Why is that movie so god tier ?

Why is that movie so god tier ?
Even though it's obvious who the killer is
also why didn't they do sequels?
the ending is weird if they don't intend to follow up

>also why didn't they do sequels?
the rest of the books are shit

this. i couldnt finish them. the first was so good though.

Trips are as good as the movie. I didn't expect anything when I heard of this movie and enjoyed the fuck out of it.

is the first book even good?
>a powerful but austitic hacker helps a journalist
it's like a shitty B-movie plot

>also why didn't they do sequels?

because they read like a novel that's a supervillan origin story instead of an on-the-spectrum outcast solves the mystery novel.

Really good film

I really like Craig and Rooney in this kino

If you don't like this film, you're pleb as fuck

If you don't like the trilogy of novels, you're pleb as fuck

/thread
/board
/site
/internet
/life
/everything

>Great acting
>Fantastic directing, seriously one of Fincher's best
>Noir detective, they don't make those too often anymore
>comfy snowy Sweden
>a movie for adults, doesn't shy away from anything
>seriously, how often do you see people smoking in movies nowadays?
>great soundtrack

>Why is that movie so god tier ?

because we got ass snack.webm

>sympathetic but shifty rich white guy is the killer

i really liked it. endings different.

i had high expectations for this movie and it blew me away still. my fav song is orinoco flow by enya because me and my grandma would always listen to it when i was little and when Martin played it as he was about to kill Craig i lost my shit. so good.

Swedish version was better

I have absolutely no idea how it's possible to make such a god tier movie out of a script that average

Said no one with taste.

Craig was so /fa/ in this

Short version? David Fincher is The Man.

post fucking-webm

...

...

dove in face first like a true patrician

that ass did look tasty.

This is correct, your all tasteless faggot if you think otherwise

...

she has a great butt ill give her that

you wouldn't want sequels to this if you ever watched the swedish trilogy. what a pile of shit. it turns into some retarded conspiracy spy thriller.

Are the 2nd and 3rd Swedish ones even worth watching, then? I've had them on the backburner for a while.

>the ending is weird if they don't intend to follow up

Ending was good. Same one as in the book iirc. The case is solved, Mikael's problem with the industrialist is done, everyone can move on.

Lisbeth was finally ready to have an intimate relationship with someone, but when she saw him with Erika, she was heartbroken and tossed the jacket away. It was a sad ending but it was a good one

>why didn't they do sequels?
Because Sony's Amy Pascal is a flaky cunt
>pic related

no, don't waste your time. they are extremely bad and they don't feel anything like the first movie at all. the first movie had that whole comfy murder mystery atmosphere to it.

the second and third movie do not have that. instead of a mystery it turns into some ridiculous spy movie that involves a henchmen that does not feel pain who beats people up, and a russian spy that is working with the swedish government. there's also conspiracy spy crap in it, her therapist is a part of it.

the third movie mostly takes place in a court room.

they're absolute trash, don't bother.

Glad I didn't waste my time then. Thanks, bruh.