Thankssssssssssssssss

>Thankssssssssssssssss

Why did the snake thank Harry here?

cuz sneks are based bros

Because it's Nagini and he's going to go revive Voldemort now.

What did saetre mean by this?

Because he hadn't talked to anyone in ages, imagine being an abo in a cage and an anthropologists talks to you after years of silent stares and lets you out, would you thank him?

because harry potter is secretly hell

This. I could never understand why parseltongue was seen as evil. Snakes are cool, they eat disgusting bugs that spiderbros can't catch in webs. Who wouldn't want to talk to snakes?

Snakey was thanking him for getting it out of one the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Good meme

Dumb meme. The image having a few god tier books in each tier and then some pleb filter and some overrated shit triggers me.