Is Lord of the Rings the most consistently good film trilogy?
Is Lord of the Rings the most consistently good film trilogy?
what's wrong with this guy
What is his expression trying to convey?
BIG
ORC
CUMMIES
actual kinotrilogy here
Patrician detected.
...
Yes. And it has extra points for each film being 3 and a half hours long on average. To make that much good content takes a fucking miracle
Return of the King is a bit of a disappointment.
"but not a womyn!" and ghost ex machina were lame resolutions. It's the same in the books though, isn't it? I forget
fuck off, Kevin
No.
The Pusher triology is.
yep
She didnt actually "kill" the witch king. All the ringwraiths were immortal and he would have come back as a ghost in a few days if the ring hadnt been destroyed
...
kek you no nostalgia faggot fucking nerd only fellowship is good
how does it feel not being able to see hackson at work right infront of your eyes
name a better trilogy then, smartass
no it wasn't wtf, the green bubble army didn't exist at all, aragorn shows up like a badass with actual human soldiers from all around gondor
the ghosts in the book were just to spook the pirates and steal their ships
It was actually pretty shit after the first one and not even close to the best trilogies.
name a better trilogy then
Dollars
Why lie?
>‘Éowyn! Éowyn!’ cried Merry. Then tottering, struggling up, with her last strength she drove her sword between crown and mantle, as the great shoulders bowed before her. The sword broke sparkling into many shards. The crown rolled away with a clang. Éowyn fell forward upon her fallen foe. But lo! the mantle and hauberk were empty. Shapeless they lay now on the ground, torn and tumbled; and a cry went up into the shuddering air, and faded to a shrill wailing, passing with the wind, a voice bodiless and thin that died, and was swallowed up, and was never heard again in that age of this world.
the pusher trilogy is very consistent in quality imo