, who are not poor.

yeah because you can't even focus on what's being asked of you, others are shills.

got it

Yeah I'm so sad and so strange for pointing out your shit-tier "source."

kek

Typical lib not understanding economics. Price of energy goes up because of taxes, poor people like you will pay more. Rich people don't give fuck if their electric bill goes up, you nigger

>Climate change is a fraud
>Not for the science,

If the science is right, then the conclusion is too, don't be so buttmad.

>These envirowackos just attack personally.

When you post like a retard, expect to be treated like one.

Denying climate change is about as stupid as being a flat-earther. Don't expect debates, but ridicule.

>. Rich people don't give fuck if their electric bill goes up,

yeah they do, actually, which is why they're the biggest opponents of carbon taxes

#nochin

I never expect debate from a liberal. You people don't know how to debate ideas. You only defend your ideas and lash out at anyone that believes something different

>durr I never debate liberals

sore loser much?

kek

No they're against it because it's not good for business.

whatever your excuse

the rich are bitching about carbon taxes, not the poor.

thanks for proving my point

You can let it go now . I made my point , you successfully avoided addressing it .
That's why I said "bravo".

Read it again. I said i never EXPECT debate. Because liberals don't discuss ideas. They only defend and offer personal insults instead

you're all over the place faggot

let's sum up:

1. You made a claim
2. You posted no sources to back up this claim
3. You then state I should "look up" something

that's not an argument

That's because they haven't been implemented yet. When they do, the cost of energy WILL go up.

Typical idiot, not understanding competition and other economic drives that reduce prices.

He's a moron but he's not as bad as the liberal nuts.

>passive aggressive bullshit

You want to discuss ideas?

The only "debate" concerns what we should be doing about climate change, not whether it's real or not.

>the cost of energy WILL go up.

Using coal-fired shit, sure.

Green energy, like solar or wind, has a retroactive effect on energy bills.

But you're not worried about the poor, you're kind of carrying water for the rich, making assumptions that not polluting is somehow "bad for business" and worrying about rich people paying their bills.

Cuz any opinion other than yours is bullshit. I get it, libtard. It's caked "groupthink" and you're part of it

1. I posted a fact
2. I posted my source (washington post)
3. Been waiting for you to stop being a winy cunt and rebut me

lol

>Climate change supported by the entire body of work of almost every single living climatologist on the planet.

Support you've provided to disprove any of their work

>...*crickets*...

I'm not surprised you "don't debate liberals" it doesn't seem you even know how to...

And the funny part is, I'm not even a liberal! Lol I've voted for candidates from both major parties, but liberals are the ones lashing out. Yeah, sure, buddy. How's highschool?

Except I'm not stating any opinions here.

>I posted my source (washington post)

no you didn't.

sauce?

Workin on a song atm need some sound samples
soundcloud.com/jens-bond-4/hello-satan667#t=3:54

SOMEONE TOOK THE BAIT GET IN HERE NIGGERS

faggot

I believe what you are thinking of is called "peer review." It's something that happens in communities of scientists, and other people, who in general, know what the fuck they're talking about unlike you.

Except that i never said i "don't debate liberals"

wait, Breitbart isn't peer-reviewed?

kek

You don't know how to use Google? Wasn't that part of your classical education?

Oh ok my bad. I didn't know you were all scientists here. My mistake Dr.s

>durr use gugel

You're a shitty troll, you know that?

God you are so fucking butthurt.

Mad that Clinton's gonna raise your taxes?

No, you're lack of any argument or support for your dumb notions makes that statement for you loud and clear.

Lol wat? Are we talking about hillary and taxes now?? We can if you want, dr. You control the conversation

I win again

He's unintentionally hilarious

...

My notions? All ive done is question yours. The best way to troll a lib,btw

you are uniquely retarded
you do know that

not that user

but you did was post a bunch of cringing flat-earther bullshit

granted user was kind of dumb to fall for it
but I like him

It's so obvious (and hilarious) that intelligence makes you feel very insecure. I wonder if it could be because you're working with the intellect of a heavily stoned toddler?

Just pointing out why you're so buttmad about man made climate change:

You find liberals irritating. Like Hillary.

Libtards sticking together, huh. Typical. No individuality. You people used to fight the man. Now you've become the man.

No we're still fighting idiocy.

See: Trump.

A true capitalist. He got rich by having flat out morons give him their money. Very smart man.

Again, I'm not a liberal. Your crippling need to generalize those who know more than you as some archetypal "other" shows how emotionally dependent you are on the position you're defending. I ask again; what would you consider reasonable proof that humans are impacting climate?

This is classic liberal tactic. Go for personal attacks and insinuate your opponent has a lower intellect.

If only they taught you anything more then ad-homm attacks at your classical institute of learning
>you might have a chance debating me