CUCK

So he's a cuck now, his ONLY complaint about the movie was the lack of an interracial relationship

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/miVRaoR_8xQ?t=3979
youtu.be/miVRaoR_8xQ?t=5484
youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>haha oh man just thought of a great cuck meme to post on Cred Forums
>fuck going to class this is more important

Nah, he's right: the movie sucked because no gay interracial relationship between Finn and Poe.

Call me crazy, but I don't think beta nerds who aren't slamming pussy on any basis shouldn't be throwing around the word "cuck."

That's also not what he was complaining about, he was just illustrating that for the movie's accolades for diversity, it didn't go as far as other movies.

But no, you're correct, it fits your dumb alt-right nerd brand. Go listen to some retro new wave and circle jerk over a generation you never lived in.

Well copypasta'd

I've completely given up discussing these guys on this board. I'm convinced everyone just skips through the reviews and watches little bits of it at a time and then just pretends they got all the details out of that and whatever some other idiot who also didn't watch it posts here.

>Call me crazy

>his ONLY complaint

It's like you only heard what you wanted to hear.

>someone makes a point that flawlessly poked holes in millennial Cred Forums's "logic"
>LOL COPYPASTA R-right?

...

I think you missed the point. The fact the movie took no chances and relied on fan service, made for little to complain about, and that in of itself was the complaint.

Well that gif is just a damn dirty trick.

His complaint was that it was a safe comitee-approved and artificial movie, with by the number corporate diversity, but not actual balls to go all the way.

No, I mean I plan to use it. Thanks for the new copypasta.

>Everyone knows the Star Wars series peaked with that confrontation in The Empire Strikes Back (1980) between Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) and the villain, Darth Vader (played on screen by David Prowse, but voiced by James Earl Jones).

>The “Luke, I am your father” revelation resonated because it expressed how George Lucas, like his movie-brat peers (Coppola, Bogdanovich, Scorsese, Spielberg, De Palma) struggled with Sixties generational ambivalence. A father–son antagonism resounds through all their films as a reflection of Vietnam-era student protests and the privilege of those draft-dodging filmmaker progeny. Even Lucas, in his escapist outer-space mode, iterated the era’s unease, culminating in Luke’s fear and symbolic castration.

>It’s seldom realized that the movie brats’ films are essentially conservative, politically speaking. Yet, in the new millennium, filmgoers’ superficial political awareness makes them nostalgic for Star Wars to maintain the gullibility of their youth. Longing for innocence is all that the insipidness of the latest sequel, The Force Awakens, signifies. When director J. J. Abrams re-stages that primal moment, he does it for brand recognition, but so unimaginatively that it feels hackneyed. Even though it’s meant to be painful for rabid Star Wars fanatics, it lacks mythological significance. Star Wars fans are not required to think metaphorically, so any Oedipal meaning is lost (although there is something of millennial ingratitude in the new filial confrontation), just as the original scene’s impact was ignored in subsequent sequels.

Since when do you need a sex life to use memes?

>The new characters in The Force Awakens are banal. John Boyega’s black superhero, Finn, updates and restyles Han Solo’s jockish heroism — a cultural evolution that evokes Obama (“I was taken from a family I’ll never know”) for global commercialism. Boyega is appealing-enough to surpass the series’ previous racial tokens, Billy Dee Williams and Samuel L. Jackson, but he is subordinate to the new gallantry of Daisy Ridley’s Rey, who embodies the female empowerment denied to Princess (now General) Leia. Rey “leans in” when she grips the Skywalker light saber, so that feminists can rejoice at the Disney Corporation’s calculated political correctness (although Rey’s competence with weaponry contradicts liberals’ convenient attitudes toward gun control.)

>By now we all should know that there’s nothing of adult interest in Star Wars. Even when it premiered back in 1977, the sci-fi premise and comic-book characters were eclipsed artistically by the visionary spirituality of Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Yet the continued prominence of Star Wars signifies something that is politically serious, if not dreadful: The great renaissance of American filmmaking during the 1970s and its regeneration of film culture (when movies were seen as a vital means of approaching and understanding contemporary experience) were doomed by Star Wars’ pseudo-imaginative, non-campy rehash of escapist junk. Now, the rebooted, politically empty The Force Awakens suggests a boot stuck in the rear of film culture’s flabby remains.

>The Force Awakens is a bread-and-circuses carnival (disguised as “The Rapture,” a young videomaker told me) that is intended to keep millennial audiences docile. Maybe that explains the film’s unavoidable sell and both the media’s and the public’s desperate genuflection. Love of Star Wars is not love of cinema, just consumerist habit. The Star Wars Generation — that unfortunate rabble primed to see these films at the precise moment they were becoming culturally responsive — are not necessarily the audience the movie brats deserved; they’re spawn of Baby Boomer affluence and narcissism. Star Wars turned their natural curiosity and wonder into self-satisfaction, artificially dependent on media and merchandising (a tragedy also evident in Apple and Pixar evangelism).

>TV-show runner J. J. Abrams brings his game-changing banality to the Star Wars franchise. He follows the template as originated by Lucas and appeals to adolescent thralldom, keeping the brand recognizable. The Force Awakens is paced better than Star Wars’ other dismal episodes, yet it’s even more impersonal. There’s no visual or spiritual excitement, as there was even in a cynical sci-fi product like Ridley Scott’s Prometheus. Abrams is making product to salute the cultural and economic status quo. With Star Wars, product has not only taken the place of art; it has replaced myth.

I mean, it was his one unique criticism, and he focused on it a long time. Like, it really bothered him Rey didn't find the ugly negro sexually attractive.

He actually kinda forgave the fact that it's a lazy rehash of episode IV because it introduces Star Wars to the kids and the next two might be better.

>comitee-approved and artificial movie
yes, the only REAL movies are made by three people in a midwest warehouse for $200. could mike get more self-serving?

You didn't watch the whole did you?

When do we get another Wincest Story?

Now Han Solo is finally dead Luke could nail Leia, no problem.

Yes, though i did get distracted while he was going on about the fucking ring theory.

ever since Cred Forums implemented the no singles policy so hiro can get double the money off of passes

whole vid seems like a joke (not a joke review but just a joke) since he does not even get to the movie til lthe 1 hour mark

considering that gay relationships are being pushed so hard in movies now, incest is the next logical step in 10 or so years.

it will go a little something like this

>2016 the year of progressive gay movies
>2026 the year of progressive incest movies
>2036 the year of progressive pedophilia movies
>2046 I can't even fucking imagine

>2046 the year of progressive clone fucking movies

No his complaint was a lack of passion from any of the characters.

youtu.be/miVRaoR_8xQ?t=3979
>I give the film a pass for being a soft reboot

youtu.be/miVRaoR_8xQ?t=5484
>The other major problem is the lack of sex

>forgetting bestiality is currently trending

>I've completely given up discussing these guys on this board.
Good. What's there to discuss really? It was a decent review with some good laughs. If we're not memeing, there is literally nothing to talk about in regards to this review.

Dude, everyone knows that's what he was actually saying.

We're just contractually obligated to shitpost as much as possible at any available opportunity.

Please send me help I haven't seen my family in years.

Disney execs cynically obsessed with 'diversity' don't do anything with it, seeking to maximise audience numbers and good goy points whilst playing it safe

+

A weird lack of romance of any kind in a story that would easily facilitate it
> "I don't care who kisses whom!"
c'mon man did you even see the hugging bit

use your head

>Plinkett on prequels
>REEEEEE WHERE S MAH SEX AND HUGS
>Plinkett on ep 7
>REEEEEE WHERE S MAH SEX AND HUGS

>MUH HUMANITEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Why can't this cucklord understand that not all movies are obliged to be friend simulators?

He's actually 100% on point. Why did I fall for the Armond hate meme?

>With Star Wars, product has not only taken the place of art; it has replaced myth.

Goddamn, why is he so based?

>YourMovieSucks.org
wait, that's a real site? I thought those were all just made up joke names.

>he thought the bestialityposting was just memes
youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk

>tfw you're a progressive cuck and didn't even know

I get that you're trolling him and wish you best on that, but he does have a point.

>t. dogfucker

I knew you were a faggot you posted that gif

>missing the point this hard

are you fucking retarded