Wow this was actually good

PROTECT
and
CHECKED

Anyone with true taste wouldn't touch that thing with a yard pole

...

>that depends, do you want to eat the bunny?

We all want to ____ the bunny.

Was crashing this thread a part of your plan?

>not wanting to be dommed by pic related

why did they make bunny thicc?

I thought it was a fantastic movie, particularly in that it felt like a legit buddy cop movie. The action scenes were very entertaining. But I am on my phone so take that with a grain of salt.

...

I thought it was pretty good for a kid's movie. It was pretty hilarious, it's a genuine buddy cop movie. The message is very hamfisted though.

what's his tumblr again?

...

...

There is nothing wrong with furry porn.

faggot.

don't call me that

...

I hate this movie because of how utterly irrational it's message is.

It literally tries to teach children that there is no intrinsic behavioral difference between a rabbit and a fox. This is so false that it would only take a few tweaks to the movie to change it into a parody of liberal politics.

I hate niggers even more because of this movie

ok, then but does that mean to you, uh...

black people are dangerous, powerful predators?
or they are useless bunnies and rodents?

Then again i've never fucking understood racists: ok, so you're SOOOOOO superior to people because you are pale by comparison. So then, why give a fuck? Why scream and obsess over them so much?

The Fox was representation of minorties, judged for acting in a particular way, where as the rabbit was a representation of women, judged for being unable to compete.

There is no direct comparison for black stereotypes in the movie, it just tries to deliver the message that violent, 'predator' behaviour is merely a symptom of environmental conditions.

This is narcissistic egalitarianism

In reality, regardless of environmental conditions, people of sub-Saharan Africa descent are statistically more likely to have lower intelligence, violent behaviour and lack of civility.

Weak bait. A squirrel and a fox are a dumb illustration of 'after all we are one universal race' because they're different species. Anthro kids' films are poor carriers for messages about human social behavior.

yeah its bluepilled as fuck but that rabbit tbqh

People who try to play more tolerant than thou and pat themselves on the back over how liberal and progressive they are have just as much inborn stereotypes as everyone else. We're all a little bit racist. Trying to shove it in everyone's face how above it all you are makes things worse.

Watch the movie a second time and you'll notice just how consistently Judy pushes people away over perceived slights. Like Clawhauser calling her cute. Yeah, yeah, "cute" was a standin for "nigger," but look again. Clawhauser clearly didn't mean anything offensive by it and she shut down a likeable guy for literally no reason. She's not the advocate, she's the problem.

It's a fuck you to SJWs, it's just a subtle one.

This film was bogus. Judy is designed to be sexy, which is inappropriate in a kids' movie anyway, and it's not right to arouse men in the audience and then penalize them for whacking off.

Don't know if b8, but Clawhauser calling her cute was just a "talking down" thing

She tells him it's okay if a bunny calls another bunny cute, but predators can't say that word.

If that isn't a stand-in for the word "nigger" I'm not sure what is.

>It literally tries to teach children that there is no intrinsic behavioral difference between a rabbit and a fox.
No, its saying those differences dont matter because as rational beings (in that universe), they are all entitled to the same rights and treatment of rational beings.

For fucks sakes its a cartoon, it doesnt need to hold up to biological scrutiny.

Except foxes eat other animals. Which is a stand-in for how niggers are cannibalistic humanoid underground dwellers.

>squirrel
???

Okay, I haven't seen the movie, not a furry personally, my point still stands.

>removed the Cred Forums-badger that names the Jew

Also I thought the message was that diversity doesn't mean we are all equal but that we can all help each other with the different skills we posses.

I don't know, the delivery is innocent and well-meaning, I've never heard of anyone calling somebody a nigger like that

This, Judy flat out states at the end that some people have to work harder if they want to make it in certain fields than others, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't try. One of the strengths of this movie is that it keeps its message broad.

Look at that, my point illustrated personally. Imagery like this gets sexually mature males in a potent state, ready to mount. Yet if the men in the audience relieve the tension of this manually, they get attacked for it.

Nigga, you dumb

It was actually an illustration of how women don't like being complimented on the only thing they have going for them, which is why they need to be shunned.

/r9k/ pls go

>not Name the Ewe

...

The movie was pretty based desu.

Hold on, at the police academy most of the prejudice seemed to be that she was too small and weak to be taken seriously as a candidate. And then when she goes off to the big city she's given some mace to protect herself against "predators". PINK mace no less! Is this movie trying to make a point about race politics or gender politics? Answer: It's making whatever point you want it to make! Rule #1 about putting social commentary into your family movie: maximum vagueness equals maximum deniability.

The worst conceit the film has you try to accept is that predators continue to go unpredictably bonkers, with numerous incidents of huge strong animals with claws and sharp teeth suddenly trying to murder unsuspecting pedestrians... but nobody's dies, and they want you to just pretend that's plausible.

This results in similarly non-violent prejudice against predators. So is the film making some comment about how bigotry is a two-way street and even the racial majority can be the victim of racist attitudes? Maybe? But "violence in the blood" is traditionally a racist attitude that has been held against black people in real life, so maybe predators are just another minority. So this movie has been a parallel for, I don't know, black-vs-Hispanic racism the whole time?

Come to think of it, who ISN'T a minority in the film? Prey are discriminated against for being small and vulnerable, predators are discriminated against for being former carnivores of aforementioned prey animals. And animals like foxes and sloths face more specific prejudice because of specific stereotypes and limitations of their species. Is it even possible to avoid ticking some box or other in such a pan-racist setting?

I suppose if you're a big, powerful herbivore whose race doesn't have any kind of a questionable reputation. Which would make the only character in this movie who doesn't suffer from any kind of race prejudice... the one played by Idris Elba?

That was punnier than it had any right to be.

Shut it down.

>It literally tries to teach children that there is no intrinsic behavioural difference between a rabbit and a fox.
Which we know is a disgusting lie perpetuated by the Ewes in charge. No one naturally comes to the conclusion that rabbits -- creatures descended from small vegetarians who depend on speed for defence against predators -- are anything like foxes, their natural born enemies. The mental gymnastics involved behind that one is staggering.

no, just a disneydrone™

Saved

wabbit

truly causes one's synapses to fire...