Is living on the Eastern side of California worth it?

Is living on the Eastern side of California worth it?

Northern or southern? Northern is mountains and southern is desert.

That is a vague question. I suggest you live in an area that offers job opportunities for your skills. Other factors you can look into are district related regulations and representation, demographics, population size, average income of residence, cost of living, environmental conditions, ect.

Depends on what you're looking for. If you want to be in the middle of bumfuck nowhere with a fuckton of sand and people who vote Republican, sure. Lots of outdoor activities and it's cheaper than the cities.

Either midway up or southern

Bay area best area if you can find a decent job and somewhere to live

Don't listen to this guy. Bay area is the worst. Expensive as fuck, idiot drivers, retarded people aplenty, and full of liberals. Not to mention it's going to get hit with a devastating earthquake any day now.

I'd rather live in the east of Cali than the Middle East of the world.

Stupid sand niggers.

The bay area has the highest quality of life in the US

When you have to make 6 figures to live there, I wonder why

If you can afford the rent.

Exactly this.

A couple making $52000 a year each, which is average wage, can easily live there

The fuck you smoking man?

That may get you into Oakland, but that's about it.

That can get you a decent apartment in SF

>thinks living in an apartment is the highest quality of life
>ishygddt

>Be 29
>Bring home ~40k/year
> live well in east bay

You forgot
>Lives with parents

Check out Darwin CA nice community, there is even a docuntary on u tube about it.

Too small of a city

Not many cities East of the Sierras, if you don't like Lancaster. Oh ya California city you would like it there.