What's the verdict on these?

What's the verdict on these?

misunderstood master pieces

very misunderstood films. theyre really deep and have great themes.

Flawed, but enjoyable movies.

The Amazing Spider-Man: 7/10.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2: 6/10.

Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone were better leads than Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst, but the villains were subpar in comparison to Willem Dafoe, Alfred Molina and the likes. Action scenes were great, scripts were uneven, and the sequel was bogged down by the excessive attempts to set up a cinematic universe.

some flaws but theyre misunderstood. watch the breakdown of these movies on youtube. theyre actually pretty fucking great in retrospec

Link?

Samefag harder

Apparently Andrew Garfield shit-talked Sony and the production company a lot after Amazing 3 got canned. Said he felt like he never got his real chance due to scripts meant to appeal to every single demographic. He said it had to appeal to little girls, 40 year old comic fans, 15 year old boys, etc etc. Every demographic possible.

He did good as Parker, he made the best of some truly putrid scripts

...

Not really. He criticized Sony for meddling with the script for ASM2 and didn't show up for a meeting where Sony's head honcho Kaz Hirai would announce ASM3. Hirai was so pissed off by the SHAMEFUL DISPLAY that he fired Garfield and decided to reboot the franchise again.

You got a source on that, cuz I was quoting an interview I read right out of the paper

It's from the Sony leaks.

Didn't care for the first one all that much. But I genuinely liked the second one. The stakes were pretty high and they stopped giving a fuck about not killing people so they just started offing motherfuckers without remorse and I loved it. It was darker without being grimdark and I can appreciate that.

Ending was really sad too, felt genuine.

Some of the worst movies ever made. At least the second one had the so bad its funny aspect.

Ahhh okay. I don't blame Garfield at all, ASM2 was a mess, I wouldn't care about a 3rd film at that point either

Absolutely not the worst. ASM2 was bad but the original is okay. They cast Gwen really well and Garfield clearly wanted to have fun with the role. But bad management and corporate meddling doomed them from the start in a way Raimi didn't have to deal with as much until Spiderman3

The new Spiderman reboot inspired from Amy Pascal will make those two look like masterpieces.

this

Clearly kino plebs couldn't understand

The behind-the-scenes on the movies.

>David Fincher was approached to direct the movie before Marc Webb was hired.

>In early drafts, Peter would find out his father, Richard Parker, coded the venom of the genetically modified spiders to his DNA and that OsCorp engineered both his parents' death and the accident in which he acquired his powers in order to retrieve a sample of his blood to cure Norman Osborn, but the entire subplot was scrapped after it leaked online and was poorly received.

>Early drafts featured larger roles for Peter and Gwen's high school friends including Flash Thompson, Sally Avril, Missy Hallenback and Ariel Keene.

>Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Daniel Radcliffe, Robert Pattinson, Logan Lerman, Anton Yelchin, Alden Ehrenreich, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Zac Efron, Jim Sturgess, Xavier Samuel, Liam Aiken, Drake Bell, Michael Angarano, Dane DeHaan and and Josh Hutcherson, among others, auditioned for the role of Peter before Andrew Garfield was cast.

>Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Mia Wasikowska, Imogen Poots, Teresa Palmer, Brooklyn Decker, Amber Heard, Dianna Agron, Emily Browning, Lily Collins, Emma Roberts, Anna Kendrick, Ophelia Lovibond, Sara Paxton, Georgina Haig, Dominique McElligott, Scout Taylor-Compton auditoned for the role of Gwen before Emma Stone was cast.

>Michael Fassbender was approached to play Connors before Rhys Ifans was cast.

>The "Man in the Shadows" played by Michael Massee was originally Electro, who'd be an enforcer for OsCorp and become the main villain of the sequel. However, when Sony changed their plans for the franchise, he was made into the Gentleman instead.

>Sony merged Marc Webb's ideas for THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2, featuring Electro and Rhino; and THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 3, featuring the Green Goblin and Gwen Stacy's death, into one movie in order to build up to the Sinister Six and other spin-offs and compete with the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

>Early drafts featured Mary-Jane Watson as Peter's neighbor, a troublemaking waitress who lives with her abusive father and admires Spider-Man. Shailene Woodley played her in the movie, but all of her scenes were cut.

>Early drafts featured J. Jonah Jameson as the editor-in-chief of the Daily Bugle who believes Spider-Man is a menace, particularly after Spider-Man and Electro crash into his office while fighting in Times Square. Sam Elliot and John Slattery were approached for the role before the character was scrapped.

>In early drafts, Peter would've actually given his blood to Harry, but this was changed as it made Peter indirectly responsible for the creation of the Green Goblin.

>Early drafts featured a larger role for Felicia Hardy, who'd be Harry's girlfriend and accomplice; and a smaller role for Rhino, who'd be just a throaway villain. Due to Sony's meddling, Felicia was reduced to a tertiary character and Rhino's role was expanded so he could integrate the Sinister Six.

>In early drafts, Norman Osborn would've been preserved in suspended animation after his apparent death while OsCorp cloned a healthy younger body for him.

>In early drafts, Richard Parker would've been revealed to have survived the plane crash and reunite with Peter in the end.

>Alden Ehrenreich, Brady Corbet, Eddie Redmayne, Sam Claflin, Douglas Booth and Boyd Holbrook auditioned for Harry Osborn before Dane DeHaan was cast

>Damian Lewis was approached for Electro before Jamie Foxx was cast.

Misunderstood post

Emily Browning as Gwen and Anton Yelchin as Peter would have been fire IMO. I would have watched the hell out of that. Emily's sexy and Anton was an excellent actor.

They make Spider-Man 3 look good

The Amazing Spider-Man - 5/10
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - 3/10

The first one is a mediocre rehash of what Raimi did in the original Spider-Man and the second one is a fucking mess.

Every now and then some Cred Forumscksucker will defend these shitty movies but every time their argument is just "ANDREW'S SPIDER-MAN WAS MORE FAITHFUL TO MUH COMICS THAN TOBEY'S SPIDER-MAN! IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT THE RAIMI MOVIES ARE BETTER IN EVERY OTHER WAY, SPIDEY IS THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS!"

But Spiderman 3 was already good

Unmitigated shit, even by shart in mart standards

Even the emo dance scene and any time Topher Grace was on screen?

Emo Parker was at least entertaining to watch
The AMSM movies didn't have much of anything interesting

>Spider-Man 1
6/10

>Spider-Man 2
8/10

>Spider-Man 3
5/10

>Amazing Spider-Man 1
2/10

>Amazing Spider-Man 2
4/10

fuck off raimifag

They feel like they where cobbled together from a season each of a(relatively high budget) tv series. There's a lot of great moments but it ends up feeling like an edited clip than actual movies.

As far as visuals go, spider-man in ASM2 is pitch perfect.

>Raimifag
>Spider-Man 2 is the only one that's rated highly
Kill yourself. The Amazing Spider-Man movies are pure trash.

Spider-Man - 9/10

Spider-Man 2 - 10/10 (it's the perfect capeshit movie)

Spider-Man 3 - 6/10

The Amazing Spider-Man - 5/10

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - 3/10

this

ASM2 is quite possibly one of the worst movies ever released.

>"Spider-Man"
7/10
>"Spider-Man 2"
7/10
>"Spider-Man 3"
7/10
>"The Amazing Spider-Man"
2/10
>"The Amazing Spider-Man 2"
1/10

>"Captain America: Civil War"
5/10