Is Lord of the Rings the most consistently good film trilogy?

Is Lord of the Rings the most consistently good film trilogy?

what's wrong with this guy
What is his expression trying to convey?

BIG

ORC

CUMMIES

actual kinotrilogy here

Patrician detected.

...

Yes. And it has extra points for each film being 3 and a half hours long on average. To make that much good content takes a fucking miracle

Return of the King is a bit of a disappointment.
"but not a womyn!" and ghost ex machina were lame resolutions. It's the same in the books though, isn't it? I forget

fuck off, Kevin

No.
The Pusher triology is.

yep

She didnt actually "kill" the witch king. All the ringwraiths were immortal and he would have come back as a ghost in a few days if the ring hadnt been destroyed

...

kek you no nostalgia faggot fucking nerd only fellowship is good

how does it feel not being able to see hackson at work right infront of your eyes

name a better trilogy then, smartass

no it wasn't wtf, the green bubble army didn't exist at all, aragorn shows up like a badass with actual human soldiers from all around gondor
the ghosts in the book were just to spook the pirates and steal their ships

It was actually pretty shit after the first one and not even close to the best trilogies.

name a better trilogy then

Dollars

Why lie?

>‘Éowyn! Éowyn!’ cried Merry. Then tottering, struggling up, with her last strength she drove her sword between crown and mantle, as the great shoulders bowed before her. The sword broke sparkling into many shards. The crown rolled away with a clang. Éowyn fell forward upon her fallen foe. But lo! the mantle and hauberk were empty. Shapeless they lay now on the ground, torn and tumbled; and a cry went up into the shuddering air, and faded to a shrill wailing, passing with the wind, a voice bodiless and thin that died, and was swallowed up, and was never heard again in that age of this world.

the pusher trilogy is very consistent in quality imo