So here i go. I'm a libertarian. As much as i love gary johnson, there is no chance of him winning...

I'm a Libertarian too, but Drumpf's protectionist policies precludes me from voting for him.
That, and i live in Cali, and theres no chance my vote is going to matter, Hildabeest has this state locked up.

>How do you see Hillary as more of a problem for the United States than Donald Trump?

For one she's an insincere cunt. Every single thing she's said and done for the past 20 years has been calculated for effect towards becoming president. She's just power hungry and wants her name in history books. Secondly, she'll fill the SCOTUS with liberal activist judges who will conduct social experimentation for the next half a century. That alone is enough for anyone not to vote for her. Trump says things that aren't politically correct, but that's not exactly dangerous. Hillary is absolutely dangerous.

Settle down OP.

How in the hell do you think Hillary is going to get a liberal judge nominated when Obama can't even get a hearing for fucking Garland?

Babby's first shitpost?

Ok, so you're a total fucking idiot. Got it. Thought for a moment that you might have a brain. Guess not. Peace out dumb ass.

I am a refugee thanks America

Hahaha, OP exposes himself as actaully being an Alt-right nutjob. The whole lie about being Libertarian was just bullshit. Almost had 'em OP, almost.

It doesn't matter. Your vote doesn't carry any weight. The popular vote will not decide this election.

Everyone I know thinks I'm a democrat, and I have been my whole life, but I'm no longer a member of the party and I'm voting for trump too.

Doesnt' matter either. It just pacifies us by making us feel like we have a stake in it, and keeps us from murdering the leadership in endless coups, as was done in most of human history.

You're retarded. Ross Pert withdrew before the primary election. Next time do your homework fag.

Because its likely that congress may change hands.

Name calling. Nothing of substance. Opinions discarded.

I'm not OP. Not alt-right either, whatever that means. I would just rather have a SCOTUS that has common sense and isn't going to debate things like the rights of dudes in dresses to shit in a women's restroom. I guess that makes me a "nut job".

his protectionist economics and general authoritarianism along with his narcissist personality makes him dangerous.

>He's pro-TPP
>He's pro-gun regulation
>He believes in political correctness
>He believes in more government intervention

The FUCK makes him a libertarian?!

it's not really about Garland--they wouldn't have heard any scotus noms because it is an election year. Next president will get 1-2 picks

"I don't like his policies" =/= dangerous.

study the policies and the person before you make the assessment.

The election year is the excuse that they're giving. There is precedent for confirming a supreme court judge in an election year. They just don't want to because they want a shot at having a Republican make the nomination.

...even if the "Republican" is Trump.

try it the other way though!

He's dangerous = i don't like his politics

>Because it's likely that congress may change hands.

Don't stop believin'

Makes me laugh to see plebs with a microscopic economic and political footprint saying they are going to vote for this or that candidate based on vague reasons like "the economy" or some foreign trade deal that they know nothing about. All of these policy debates during campaign seasons are just talk. We're voting for someone to run the executive branch, not emperor. We're voting for someone who will implement and execute the laws passed by congress. Vote based upon who you think will be able to do that job the best, not who promises to fiddle with this or that tax bracket that has nothing to do with you or will promise to create X amount of jobs somehow.

I like you.

of course it's political. dems did the same thing with Bush in 2007.

Trump actually released a good list of constructionist noms. Really the most long term damage that could be done to this country would be replacing scalia with an activist

it's cool how you're so smart and find amusement out of trolling the internet and reading everyone's comments.

...

Scalia wasn't an activist?

I like simple pleasures.

I'm a democrat too, but Hillary is so awful that I am voting for Trump, even though I don't really like him either

...

yeah, cause all the democrats find Trump more palatable than Hillary.

take a look at trump's trade policy and i dont think you'll be supporting him anymore

The only reason I'm voting this year...
WE NEED TO HIT THAT 5%

>he's an arrogant asshole

Translation: he's not politically correct, doesn't suck minority cock, and it's #triggering me.

samefag

...

>super neato meme

ok?

no way. he was a constructionist.

or arrogant that he lies whenever it's convenient and thinks it's okay and has no repercussions.

>i can write whatever i want on a meme and people will think he said that

lol

he was a federalist unless it was granting the states to have liberal views, then he was an activist...

there was no balance in that man. he was a piece of shit and i'm relieved that he's dead.

>I disagree with his opinions, therefore they are lies because my opinions are just that valuable.

surekid.exe

...

Every country has the government that it deserves.
–Joseph de Maistre

The United Snakes deserves Rosanne Barr, but Chuckles the Clown will do in a pinch.

another neato meme. Not sure what kind of response you are looking for here.

>The United Snakes

I see what you did there. Very clever wordplay.

...

...

...

Not me there, lad, that was a real live US citizen who came up with that tribute.

...

And....this happens every time. What else is new?

...

you honestly believe that he isn't brazenly lying? i don't even mean like normal political lying. He has shown an indifference to the truth.

Like a straight up liar is calculated. They know the truth and concoct a lie that serves their needs. I think he's more of a bullshitter. The truth matters very little to him. He has no clue what the truth is, he just regularly says what he wants. And when confronted with his lies, he just deflects by throwing out so many more lies. I love when he says, "people tell me." That is code for, "I'm making this shit up as I go."

but go ahead and vote for him. cause it aligns with your ideology of being a republican more than your ideology of being a free thinker.

During one of the republican debates Jeb said that trump had tried to buy him off to expand his casino business into Florida, trump denied it, but in 2007 he said in a deposition for a lawsuit that he had had a fundraiser for Jeb to try and change his mind about the casinos, but that it didn't work.
>I hate Clinton so everything trump says is true

Enthusiastic Hillary supporters are still dumber.

I'm not saying that he was perfect. but he was the balance of the court. if you want the court to swing left and embrace a "living constitution", well then I can't really help you there because I think the constitution is greatest governing document ever written

the definition of a pathological liar.
he actually believes his own lies

the Trump battle cry

good boy. i am from germany, all hopes up for trum, this could change the whole world

Doesn't make it any less true.

i agree with that. i do believe in the general concept of a living document. The world changes, it's a little naive to think that exactly what was written 200+ years ago will apply forever perfectly.

I don't think we're getting liberal nutjobs nominated. Garland? Shit, Reagan would have nominated that guy. But the right is at the point where it must be a republican nutjob or nobody. That's not exactly promoting balance of the court either.

The voters will wear themselves out debating tweedledee and tweedledum thinking that their vote actually means shit just like they have been doing every four years. Noone gives a shit what you think OP and whatever you think doesn't matter. Not in this current system. And you know this, mayyyyyyyyyyyn

>Tfw antitrump memes are God awful and low energy

He does this on purpose. Most people can tell when he is talking shit. And it's working too. Look at the "honest and trustworthy" numbers. More people trust him than her because they know when he's lying. With her, you just have to assume that she's always lying.

You're dumb.
This is probably the best election for the libertarian party so far since both parties are so polarizing. Also, supporting anyone other than who you think is the best candidate is the major flaw with the American political system.

...

protectionist economics is not dangerous. It's just common sense. Nobody will go to war with us over some tariffs.

...

i'm not "Enthusiastic" about any candidate in this election. you on the other hand...

What's Aleppo?
Calling illegal immigrants what they are is racist, call them undocumented friends.
Hillary was a good public servant.

He does this because the truth isn't an option. For it to be an option, he would have to know the truth.

No matter who wins, the weeping and gnashing of teeth on facebook will be glorious.

>The world changes
Yes, but your natural rights do not, therefore the document guaranteeing them should not.

>That's not exactly promoting balance of the court either.
The court is unbalanced now. putting another moderate is risky, and putting another activist is suicide

Who am I enthusiastic about?

Beautifully exemplified in this thread, no?

It is weird how being able to be easily proven to be a liar is considered a strong point for a candidate, and thinking someone might be lying without evidence is a bad thing.

I don't want to live on this planet anymore

We could say that about hillary too. Every time she fucks something up, she uses the incompetence defense. And she has spent her entire life in government.

HER shills have the day off before the big debate.

In the meantime, enjoy some pics of Hillary's prism glasses. these keep her eyes pointed more or less in the same direction. she needs them at all times so that she can find the delete button on her emails.

>Drumpf's protectionist policies precludes me from voting for him

I'm not sure that those are incompatible with libertarianism. Government stays out of business way in the country sure but I don't think they need to allow foreign countries to ship cheap crap in without a tariff on it.

I think your interpretation is definitely what most people consider libertarian but I dunno if I agree 100%

super important. I want to vote Stein but I will probably vote Gary

>For one she's an insincere cunt.

totally correct. Plato said in the republic that the best leaders are the ones who do not want to lead, who do not desire the power.

Simmer OP

Nice comeback, when is your middle school prom?

I'm not sure that promoting a far right nominee and believing that a moderate or right/centrist can't protect the constitution is rational thinking.

yes, she gets top marks for keeping that money rolling into the Clinton Foundation

That's a flaw because you can't decide he's dangerous without deciding where you stand on his policies.

Despite what Clint-Cunts tell you he's not hitler, he won't nuke ??? Whoever they say he will, he won't commit a holocaust so just leave it be.

If we're being honest it's less who we want and more who we don't, which should never happen in a government election.

I kinda wish we had a blank vote system where we didn't vote for anybody and start a new campaign with new blood.

>Gary Johnson
>Libertarian
Pick one or the other.
He's an SJW and a Statist.

I like you. This is the kind of discussion that is actually proactive

If you don't like either candidate then why the fuck would you vote for either???? Just because you don't like Clinton doesn't mean you gotta go and vote Trump. I don't get your logic.

So by your logic he can't be dangerous. Brilliant.

>which should never happen in a government election.
Except it happens every election.

it's not really about left/right. Look at people Alan Dershowitz--he is extremely liberal, yet someone like him would be a very good constructionist scotus. that doesn't mean I would agree with everything, just like with scalia, but he respects the constitution as is.

Wouldn't not voting at all be better? That way you aren't contributing to either candidates.

No by my logic you need a specific reason to believe someone is dangerous. You cannot decide that someone is dangerous for no reason and therefore their ideas should be invalid.

The sense that there is one choice between two who must be avoided at all costs is why we keep getting stuck with just two choices.

...

you're really starting to win some points with me user.

but we both know he'd never get nominated. besides, how old is he now? a thousand?

>Trump isn't pro science
Doesn't deserve it

You mean there's life beyond being a CTR shill?

Heil, Drumpf! Tod fur den Meksicanishekeit!

That's because scientists hate him!

look - you started this shit because you assume that because some dislikes his policies is the reason they think he's dangerous. you said that's not a legitimate case.

I suggested that it's okay to dislike his politics if you think he's dangerous. You don't like that either. Because you want to believe he's not dangerous.

Not liking his politics doesn't necessitate him being dangerous. But if you believe he is dangerous, then it would stand to reason a danger-averse person would dislike his politics.

That doesn't make it flawed logic. I'm just staying away from the policy part of it because I'm not talking about a specific candidate. It matters to you, because you are.

I've been unregistered by the Registrar of Voters but I agree with the Neither group.

I was really hoping this was going to be a "So here I go again on my own! Ba dah duhn duhn! Going down the only road is ever known! Ba dah duhn dunn!!" thread. Fuck you OP you're a fgot

>Calling illegal immigrants what they are is racist
If by that you mean they are undocumented workers, you would be correct. They are note illegal until a judge declares them so and most do not believe they have immigrated.

But, of course, whatever you need to float your boat.

...

>believing your vote matters
>believing any politician has your best interest at heart
>believing that Johnson is a libertarian

kek

you're right he is up there. but I think there are more people out there like him who just don't speak out enough because maybe it is politically dangerous (on both sides too). my whole thing is that I like the constitution, and I respect anyone who does, even If I disagree with them politically.

Your citizenship is in question.

I was quoting Johnson dumbass, illegals are illegal as soon as they hop the border and they need to go back

Tru doe

>I don't get your logic.
That's because it isn't logic, it's a fallacy to insist on one thing or another.

Ikr
>it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad

>Alan Dershowitz--he is extremely liberal
No Zionist can be remotely liberal.

...

Anyone with half a brain knows that the president doesn't really matter. They all just do whatever people with money say. The only difference with Hillary is we know a lot more of the creepy shit she's done because of how long she's been around, the scrutiny her husband was under, and the internet.

bump

Wrong yet again, but do whatever it takes to float your leaky boat. Your children might respect you for it.

...

Being a libertarian just means you're sad. Republicans win and you're sad. Democrats win and you're sad. It's just pathetic.

I'm good with that. For me, that does not lead me to Donald Trump.

All of them are sad brotato

a wasted vote is a vote for someone you don't believe in

...

see

...

The Donald is good for you. The first Orange president of the USA.

>illegally cross border
>live in new country illegally
>work in new country illegally
>Have children in new country
>send children to school in new country
>didn't imigrate tho
>not illegal immigrants tho
>be nice, dey undocumented workers tho

Cuck.
The real victims of illegal immigrants, are the upstanding people who spend years going through the immigration process, that is in fact so long because there are so many illegal fucking immigrants.
The solution:
1. Release public service announcement: Have proof of citizenship one year from x date or be forcefully removed from the country, without consideration for your welfare or safety.
2. Build a fucking wall.
3. Declare temporary state of emergency in all states commonly harboring illegals.
4. Roll out the military, and literally comb south, throwing everyone without proof of citizenship into buses.
5. Drive buses to Mexican border.
6. Kick em into mexico, seal the gates.
7. Watch your society improve dramatically overnight.

Good idea!

...

You got that right brudda

...

>I'm a libertarian
>I love Gary Johnson
pick one, faggot

He could never get it though... never.

I am voting trump as well.

No way will I support Clinton.

...

Please desist, you have just described my grandfather John Sullivan, who came from County Cork to Chicago via Toronto.

OverComb government corruption 2016

...

Does this pic have something to do with beaner rapists?

...

...

#feelthePetersen

...

.

he has no chance of winning if nitwits likes you dont vote for him

Don't you have a cake to be baking somewhere?

...

Surprisingly, OP is not a faggot.

2016 will go down as the year that MuriKKKa lost its one-party system.

>Trump says things that aren't politically correct, but that's not exactly dangerous.
You do realize that there are a few countries with nuclear capabilities that have leaders who are completely fucking insane, and the last thing we need is our president to insult them? Not only that, but most of the wars in human history have been caused by hurt feelings, including, but not limited to, WW1, WW2, the American Revolution, the French Revolution and its subsequent conflicts, almost any major conflict in Asia, the Hundred Years War, and the Thirty Years war. So, how exactly is a leader with absolutely no tact and no diplomatic capability not a dangerous thing?

I don't know, but it appears to be in their dialect.

There's a hold-up in the Bronx,
Brooklyn's broken out in fights,
there's a traffic jam in Harlem
that's backed up to Jackson Heights.
There's a Scout troop lost in Childs,
Khrushchev's due in Idlewild…

>I'm a libertarian

You won't catch me bashing Killary, and you also won't find me dead in a bathtub. Be careful people.

Kek CTR inside info

Rofl

...

The fuck are you than? Socialist?

Libertarian doesn't mean anarchist you moron.

...

>So here i go. I'm a libertarian. As much as i love gary johnson, there is no chance of him winning. Therefore i will vote for trump because hillary has to be kept out of the white house at all costs.

Same here, I was going to vote Johnson but it's a lost cause. All aboard the Trump Train, gentlemen.

>The fuck are you than? Socialist?
Yep.

youtube.com/watch?v=w6dCBUAjwog

...

And you're calling the libertarian a fedora tipper. That's rich.

>by hurt feelings, including, but not limited to, WW1, WW2, the American Revolution, the French Revolution
Wow you're fucking stupid. No nothing about a single fucking war.

Enjoy your waste of time tugowar gentlemen

*know

Please Hillary hasn't done a damn thing for anybody. Go to bed troll

...

gayest shit i've seen all day

youtu.be/HXZQpXir4HA

please, you and the rest of you trumpie mental midgets, please, go lick the third rail of that chump train.

Lold my Ass off.

Yea not when it means total annihilation no one will push the button don't be so
Fucking dramatic

...