How is this passable??

how is this passable??

okay dumbass let me change the example totally randomly :

day 1 : 00 - 100
day 2 : 00 - 100
day 3 : 10 - 90
day 4 : 00 - 90
day 5 : 90 - 00

total : 100 - 380

WOW MIND BLOWN

ever heard of inflation?

fucking autist i swear

The "saved" amount is meaningless, and isn't tied to the amount given at the start.

If you spend a dollar a day for 100 days, at the end you would have spent $100, but the amount saved according to this method would be $5000

Why would you expect your saved money to add up to 100.

>never spend a penny
>save an infinite sum of money

Cool, preschool math problems.

This thing is flawed in so many ways. First of all, you aren't "saving" any money in this just because you didn't spend it all in one day.

Saged and /thread

>the saved amount is meaningless
Are you fucking dumb?

>have 10 bucks
>spend 0 and save 10 on first day
>spend 10 and save 0 on second day

Spent (0+10) = Saved (10+0)

No matter what you do, the saved amount should always equal the amount spent

you're stupid

>have 20
>spend 5 save 15
>spend 5 save 10
>spend 5 save 5
>spend 5 save 0

spent 20, yet saved a total of 30

She's a liberal on welfare

a=b
a^2=ab
a^2+a^2=a^2+ab
2a^2=a^2+ab
2a^2-2ab=a^2+ab-2ab
2a^2-2ab=a^2-ab
2(a^2-ab)=1(a^2-ab)
2=1

shiieet

Each time you use money you deduct from the WHOLE value. Every time that the WHOLE gets deducted from that value is now considered the WHOLE value. So anything that happened before the new WHOLE value is irrelevent because it was deducted off of an entirely different sum. Budgeting is not a generating idea it is a one shot repitive idea. These savings dont stack. If user would have stopped spending after his initial purchase he would have saved $60 dollars but he was a greedy bastard and ended up not saving any.

(a^2-ab)=0
you cant divide 0 by 0 and say its 1

2(a^2-ab)=1(a^2-ab)
>2(2^2-2x2)=1(2^2-2^2)
>2(4-4)=1(4-4)
>2(0)=1(0)
>2/0???

Your logic error is that you divide by zero to go from the second to last to the last line.
Doesn't matter if you do that to cancel the zeros on each side, you're not allowed to divide by zero.

...

#DIV/0!

>taking the bait

Try it again with different numbers:

Day 1: spent $1, saved $99.
Day 2: spent $1, saved $98.
Day 3: spent $1, saved $97.
...
etc., spending $1 every day
...
Day 100: spent $1, saved $0.


Total: spent $100, saved $4950.


Get it now?

It's because the "saved" column is tracking individual days, not progress so far.

For instance, day 1 and day 2's spending add up to 70 yet day 1 and 2's "saved" somehow "add up" to 90. It's obviously bullshit.

Two different methods of counting merged together.

How funny that you're questioning someone else's intelligence.

Spent Saved
50 50
50 0

Total: 100, 50
zomg!

>have 100

Spent 0, saved 100
Spent 0, saved 100
Spent 0, saved 100
Spent 0, saved 100
Spent 0, saved 100

Saved: 500

omfg hax

This shit is why the markets collapsed in 2008.

...

2=1
2-1=1-1
1=0

God exists

And the fucking jews have kept this a secret
Smh