What is Cred Forums's political compass?

Purple is libertarian, Cred Forums hates us retard.

...

No...

If you're not green or purple, you have no morals.

If you're not blue or purple, you have no brains.

looks like tey are both

...

...

...

politicalcompass.org/uselection2016

>He's an ancom

Oh Christ user, tfw your political ideology is an oxymoron

Eh. Not really an oxymoron. But I don't personally identify as one. I say I'm more on the left most wing of mutualism.

I'm an anarchist but I go with whoever will cause the most butthurt among normies. I only engage in politics for amusement.

No, I'm not stupid enough to think anarchy will result in stability, security, or any kind of cooperation among anyone. It'll be chaos. But I enjoy chaos and collapsing systems normies have religious like faith in. It's pretty entertaining, you know?

Yeah yeah I'm cancer I'm degenerate, whatever.

It’s been the same story for over two years now. Cred Forums is infested with leftist cucks, but is it really surprising given that there is a proportional amount of NEETs on this board who blame big business for all their problems?

...

...

Cred Forums has always been quite leftist, especially during the Bush years. Then it shifted right with Obama. Probably only to shift left with a Trump presidency

>butthurt among normies

vote trump

Comrade

I think you have your sides switched

Gr8 B8, I almost fell for it

...

b is leftist because it's full of fucking children

kill yourself faggot

Die

Kansasfag here.

...

...

Well, I guess.

That's not what anarchism is you fucking waste of human skin

It usually is opposite of the sitting presidents ideology.

Is Cred Forums full of retarded libtards now cause that's what I'm seeing in this thread.

Smash the state lads

This isn't what I expected

This is what they showed before the non-Primaries.

...

...

My ideology falls on purple. I'm a libertarian at heart but if you view things logically what we truly need is full on full on fascism. People are far too stupid for freedom. Just look at all the reds and greens itt. Bunch of parasitic degenerates

This. I'd be full on libertarian if I didn't think that the average person is a full on mongoloid

Communism is actually optimal as long as it's consensual and not coercive. Anarcho communism makes perfect sense.
>inb4 communism implies statism

...

Spoken like a true Fascist bonehead

Communism only works if humans don't have human nature

Give one example of a communist nation that was prosperous and successful. Oh wait.

Agree with this, although I'm politically agnostic at the moment. One day it will have to come to this and it can't be by force.

And now that incorrect human nature argument.

RETARD ALERT CLASS

You're thinking today. Of course it wouldn't work today. We're still evolving, you know. We'll probably be wiped out as a species before it happens though.

This.

Tell me why it's incorrect, because guess what, it's not.

Implying that Marxist-Leninism and derivatives are the only forms of Communism

Anything that isnt right is wrong.

...

I actually very much identify similarly. Being an anarchist in a world where statism is so socially pervasive is difficult. Might as well help it collapse...it's going to anyway.
I don't vote, though. If I did it would most definitely be for Trump. Hillary = continuation of the exact same status quo. Trump presidency will definitely be more interesting, although neither result will affect me in any way. Exciting times ahead! *sigh*

Left-leaning, extreme libertarian.

Because Cred Forums are reactionary morons who can't make up their mind and hate anything "establishment"

>left
>dot is literally further to the right
what are you fucking retarded?

What the fuck is wrong with all of these authoritarian faggots?

You can figure that much just being here for half an hour

Maybe, just maybe, he's describing his own position?

...

You're a fuckin idiot he's not talking about op hahaha you're a fuckin retarded omg haha kys

...

thank you

What test

...

...

spekr.org

>kys
newfag alert

They're scared of brown people and don't know how a government works so they want a new 4th reich.

Good to see people who actually understand economics in this thread.

People aren't just shit on 4chins. People are shit outside of your parents' basement too.

No citizen is in favor of corporations.

...

umm lol... alrighty then.

DIGUSTING

...

Nicee

Confirmation bias: the comment

...

>good, good, now I can wallow in my echochamber
you're a fucking fag

Economic Left/Right: 2.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

>all these authoritarians
disgusting

Less Libertarian and less Right than I expected but pretty based still.

Been a long time since I've taken this quiz. Used to be in the blue

>centrist faggot complains about authoritarians
>Is most likely another sperm catching statis

>he fell for the human nature meme

Master race checking in

...

China, USSR, Vietnam, DPRK, Free Territory of Ukraine, Spanish Civil War, etc.

>calls me fag for enjoying freedom
>enjoys choking on the cock of a giant government that destroys freedom in the name of the state
sorry kevin, but reading mein kampf doesn't make you smart.

...

Rojava could be added
Paris commune
Iroquois Confederacy

Your compass doesn't show Fascism though you lier

>can't concieve of a world without the goverment's dick 30 inches up his ass
>i must be a nazi
You statists are so funny and simple.

I miss randy

I see you're enjoying your government class assignment. Did you remember to print it out?

...

>political dick measuring on Cred Forums
kek

too lazy to take it again, but was far upper left corner last time

i hope you're joking

ew commie pls

i know you capitalist faggots are going to think this is a troll. i assure you its not, this legitimately my actual polcompass as of the 25th May this year

You commies deserve death by Zyklon B. When will another Hitler arise so we can rid this world of filth and degeneracy.

Fucking tankies

Green Master Race

...

KEEEEEEEEEEEYNESSSSSSSS

Eh. I was further left. At like -9.5 and more Libertarian at - 8.5

Same here man. It's infuriating because libs are too busy forcing unity and compromise to get anything done. They're too busy trying to meet fascists in the middle which only pushes the spineless liberals further to the right. That's why Libs are actually center right, at best.

Yep. Liberals are just there to preserve the system through compromise with the far right.

This would apply nicely right now.
"Direct action gets the goods"

That is NOT Jill Stein's location on that graph.

I would think she's a bit further left, but probably around that level Libertarian wise at least

(1,-3)
fuck the niggers though

Bro ive been here since last summer

Mine was -4 or -5

too lazy to take the test again, so I put the dot where it typically lands.

Apparently

Suck it fascists

shut up filthyfrank watching 15 year old faggot leave please.

here's where it's at

...

muh economics bluh bluh bluh

are u me?

Uh oh I'm a faggot.

>all the green and purple in this thread

>>>thinking you are "for the people"

Economics is a capitalist construct and must be smashed.

How'd I do OP

...

I still think this compass is quite biased. It does polarize shades of gray (obviously it needs to, to make the choice finite) in a way that compels you to take the "sunshine, lollipops and rainbows" decision, that ultimately drags you to the left side of the compass.
So anyone who can't work out the propensity towards peoples behavior and the systems architecture, usually ends up in the green. And these people are fucking stupid. Usually comprised of women and teenage men. If you're a male in your 20s and still in the Green, there is legitimately something wrong with you.

>being a wehraboo
have fun with your delusions dipshit

wow.... just.... wow. lol.

there are no words.

>muh ignorance, hurr durr.

human nature is determined by the environment in which we are raised

Race underpins culture.

nice dubs, comrade

Race is a social construct.

>all these fucking facists

Of course it is m8

Stay mad, porkies

...

>implying you wouldn't be weirded out by a person who looks unlike anyone you have ever seen before in your life

Then why would you say race is a social construct you massive fucking idiot?

Because people are taught to be afraid of what they don't know.

the problem with this is that race is the genetic adaptations of a species to surroundings. For example, certain tribes in Kenya contain the best runners in the world because their ancestors chased wildebeest and other prey for hundreds of miles on foot. There's even a tribe in the south pacific that has been diving underwater for fish for so long they have developed the ability to see clearly underwater. Race is a real, physical difference between humans. you are a big ol dummy

Already did in the primaries. >people can't unironically enjoy chaos
I know what anarchy is nigger

If you are in the red square then kill yourself before you lay eggs.

You speak of race as if they are entirely different species of humans. Do people from different parts of the world look and maybe even behave differently? Of course they do. There's a reason why people from Africa have darker skin, while those who migrated to Europe have lighter skin. But I was referring to the cultural aspect of race. The idea that someone will always act a certain way because of their heritage. There's this idea of nature vs nurture, and if you believe either one 100% determines behavior, you're an idiot. A black man in America will act differently than a black man in Africa. A black man from the ghetto will act differently than a black man in the suburbs. The same could be said about whites. A white man from a rich neighborhood will act much differently than one from a trailer park. Behavior is about much more than where your parents came from you fucking idiot

...

This compass doesn't tell much about anything.

>oh no, he referenced to a field of social sciences not in total agreement with my ideology
>better just say bluh bluh bluh instead of responding to his points
kek

Wot?

It is known that human beings judge each other subconsciously, and in a very short timeframe.

This is thought to be due to the fact that you needed to be able to ascertain, quickly, who was and wasn't 'like you,' as a means of survival.

Of course we have this ability to this day. Of course the first things we notice about people are differences and/or things with which we disagree.

Race is certainly a human construct! It is just that we are coded to find patterns and discrepancies in every day life.

>People being scared of what they don't understand is a bad thing
When will this meme end?

...

>Race is a social construct.
Lol people's skin colours are actually all our imaginations xD

Culture is a social construct, race is biological fact

...

Name one successful anarchistic society.

Switzerland

And how exactly is Switzerland anarchistic?

>Genes are a social construct

A biological fact is the color of a black man's skin (which typically has a specific range).

Race is not a fact. It is an idea. A human idea. A human construct. Unless we want to outline our own personal definitions of these words, I don't see why we could or would have an argument.

anarchy.no/ija137.html

...

You do know that the color of skin isn't the only thing that's different between races? And you do know that some races share the same skin color but have other differentiating characteristics?

Pic related. Weakest propaganda I've seen in a while.

race is other "ranges" as well

the word nigger represents an american cultural phenomenon, the literal antithesis of civilization. To avoid acknowledging this fact is the REAL racism.

Even if I had gone and implied that race is determined by skin color (I didn't intend to do so), the fact that (and the way in which) you refute me really only helps to prove my point.

Now the definition of race isn't concrete. It's not just skin color. It's not just anything in particular. It's almost, like, subjective, man. Not observable fact. Room for interpretation. Human construct, perhaps? I think so. That's what I'm getting at.

I didn't do the test, but I know I am center-left.

I want all drugs legalized, care about gun rights, social programs and the death penalty.

fite me.

anarcho-cap

Except we're talking about race being a human construct instead of talking about racism.

I would not disagree with you that race is a very broad topic. I would add sensitive and controversial to the list of adjectives as well.

Well then, would you hold the same attitude for dogs? Cats? There are some highly observable differences between "races" that appear consistent. If you say that isn't enough for such a classification then I'd have to ask, where the fuck do you draw the line of "human construct"? Because the same can be said for a SHITLOAD of other subjects.

So essentially you refute the existence of races, because different people may disagree on the definition of race? That still doesn't change the fact that there are groups of people that share similar traits and which are different than the traits of another group and so on. In biology this is called subspecies and it's a normal taxonomical concept. It's science, not sociology.

I don't know. I'll draw the line right before everything I think and believe becomes moot, I guess. That sounds convenient.

Is a cat observably different from a dog? They walk on all fours and have tails and mouths and feet and lungs and hearts, and etc. Are house cats with stripes the same race as tigers? Do we generally assign race to cats? If so, why? If not, why not? Would race have a different meaning in the context of cats? I totally don't care.

It's not the things that are being related, classified, grouped or associated that are constructs, it's the grouping and classifying and associating of those things that are human constructs.

>Obligatory: You're gay.

And it's all made by people?

>
I'm just asking for a consistent line of logic, rather than some convenience in thinking, really. Well, you do what you do I guess, you bundle of sticks.

I think I'm being logically consistent. I really hope I am. I don't even understand why it's an argument that a concept- a fucking concept- is not considered a human construct.

Maybe, like I said earlier, we should be sharing definitions instead of rushing into an argument. Because what you're saying makes so little sense to me, and it seems to be very mutual.

Naturally but there's nothing social about it. Or do you also think that mathematics and physics are social constructs, because they are studied by humans and humans are social beings?

Why did you reply to me?
t.

Of course their social constructs. There's no such thing as a theory of gravity. We made that based on observations. Am I just being too semantic here?

Gravity predates us, but the theory does not.

I did my best to try to click strongly agree/disagree to try to get an extreme result. Turns out I'm a radical centralist. fuck...

Voted for Obama. Voted for Bernie.

now...

MAGA

Dis me.

Left out quite a few questions that would have thrown me pretty deep on the libertairian side. I am however a confederate in actual meaning of the idea, not in relation to the CSA. I believe in little to no federal government, with all power being pushed to the states. People should live in the society they desire, and not be helped or hindered by outside societies, or powers.

...

It's Funny because despite all that,
MAGA

...

Please explain this

I don't think you understand, what a "social construct" is.
Wikipedia isn't usually a good source but I'll use it now, because it's convenient.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructionism
>A social construct or construction concerns the meaning, notion, or connotation placed on an object or event by a society, and adopted by the inhabitants of that society with respect to how they view or deal with the object or event. In that respect, a social construct as an idea would be widely accepted as natural by the society, but may or may not represent a reality shared by those outside the society, and would be an "invention or artifice of that society."

>A major focus of social constructionism is to uncover the ways in which individuals and groups participate in the construction of their perceived social reality. It involves looking at the ways social phenomena are created, institutionalized, known, and made into tradition by humans.

Now about the theory of gravity. Gravity works the same, no matter how we try to explain it. Theories exist to interpret and explain various phenomena that exist and when we define that the abstract called "theory of gravitation" explains the natural phenomena called "gravitation", the theory of gravity becomes tied to the natural phenomena. Whether the theory is correct or not doesn't affect the existence of the theory after the abstract has been conceived and the theory ceases to exist only after there are no more intelligent beings, that acknowledge its existence. If you were to claim that the theory of gravitation is a social construct, you would either have to disagree, what 'theory' means or argue that natural phenomena changes depending on your thoughts. Then you face the problem that most people would likely disagree with you and the theory of gravitation wouldn't become a social construct.

...

The only way you could tie sociology into races is to study, how races affect societies and human interaction. Whether you and your community let them affect your daily life (this is the social construct) doesn't change the fact that race as a natural phenomena exists.

strawman.jpg

genes =/= race

>politicalcompass.org/
i consider myself a nationalist, a corporatist, a socialist, a libertarian, and a progressivist

Well I wouldn't argue that natural phenomena change with my thoughts, because I'd be crazy.

I also have no beef with how a theory is formed.

Unless I'm misunderstanding, I guess the definition I was operating on was just more vague than the definition you have there?

Maybe I'm missing some glaring contradiction? Feel free to point it out. Otherwise I don't really see how we disagree.

I don't see how the idea of race doesn't fit into that definition either.

How long you been waiting to bust that pic? Little undereducated baby

Communism only works without idiot interfering Americans

So you must think about the same as i , we shall destroy the world for fun.

This will sound crazy, but I'm voting Trump.

this survey puts me a little further along on the liberal scale

Cognitive dissonance dot com backslash death to the system dot jaypeg

go show me a case study where austerity worked with respect to a crisis, I'll wait

i forgot to mention i consider myself a capitalist in foreign markets but socialist in domestic

>Jill Stein

goddamnit now I just feel like all my opinions are discredited

Read up on what kind of policies are efficient and have empathy, that's how you arrive at this position

Shitfest in 3... 2... 1...

I'd say they have a pretty significant part in determining individual's physical characteristics.

The point is that social constructs represent the meanings we give to certain phenomena. A social construct isn't the phenomena itself. For example people from different parts of the world have evolved different characteristics. Those of us, who wandered towards north became light-skinned. Color of skin isn't the only difference between different people but let's concentrate on that and talk about racism. There are biological reasons for racism that trace back to our survival instinct but we can also view racism as a social phenomena, because we have the ability to reason with our biological urges and suppress them, if we want to. Now racism has become a social construct that affects human interaction but the underlying natural phenomena, i.e. different skin colors, exists with or without racism.
Do you see the difference? A social phenomenon based on our perceived rational thinking with a corresponding natural phenomenon is called a social construct.

WEED AND FREE LOVE BROSKI......... UHHHH PEACE AND FAG SEX AND SHIT BROMAN

hurr durr `~ giving people good things, hoping they do good things..instead of asking them to do good things, and then giving them good things

Wikipedia isn't a good source, are you fucking mental? Wikipedia for anything academic is way more rigorously checked than any other database out there. Go look up a protein cycle on wikipedia, odds are it'll be way above both our heads. The only people who said wikipedia wasn't a good source were my middle school librarians, my college profs used it all the time

DONALD TRUMP XD :P XD :P EPIC DUDE

GO SELL HEROIN TO A CHILD PROSTITUTE U FUCKIN ANCAP SCUMFUCK

Peace and love, brother

it doesn't, at least not in any way that's biologically useful. Geneticists threw out race basically altogether in the 80s

my negro :)

(Me)
My negro

Any other blues?

Okay. I'm either retarded or you're fucking with me. I literally said all of that earlier. either way we don't disagree. jesus christ.

Well, judging by your chart you're relatively unlikely to be a fucking retard - so, Sanders?

using personal experiences and thinking that's applicable to the aggregate, it's naive to expect corporations to do anything for the social good, and they should thusly be regulated. Women should have entirely equal treatment and opportunity because I'm not an asshole. Why are these controversial?

They should just have faced facts and made it brown

for one private businesses want a well-off society to hire workers from and to sell products to,why dont people believe this? and two i agree women need to start working their fair share

Wikipedia isn't a good source but the sources used for the Wikipedia article usually are but this is mostly true with articles dealing with mathematics, physics and other fields of science that don't leave anything up to interpretation or divide public opinions.

And you think this has nothing to do with the social persecution or even legal consequences waiting for anyone, who talks about races? It's a very controversial field of study, because it opens the door for real scientific racism but then on the other hand we now have a blank spot in human biology and many other fields of science.

You started by saying that race is a social construct, which it isn't, so based on that we didn't agree but if it was only a problem in communicating your thoughts, then we might agree.

Yo

...

Ok, here's something that took me ~70 seconds of googling
>By the 1970s, it had become clear that (1) most human differences were cultural; (2) what was not cultural was principally polymorphic – that is to say, found in diverse groups of people at different frequencies; (3) what was not cultural or polymorphic was principally clinal – that is to say, gradually variable over geography; and (4) what was left – the component of human diversity that was not cultural, polymorphic, or clinal – was very small.

A consensus consequently developed among anthropologists and geneticists that race as the previous generation had known it – as largely discrete, geographically distinct, gene pools – did not exist.

"Race: Past, present and future John Marks"

...

Points 2, 3 and 4 literally say that there are distinct subspecies of modern humans, even if they aren't as distinct as some may have thought or hoped earlier. You're only pointing out that at some point scientists agreed to downplay the differences, i.e. put more emphasis on the relative tiny changes in human genome. Well, as a species we also share 98.8% of our DNA with chimps, so we're relatively close to each other but still not the same.

My admiration for Adolf Hitler is counteracted by my love of fornicating with foreign women.
And generally I'm libertarian from an economic standpoint.

Normie

anything that isnt in the blue square belongs in the gas chamber.

what does this mean?

it means youre a wishy washy milquetoast heap of useless fuck. grow some balls and make a stand for something, anything.

:^)

The compass doesn't tell much. Opposite views cancel each other, so you could for example support every possible LGBTLOLWTFHAHAHAHAA+ right, racial segregation and white supremacy, completely unrestricted market and huge taxes and that would get you to the centre.

hes got a point.

seems like a pretty fragile noncommittal kind of person anyways. either that or a hardcore maniac.

if it ain't in the blue square, it belongs nowhere.

My favorite politician in Ben Shapiro who is far right and i agree on most of his views.

but i can also sympathize with the emotion drivin left even though im pretty sure its corrupted by the "jews".

It must just even out perfectly putting me in the middle.

...

alerta alerta Antifacista!!!

...

Sieg heil

>Implying there is something wrong with fascism

...

...

...

They're submissive, enraged betas who want a strong daddy to cuck them and tell them how to think.

id expect most people on Cred Forums to be on the left. Most of the people on here probably dont have a job and want things just handed out to them.

Well shit, it looks like I'm #touchingmyjohnson now.

...

Yep, I'm usually right about here, supported Johnson this election and last election

Am I fucked b

...

I'm more left than I thought

What's a dead weight loss, amirite?

purple life

>What is Cred Forums's political compass?
I can state with complete confidence and accuracy that /b's political compass, platform, and mission statement ccan be summed up in one sentence:

"Tits, or GTFO!"

Words to live by.

when love of cute traps meet knowledge of econmics.

Rest can commit sepukku desu

hmm im not libertarian enough it seems

...