/thread

All unnecessary pregnancies should be banned

> OH yes is great idea.
> So criminal shitlord scumgbags can have them only.
> Is good plan, so government can just totally oppress the plebs.
> #Don't Cred Forums retarded.

Give me one good reason you need a gun.

Oh right you can't.

> unironic use of the word shitlord
>>>tumblr

A non-law-abiding citizen illegally obtained a gun and is breaking into my house trying to kill my family. I dont have a phone to call 911.

...

The sport of target shooting

And don't tell me it's not a reason to have a gun, even Canada allows it

...

...

...

...

So when some 6'6 250lb animal bashed in your door and I can hear you screaming as he beats the shit out of you and ass rapes you.
Me and my 5'7 frame can walk in, pull a pistol and defend your honor by blowing his brains all over the floor.
> Hero.

How's that working on murder being banned?

"/thread"

If all guns were illegal and eliminated, the few that would be left in criminal hands would cost so much there's literally no way they would use them to break in to your shitty Midwest bungalow.
That's just fun, not a "need"

You should let his ass get molested for a few more minutes before you stop it.

staple guns?

>because the black market cant just import AK-47s from Africa/mid east, where they average about 25 dollars apiece.

Kill yourself.

Mfw you can 3d print a gun from anywhere on the planet

Gun nuts are the easiest to troll OP why even bother there's no glory in it.

It's like getting your Asian gf in to bdsm. It's do easy it doesn't even count as a win.

...

If there was a magic wand that poofed all guns and knowledge of guns and any evidence that they ever existed out of existence then sure. Wave the wand. But as it stands right now what you're suggesting would never be possible. Not even remotely. And the number of defensive uses dwarfs all gun death so statistically speaking allowing legal ownership of guns, at least in USA, has far more benefits than consequences.

No trolls here. Only legitimate conversation about the ins and outs of gun control

"/thread"

You don't think Mexican drug cartels wouldn't see money to be made with this and start smuggling in guns? You're a special kind of stupid you know that right?

The debate isn't about whether there are situations where guns will help, it's about whether stricter gun control will reduce the number of occurrences of gun deaths (other than suicide).

Different guy here. Gun owner. 2A supporter. Our gun control is fine. Sure it could use some tweaks. And criminals are making it look bad. Most legislation that could be inacted already is. It's already multiple felonies to buy guns outside your state of residence without transfer to an FFL in your state who runs the BG check. Most gun shows already don't rent booths to private sellers(tho some do). It's already multiple felonies to sell to felons and the mentally ill knowingly. The one thing I would change would be to make it a "do not proceed" when the BG check returns "no data". Waiting times don't stop anything. Mag caps don't stop anything. Assault weapons(Kek) bans don't stop anything(they actually cost more lives than they save).

I'll give you 4.

Self Protection
Home Protection
Target Shooting
Hunting

What about bombs and knives? Because thats what the latest terrorists had...dont forget axes and bats too

>Give me one good reason you need a gun.

We don't need cars either, or tons of other stuff we have.

>no way they would use them to break in to your shitty Midwest bungalow

You're right, because there's no way a break in happens if they're not holding a gun. All crime would just disappear right?

how about my 1742 replica flintlock, that can fire up to 4 times a minute, gonna ban that too?

Give me one reason you need a penia. We can just shove a needle in your balls and get the sperm thaaaat way right

...

I can kill someone with my bare hands if I rip out there eyeballs and shove them down the guys throat.

If buy guns from the cartels just out of spite that our government banned them . I'd spend my life savings just to fuck them in the fucking fuck till their fuckin fuck fucks fucks in fucking fuck

but another 2 million did?

Where are you getting your information?

let's make heroin illegal too so no one can do heroin

Better enforcement of the laws already in place would do a lot. Felons that have been picked up multiple times with illegal firearms on them should be back on the street in a year. Or be allowed to plea bargain it away. Felon caught with a gun should be an automatic 5 years no early release.

Here is my gun.
Come and take it.

...

When did Obama say he wanted to ban all semi auto rifles?

KSG, right?

Yeah, and I keep one tube filled with Hexolit32. It's basically going to stop anyone who ends up on the wrong end of it.

It is surprisingly difficult to mug someone with a knife compared to a gun.
>"give me your money or I'll shoot."
>get money.
>"give me your money or I'll stab you."
>runs away.
>fuck leaving the alley.
>get no money.

You don't pay attention very much. He hasn't said it but he panders to those that do. He supports the retardedness going on in California. And he supports Clinton who if elected has another useless AWB locked in and ready to go. There's only one reason to go down that failed road again. And that's as a stepping stone to more superfluous bans and restrictions till we're left with muzzleloaders and single shots. They're already referring to bolt action deer rifles as sniper rifles in California.

I don't think he has ever said it outright, but more alluded to that being his goal with suggesting America needs to do what Australia did.

I've used a firearm twice in my life to stop bad things from happening.

Request denied.

No further infringements will be tolerated.

I pay attention. Obama is in his final year. He isn't enacting anything close to a gun ban. He is entitled to try and support whatever legislation he feels, but so what, that's what politicians do. Stop your doom and gloom bullshit. Last I checked, gun laws are mostly regulated by the individual states and not federal mandates. The wheels of government turn slowly, and unless the demo control the house and Senate, it's all hyperbole.

He's been in office for 8 years. If he hasn't done it by now, then he isn't doing it.

When he went on TV to cry crocodile tears because he couldn't guilt-trip congress into voting for the legislation he wanted.

Oh, and he flew out the parents of dead children to sit in on the senate during the vote, just to guilt them to vote a certain way.

I'm talking about Hillary with most of that. And Bill didn't have any trouble enacting his AWB. It failed. And now Hillary wants one too. No reason for it. And she doesn't have to have congressional approval on something like that if scotus(which will be in her pocket) deems it constitutional(which it will). Seriously if there wasn't a scotus pick on the line I would say exactly what you're saying. But that's not the case

>When did he say he wanted something?
>He isn't enacting anything close to a gun ban

That's when he said he wanted to ban evil semi-automatic guns.

Just because he couldn't get it passed in congress doesn't make his intent to ban them any less real.

you get tired of posting dick pics OP?

Evil Obama!! How dare he try and enact legislation based on his political party beliefs. As if the pendulum doesn't swing the other way when a GOP candidate is on office, trying to enact legislation of their party.
You people are fucking stupid. Do you even understand how politics work?

He didn't do it because he never had a strong enough majority in Congress to do it. Hillary will try for it

Because he knows he'd never get away with it. Hillary has a scotus pick. She will be able to. And will. She's already said she will

>How dare he try and enact legislation based on his political party beliefs

He and his party are acting directly against the Bill of Rights. He is staunchly against the Bill of Rights. Yes, that is evil.

And it's pretty disgusting to guilt members of congress with grieving parents to sit in on their vote.

3% of the country owns the majority of the guns in the US.

30,000 people are shot each year.

Most gun owners aren't in WELL-REGULATED MILITIAS.

And when tyranny came - the gunfags cowered like the bitches they are.

BAN GUNS NOW! REPEAL AMENDMENT 2! CONFISCATE GUNS! SHOOT THE REBELS!

Trump said he'd build a wall on yhe Mexico border and deport every illegal.
It doesn't mean he will make it happen.
Scotus pick or not, Shillary doesn't have the means to disarm the populace.

Because as president you represent all of the people and what they want. Just cause they voted for you, doesn't mean they want everything you want, maybe they only want 80% of what you want. Same for Congress. But there lies the problem. It's not what the people want anymore, it's what they want

>30,000 people are shot each year

20,000 of them are depressed losers who shoot themselves to end their lives.

I'm not planning on shooting myself, so I don't really care. I'm not going to be unsafe because I can buy a gun, because some depressed loser ended his life.

If I was depressed enough to kill myself, banning a gun wouldn't stop me either.

guns save lives

>300 replies later

Per the Supreme Court every fighting age male US citizen is the militia.

Those 30000 people weren't killed by the 3% you referenced. And of those 2/3 popped themselves. The majority of those killed after that are black, of which over 90% is committed by another black.

Your understanding of well regulated militia is incorrect

>implying race is a factor
A dead person is a dead person. Who kills and who dies doesn't matter. You still have a killer and victim.

That things is prolly a ghost gun that has a 30 caliber clip that can fire 100/rounds a second.

Your understanding of shall not be infringed is incorrect

You should have to be licensed to breed.

Stop being a Google user.

If someone is within 10 feet of you with a knife, that knife is just as deadly as a gun.

Make cars iliggal no more drunk driving!

>/threading your own post
Not even contesting your image, you are one huge fucking newfags and should kill yourself

The fact that this whole thread exists is proof that Cred Forums as a whole is one huge shitpost on society

I bet half the faggots posting here are noguns anyway.
Get on my level.

If you believe that picture you are a Google. I will Youtube you!

But sadly race is a factor. Disenfranchisement, poor education, poverty. Those all create circumstances that lead to the issue. If black on black crime were on par with white on white crime, especially murder by gun, gun homicides would be significantly lower

So everyone should have fully automatics?

It's a Google problem!

As the ownership of guns increase, crime decreases.

Why don't you go to Charlotte and make New Rhodesia, pussy?

Yes, that's what shall not be infringed means.

Now your homework is to look up the legality of "fully automatics" in the USA currently before you start with the big boy talk.

you gun nut's 'definition' of well regulated militia's a joke.

"oh it's just anyone over the age of 18".

>well regulated
I think not. I enjoy hunting rifles. but you gun nuts and right wing whackos have fucked our country with guns.

nope. time to ban them.

There is nothing wrong with a fully automatic weapon

Bill had one. She wants and will get one. That's a whole lot more realistic than trumps plan.

>because thats working so well with drugs at the moment

You are reading the 2nd amendment wrong. The reason we have arms is to have the ability to form a militia when needed. Not to maintain a militia at all times.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

it's funny, because all of these proposed gun-lovers, and "Constitutionalists" love to change the 2nd Amendment whenever possible (ie no felons owning guns, no one can own A-10 Warthogs with 30mm guns, no one can own nukes)...

So it looks like the 2nd Amendment has been infringed. Repealing it is the only rational next step.

then a mass confiscation. won't give up your guns? no biggie, the vast majority of Americans don't own guns - and have no problem taking them from your cold, dead hands.

most mass shootings are liberals, idiot. that's not even including niggers, who are responsible for virtually all mass shootings, and most shootings.

and they're no doubt liberal.

jesus you're stupid.

Most people think I have to be right in front of them or something for it to be dangerous. And like I said, fuck leaving wherever I am. I'm not trying to kill anybody/get caught.

Us right wingers and gun nuts haven't killed anyone lately. Need to go a bit more left wing for your significant murder by gun statistics. Particularly welfare recipients.

with all due respect. YOUR idea of the 2nd amendment is wrong.

no matter what the conservative supreme court says - you're not a part of a well-regulated militia. which is a caveat to owning guns.

maintaining a well-regulated militia at all times is exactly what the founders meant. Thank GOD Hillary's going to win, and appoint liberal justices.

it's time to take your guns.

aaaaaand the retards chime in. how's trump, you closeted buttfag racist. tell cleetus to get that Camaro off the goddam "lawn".

K.

obvious troll is obvious, but it cannot be affirmed enough:

Every gun law is an infringement!!!

GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH

nbcmiami.com/news/local/Florida-Woman-Killed-in-Accidental-Shooting-at-Punta-Gorda-Citizen-Police-Academy-389687322.html
lel ya ok

You are still missing the fact that a militia does not need to be maintained at all times. The guns are there for when the need to form a militia comes, you have them already and don't need to ask the state to provide you arms for you.

can you at least try to make posts worth responding to?

Not really, the meaning of shall not be infringed hasn't changed in 200 years. How people perceive the phrase well regulated compared to how the founding fathers meant it has.

Not him but
>cantrefute/10
Nice inaccurate insults you got there. Do you have equally inaccurate opinions?

uh
how lately do you mean?
right wingers have killed a bunch of people over the last 5ish years.

you shoot 30000 per year. mass shootings weekly.

do you really think a Chicago gang member's a liberal? you really believe that, don't you, you goddam trump-voting retard.

>pro-tip: Islamic terrorists? yeah those ones. they're extreme right-wingers.

but that doesn't meet your inane, ignorant, undereducated narrative - so it's easier to just label all murderers "liberals".

One person killed by accident vs 50 queers killed plus 100+ wounded by a liberal

K

But mah guns man!!

Mah ammendment and right to bare arms!

This.

closeted? motherfucker i am racist, i don't deny it. niggers are violent, hateful, stupid pieces of shit.

> oh no, an opinion that differs from yours
> oh no, WORDS!

CRY. Fuck off to your safe space cunt.

Or we could just kill all non caucasians to end world hunger, wars and most of all BLM.

Nail guns too?

It's not even my definition, read the federalist and anti federalist papers, they tell you exactly what they meant when they wrote it

Were talking about the percentage of the 17000 gun murders. That's not us friendo.

you havent lived until you have masturbated with gun oil and a shotgun up your ass

Yet they always vote democrat because they let them continue their lifestyle. The gang member just wants to keep gang bangin and the Muslim wants to come here without being looked at too hard.

If most of them don't own guns, how are they taking them from our cold dead hands? Do you really think the entire military or police will back it up?

And WE hardly ever shoot anyone at all.

...

Books also should be banned, they contain evil.

The internet should be banned, it's nothing but a tool for spreading hatespeech and racism

>Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Why didn't more guns prevent the crime rises in 1973, 1977, 1983, 1989, or 1999?
You could argue that the Internet becoming more popular prevented crime better than guns based on that graph

Military and police swear oaths to the constitution. Tell them to disarm civilians. See how far that gets ya.

you think Chicago gang members vote? are you literally retarded?

The first amendments only cover written words on paper with ink. Internet is not covered because it didn't exist when the constitution was written.

Hatespeech and racism(on an individual level) is constitutionally protected. So no.

jesus you're stupid. deep in denial.

Give me one good reason you need a car.
Give me one good reason you need a house.
Give me one good reason you need a job.

They do when they're bussed to the polls by the left.

>projecting this hard

what do you mean "we"? timothy McVeigh "we"? every white mass-shooter in US-history "we"? virtually all white shooters "we"?

you kill people daily. you shoot thousands of people annually.

and now - you've embraced Russia as your savior. and call America "weak and awful". You literally hate America. And Love Russia.

Well republitard, how about this: If you don't love it? you can GET OUT.

get baited hard, faggots

>I enjoy hunting rifles.
It's safer if you stick a dildo up your ass instead.

McVeigh didn't commit the OKC bombing

So I can kill people to avoid deaths

Jesus Christ could you be any more smug?

Niggers. And my beautiful, white daughters who jog isolated trails, are often home alone, etc do.

They will not be disarmed. I don't think you understand. We will tear this country apart if you try.

And don't think for a second that if it comes to that, we're not going to take that opportunity to purge this country of idiotic shits like you.

We'll fix the problem, once and for all.

Damn

Oh look, Ruth Based Ginsburg is posting on Cred Forums.

Oh wait, you're not a Supreme Court justice? Then your shitty uninformed reading of the prefatory clause doesnt matter. Fuck off to HuffPo faggot.

I think you really believe that. I don't think you're trolling. And you probably really are a trump-supporter...

God what stupid people the GOP's created. Anti-intellectualists. Retards. Perverts. Criminals. Deplorables. The literal lowest common denominator.

I wish you republicans didn't hate work (that's right, the biggest population on welfare in America are southern whites). I wish you didn't hate education. And the law.

Why not prove you deserve guns by killing people who disagree with that?

is cool make mine jus fine

Most blacks in the US live in the South. Because of that, there are no jobs. Criminality drives business away.

Look at Detroit, Camden, Compton, etc.

Stop blaming whites for the actions of niggers.. which is the entire gun debate in itself.

Die.

You hate successful Americans. And so you, and the rest of the retards cling to what you know best - your bible, your guns, and Donald trump.

The purge we need in this country isn't of Mexicans. It's of the right wing. You must be destroyed.

How does it feel knowing you typed all that out despite the fact I live in Canada and have literally no dog in the fight?

You exercise free speech in such a reasonable and articulate way . . . I'm sold.

Let's kill 1/3 of the population!

ok I'll write it again.

read this slowly, cleetus.

THE LARGEST GROUP IN AMERICA ON WELFARE ARE SOUTHERN WHITES

You know who pays your welfare? Blue States. Because we "libtards" are the earners. The educated. The producers.

What a twist, eh? Who ever thought the GOP'ers would be the real red threat?

you do realise that this is equally as likely to kill you as whoever you point it at?

I'll allow that once all niggers Spics white trash and other degenerates are wiped off the face of the earth because gun laws won't stop the Googles from buy guns and how will I defend myself.

Whites are 5X the population of blacks. They're the majority, dipshit. Of course there are more whites on welfare.

What point are you making, besides the fact that you have to construe reality to appear correct in some way?

You're a fucking moron.

it's only a .22. let those fucking retards blow their limbs off.

apparently with knives and large automobiles which are just as effective at killing people as guns.

especially in tight corridors

Could someone give me reliable source for this statement ? (same crime rate US/Belgium) ?

and incedentally the orginised crime where i live have like company guns. they circulate and you return them. 'us common thugs' dont own the guns ourselves... it dosent matter if you qualify for guns. they can be baught and made from parts or legally got by a crackhead with no legal problems for extra crack and look there a gun had. seriously making them illegal does not effect us on the underside. it unarms the mass.

from this side i can say the stated gals must be either untruthful or ignorant.

its time for you to take some remedial reading comprehension, google.

So you finally admit it, cleetus.

Up until now, your narrative's been "only black niggers are on welfare!".

black niggers and southern white trash.

I never said anything like that.

You must dribble from the mouth.

btw u trump-lovers are libtards. literal rino libtards.

>incidentally
>baught

mfw that rape of the English language by a typical right wing white trumpateer

goals.... the stated goals.

Where did I say I like Trump, lol?

Didn't even read the thread.

Come and take them.
I'll hand them over one round at a time.

-t Ausfag

i misspelled it so you had to think about it, corrected it to play people to the post, and laugh at your being provoked to its responce. you ever been manipulated before? because you are easly.

Yobbo

my goal is to point out something relevent.

I live in omaha and was at the mall when Von Maur shooting happened. I now carry a sidearm concealed or open, wherever I go.

Calm down kimmy, we won't be banning websites or internet access anytime soon

it's all part of a larger plan
>step one - "ban guns"
This will force the law abiding to become criminals, or become victims
>step two - crime rates go up
the honest citizens that have surrendered their guns now find their homes and lives in danger and in need of protection
>step three - expanded police powers
To "protect" the law abiding population the police are granted more authority with less regulation
>step four - protection from yourself
to prevent protests over the increased police action, and to help find the 'bad guys" new laws are put into place, like mandatory curfews and compulsory searches of cars and homes
>step five - total control by the government.
Welcome to the Liberal America. You have no rights that may offend someone else, you have no more money than you are told you may have. You may not live anywhere you are not assigned to live.

Thank God you damn libs are gonna lose. Trump will ban porn finally. And criminalize encryption.

And it's about damn time.

3 armed blacks break in to home and woman shoots them. so fuck you

dailycaller.com/2016/09/23/georgia-woman-shot-burglars-in-epic-home-video/

the machine is very simple, you doubt that?

Just ban niggers, spics and sandniggers. Problem solved

eeeeeew! no.

yea no

It's honestly way more complicated than it needs to be.

The easy way to do it is just put a .22 cartridge into a piece of brake line and hit it with a hammer.

...

Ikr just like the bible xD

but lazyness is the brother of all invention. senpi i just wanna pull a trigger.

Zoz

>implying that's actually a bad idea

Alcohol is fucking degenerate.

So how do your precious stats on gun deaths look after you remove the ones that were legitimate self-defense and other justified killings?

Antis once again demonstrating that they have absolutely no understanding of history whatsoever.

Thats cool as fuck

Yeah... they tried that about a century ago. Didn't work out too well.

What do you mean? Just because alcohol got banned once in America and people got butthurt, doesn't mean you can't successfully ban alcohol. Alcohol is banned in several countries already and they didn't have any problems with that whatsoever.

see

So wait, which of these countries do you consider to be not a complete hellhole?

Damn, beat me to it.

Sause:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_alcohol_prohibition

Are you retarded? Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Brunei and UAE are all good, rich and successful countries.

inb4: durr, no they're not they're full of muslimz, durr.

see

Sandgoogle spotted

But I need my gun op!

Relatively the same as defensive uses end with no shots fired 99% of the time. Also they number in at least the hundreds of thousands if not the millions.

>implying alcohol prohibition is related in anyway to how good a country is
>implying "this shitty country has X, therefore X is bad" is an actual argument
>implying Brunei, Emirates and Kuwait are shit

Kill yourself.

Except these Guns

Banning something does not make it go away.

...

Hahah oh shit, too bad she didn't kill all 3 of them
>sweet justice

Nope, I'm white. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Brunei and UAE are objectively successful countries, saying they're not just because they're muslim is retarded. inb4: kek go fuck a goat ahmed, kekeke.

What is the purpose of the trigger on that?

This

The trigger releases the hammer, which fires a 22 blank and it launches the dilo deep intp your ass faggot.

all bans should be banned

My Mayonnaise Launcher is the only Gun I need.

...

Wtf is that I've never even heard of that before

Not implying it's bad, just genuinely interested

It's basically a lightweight slug designed to open up and slow down quickly when it hits drywall.

The idea is to limit overpenetration.

Yeah, they're totally all complete hellholes. Derp.

ban guns all you want, i will still carry every single day. i also own over 100 guns and close to half a million rounds. i also own a reloading bench

>I also own a reloading bench
Is this unusual where you live?
Here in Aus probably 80-90% of shooters roll their own.

i live in the US, I only know 2 people who load their own

All liberals should be killed

This is abysmal bait even for here

Wow, that's crazy.

What do you do with your brass, do you just let it pile up in your house or do you not even bother picking it up?

...

most people just throw it away or buy steel jackets to save money

...

Where you can be legally tossed from a roof for being gay and beaten for minor infractions. I like to keep my society out of the 1400s thank you.

must be the same ,,expert,, who calls blacks ,,people,,

Funny considering the fact that your shithole country looks like it's from the 1400s compared to theirs.

>look such a small number
>therefore not a problem
You dont even know that many people. .....

>implying queers shouldn't be killed

Back to >>>tumblr with you.

who is defined as mentally ill in this context, out of curiosity?

I'm in Australia. What does a gun sound like? And what does it look like when fired? Never experienced it.

Go to a range, you faggot.

It goes "bang" and looks the same after you fire it.

You mean you're in one of the state capitals? Everyone in the bush has guns, and for good reason.

niggers?

What kind of guns? I live in a "bush" area and know only one person with a small bb rifle that he keeps in a vault. I'm definitely not in the desert, though.

Hitler did nothing wrong. Seriously.

What kind of guns are at the range?

His war tactics were cringe.

>Rifles (excl. semi-auto)
>Shotguns (excl. semi-auto)
>Revolvers
>Pistols

What did you expect?

Except beef with the US and the Soviet Union at the same time like a retard and lose the war

This
This right here

>implying I'm human
>I would't worry about it

Wild pigs, wild dogs. Only a relatively small part of the country has crocs but anyone living near them would sure as fuck want guns too. On top of that, anyone on s farm needs guns so if livestock get badly injured they aren't forced to soend 20 minutes beating a thrashing horse with a stick to put it out of its misery.

Mostly bolt action rifles or shotguns, but a hell of a lot of people have guns buried or otherwise hidden from before gun control. It wouldn't surprise me if a few of the people you know (at least half those with properties) have shit they just don't tell anyone about.

I expected only hunting rifles and small pistols.

More so. You can't draw that fast, even with one in the chamber.
>21 feet rule

BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WALL

All stupid opinions should be banned.

It actually looks slightly dirtier

an hero

You're restricting our freedom then, and if banning guns is restricting yours, then how is not allowing us to voice our opinions because they are in contrast to yours not blocking freedom?

A principle most Americucks seem deeply invested into.

I smell bullshit, may I have a source so I can evaluate it's actual reliability?