Younger girls into older men into exploiting younger girls

That movie was pretty hot.

>softcore porn on Youtube

What did they mean by this?

Indiana Jones, it's subtext though

how old is she in this mr. fbi?

old enough for Google apparently

Leon

nice

Thanks for the legal fap, based Russia

You can go down a rabbit hole on youtube and find plenty of shit of questionable legality.

>lolita has tits and big hairy bush

You won't find those Russian movies on YouTube.

>Younger girls into older men
Did you not pay attention to any of Lolita?

hello FBI

Tell me where can i find them, so i don't go there accidentally

Orphan

More like this

You wait for based Siberian mouse webm poster to show up.

Fish Tank

Anymore Russian Kino?

Lolita (1962), like your pic OP. Haven't seen the 97 version.

Pretty Baby.

Fish Tank is alright. And Ghost World is not about an older man exploiting younger girls.

Removing "exploiting" and just focusing on older men/younger girls movies: The Crush is also good. American Beauty. Leon. Poison Ivy 3. Nymphomaniac Vol 1 and 2. Wanda Nevada. God Bless America. Kick Ass. Hick.

Bump for recommendations for more "russian" movies

>looking for questionable shit on youtube
nice knowing you ahmed, hope they give you a cell with a view

The 97 version of Lolita features Dominique Swain; the most explicit stuff is her moaning while she gets fingered or fucked. There's a nude body double scene. In general it's much more faithful to the source material, it also has a good score and some pretty decent cinematography. Based Jeremy Irons.

The original film was an impossible thing, censors would never allow anything close to the book to be filmed. What they got away with was noteworthy, for the time.

Yeah, censors were a bitch with that movie. They were much more strict in the 60's than the 90's, Kubrick said he never would have made the movie if he know how difficult it would be to get past the censors to get it made.

which one's the one where some girl asks a bloke for a fag? she's wearing flip flops I think and her roadies are watching from afar

also, why are young girls so lewd? it drives me crazy

>why are young girls so lewd?

Women are receptacles. I don't say this to demean women, but they are literally receivers: of DNA, of food while they're pregnant, of resources. Which explains why women tend to be gold diggers. Which explains why women value power and wealth. Which also explains why they always want to be entertained. In her mind, men exist to please her. Men are tools to women. All arrows point to women.

So females advertise. Look at this receiver everybody! Give me attention! If she's not getting attention, she may never be a receiver of DNA. If she fails to attract a mate, she will die alone. She has billions of years of evolution behind her, shaping her behavior so her bloodline continues. So most females spend a considerable amount of time trying to attract a mate.

That's also why females prefer taller, stronger, older men. In prehistory, if a guy can make it to that age it's a sign he knows what the hell he's doing. He knows how to obtain resources, he knows how to fight off attackers, he knows how to defend his ingroup. He has status. And all females love status.

The most basic interaction between females and males is a young girl looking up to her taller, stronger, older father. But she can't have kids with her father. Incest taboos evolved because those who engaged in it tended to die out. So she has to find a man like her father. Or, who traumatized her like her father did. People often seek out relationships with partners who provide them with familiar trauma.

cirp.org/library/psych/vanderkolk/
>Many traumatized people expose themselves, seemingly compulsively, to situations reminiscent of the original trauma. These behavioral reenactments are rarely consciously understood to be related to earlier life experiences.

Which explains why so many pornstars are prior victims of sexual abuse.

What's the point of Lolita if Dolly is in high school? At least the 1997 version pretended she was a little girl, even if the actress was still too old.

>inb4 analravaged women and white knights

I suspected Cred Forums was the only decent board left.

Oh please, I only started dating my current boyfriend because he was wearing a 'All your base belong to us' t-shirt, how is that status? :roll:

>there is a woman un this board, right now

In Manhattan he is dating a barely legal teen

Come back when you're not living with or supported by your parents, young lady.

So you're saying if you found another man with more status, you wouldn't leave your geek boyfriend in a second? Why haven't you married him?

This is how women are totally focused on the present, on how they feel now, and don't seem care as much about future consequences (unless that means earning potential).

"Oh yeah? I'm with a geek now, and that means I'll always love a geek! Tee hee!"

You're seriously going to pick a tshirt instead of if George Clooney showed up and wanted to fuck you?

Give me a fucking break.

And if you DID pick him simply based on his clothing, that's Peacocking 101. Clothing is a status signifier. And you didn't pick a guy because he was wearing a boring basic shirt.

Newsflash: In Fifty Shades of Grey, which sold over 100 million copies, written by a woman, bought by women, Christian Grey is not wearing a geeky "All your base belong to us" T-shirt. He's a billionaire in a suit who practically stalks and rapes her the whole time.

Just look at the all the women who throw themselves at Donald Trump or Bill Clinton. They're both disgusting sleazebags, but because they're rich and famous, they're not in prison right now. And speaking of prison, look at all the women who throw themselves at convicted murderer James Holmes who shot up the theater in Aurora, Colorado when The Dark Knight Rises was playing.

When Trump said "when you're a star, they let you do it", he was unfortunately right (which doesn't say much about females in general).

WOW do you need to get laid, my boyfriend makes me very very happy you sad sad person

>You're seriously going to pick a tshirt instead of if George Clooney showed up and wanted to fuck you?

Yeah I'm just going to throw my loving bf under a bus because some old celebrity wants to fuck me :roll: shoo shoo troll

>WOW do you need to get laid

Argument with holes.

And BTW, extramarital sex is morally wrong. Extramarital sex includes: all rape (except marital rape), affairs, cheating, bastard children born to single mothers, sex trafficking, child molestation, child sex abuse, child sex trafficking, prostitution, hardcore porn, the contraction of most STDs, even most abortions. People who defend extramarital sex are defending all of the above.

I'm sure your (current) boyfriend makes you very happy. It won't last. Just sayin. Eventually you *will* betray him for someone else who thrills you more.

"From early glances at her data, Chivers said, she guesses she will find that women are most turned on, subjectively if not objectively, by scenarios of sex with strangers."

>Yeah I'm just going to throw my loving bf under a bus because some old celebrity wants to fuck me :roll: shoo shoo troll

How many boyfriends have you had? How fat are you? You probably *will* eventually throw your "loving" bf under a bus.

Every woman wants to upgrade.

Don't act like you're any different, sweetheart. Come back in 5 years and tell me about your loving boyfriend and his All Your Base tshirt.

"We just grew apart." "We just weren't compatible" "I wasn't happy" "I fell out of love with him"

Poor fucking guy doesn't see what's coming.

Dude, you're talking to someone who is obviously like 15. You yourself likely aren't much older, but at least your keen on things even old men miss.. bow out. go home.

Just a pro tip, that kind of social economic status, safety, seeking behavior does not start in these women until they're 21+ on average, unless they are real gold digger by their soul if you know what I mean. Younger women and girls just want to have fun. They don't give a fuck about SES or any of that yet. MMK?

>cirp.org/library/psych/vanderkolk/
interesting read, thanks for the share

my little sister used to flirt with older men and bully/tease them at the mall/in public and she was just 12, but it was more like a powerplay than something sexual
What is that then? just her 'advertising'?

Im just shocked by the behaviour and her discovery/exploration of it. Weve talked about it and she says that if it hadnt been for our parents, she would have probably used it to her advantage into sleeping with older men and blackmailing them for playing with jailbait
it's fucking terrifying how fucked up it is

This seems like ike an elaborate samefag

Is this autism?

No, just two retards.

Even older women talk like they're 15, WTF are you talking about? Every woman has the mind of a child in Disneyland. Always keep that in mind.

I'm likely not much older than 15? This is a loli thread. What the hell are you talking about?

Read the book What Women Want. It's based on studies (by women) about what actually turns women on. Which often contradicts with what women *say* they want (because they don't want to look like sluts). And it's not geeky tshirts. A geeky shirt certainly has more novelty than bland, basic. But her eyes will unquestionably be drawn to someone who peacocks more.

Yes, most girls don't care about fat wallets until their 20s. But status is not simply wealth.

Captain of the football team? High status. Most popular guy in school? High status. Justin Bieber? High status. Male model? High status. Class clown? Maybe not as high status, but still an attention getter. Guy who can lift her up? High status. The only reason a female wouldn't go for strong guys is if they've seriously bullied her and she thinks she doesn't have a chance. And girls going for jocks in high school is part of safety-seeking behavior, looking for warrior genes. Sure, lots of girls in high school say they hate preppies and jocks, but only if they're not popular with preppies and jocks.

Women are fundamentally gold diggers. Yeah, "girls just wanna have fun", that means you pay. He brings the money to the table, she brings her body to the table.

The question was why are young girls so lewd. I already explained why females are attention whores. And it is directly linked to the biological reality that females are receivers. Again, why women want men to entertain them.

Actually every post in this thread is just me talking to myself.

mra pls go

Well, you might be right but you should talk to someone about that autism.

On Loveline, Dr. Drew would talk about "repetition compulsion" when it comes to trauma all the time.
loveline.wikia.com/wiki/Repetition_Compulsion

And in almost all cases, the girls calling up didn't understand why they kept falling for certain types of guys. Repetition compulsion is why.

On Youtube there is also some channel called School of Life or something, about how love can be hard for some people to receive. Some people feel they are not deserving of love, so they seek out people who make them suffer in ways that feel familiar, and who leave them in painful yet unconsciously gratifying ways.

>What is that then? just her 'advertising'?

"Advertising" is kind of a crass way to put it, but yes, all attention-seeking behavior of females basically amounts to advertising, here I am boys, don't you want me? Since human females are typically smaller and weaker (and less intelligent) than males, throughout evolution their survival has depended on glomming on to stronger, more powerful, higher status males. Riding their coattails. Since feminism and the sexual revolution in the 60s after the invention of oral contraceptives, many women have insisted they "don't need no man." But a few decades of philosophy or technology cannot change millions of years of evolution.

And power is sexual when it comes to women. Power is a turn on to women.

Wikipedia:
>A 1974 study by Hariton and Singer found that being "overpowered or forced to surrender" was the second most frequent fantasy in their survey; a 1984 study by Knafo and Jaffe ranked being overpowered as their study's most common fantasy during intercourse. In 1985, Louis H. Janda who is an associate professor of psychology at Old Dominion University said that the sexual fantasy of being raped is the most common sexual fantasy for women.

No, it's just me arguing with an user who claims to love her All Your Base bf (and I'm sure that will last...)

Dr. Drew is one of the most vile and discredited pieces of shit in recent time. Compared to Dr. Drew fucking Dr. Oz is like fucking God.

Drew is just another small dick, Christian, conservative, white boy, pushing his bullshit morality and views on the world through the platform he has been given. Fuck "dr" Drew Dickse.

Seriously, you're taking 2 steps backwards by referencing him now. Stop it.

You must be bluepilled as fuck.

But go ahead. Go wear an All Your Base tshirt around and see how much you get laid.

Women can't give good advice. That assumes they consciously know what they want. They don't.

theguardian.com/books/2013/jul/05/what-do-women-want-extract
>How to explain the conflict between what the women claimed and what their genitals said?

>As they enrolled in the study, Chivers' subjects identified themselves as straight or lesbian. They were shown images of sex between men and women, women and women, men and men, and a pair of bonobos (a species of ape). The subjects, straight and lesbian, were turned on right away by all of it, including the copulating apes. While they watched, they also held a keypad on which they rated their own feelings of arousal. So Chivers had physiological and self-reported scores. They hardly matched at all. Chivers' objective numbers, tracking what's technically called vaginal pulse amplitude, soared no matter who was on screen and regardless of what they were doing, to each other, to themselves. The keypad contradicted the plethysmograph entirely. The self-reports announced indifference to the bonobos. But that was only for starters. When the films were of women touching themselves or enmeshed with each other, the straight subjects said they were a lot less excited than their genitals declared. During the segments of gay male sex, the ratings of heterosexual women were even more muted.

Excuse me. I would just like to say we should STOP SEXISM on this board RIGHT NOW.

I'm trying to find a nice film to feel uncomfortably aroused by later on, after a long day of what I hope will be productive studying. I DON'T need people who don't know my trying to tell me my gender is inferior, and does or likes this and that. It's a downer.

OK that's all, thank you.

> mother finds out
> expect her to go utterly apeshit
> instead, talks things out
> ends with happy family and a threesome

The only downside was that the mother was fat and ugly.

claire?

Are you own of those "Return of the Kings" or whatever dudes? You realize your Iranian messiah Roosh the Douche or whatever is just a fucking troll doing it for the money himself, right?

My post says nothing about rights, it's simply about biological reality.

However, The Red Pill documentary is about MRA:
imdb.com/title/tt3686998/

rooshv.com/the-true-nature-of-women
>Water takes the shape of the container it fills.

>There is no other conclusion that I can arrive at when I’ve witnessed how easily women degrade into this negative condition, and—more importantly—how much they love it. How with just a little bit of practice, women love being a bitch, love attention whoring, and love exerting any bit of power they have over men to validate themselves and feed their starving self-esteem, to see men not as men but items in a supermarket that they can shop through at their leisure.

>Free from the shackles of acting within traditional sex roles, all women of the world would much rather act like a lazy sailor than a prim and proper lady as long as male attention continues to flow—even women who have been a lady for most of their lives, because acting like a lady is hard work that involves effort, while failing to examine the mirror before stepping out of the house or failing to exert control over an f-bomb filter does not.

>This change is not a metamorphosis that brings upon a new state never known, like a caterpillar turning into a butterfly, but a reversion to the woman’s natural, primordial state, the true order of her being. American men can tell you of this reversion with much detail, and how because of it they have given up on enjoying their leisure time with the opposite sex, resigned to watching Youtube videos on the internet instead of trying to mate.

>When the true nature of women became clear in my mind, I was deeply pained, because I realized that no matter where I go and what apparent girl I fall in love with, a certain environment or trigger will uncover the excrement hiding within my angel and she will then give me her worst without a second of hesitation or moral doubt.

I am trying to explain the true nature of females. Sorry I don't speak in Tweet form.

>rooshv.com

For fucks sake. Yep.. I knew it.

see: We fuck misogynistic dwarfs in the ass, dawg. I'm talking spoon.

Oh my fucking God.

Even if a quack notices the sky is blue, that has no bearing on the fact he observed. It doesn't put the fact into doubt, at all.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repetition_compulsion
>Repetition compulsion is a psychological phenomenon in which a person repeats a traumatic event or its circumstances over and over again. This includes reenacting the event or putting oneself in situations where the event is likely to happen again. This "re-living" can also take the form of dreams in which memories and feelings of what happened are repeated, and even hallucination.

>The term can also be used to cover the repetition of behaviour or life patterns more broadly: a "key component in Freud's understanding of mental life, 'repetition compulsion'...describes the pattern whereby people endlessly repeat patterns of behaviour which were difficult or distressing in earlier life."

Even if you think Freud was a quack, repetition compulsion is real.

loveline.wikia.com/wiki/Repetition_Compulsion
>In the context of Loveline's subject area of sexuality and romantic relationships, repetition compulsion is a frequent subject brought up by Dr. Drew about why callers seem to engage in certain maladaptive behaviors, or are extremely attracted to people that hurt them. Dr. Drew often uses the definition "Events that are terrorizing in childhood become sources if immense attraction in adulthood" and describes the causal relationship as "magical," refering metaphorically to how reliably it occurs, yet people are unaware of it.

>Over the years of Loveline, several prominent examples of repetition compulsion have come up so often it is almost uncanny. Yet most callers are utterly oblivious to the connection between their current problems and the events of their childhood; some are even in extreme denial, claiming no trauma happened, only to reveal the exact event Drew speculated happened to them later in the call.

r u sure ur in the right thread?

I do so love the typical female response of, "wow do you need to get laid". Its like the most cliched thing they can say to try and take the moral high ground in an argument.
Instead of rational, informative discourse they just revert to that. Rather like white knights cry of , "Not all women are like that!!".

Roosh has probably fucked more women than everyone in this thread combined. He knows exactly what he's talking about when it comes to women.

OMG! Are you telling me that his books and website exist to make money? Say it isn't so!

Roosh can certainly be trollish at times, but he's done more to help fa/tv/irgins and other guys understand woman than you fucking have.

You should have just stuck with Freud. He's much more respected than that celebrity quack "doctor." Plus he's the one who actually came up with that theory in the first place, right?

Just saying. Go listen to Bill Bur rip into Dr. Drew. It's fucking great.

And what? You think everything Roosh says is a lie?

If you think he's a troll, you MUST be a woman.

Men Are Nothing More Than Clowns To The Modern Woman
rooshv.com/men-are-nothing-more-than-clowns-to-the-modern-woman

Women Have Reduced Themselves To Sexual Commodities
rooshv.com/women-have-reduced-themselves-to-sexual-commodities

ctrl+F "the lover"

da fuck wrong wit ya homos?!?

these all refer to abused people who have mental issues or broken fathers
People seeking to repeat their traumas, not all women come from broken homes or were molested/raped as children

You thin women actually need men or intercourse to be sexually stimulated and satisfied? Here's a pro tip your overly testosterone friends overcompensating for their insecurity won't tell you... most women don't even get off from penetration alone.

Saying "wow you need to get laid" is the opposite of taking the moral high ground.

The attack is basically "you're a prude, you're a square, you're lame, you're a virgin, you're a loser, just relax, live a little." As if black teen moms are doing it right.

"No woman's holes will ever be available to you"

It's an ad hominem attack because they have no way to refute whatever was said.

According to stats it's like 1 in 4 or something. Fucked up shit. Epidemic.

I'm not a big defender of Dr. Drew, but Loveline itself was pretty trashy (and tons of it focused on "little girl voice", to bring it back to OP's topic).

Nearly everything I've said, Bill Burr will back up.

Bill Burr: Let It Go
Bill Burr: You People Are All The Same
Bill Burr: I'm Sorry You Feel That Way

One of his best bits is why are there so many golddigging whores? These women are losers and parasites who latch onto rich successful men. And for some reason, they think being "unhappy" entitles them to millions and millions of dollars that a man worked for.

Which brings to mind Amber Heard and Johnny Depp. Or Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.

Brad FUCKING Pitt.

If he can't keep a woman, what chance do you think any other guy has?

Brad Pitt has seen the true nature of women too. Every woman wants to upgrade. Beyonce sang so herself.

Yes. At least the 1 or 2 posters heavily posting. I wish they'd stop.
I wish we'd stop with the sexism on this board in general. Making /cel/ would defintiely help.
I wish

Kek, I made that 'all your base belong to us' post disguised as a girl hoping for some more Russian youtube vids, not some fucking sperg on the spectrum going on and on about women

Yea, why doesn't Cred Forums have a cel? Never even thought about that.

This, it's nigger dicks until 23 and after their five hundredth cock they'll settle for some beta that can pay the bills.

Deal with it, black people have it way worse. You advertise that and all you get in response is "nigger nigger nigger"

Repetition compulsion is about repeating past trauma. Yes, one big trauma is past sexual abuse, but it can be any trauma.

Not all women were sexually abused as children. But all parents mess up their children.

"All parents damage their children. It cannot be helped. Youth, like pristine glass, absorbs the prints of its handlers. Some parents smudge, others crack, a few shatter childhoods completely into jagged little pieces, beyond repair." -Mitch Albom

But even if a female doesn't have a bad father, or mental issues, or come from a broken home, or wasn't abused a child, women in their sexual prime prefer sex with damaged men:

rooshv.com/women-in-their-prime-prefer-sex-with-damaged-men
>I want you to feel sorry for me that I have to pretend I’m not interested in a girl even if I actually am, that I must take my time responding to a girl’s text message when I’m eager to talk to her, and that I’m forbidden to compliment her during the most intimate moments we experience in bed. All of that goes against my natural instinct.

>If you want to be sexually successful, you have to simulate the behavior of men who were emotionally abused as a child, who have stunted development and who fail to properly connect and relate to human beings compared to those with normal upbringings. You have to take on sociopathic traits, put girls on an emotional roller coaster of abuse, and ensure that you view females with great disdain.

"How come the deeply troubled women are always the best in bed?" -Donald Trump to Howard Stern

I mean, look at the history of actresses in Hollywood, or strippers, or pornstars.

loveline.wikia.com/wiki/Little_Girl_Voice
>The Little Girl Voice is an informal name for a vocal trait in adult women that is caused by psychological trauma before the onset of puberty. Women that are affected speak in a higher sounding, child-like pattern, usually in a manner similar to the age at which they suffered the traumatic event.

I'm writing a book about a lolita who's ALL MESSED UP because her now-imprisoned father used to sexually abuse her in very violent, invasive ways.

Pretty much, the whole book is about her life experiences with a whole bunch of older guys starting from the age of 6, and sometimes the older men are abusive and exploitative like her father (rough sex and thinly veiled threats), and sometimes the older men are gentle and kind, like her math teacher (some try to help her, and the math teacher even manages to fall in love with her).

As the story goes, whenever her relationships get worse, her taste in older men intensifies; and at the same time, she always falls out of love with older men when they treat her nicely, instead falling for men who are slightly younger then the men she just broke up with. By the end of the novel, she's now 16 and breaks off a relationship with a 34 year old man to date someone from her class who has always been in love with her; indicating that she's overcome her inner-demons and can now pursue "normal" relationships with people her age and connect with them.

I'm trying to be serious about it, so I've been doing a lot of research, including hanging out with these guys at my local community college who run a child abuse program. Pretty interesting stuff. All ebin meems aside, it's a very interesting topic.

That's fucking creepy and reminds me of my ex.

No, I never said that. And yeah, I already know about clitoral orgasms. Thanks though.

Female sexuality is based on sexual narcissism. Like the song says, "I want you to want me, I need you need me."

"Chivers, too, struggled over language about this subject. The topic arose because I had been drawn into her ceaseless puzzling, as could easily happen when we spent time together. I had been thinking about three ideas from our many talks: the power, for women, in being desired; the keen excitement stoked by descriptions of sex with strangers; and her positing of distinct systems of arousal and desire. This last concept seemed to confound a simpler truth, that women associate lubrication with being turned on. The idea of dual systems appeared, possibly, to be the product of an unscientific impulse, a wish to make comforting sense of the unsettling evidence of women's arousal during rape and during depictions of sexual assault in the lab."

"[Meana], even more than Chivers, emphasized the role of being desired - and of narcissism - in women's desiring."

"The critical part played by being desired, Julia Heiman observed, is an emerging theme in the current study of female sexuality."

Fucking love hearing the moans of petite porn actresses when they use a little girl voice.

...

It's not sexism to point out differences between the sexes.

It's not sexism to talk about what actually turns women on.

In general, men are turned on by submissiveness, women are turned on by dominance. That explains older guy/younger girl pairings. Or tall/short. Or strong/weak. Or 90-year-old millionaires and Anna Nicole Smith. Or Hugh Hefner.

A girl who is young, virginal, and undiseased has more childbearing years ahead of her, so it's no surprise when boys and men find them attractive.

But women KNOW their "number" of sex partners matters (and is a negative in the eyes of men) so they constantly say it doesn't matter.

In general, men are more disgusted the more sex partners a female has had, women are more intrigued the more sex partners a male has had.

Because, again, women are receivers. That's also why it's more likely for women to contract STD's from men, than vice versa.

And how's that working out for ya?

Maybe learn cause and effect before you go searching the clearweb for fucking CP?

>black people have it way worse.

That's what's known in soccer as an "own goal."

When immigrants come to America, say, from China, they have to starch from scratch.

But when black females lose their virginity in their early teens, and get knocked out, and become teen moms, single moms, it's not starting over from scratch EVERY FUCKING GENERATION.

But ohhhhh no, it's the police's fault that black fathers abandon their children over 70% of the time, and that black teens are twice as likely to become teen dads (who don't marry the girls they knocked up 80% of the time) than white teens.

So blacks get to play the Cool Card and the Ladies Man Card, and get to live in poverty. Whites are stuck with the Lame Card and the Can't Dance Card, but enjoy the benefits of accumulated wealth of nuclear families who waited until marriage to have children.

yeah im sure u did a looooooooooot of "research"

women here and this is all generally pretty accurate.

user I don't have the time for you.
But this
>women are more intrigued the more sex partners a male has had.
is just silly.

And this
> it's more likely for women to contract STD's from men
is funny.

Guys, listen to this shit...

youtube.com/watch?v=ThLST6SRbrk

I mean, what the fuck. It just keeps getting worse and worst. Just when you think it can't get worse, it gets worse, and again, and again. Un fucking real.

In the porn industry, I'm sure a lot of little girl voices are genuine (as survivors of child sexual abuse, which is why they got into porn), but others fake the voice, and the voice can be extremely annoying.

can you add 'american' in there please.
plenty of black folks in the world who have no relation to america whatsoever.

cheerios.

Tfw almost bombed by a madman and kinda miss the thrill

>women here
liar

I fucking hate, hate, hate, hate, HATE Japanese porn stars who use the "YAMATE! ITAI! YAMATE!" voice during their porno shoots. Even if it's just, like, weird, child-like moaning and stuff, it's SUCH a major fucking turn off.

Had a Japanese girlfriend once, and she'd always try to do that voice during bed where it got to the point I'd just sit up and say "Stop. Don't do that." Very off putting to hear a 20-something year old lady trying to put on a very fake, very bad "little girl" accent just to seem innocent and petite.

To this day, I find Japanese women, and most FOB Asian women in general, to be incredibly irritating.

Huh?

How do you think Wilt Chamberlain fucked 2,000 women? Because women thought his number was "gross"? No, impressive.

Not 100% of women will be impressed by promiscuous Chads, but there's a reason the slut/stud dichotomy exists (because women themselves view sexually successful men as studs, as view sexually promiscuous women as sluts, because females are natural enemies).

See, it actually takes effort for a guy to fuck 2,000 women. He has to achieve something. For a woman to fuck 2,000 men she just has to lay there.

Bill Clinton had at least 5 affairs while he was married, he paid Gennifer Flowers to abort his baby, and there's even a black lady who claims she has a child by Bill Clinton.

But female prostitutes are not seen as high value women by men. What guy what want to put his dick somewhere where thousands of other dicks have jizzed all over? What kind of guy would want to marry that?

Women love men that have been preselected by other women. That's why they love stealing guys from their girlfriends and wives.

And yes, unless a guy has abrasions or cuts on his penis, a woman (as a receiver) is more likely to get STDs from a man than vice versa (unless you're talking about surface contact like HPV, genital warts, things that don't depend on seminal fluid transmission).

fhi360.org/sites/default/files/webpages/Modules/STD/s1pg22.htm
>Women are also biologically more vulnerable to STDs than are men.

>Vaginal surface is larger and more vulnerable to infection than penis

>Also, the volume of potentially infected male ejaculate deposited in a woman’s vagina during intercourse is larger than the potentially infected cervical and vaginal secretions to which men are exposed.

Learn something.

wilt chamberlain's claim to fame isn't that he fucked a lot of women lol, women didn't flock to him because he had stadiums full of people watch him bone a broad

Can't say I don't envy you a bit though. Not into the high pitched bullshit, but I've only ever been with plain vanilla white chicks. Actually I take that back.. I had 2 Asian hookers, but those were just a quick handjob.

Well, call me crazy, but I bet most births in Africa are out of wedlock too.

They literally cannot see the connection between single motherhood, having less resources, poverty, and crime and violence.

How about some movies with non sexual theme? I liked Alice in the Cities and looking for something simillar

Why are you engaging the autist

Lolita (1962)
Absolon (2003)
An Affair to Remember (1957)
American Beauty (1999)
An American Haunting (2005)
An American in Paris (1951)
An Education (2009)
As Good as It Gets (1997)
Atlantic City (1980)
Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002)
Autumn in New York (2000)
The Ballad of Jack and Rose (2005)
Beautiful Girls (1996)
The Big Sleep (1946)
Big Daddy (1999)
Blame It on Rio (1984)
Black Swan (2010)
Breezy (1973)
Bulworth (1998)
Casablanca (1942)

Can you name a guy that's fucked more women? With a number higher than Wilt Chamberlain?

Women fucked him because he was famous and all women are famewhores.

And women flock to popular men. When a man is popular in bed, it's a positive feedback loop that only attracts more women like moths to a flame.

Women view men who get laid a lot as succeesful (because it takes effort). Men view women who get fucked a lot as disease-riddled whores (it takes zero effort to get fucked).

And the more men a woman has fucked, the less able she is to pairbond with any one man. She is probably constantly comparing her current man to one of her many previous sexual partners. And not just comparing him sexually, but in every checkbox. The chances of her current man being the best in every checkbox vs all her previous fuckbuddies is close to zero.

Adult women and slightly older men don't count. There's a big difference between a teenager and a woman in her 20's.

Will we ever get a Lolita adaptation with an actual nymphet?

Wanda Nevada isn't sexual. It's just extremely creepy by today's standards and you wonder how it ever got made.

Although the fat bearded creep in the movie does get shot by an Indian ghost arrow

fucking hell

I know women hate it when men give them 'advice' but wtf
I will never understand how being a woman is, but god bless this male privilege

>Women fucked him because he was famous and all women are famewhores.
This is what I dont understand about the Trump and pussy grabbing stuff....the types of women that would be near donald trump are the LEAST LIKELY women in the whole world to consider that type of behavior assault. Gold-diggers are willing to put up with a lot of bullshit due to their gold digging nature.

Why are you reducing everything to sex?

Like women are sexually this, and men are sexually that. It's like for you there's nothing above that.

I've been single for a while now. And while I think things like "oh, he's cute/he'd be a nice boyfriend" it doesn't affect my day to day life.

I didn't know that about the STD's, but it is an odd website. No papers or anything?

I don't know user, I feel it'd do you some good to think a little higher than base urges.

>Ghost World
Prime thicc Thora Birch

You know that we are animals and the final purpose of our existence is reproduction right?

So it's your whole life? I mean, you base your own, personal existence around it? Your hobbies, your job, your friends?

its keeps getting worse because she is clearly lying about at least 80% of that

Would seem convenient, but it seems pretty legit to me.

>So it's your whole life?
No.
>you base your own, personal existence around it?
Kind off, yes.

On the news, some woman talked to a Trump supporter at a rally in North Carolina. The lady said something like:

"Back in the day, if a billionaire had kissed me, I would have welcomed it."

Obviously lots of these women had no problem being kissed by a billionare at the time, and they probably hoped he could make them famous (or maybe even latch onto his money). And when that didn't work out, suddenly they speak up now, when they might be able to get some fame or money out of it. Why wait so long to say something?

All the people acting outraged about Donald Trump, I want to ask them if they have read Fifty Shades of Grey, or if his accusers have.

Trump is called "sexually predatory" but that is the definition of Christian Grey. And a woman wrote that book. And millions of women paid money for that book. And tons of women paid money to see the movie about a billionaire sleazebag -- this is supposed to be a woman's greatest fantasy.

When Trump said "when you're a star, they let you do it", he was right.

These kinds of stories are really bringing to light some inconvenient truths about female sexuality: it's no surprise that women are drawn to rich, powerful men, and also sexually aggressive men.

That doesn't excuse his actions, but Trump isn't in prison for the same reason Hillary isn't: power, money, connections, Jewish lawyers.

America, You Have No Right to Judge Donald Trump
pjmedia.com/blog/america-you-have-no-right-to-judge-donald-trump/?singlepage=true

The media and politicians defended sleazeball Bill Clinton for years. So the current "moral outrage" is hollow. The media doesn't have any morals.

The Crush

That's a shame.

>rape pregnancy
>sexual abused daughter
>a third kid
>sexually abused herself as a child by multiple people
>cancer
>married at least twice
>only 23
>police report just "disappeared" due to small town stuff
>etc etc
>cancer
While some of that may be true or partially true......there is almost no way any of that is true. If it was, then she should be using all that luck to by lottery tickets.
Also, if she was really dealing all of those issue, she wouldnt be in a mental place where she would or could be calling a radio a show to talk about it. She would be rendered into a catatonic zombie due to the mental stress of all of it.

I'm talking about sex, not reducing everything to sex. And it's largely who females had sex with in the past 2 million years that shaped women's behavior today. A lot of those men were violent caveman, and rapey barbarians.

I'm explaining to any frustrated males here how things are the way they are.

And it's much more likely for males to be single than females.

And I think men do think higher than base urges. But the truth about women is that they're sexually voracious hypergamists, not built for monogamy at all. Men are happy settling down with one woman. For years men got a bad rap as being the ones more likely to cheat, but it's actually women who are more likely to cheat, due to evolution.

Men are the hopeless romantics. It's men who write the love songs, the love poems, who create the great works of art depicting women. Basically, men can love women for who they are. Women love men for what they do for them.

A man wrote Romeo and Juliet, a woman wrote Fifty Shades of Grey.

She was gorgeous.

kek@41 mins in

>And women flock to popular men. When a man is popular in bed, it's a positive feedback loop that only attracts more women like moths to a flame.
>Women view men who get laid a lot as succeesful (because it takes effort). Men view women who get fucked a lot as disease-riddled whores (it takes zero effort to get fucked).
Uhhh, no. Guys who have positive qualities get laid more often because women are more receptive to them, generally. Whether it's charm, looks, success, popularity, whatever. It's not the fact that they get laid often being self-sustaining, unless literally the only thing going for you is a huge dick and you're good in bed and they hear it from someone.

>And the more men a woman has fucked, the less able she is to pairbond with any one man.
And you base this assertion on what exactly? More like promiscuous women just less likely to have a relationship and prefer hoeing around rather than being a direct cause of sleeping with a lot of guys.
>Men view women who get fucked a lot as disease-riddled whores (it takes zero effort to get fucked).
Women still get rejected, just not as often.
I agree with you to an extent, there is a biologically mandated dichotomy in sexual dynamic, mainly due to differences in reproductive cost, but you're exaggerating and making the wrong inferences.

Watch Trees Lounge if you want more Buscemi hitting on underage girls.

and Beautiful Girls

Based Hershlag

But you are. You're saying it's shaped women's behaviour today. What, their behaviour in the bedroom? Yes. A large proportion do like being submissive. But in general? I totally disagree. You're just saying their behaviour, so you think that sex and reproductive success influences
their career?
what food they like?
what films they enjoy?
what colour they decide to paint their nails?

Someone's behaviour, their actions define who they are, and you're stating that sexual evolution shapes that.

I'm not saying men don't think higher than their base urges. I know plenty of men who just enjoy life as is without the neuroticism about gfs and women.
Who are you trying to fool here?

>Guys who have positive qualities get laid more often because women are more receptive to them, generally..

Women are more receptive to them because they get laid more: that is the defining trait of an Alpha.

Sexual market value. Status. Alpha. Or like you said, charm, looks, success, popularity. Women are drawn to popular men.

Men don't care if a woman is popular or rich. Men value youth and beauty in mates.

And getting laid often is a positive feedback loop. Because there are scores of ugly men in rock bands who have some hint of fame, and women are drawn to them. Steven Tyler of Aerosmith is one of the ugliest men on Earth, yet women all over want his dick simply because tons of other women want his dick.

Women go where other women go.

>And you base this assertion on what exactly?

Pic related. Women with more premarital sex partners are more likely to be unhappy, more likely to get divorced, etc, etc.

>Women still get rejected, just not as often.

Please. Women may get rejected by men who are out of their league. But if a woman wants sex, it's a phone call or text away.

>I agree with you to an extent, there is a biologically mandated dichotomy in sexual dynamic, mainly due to differences in reproductive cost, but you're exaggerating and making the wrong inferences.

I'm not exaggerating. There is a fundamental assymmetry when it comes to male and female mating strategies. She is biologically driven to have children by the best mates possible, preferably with mates with immune systems highly different from her own (which is why kissing her brother is icky).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_histocompatibility_complex_and_sexual_selection
>Women that were ovulating rated the odors of MHC-dissimilar men as more pleasant than those of the MHC-similar men. Furthermore, odors of MHC-dissimilar men often reminded women of current or former partners, suggesting that odor—specifically odor for MHC-dissimilarity—plays a role in mate choice.

Forgot the pic re sluts having impaired pairbonding.

the same women would have probably fucked him even if he had sex with only 2 women previously

>women
>not built for monogamy at all
youre fucking retarded, it's the other way around
Men are the ones who are to spread their seed to as many incubators as possible

>Men are the hopeless romantics.
this and pic related are too true
just read Anna Karenina
feels bad man

holy shit those women have sex with nearly two different people a year. TWO!!!!!!! THAT'S INSANE

lol

fucking puritan bullshit still runs the USA.

caused a bit of a shitstorm when it came out and when the director called the protag an "anti-pedophile" because he doesn't rape her

>You're saying it's shaped women's behaviour today.

Yes. Evolution (which humans have undergone due to sexual reproduction) has shaped men and women's behavior today.

>What, their behaviour in the bedroom?

What kind of guys they go for. What turns them on.

OP's pic is about younger females and older men. I am explaining why younger females are attracted to older, stronger, more powerful men (and vice versa).

>A large proportion do like being submissive. But in general? I totally disagree.

As for being submissive:

Wikipedia:
>A 1974 study by Hariton and Singer found that being "overpowered or forced to surrender" was the second most frequent fantasy in their survey; a 1984 study by Knafo and Jaffe ranked being overpowered as their study's most common fantasy during intercourse. In 1985, Louis H. Janda who is an associate professor of psychology at Old Dominion University said that the sexual fantasy of being raped is the most common sexual fantasy for women. A 1988 study by Pelletier and Herold found that over half of their female respondents had fantasies of forced sex.

>A study of college-age women found over half had engaged in fantasies of rape or coercion which, another study claims, are within the normal range of female sexuality.

>Someone's behaviour, their actions define who they are, and you're stating that sexual evolution shapes that.

Yes, evolution gives people instincts, it programs responses to stimuli, it affects your behavior.

>Who are you trying to fool here?

I'm not trying to fool anyone.

But I am suggesting that men invented romance (maybe as a way to pick up women), while women are more concerned with sex.

Women didn't buy 100 million copies of Fifty Shades of Grey because Christian Grey sang love songs to Anastalia Steele. It's because he dominated and fucked her hard. A woman wrote that. It was her fantasy. And apparently millions and millions of other women's fantasies.

Yeah. Because he's famous.

But the point is that a guy's high number is not counted against him, just the opposite. The contrary is true for women. A guy who gets laid a lot is a stud. A woman who gets laid a lot is a slut. That's idea is promoted by women themselves.

Men value virginity in women. Youth, beauty, yes, even "lolitas" like in OP's pic.

But notice how women all over call male virgins "losers." Women view virginity in men as a failure, a failure to impress other women. No sane man views virginity in women as a failure (unless he's a total manwhore and genuinely thinks virgins are lousy in bed).

You're giving quotes on women enjoying being submissive. I agreed so don't see why you're tryign to reinforce it. I'm saying it doesn't influence the majority of their life. You say women are more concerned with sex. In the context of sex vs. romance. It's possible. I've never been much of a romantic so I can't say either way. But you said earlier women are essentially nymphos, so you think it takes up most of their life?

Since you say you're only talking specifically about sex, then I have to ask.
What proportion do you think sex does affect peoples lives?

>But notice how women all over call male virgins "losers."
>Women view virginity in men as a failure
in what societies?
nonChristian? in general?
Ive been reading this whole thread and wondering how much of a difference it makes if you're religious, can you really generalize that much?

Ive seen women have an aversion to a man's promiscuous behaviour...but that might just be Mormons and Catholics/Christians

I was raised Catholic and girls wanted a virgin boy to marry, and many of them did

>it's the other way around
>Men are the ones who are to spread their seed to as many incubators as possible

Wrong.

Men *are* driven to spread their seed. But semen is cheap, incredibly cheap. After puberty, males produce 1,500 sperm a second. With a reproductive window of like age 13 to the 90s or more, maybe over 80 years.

But females are born with every egg they will ever release, and only one per month, from maybe 13 to 45, a much shorter reproductive window. About 30 years or so. A woman has less time to have kids.

But since mutations accumulate with age, males and females tend to have kids with more genetic defects after about age 35 or so, including mental disorders, autism, depression, etc. Fathers who have kids past 35 are more likely to have kids with autism. Mothers who have kids past 35 are more likely to have kids with Down syndrome.

Men are not exactly built for monogamy. But women are even less monogamous, but hypergamous. A man has got possibly 80 years of making 1,500 sperm a second. Meanwhile, a woman only has about 400 eggs she will ever release in her lifetime. She is driven to find the best genes for her limited number of eggs, and resource intensive pregnancy, and resource intensive child-rearing up until puberty or adulthood.

Since women are incubators, they are stuck with raising a baby in case a male leaves. It behooves women to seek out alpha genes, and find betas to provide for them. "Alpha fux, beta bux." Violent men to have warrior genes, but gentler men to actually feed her kids.

Marriage was likely invented by men (and adultery punished) to ensure women would remain monogamous (so a male would not be cuckolded and unwittingly end up raising some other guy's Alpha DNA).

salon.com/2013/06/02/the_truth_about_female_desire_its_base_animalistic_and_ravenous/
>"if you look at some of the data, that women are even less well-suited for monogamy than men."

Do you understand bar graphs user? It's a sliding scale.

This thread in a nutshell

>fucking puritan bullshit still runs the USA.

That's laughable (especially when it comes to African-Americans). They think premarital sex is fine, then are shocked when single moms live in poverty and their bastard children turn to a life of crime.

The Decline Of American Women
rooshv.com/the-decline-of-american-women

42 Things Wrong With American Women
rooshv.com/42-things-wrong-with-american-women

Western Culture Poisons Women
rooshv.com/western-culture-poisons-women

7 Ways Feminism Is Destroying American Women
rooshv.com/7-ways-feminism-is-destroying-american-women

F P B P, faggots

You're source is a troll trolling trolls. I mean what the fuck man. Dislodge your head from your ass.

Your*

Wo krieg ich den her?

The Lover

Of course women aren't romantics. They want it all towards them. He's the giver, she's the receiver. When it comes to sex, money, attention. All kinds of things. It's expected of men. Even after women wanted equality, men are expected to pay, men are expected to work, men are even expected to sacrifice his life for her. "Women and children first" off the Tianic. Not many women would sacrifice her life or her kids for a man.

And yeah, studies have shown that women are essentially nymphos. Any woman who wants sex can easily get it, for free. Any man who wants sex may have to pay for it.

>What proportion do you think sex does affect peoples lives?

I think peer pressure/media make people feel bad for all the sex they're not having. That they have to "keep up." If not, they will be shamed as "losers" or virgins.

Since "virgin" has been turned into an insult (when it's actually a virtue), it leads to anxiety for not having sex. Which only does things like promote teen pregnancy, single moms, and from that you get bastard kids without dads in their lives, who are more likely to turn to a life of crime. Then you get frustrated males who are not having as much sex as they would like, because they have believed falsehoods about women ("just be yourself!"), many of them are enraged, and end up shooting a bunch of people.

But in this sick world we live in (as a result of evolution), women are likely to be more turned on by a mass murderer than a virgin.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybristophilia
>Many high-profile criminals, particularly those who have committed atrocious crimes, receive "fan mail" in prison that is sometimes amorous or sexual, presumably as a result of this phenomenon.

Thousands of letters sent to James Holmes reveal sick fixation with theater shooter
nydailynews.com/news/national/james-holmes-fan-mail-reveals-sick-fixatation-killer-article-1.2356103

Over 4k letters from the 2012 shooting to 2015.

tl;dr

>I was raised Catholic and girls wanted a virgin boy to marry, and many of them did

Those days are pretty much gone in America.

Only in certain religions is chastity valued. Mormons, hardcore Catholics, Orthodox Jews I guess, I guess Muslims. But liberal secular society has pushed religion to the margins. Religion can't counteract the tide of media, Internet, apps, peer pressure and the liberal "liberated" attitudes it pushes, that advertising pushes. Miley Cyrus is "pansexual." Wow! How liberated!

Nowadays in America, it's actually counter-cultural to have conservative traditional values, or even think virginity/chastity is a virtue and not a an embarassing social failure.

Postmodern permissiveness is the fuel behind hyper-capitalism. Sex sells. Be cool. Don't be lame, don't be a prude, don't be a square, live a little, get a life, #yolo. All those people who wait to get married to have kids and have stable nuclear families are just ancient relics! Love is love! Who is anyone else to tell you what's wrong or right? In no coincidence, pedophilia is rampant in Hollywood.

In an increasingly liberal secular society, which defended Bill Clinton for all his sex scandals, the attacks on Donald Trump seem hollow.

America, You Have No Right to Judge Donald Trump
pjmedia.com/blog/america-you-have-no-right-to-judge-donald-trump/?singlepage=true

This is the last spastic breath from the Religious Right before its overdue death
washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/10/08/this-is-the-last-spastic-breath-from-the-religious-right-before-its-overdue-death/

Oh please. You just posted a fedora m'lady white knight, who defends the virtue of women online.

Roosh isn't a troll.

If you think someone in this thread is trolling, I don't care, because everything I've said is true. My points stand.

Is that guy a known person? I just meant that fat greasy people usually have a penchant for all this biology shit.

>Me an animal
>Hardwired
>Reproduce
>poopy

tl;dr

TLDR: Women are fucked up.

No. But odds are he's a whiteknight he would NEVER insult a lady online. Then he wonders why he fails with women (besides his massive obesity).

TLDR: The media has more influence than religion nowadays. Therefore, no sex = loser.

It's literally Pretty Baby.

neon demon