Why did they give Scorsese an Oscar for one of his worst movies?
Why did they give Scorsese an Oscar for one of his worst movies?
Chase Evans
Other urls found in this thread:
Camden Butler
Because it's not one of his worst movies
Joshua Brooks
I'm sorry to say this user, and I'm warning you, this might be shocking, but the Oscars are not in fact about rewarding quality.
Ethan Green
Oh no, without a doubt. They just gave him an Oscar because it was 'his turn' but why couldn't they decide that it was his turn when he released a better movie?
Gabriel Green
in case his next movie is even shitter and they'll never be able to give him an oscar, but the man deserves one so they decides to use this one
Hudson Morales
Because they wanted to give him it for a routine job of work to show him who's boss.
Henry Phillips
this oscars mean jack shit
Lincoln King
They mean a hell of a lot to the people that get them.
Nicholas Thomas
because one of his worst movies is way better than what was competing
Connor Reed
its not his best but wayy better than anything else he's done since Casino.
unless you really liked kundun or shutter island or something
Kevin Garcia
Gangs of New York, Aviator and Departed are all better than Casino.
Gavin Lopez
Apologize.
Andrew Powell
The Aviator, certainly, The Departed, possibly, but Gangs, no way.
Thomas Edwards
Bringing Out the Dead is supposed to be really good.
Jose Baker
Luke Allen
You mean like with Peter Jackson?
Easton Mitchell
What are you implying, sonny?
Jeremiah Young
>Scorsese
>making a good movie
Top kek.
Easton Clark
That Peter Jackson hasn't made a good movie since the Fellowship of the Ring.
Jordan Richardson
Call me a pleb, but i love The Departed.
Liam Flores
MAYBE MAYBE NOT MAYBE GO FUCK YOURSELF
Leo Ward
@@75162922
Yeah, got me. Here, have your reply, champ
Ryder Myers
Babel and Letters From Iwo Jima were both better than this
Joseph Brooks
Only on Cred Forums somebody has to say that. sm.h
Jace Wright
Because he is old and Academy wanted to give him an award before he passed away and it was pretty evident that he wouldn't be making anymore good films as his career was declining.
Noah Lewis
Okay, you're a pleb.
Aaron Phillips
Yeah, not really. Scorsese is far from showing signs of dying, and even farther when he got the guy, and he never stopped making quality cinema and constantly being recognized for it, before and after.
But that post was the classic Cred Forums expert supposing things from thin air, so whatever.
Noah Sullivan
I tought jack was pretty good in The departed
Daniel Rivera
And then Wolf of Wall Street came out and everyone remembered why Martin Scorsese is so revered.
Matthew Adams
Is it true that this is just a rip-off of an Asian film? Did whitey steal and take all the credit again?
Andrew Johnson
No, now fuck off nigger
Brayden Perry
kys
Caleb Davis
>le The Departed is bad epic maymay
Michael Morgan
It's not bad it's just nowhere near as good as Infernal Affairs.
Hudson Adams
>Infernal Affairs
You mean internal, right?
Wyatt Foster
It's way better.
Thomas Morales
No.
Zachary Mitchell
If most other directors had made it, no, it wouldn't be considered a bad movie. But it's a bad movie when considered the rest of Marty's resume.
Joseph Parker
I wouldn't say Infernal Affairs is way better. Just better all around.
Luis Long
Who will die first? Martin Scorsese or Ridley Scott?
Joshua Williams
Well, Scott's ability to make a good movie certainly died first.
Nolan Sullivan
This is a stupid logic. Even more when it IS a great film. And of course he made better, but this can't weigh against his 'lesser' works.
Robert Stewart
ARE YOU A COAP?
James Evans
Because the Oscars are shit