How can a man so well-versed in philosophy be so bad at making movies?
How can a man so well-versed in philosophy be so bad at making movies?
He's like a more innovative and consistent Michael Bay with better storytelling chops, what's wrong with his movies?
He's well versed in philosophy.
>what's wrong with his movies?
Not a damn thing as far as I'm concerned.
>snyder
>versed in anything but framing
lmao
DUDE CHEAP SYMBOLISM
DUDE 101 PHILOSOPHY CLASS
What's cheap about it?
Not him, but:
DUDE, SUPERMAN IS GOD
DUDE, BATMAN IS MAN
DUDE, ZOD/DOOMSDAY IS THE DEVIL
WOW, WHAT AMAZING KINO I HAVE MADE
Superman's not God. That's the point. The irony lies in the fact that the only person that calls him a god to his face doesn't see him as anything but a pawn.
>gym jones
What did he mean by this?
Because he still wants to show cool moments that go against whatever point he is trying to make.
well according to you he's still like Michael Bay
being innovative or consistent doesn't make you intelligent
>both went to the same film school
Zack "Kubrick" Snyder
DUDE NOT AN ARGUMENT
Being well versed in philosophy doesn't automatically make you good at implementing it into movies
It's cheap, generic, overdone, religious symbolism is my argument.
How generic is this? Is there religious imagery besides Christ imagery?
There is.
>Ayn Rand = well-versed in philosophy
>Halo above Lex's head
Snyder kino is the best kino.
>well-versed in philosophy
So are like half the people stuck working at Starbucks.
with his esoteric symbolism we can say Zack Snyder truly is the Kubrick of our generation.
Lool ofc he would consider ayn Rand a serious philosopher.
the guy is literally a teenager in a man's body.