Why do actresses get pressured into doing nudity, but actors not? Pretty unfair

Brad Pitt only exists in Hollywood because of his looks. He wasn't cast in Thelma and Louise because of his talent. He didn't even have any acting talent when his career started, he was just a face.

Yeah a better example would have been Matt Damon

Topless men isn't lewd, so there's little financial motive on the part of the film makers.

Because men want to see nudity more than women.

No, a better example would be Steve Buscemi.

Your argument is invalid anyway. There's plenty of "ugly" or unconventional looking actresses in Hollywood, too.

Because you can't show a huge throbbing cock swinging majestically like a giraffe's neck, and flaccid cocks aren't sexy.

>The Mull of Kintyre test or Mull of Kintyre rule is an official guideline that was used by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) in the United Kingdom to decide whether an image of a penis could be shown. The BBFC would not permit the general release of a film or video if it depicted a phallus erect to the point that the angle it made from the vertical was higher than that of the Mull of Kintyre, Argyll and Bute, on maps of Scotland.

No one is talking about your porn actress of a mom user were talking about the beauty of the male body. Fucking kill yourself already.

im talking about achieving celebrity status.

There are no male actors who are celebrities only for the way they look.

But most people get their start in film by the way they look.

>There are no male actors who are celebrities only for the way they look

user don't tell lies

Tits

Men can have tits. Moobs is in the dictionary

A flaccid penis is objectively more aesthetic than a bestial erect phallus, yet another philistine! I live in a world of philistines!

Yeah but theyre unsightly

>Who is Channing Tatum?
>Who is Ian Somerhalder?
>Who is Chris Hemsworth?
>Who is Matt Bomer?
>Who is Jamie Dornan?
>Who is Ryan Reynolds?

the list could go on

its called the free market you commie

they signed a contract, if they didnt want to then they shouldve negotiated a better contract

That's the thing, women only desire the top possible physique of men. In real life they're just forced to settle for less. In media though they need the hottest men to be turned on, yet men would get turned on by even an above average female body

Yes, but society has expectations. For example, when people here complain that women can get laid whenever they want but men can't, you could make the same argument that it's a free market, and if men don't like it, they should just increase their own market value more.

fake

There are thousands of topless actors scenes.

>Channing tatum
Fox Catcher was a good performance.
>Ian Somerhalder
never heard of him... not celebrity
>Chris Hemsworth
He plays Thor really well, he is also a People's choice award winner.
>Matt Bomer
never heard of him... not a celebrity
>Jamie Doman
Literally who
>Ryan Reynolds
Award winning actor who made the highest grossing R-rated film of all time. He is also funny and talented.

pls, go on...

When producers force young actresses by threatening to blacklist, it's not a free market

Cost of doing business

>BBFC
>big black fucking cock

Except if it was a truly a free market one could rape women in it.

>watching a movie/tv show
>qt3.14 comes on screen
>look up her name
>look up any nude scenes and fap to them

everyone does this, right?

You should hang dong in a movie OP

When a man is threatened by legal force to not rape a women he could easily overpower its not a free market

Because the crazy in depth studies they shelled out millions for told them that its almost exclusively men who pay to see movies.

Guess what the majority of men like looking at?

Yes, naked bitches is the correct answer.

Because straight men go to see naked women. And straight women don't mind it.

Only gay men go to see naked men, and they are an extreme minority. It also turns away most straight men.

Also there's no equivalent for showing breasts. Men often film shirtless but no one cares. I'd also say probably there's been more man ass than female ass, even if for comedic reasons.

Lastly, male actors probably don't want to film flaccid as many men are showers, not growers. Men are often judged by the size of their dicks, you don't say the same about women's labia. You could argue that people talk about women's chest, but that's already visible with clothes on, so its not a fair comparison. And I doubt most people want to see an erect penis in a non-porn movie. Basically there's a reason why most men swim in trunks and women swim in swimsuits that look painted on.

>Only gay men go to see naked men
Incorrect, there are also aesthetes like myself. In fact, sexualizing the beautiful male form is tantamount to heresy, you reduce it to function like that of a woman.

Your average subhuman, American philistine though, yes, he will act in this manner.

Yes

but still funny

That's exactly right though; it is a free market and men's reaction to having lesser value IS to increase their value
The thing is though that each man has a maximum potential value, and that value will never be as high as a woman of the same "tier"
I.e a 7/10 woman will always be able to attract more people than a 7/10 man

nobody wants to see balls

Yeah, obviously. There's entire websites dedicated to it

No one wants to see dicks except homo degenerates

No, I mean I remember looking for celeb nudes when I was like 13 on Dogpile or Yahoo or whatever the major search engine was in 1998. But once porn videos were easily attainable from torrents and streaming. I didn't care about seeing some actresses booby for 15 seconds.
Internet porn has probably desensitized me.

Fag

...

That's hot

She loses the bra, right.

What movie is this from?

what a garbage post

cut the safesearch off on your moms google account and find out for yourself

...

Meant for