I hate 4-2-3-1
I hate 4-2-3-1
Other urls found in this thread:
niggermania.net
twitter.com
>3-5-2
>mfw my local team plays a 4-2-3-1 and literally never changes formation
>tf
>tt
>brazil
>talking
>usa
>not being shot or sharting in marts
5-4-1 is the best formation la.
PICK ANOTHER FORMATION AAAAAAAA
---------GK
---------SW
FB - CB - CB
----------Mid--------WB
-------Mid---Mid--------
FW----------------------
----------FW-----------
Seriously though, 3 at the back works wonders if you have a DM on and 3 good center backs.
You get a more organized defense. Overload the midfield, and two strikers to play off of each other.
it's shit
4-2-3-1
4-3-3
3-5-2
4-4-2
fucking boring shit
good pick
But you need 3 young centre backs that are both intelligent and have the pace to do a job out wide against a winger. In theory your right and 3 centre backs is good but the quality needed to do that system in most leagues isn't feasible.
4-2-2-1-1 Diamond is patrician choice
-------GK
--CB--CB--CB-----
WB-----DM----WB
-------CM--CM------
-----------AM--------
-----------ST--------
Its new 4-4-2
otalian detected
>not playing false 9 and flying on wings and do a cheeky le cut inside every time
all about 5-3-2 wing backs
------------gk
------cb--cb--cb
--wb-------------wb
-------cm----cm
-------am----am
-------------st
Close, just a italoboo
sorry we can't ape your NT's famous 2-2-0 formation from the Germany game :)
You're all plebs, 4-3-3 is objectively the best formation.
>you're all plebs
>chats about the second most used formation in the world
what did xe mean by this
This
/thread
If your formation utilizes more than 4 attacking players in the final third it is shit and I hate it
If your formation isn't asymmetrical and staggered it is shit and I hate it
Itt: weird flags and bizarre number sequences
>that scouse accent
>we gonna win the league la
holy shit
If your formation doesn't have less than 3 defenders or more than 4 defenders it is shit and I hate it
>Complaining that a tactic is popular
So when did the hipsters invade Cred Forums?
Oh wait that's right, literally every US soccer fan is a hipster.
You can't cite people as plebs and then use one of the most-used formations on the planet. You don't get the credibility of being in the know about something everyone knows about. And 4-3-3 is not difficult to overwhelm unless you're Barca and have the best front 3 on the planet
Me too famalam. 3-5-2 is the choice of the refined gentleman of today
It's the tactic that ruined football for a few years some years ago.
3-3-3-1 master race reporting
Fluid 4-3-3 dropping back into 4-5-1 is the GOAT formation because it's two formations
What the fuck am I even looking at
good
boring
Zachetti master race
>static formations
>the current year
>i don't rate 3-4-2
*Fachetti
Canada gets it. Real men don't need 11 players.
>not doing a 2-5-3 with the keeper as a secret third cb
Why would an amateur team play anything but 4-4-2?
>you don't get the credibility of being in the know about something everyone knows about
do americans unironically believe they could know something about football that an Englishman doesn't? Or even, dare I say it, a soapless Continental?
bewildering
...
You countryflagged me good there Cred Forumsro
4-2-1-2 is the Patrician connoisseur formation. Fight me, plebs.
>tfw no formation
Jazz Football when?
Oh shit I forgot to add the lone striker up front. 4-2-1-2-1
>having two strikers
lmao
>hurr best formation
>durr other formations suck
There are no good/bad formations (talking about the standard ones of course, not some 1-4-5 abominations). You pick one based on the personnel you have and the strengths and weaknesses of the opposition. Not based on some formation power ranking.
what did he mean by this
bit serious aren't we
I like this post it's a good post
>changing formations according to the opposition
no one does this lad
lol that's literally how Rehhagel won Euro 2004 with Greece
>12 years ago
3 - 4 - 1 - 2
Always ran that in FIFA
>4-4-2 diamond
4-3-1-2 is the one true formation.
It just requires a very creative AM.
So basically a 4-4-1-1 diamond? The SS behind the ST?
RARE
A
R
E
you're just asking for it
>not playing 4-6-0 in a competitive international
didnt barca do that for a while and played fabregas as a false 9 type setup?
yeah but i think you'll agree that comparisons between barcelona and scotland begin and end there
No. It was Spain. Barça always played with 2 wide wingers. They sometimes used Fabregas as a false 9 though
worked against you, didnt it?
Roma did, first time Spalleti was there
diamond 343 is patrician tier but very difficult to execute
Everyone misses the good old 4-4-2 diamond but as Cruyff said 4-3-3 is the actual diamond formation.
4-2-3-1 counter attack
4-3-3 + false 9 sometimes
3-5-2
3-4-3
These are the only good formations to objectively exist.
>playing anything but 4-3-3
Did you know a 3-5-2 is just a flipped 4-3-3? I know, I drew it once.
Stramaccioni is that you
>using more than one defensive midfielder
I like 3-3-3-1
>playing anything but 4-1-4-1
>it's an user thinks formation is the most significant part of tactics episode