2000's

Post 2000's movies. Im feeling nostalgic.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=msBbeo0SKHI
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

Am I the only one that absolutely LOVED part one but can't even get myself to sit through part two?.

...

I would hardly call batman begins 2000s

Ye, wrong pic

early 2000's capeshit>>>>>all other capeshit

what would you call a movie made in 2004/released in 2005?

You clearly don't appreciate kino

Movies can be classified as 2000s if they're from 1997-2003. Movies from 2004-2008 are post-2000s. Movies from 2009- are 2010s, and so on.

millennial here, but I classify them as what school I was in
2000's movies are when I was in Elementary school (1998-2007)
post 2000's movie were high school (2007-2011)
and then 2010's university (2011-2016)

Based

Guys guys guys...

2000's is 2000-2009

like 60's is 1960-1969


I know it's hard for you millennials to understand time the way we did, because of the overlap, but for fuck sakes.

Elementary school movies are comfy af.

Wow rude. 2000s can have different connotations. Early y2k movies have a very distinct feeling to them, and therefore don't have to be strictly from that time period.

Actually that's a great example preY2k and post Y2k are 2 different times and is what makes the 90's (1990-1999) so much different then the 00's

but we don't say 00's because that would be saying (double ohs) which isn't a time, so we we say 2000's. but what we mean is 00's like the 90's or 80's or the 70's 60's 50's 40's 30's 20's 10's.

so you may think 2000's is whatever time you were in highschool, or 95-05, or something else weird like that, but the convention in place beforehand that's been used for 100 years before is 2000's is 2000-2009

SIMPLE.

easy.

mostly because the movies from 2005's isn't a breadth, it's specific, but 2000's is a decade.

>spacializing time
>not recognizing temporal flow or duration
one could argue that what makes a 2000's movie is the endurance or duration of a certain thought, feeling idea, mood, tone etc... For example most of the early 2000's movies are directly in the shadow of or responding to post 9/11 while I don't think that element is as prevalent in later movies post 2007. Sure there was still an element of it present but not as much. There is a noticeable tonal shift in the types of movies being made that for the most part define that decade of film. But again that really lasts for the first 7 years, by that point there starts another shift that then fully manifests itself in the next decade. Each decade of film is a response to the previous one and this response starts in the final years of that decade.

Nice conversation guys, post movies with super duper 2000's vibe now please.

2000-2009 are the noughties

youtube.com/watch?v=msBbeo0SKHI

Bull-fucking-shit.

How the fuck can you faggots be arguing about what the 2000s are?

...

>not recognizing that at the heart of the argument is a metaphysical question of the nature of time
>is time something simply divided into a succession of t1-t2-t3 series, such as years or decades, or is it more accurate to describe time in terms of a durational flow

Why don't you just google 2000s movies? The fuck is the point of this thread? Just post an image?

Jesus was actually born 8-6 before Christ. We could still live in 00s.

I dont want to end up watching a bad movie. Imdb ratings dont mean shit to me.

90's movie filled with 90's music/90's cars/90's clothes/90's hoes
This is surely b8, fun kinography tho

i dont get nostalgic for movies from the 2000s

at all

I'd argue that there are post-90s movies (2000-2004/5) and 2000s movies (2005-2009/10)

Here are the "defining" movies of the early 00s in my understanding. These are not the best or most important movies, just the most congruent with my understanding of what early 00s were like aesthetically.

"All About Lily Chou-Chou" (2001)
"28 Days Later..." (2002)
"Spider-Man" (2002)
"Elephant" (2003)
"9 Songs" (2004)
"The Puffy Chair" (2005)
"Marie Antoinette" (2006)
"LOL" (2006)