Just watched Year Man Meme's last video on youtube. Could he make his shilling any more obvious?

He lost me when he started getting on his high horse about quantitative easing. In its simplest form, it is literally printing money. It's fine to explain it as a magic trick. She doesn't need to go into the finer details on some talkshow, I'm sure she has a good grasp on them.

And the OP is sharing his opinion about John Oliver's opinion.

Hannity isn't a journalist either, he too is just sharing his opinion.

No surprises there

dcleaks.com/emails/cApR/html/Clinton_Foundation/00001237.EML.html

lol the US is so utterly fucked.

How do you get to a point where every choice is absolute shit.

You are both merely sharing your opinions.

I blame Jon Stewart.

Ever since he left, he's released his hellspawn on everyone.

>300m people
>prez candidates are a meme and ex-prez' wife
what the fuck happened?

at least strip the president of power please

This.
He was just as biased as them but at least he was funny

who?

can someone please explain who this is ?

A living meme

Comedians like him will be banished in the new Great America. Mark my words.

People are allowed to go opinions, it's his show. I don't get butt bothered when conservatives shill for their candidate on AM.

If he were a teacher or professor, then it would be an issue.

Jill Stein's an fuckhead,

Except conservative opinions are based on facts and not made up bullshits.

>Cred Forums entertainment talkshow
>telling people what to think

Lol

From my point of view the facts are the made up bullshits

the any opinion I disagree with is propaganda/brainwashing meme

Nice meme reply dear (((friendo))). How's shilling erryday for your overlords? How's the pay? What do you accomplishe you and your sheeple friends?

wow u sure fit right in mate

Whoever made this image doesn't use soap or shampoo. That's some shit right there.

She really, really doesn't because of one simple fact:
The banks paid back their bailouts with interest.

Sam Hyde

Wow, they wanted a celebrity to appear at a event, how scandalous

Except when they aren't
>terrorists were not a problem before obama
>neocon former NY mayor forgetting 9/11

You know he literally works for the Clinton campaign right?

If you don't want pro-Clinton campaign messages, don't watch Clinton campaign employees delivering them.

He's not a certified objective news reporter. He's a guy who tells political jokes and promotes political policies and candidates.

This is like watching blacked and getting made about blonde chicks getting nutted on by bbc's.

I don't understand you people sometimes.

Next you'll complain that Infowars unnecessarily promotes water filters.

Lol

this is what a real man looks like, for reference

>that image

wow, what a post-post-post-post-post-post-post-post-post-post-futuristic analysis of life.

I'm strangely attracted to Sam and I hate it

If Trump wasn't running and say some mellow tone guy like Kasich was he still wouldn't talk about Hillary's stuff and instead would call Kasich a racist neo nazi.

Stewart being funny is what converted people to liberals. These idiots lack of comedy and humor actually doesn't.

What's wrong with Chuck Taylors?

Does he have permission to use Billy Bob Thornton's image?

Grow up.

The real reason were fucked is because 99% of our media is a propaganda wing of the democratic party. There is zero objective journalism in this country. We're no better than a banana republic.

Stewart isn't and never was funny, what he did do was popularize a form of political circle-jerking under the guise of entertainment.

A snide and sneering desk jockey position, typically with going into a crowd with a camera to find the biggest, fattest dumb-ass then portray your opposition by this image. Snark over argument, cheap-shots over jokes, and when you get called out on your bullshit or calling Truman a war-criminal, you say you are just a comedian and shouldn't be taken seriously.

This form of circle-jerk has been copied by Maher, Colbert, Current Year Man, Seth and pretty much every late night """""comedy""""" show host.
Luckily, this format and style of show appears to be on the rapid decline, along with most of television.

If you want a nice form of justice lads, take into account that despite his lavish lifestyle Stewart looks fucking homeless, and has empty JUST eyes. A personality like that does not make for a happy existence.

Stewart isn't and never was funny, what he did do was popularize a form of political circle-jerking under the guise of entertainment.

A snide and sneering desk jockey position, typically with going into a crowd with a camera to find the biggest, fattest dumb-ass then portray your opposition by this image. Snark over argument, cheap-shots over jokes, and when you get called out on your bullshit or calling Truman a war-criminal, you say you are just a comedian and shouldn't be taken seriously.

This form of circle-jerk has been copied by Maher, Colbert, Current Year Man, Seth and pretty much every late night """""comedy""""" show host.
Luckily, this format and style of show appears to be on the rapid decline, along with most of television.

If you want a nice form of justice lads, take into account that despite his lavish lifestyle Stewart looks fucking homeless, and has empty JUST eyes. Despite the adoration from millions of drones, I suspect he is really miserable. Too much of an ego for no real impact.

Oh what the fuck Hiroshimoot.

how are you breathing with your head that far up your own ass?

Indeed, though the poster was never disputing that.

Actually he was saying voting third party candidates in this election might sound like a good idea until you realize they are no good either, and that it's only the lack of media focus on them that makes them look viable candidates in the first place.

>ITT: butthurt Cred Forumsfaggots

His vids on the Migrant Crisis, Brexit and Paris Attacks are hilarious for all the wrong reasons.

Try and dispute anything he says, go ahead. You may disagree with what he says but he's not factually wrong in any of his videos.

Not even printing money, the fed would just buying up treasuries and bank bonds to ease liquidity conditions for financials. They were buying financial instruments not giving money away.

NOT

You're welcome to keep [current year] man.

Regards,

The UK

...

I really don't understand why americans are ok with a brit telling them about their own politics.

Ha, spotted the cuckold!

They fall for the accent, think he must be intelligent.
There is a reason Current Year man didn't succeed in his home country.

I never understood this: how does voting for a third party candidate make Person You Don't Like win? Voting for Person You Don't Like makes Person You Don't Like win. Voting for a third party candidate is like not voting at all, except with actual effort.

Your mistake is thinking anyone takes him seriously.

>alt-rightist resorts to ad hominem once he runs out of arguments
there's literally no difference between you guys and tumblr feminists

He left the UK because hardly anyone here found him funny, I think they big him up to be this big influencer in the states but the only people who listen to him are the already converted.

voting at all is meaningless since you're just one vote among millions

right?

The November Paris attacks were committed by people born in Belgium, France and Sweden. All members of the Brussels ISIL terror cell were EU citizens, not migrants. Migration politics are irrelevant to the massacre in question. All of these people already had freedom to move unrestricted in these borders as they were born inside them. This image is misleading, to say the least. I'm not suggesting you're trying to lie, just that you seem to be misinformed.

They're trying to blackmail people into voting for Hillary, I get why people don't like the loud mouth Trump but a vote for Hillary is indefensible.

Vote third party, ignore what Current Year Meme Man says. He's literally a nobody who is "famous" because he has a British accent and worked with Jon Stewart for a while.

Their parents would have migrated from islamic countries and would have had an influence on their practices, so it absolutely is still to do with migration.

Send 'em all back, I don't care if they were born here.

>vote for third party candidate
>hillshills: YOU JUST VOTED FOR TRUMP
>trumpshills: YOU JUST VOTED FOR HILLARY

No, I didn't vote for either of them.

>Send 'em all back, I don't care if they were born here.
So you want America populated entirely by injuns?

Liberals hate anything homeland but love everything foreign. For some odd reason they hate white people but wish we were more like Europe, the homeland of whites.

I am well aware the attacks in Europe were home grown, but the current cognitive dissonance gripping most of the West is blatant turning of a blind eye to the rising 5th column in countries with a high immigration policy. Migration policies are completely relevant to the issue of terrorism. Children of migrants are growing up more radical than their parents, not assimilating and causing division, not diversity. Demographics is destiny, Western Europe as we knew it as a secular continent is quite likely not going to exist by the end of this century.

The terrorist problems are going to get worse, not better, meme man wants to shut the blinds and blame it on Islamophobia.

Lol

No, I think he's suggesting that only people who migrate from Islamic countries should be sent back. I don't really agree with it but it is at least consistent with his worldview about migration.

You should vote for whomever you want

The worst thing you can do is not to vote

Because the type of person that would say this to you already has a notion in his head that he knows what's best for the country and that there is only one candidate worth voting for. In his mind, a vote for a third party would be pointless, because they will never win, but also he tries to convince you to use that vote instead for his chosen candidate. Basically he feels he should decide your vote for you. Note how when these people say 'vote for 3rd party is a wasted vote,' they never say to use that vote for one of the two main candidates. No, they just tell you use it for their choice. A vote for a third party is only a wasted vote in their eyes because it is a vote that is not being used in the way they want it being used.

It goes both ways. Both sides are saying, if you don't vote for their candidate, a monster will win this election and it's all your fault.

They're sort of right: whether Hillary or Trump wins, we're going to have a shit president.

I am going to vote. I registered to vote absentee since I no longer live in America (thank god).

I think that makes a lot of sense.

I could argue that native americans originated from europe, and you could argue that Europeans originated from africa so we're all black lmao, and ad infinitum

But we're not talking about a few hundred years ago, we're talking about what Oliver calls the current year, and islam is a particularly dangerous force

Only the left is telling people not to vote third party and telling you vulgarity is worse than murder.

I laughed irl.

deluded

Future Historians will study in great depth how modern neo-liberalism managed to both denounce Christianity whilst apologizing and deflecting criticism of Islam.
The Privilege Myth they will call it.

Personally, I've gotten it from both Trump and Hillary supporters.

I think that's basically the same as not voting

I mean, who's going to care that you abstained? Now I realize that this doesn't matter in your situation, but in general, wouldn't it be better to vote for the party that lies closest to you opinion?

Because after all - no one is going to serve you an alternative that you can agree with entirely. That option is reserved for those who are ready to put in a lot more effort, and even they are in the end forced to compromise.

but don't you want to see murica burn?

>who's going to care
I will, because there are people I want to vote for.

I agree that radical Islam (under which I am including Islamic people that believe Sharia law should be upheld) is completely at odds with the values of all Western societies, but I don't think the issue is quite so black and white. You might well fix the problem of increasing radicalised Muslim populations in Western countries by not allowing Muslim people to migrate to Western countries, but that would be to shut out a large contingent of much more secular Muslim people who are of no danger to Western societies. You've probably met a few without realising. I personally know some. I don't think the cosmic chance of the country you happened to be born in should have anything to do with whether or not you are able to live your life in a country that isn't a complete shithole.

In my opinion what is needed is not a ban on migration, but much more thorough screening processes.

>watch a British comedy actor
>be surprised he's not a journalist

wooow

Then why not vote for those people then?

>You might well fix the problem of increasing radicalised Muslim populations in Western countries by not allowing Muslim people to migrate to Western countries
You fucking think?

And as someone who lives in Europe your wrong, letting in any Muslims is a risk, we are completely fucked because of it. Even those who aren't extreme instead are rapists or criminals. Letting in Muslims for the benefit of the very small minority of them that are decent people is retarded. And I would go so far as to say the only decent 'muslims' are ones who have abandoned their faith and are therefore no longer muslims.

That's the plan.

Is it fair to say that liberal commentators are twice as smug as conservative ones? Independent of what position you have, surely you have noticed how right-wing commentators are abrasive, hectoring, bullish. Whereas the likes of Oliver don't have the knowledge or confidence to actually go on the offensive in a type of bullying way that a conservative mouthpiece might. They are instead, sneering, arrogant, mealymouthed and use the power of mob outrage through social media sites to bully and harass. You might fight tooth and nail with a right winger, but he will usually argue and put forth his beliefs, whatever you think of them. People like John Oliver feel that they are above such discussion, the feeling that they know more than you allows them to focus on just mocking what have you said without countering it, smugly sniggering at how stupid it is to hold opinions other than the exalted ones they hold. I see a form of cowardice among people like John Oliver.

I don't think that matters.

If you like something that John's joking about, odds are you don't find it particularly funny. All who watch LWT already agree with him on some level. LWT is just another echo-chamber, something that's all too common today.

Only 40% of Americans approve of these candidates. And that's high-balling it. America is fucked. Your establishment took democracy and made it its bitch.

Ah ok, I misinterpreted "absentee".

Too bad so few Americans vote in the first place.

>letting in any Muslims is a risk, we are completely fucked because of it.
Unfortunately this. Even in the rare cases where they do pretend to get along with the locals, they will still isolate themselves in their own separate communities and continue to grow in numbers/influence, until that area of your city is lost to them. Entire sections of Birmingham are now off limits to British people.

Fair enough. You are welcome to your opinion. I would point out though that the country you live in probably has constitutionally recognised freedom of religion.

>how does voting for a third party candidate make Person You Don't Like win?

Because in a deeply rooted two party system it's basically the same as giving your vote to the opposition by deriving the crucial vote from your default party.

But I am depriving both Hillary and Trump a vote by not voting for either of them.

>Entire sections of Birmingham are now off limits to British people.
This is total bullshit. Parroting this meme on!y makes you look like a retard.

one of them is still going to win, so why vote at all then?

>trumptards this mad already

November 8 is going to be wonderful.

I live in Birmingham, he's right, you're just some leftie retard burger who doesn't know what's going on in europe

When was the last time a third party candidate won? Was it ever?

Abraham Lincoln

You don't live in Birmingham son.

> I would point out though that the country you live in probably has constitutionally recognised freedom of religion.
>he thinks europe has absolute freedoms

Oh you poor, innocent, stupid american

Wasn't he like the first Republican?
The guy who created the exact two party divide that currently exists...?

wait 'till you watch Bill Maher's videos.
The guy is so full of himself. Last two shows he went the classic route of presenting a perfect picture under the dems (violent crime is down,unemployment is down, cancer is down, EVERYTHING BAD IS DOWN) combined with the cheapest form of fear-mongering ("did you know that movies are real? and what are the latest disaster movies about?think about it!").
But when Assange calls him out, he straight out lies about his endorsements to Hillary specifically.

Must be pretty sweet when you go from failed actor to living large on the Democrat dollar (your money).

Also, fuck you OP.

It's almost as if there are moneyed interests in the perpetuation of the one-party system because voting dem or rep doesn't change a thing.

The establishment saw that people are receptive to leftist ideas (Sanders is a self declared socialist) and they're afraid that someone like Jill Stein might join the debates and steer the conversation to real issues, rather than the non-issues that are being debated.

5% of the national vote gives a party federal funding. 15% of the vote gets them into the debates. Americans should be looking in the long-term.

I'm not American. The large majority of European countries have constitutionally recognised freedom of religion. That's a fact. Debate it if you want to.

It's too bad the current third party options are so stupid. This election was actually a good time for them to step in and they blew it. Gary Johnson and Jill Stein are fucking stupid.

Yeah, cause Trump will win by a landslide unless elections are rigged, but that could not happen... OH WAIT

Tell me about it.

>Not knowing the Whig Party

user, pls.

The UK doesn't even have a constitution

Bollocks. Name neighbourhoods that are no go zones. Name streets. Post news articles. Anything.

>post yfw you realize Americans have food stamps
>Europe sucks
wew

>Trump will win by a landslide
hahahaha

Not a written one, no.

He can't. Amerifats are all about that rhetoric and believing anything a person in any kind of position if authority tells them.

I mean look who is the Republican candidate for fuck sake. Yes, Hillary sucks and she's probably a lizard but at least she knows how to act like an adult.

It's going to be a total shit show here for a few months after Hillary wins. Can't wait.

For one, because there's more than just Trump and Hillary on the ballot. There are people running for non-presidential offices that I want to see win, people who stand a good chance at winning.

Who do you want to be president? I only ask because I wonder if you wouldn't vote for that person if, come election time, there was clearly a near 0% chance they'd win.

The UK has no codified constitution. No written constitution. Not no constitution. And let's be clear - it has the legally recognised right to freedom of religion. I didn't think you were actually going to try to debate this. Hilarious.

You mean how Bush won?

Shut up. Sweden and UK have daily attacks against whites by organized groups of feral muslims. There are buildings with the sign "Here rules Sharia". Read breitbart.

I think you're confused. Absentee voting is mailing in your vote when you can't make it to the polls.

I got a bit of a frisson moment when I watched Maher's most recent video about the election where he basically said that he didn't want people to decide the government, he wanted there to be a technocracy and that democracy only lets stupid people elect stupid people. Of course Maher thinks himself part of the demographic that would be allowed to choose governments in this new ideal world, as would all of his audience.

It felt like some sort of tipping point, maybe I have been paying attention but I've never seen people, especially self described liberals, so openly hostile to the concept of a citizen government. Not only did he think that argument was appropriate, his audience cheered for it- cheered! For the concept of dictatorship!

This election is really fucking me up. Everyone's gone mad.

It's this one- youtube.com/watch?v=yIMW1C-yy8k

When was the last time you watched hannity?

I don't vote for people because I think they'll win. I don't care if I vote for someone who loses. I vote for the person I think is the best candidate for the office. In my opinion, that isn't Hillary and that isn't Trump, so I'm not voting for either of them. Why would I vote for someone I think will be a shitty president? Sorry, I don't want to be mean, but that's stupid.

>Bush Sr. (establishment shill)
>Clinton
>Bush Jr. (establishment shill)
>Obama (friends with Clinton)
>Clinton (potentially)

>Americans claim they don't have a monarchy

I never said they were "no-go zones", this is a strawman made up by Americans.

Places like Alum Rock are totally lost.

Obviously Stein and Johnson would make terrible presidents, but honestly I find them both to be rather likable people.

>Children of migrants are growing up more radical than their parents, not assimilating and causing division, not diversity.

and where are you basing this? How do you know this to be a fact? If this were true, then the USA would have been one of the prime staff wells for the IRA.

>Demographics is destiny

no, it's just a result of history.

>The terrorist problems are going to get worse, not better, meme man wants to shut the blinds and blame it on Islamophobia.

Isn't it strange how the terrorist attacks HAVE gotten worse and more with all this anti-terrorist legislation and the increased security measures?

>tfw no obama third term

This guy always gets shit on here, but I never understand why. Give me a non-emotional argument where what he's saying isn't true.

He obviously presents a left leaning argument, that's his viewpoint, but he's usually basing it on facts when he's not making jokes.

He's actually calling American voters stupid and unable to decide for themselves and the audience cheers him on. Maybe he's right. They are proving his point after all.

>And let's be clear - it has the legally recognised right to freedom of religion

Nope. Read the Act retard

>Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Basically you have the freedom of religion in so far as the law prescribes, ie. you don't.

Don't forget the Kennedys before that, and Jeb Bush being the governor of Florida. Bush Jr. married to the heir to the Heinz empire, etc.

>The UK has no codified constitution. No written constitution. Not no constitution

If you want to be pedantic twat, the UK's constitution is codified in so much as the relevant statutes, books, standing orders and treatise are codified and the UK relies on convention as a constitution as much as any other country.

I bet his audience contains a lot of bernie supporters and other stereotypical young people who are too lazy to vote.

Samantha Bee convinced me to vote for Johnson tbqh

>she does an episode on the Libretarian Convention
>see footage of Libretarians
>she does an interview with Johnson explaining his beliefs
>actually agree with him and see where he's coming from
>meanwhile Bee keeps pushing the liberal narrative
>LOL look at these losers
>LOL he's not a liberal
>LOL third parties will never win
>Thanks for watching, remember to vote for Hillary!
>blow off Bee's spin and see the path of light that is Johnson

>and where are you basing this?

This is well-known and well-established.

Well, maybe not to stupid, pig ignorant Americans that is.

telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1540895/Young-British-Muslims-getting-more-radical.html

>Forty per cent of Muslims between the ages of 16 and 24 said they would prefer to live under sharia law in Britain, a legal system based on the teachings of the Koran. The figure among over-55s, in contrast, was only 17 per cent.

Maher and the people cheering him on think they're going to be a part of the smart privileged class. They don't realize they're the stupid masses.

I mean, I'm the stupid masses, too, but at least I know it.

Honestly I would have liked to see Bernie win this monkey show, but I'll settle for Hillary over Trump any given day, because I can at least trust her to be experienced enough not fuck everything up just as the country is getting back on its feet.

>because I can at least trust her to be experienced enough not fuck everything up just as the country is getting back on its feet.

Yeah, Libya is a real paradise rn

And if Hillary had no chance of winning, would you go out to vote for her? Like, if every poll said "nobody is voting for Hillary" would you?

Or if Bernie were on the ballot, and yet was polling so poorly he had no chance, would you still go out to vote for him, or would you ditch him?

>johnson
lol

Bernie: cool dude who knows what he's doing
Gary: cool dude who doesn't have a clue
Jill: cool dude who doesn't have a clue
Hillary: asshole who knows what she's doing
Trump: asshole who doesn't have a clue

Give me a single case of someone's right to freedom of religion being ruled against in a British court.

(Don't wear yourself out looking, there isn't one to find).

Again, hilarious that you're actually trying to debate this.

Now that the gust has settled.

I liked Obama as president.

Probably not. In such a situation I would most likely look for who was the best suited to fight Trump with any real chance at winning and wasn't completely abhorable choice. This is an election where I'm more invested in not seeing Trump win than championing for a specific personal favorite candidate, because Trump is toxic to any type of sensible politics.

It's not the duty of the Western societies to be a fucking hotel for every cunt who doesn't like it where he lives.

>I don't think the cosmic chance of the country you happened to be born in should have anything to do with whether or not you are able to live your life in a country that isn't a complete shithole.

You know, maybe if they made sure the country they were born in wasn't a complete shithole, they wouldn't have to.

America should fix their system so they could have more than two parties.

>Give me a single case of someone's right to freedom of religion being ruled against in a British court

R v DPP (2001)

Does John Oliver have the most punchable face in the world?

Hillary is a warmongerer and has wanted to attack Syria head-on for some years now.

>If you like something that John's joking about, odds are you don't find it particularly funny.
See, I'm not so sure about that. Maybe it is true in many cases, but I think a lot of people are not given enough credit. Personally, I can find great humour in jokes belittling beliefs, interests, outlooks I have. If those jokes are constructed well, intelligent, or even if they are just dumb but funny. Problem with Oliver and Noah, etc. is that you can see the lame nature of how dissenting voices are dealt with. There's not much humour present, above "isn't it ridiculous that people believe this? Aren't these people stuck in the past? Their views are symbolic of a lack of education!" It's a bit desperate. I don't think it's a case of 'he's mocking things I like, I automatically hate it.'

In that situation, there's no one best suited to beat Trump. Basically, there's a 0% chance that you're going to get a presidential candidate you don't want. And you're saying, in this situation, you wouldn't bother voting, correct?

>Wow, they wanted a celebrity to appear at a event,
Where does it say that?

Can someone explain how birtherism isn't sedition? He spent eight years denying the legitimacy of the president. You might say, "This wasn't a grab at political power, he was just asking questions." But then he himself ran for president in the next election. And then when it became clear he is going to lose that election, he cries that the election is rigged, a further attempt to weaken our democracy. How is he not in jail right now?

It's true what they say, that everything Trump accuses someone else of something, he is guilty of it himself. He called Edward Snowden a traitor, and here he is trying to incite a revolt.

>>terrorists were not a problem before obama
straw meet man

i honestly don't think trump will be able to do much, he doesn't know much about politics and he is very divisive, obama was very much on one side and see how much trouble he had gettign stuff done even with his politcal experience
there will be a huge boost in the quality of stand up and parodies though, like i enjoyed when bush said stupid stuff, with trump it will be like that every week

Are you not allowed to question whether the President complies with the law now?

> And then when it became clear he is going to lose that election, he cries that the election is rigged

So did John Kerry in 2004 fyi

50 rubles have been deposited into your account.

>sedition?
It's called the First Amendment, you dumb eurofag. Sedition isn't even a concept here. Also, Obama undoubtedly grew up in Indonesia, so being concerned about his loyalty to the country is perfectly reasonable.

...

Just watched hi last episode. Did this fucker just make a dead cats joke?

The Congress and Senate will be Republican-led. He'll be able to do whatever he wants. The Dems really pissed people off this time.

Because Obama isn't really a dictator so you're allowed to question him, even his legitimacy as president. You can even say "Obama isn't the real president" and that's fine as far as the law is concerned.

...

Bruh, republican politicians hate Trump. I'm pretty sure they would shit on him. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't make it easy for him.

I remember 2015 when alt-right wasn't even a term used yet.

Good times.

They hate him 'cause he ain't them.

They hate him, but they've all fallen in line. Even Paul Ryan came crawling back to kiss the ring.

hummmmmmm

telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/02/majority-of-paris-attackers-used-migration-routes-to-enter-europ/

might have proven to be a better option than letting the civil war still continue and allow Isis to grow with it

If the election was a clear slamdunk, then probably not. would be too busy moving to Canada

Imagine being a lifelong Republican politician.

Imagine putting up with constant abuse and heckling from liberal comedians making fun of you.

Imagine being called every horrible name in the book because of your party affiliation.

Imagine your kids growing up to hate you because they aren't conservative idiots like you.

Imagine having to suck off Bush Jr. for eight years and pretend like that bozo was a good president.

And then some glorious bronzed New God busting in with a bolt of lightning from the heavens and taking your party's nomination right from your entire party's greasy grip despite you and every single shitsucking buttbuddies hating him and fighting him at every step and turn, with your efforts bouncing off him like pebbles being thrown by children at a tank, because the voters worship every single stupid fucking thing that flaps out of his fish lips.

Imagine being trumped.

>would be too busy moving to Canada
Why not Mexico?

>The November Paris attacks were committed by people born in Belgium, France and Sweden. All members of the Brussels ISIL terror cell were EU citizens, not migrants.
Isn't this even worse? Doesn't this mean they WON'T assimilate like all of the policians told us they would?

supreme court threw the idea of free speech out the window long ago, and good riddance

No habla espanol, ese. And less chance of getting murdered by a cartel.

>Can someone explain how birtherism isn't sedition?
Muh, first amendment.

>Few bad eggs means everyone is a terrorist

Perhaps we should deport everyone who owns a gun since gun crime is such an issue too.

Kill yourself, libtard.

You can live in Mexico and not speak Spanish, especially if you can speak English.

Plus, you can learn unless you're stupid or something.

>And less chance of getting murdered by a cartel.
This is the real reason: you agree with Trump (and Hillary "I voted multiple times on a 'barrier' to keep those dangerous Mexicans out" Clinton) that Mexico is a dangerous place.

>then the USA would have been one of the prime staff wells for the IRA
Irish Americans provided them with a great deal of funding before 9/11.

When the Europeans fucked up their continent in the exploration age they did the same thing Muslims are doing now.

It's ironic desu.

So if Trump doesn't get elected we can pretty much expect the US to be a one party state in the coming 1-2 decades? The demographics of the country have changed and the average citizen is more socially liberal than before, easily alienated by the typical republican political stances. Hollywood, the media and academia are left leaning and will smear the republicans whenever they can. I don't think we will ever see a classic republican president ever again.

>few bad eggs
>28,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11
>99% in favor of Sharia Law according to Pew Research
kys literally irl

It's more dangerous than Canada to be sure, but I don't think everyone of in the country is a rapist and murderer, or that building a ridiculously expensive vanity wall somehow truly fixes anything about the border security.

don't be stupid. They'll change with the times because the establishment cannot go under

>ridiculously expensive vanity wall somehow truly fixes anything about the border security.
Explain?
Also, it's not even a fraction of what we spend every year sending illegal aliens back multiple times.

are you even for real right now?

That user was perfectly reasonable in his reply.

I can only assume you replied the way you did because you don't actually know what you're talking about.

If you think Mexico is a safe place, go live there. If not, then you realize why politicians want to do things to stem illegal immigration from Mexico.

>99% in favor of Sharia Law according to Pew Research

Yes, and most of those people said it would only apply to other Muslims, not all citizens of the country irregardless of religion.

It's another Cred Forums shitting up other boards with inane shitposting episode.
Remember to report, sage and hide.

>Yes, and most of those people said it would only apply to other Muslims, not all citizens of the country irregardless of religion.
You say that as if that somehow makes it okay.

>implying trump will ever win

All he wall will do is make people start digging tunnels. Tunnels that we cannot properly detect because we don't have the technology for it to do it reliably on the scale we're talking about here.

That's still really fucked up.

Why was it okay for Europeans to come over and take refugee in America/Africa when Europe got shitty back in the 1400s, but it's not okay for the Muslims to do it now?

Islam is an authoritarian religion whose goal is world domination, they will eventually force other people to subject to them when they have enough power.

At least one of them is a troll account.

>non citizens and their opinions

Astounds me how the whole world thinks we here in the US really need to give a shit, because of, what? Just because a handful of leftist social media cowards lapped up your shit, doesn't mean the rest of the country is truly listening to you.

I live in South Korea, where we have a DMZ between our country and North Korea.

North Koreans tried that tunneling thing a couple times and it doesn't work and gets spotted pretty easily, and they weren't just random, uncoordinated nobodies trying to dig underground.

Sharia law is something you can interpret in a dozen different ways in how people understand it and what it would mean in practize. You have extremists who think Isis has the right idea and then you have people who think it basically applies to property and family matter, or how many times you pray. It does not automatically make everyone a jihadist, just waiting for the call to arms to behead the fat americans

>"you're under arrest for breaking sharia law"
>uh wtf i'm not a muslim i love bacon
>"oh, our bad, carry on"
>heh suckers i hate bacon

>in practize

Yep, all "the wall" will do is make it much harder to get into America illegally, which is the whole point of building it.

I don't give a fuck what they think 'Sharia law' is, the very fact that they advocate following a different set of laws to the country that they've come to live in is disgusting.

The Mexican border already has massive underground tunnel networks used by the drug trade. Just because few of them are discovered occasionally doesn't mean new ones aren't created all the time.

I know it's hard to believe but most muslims don't really wanna murder hundreds, most people don't murder and rape.

Most people prefer eating decent food and getting laid from time to time. Islam itself isn't bad, Islam is just being used as a tool for those rebel assholes to use. It's easy to convince the poor and uneducated population that they have to fight for god. They don't have shit, the same thing went down in the Crusades. You can't blame the religion itself, religion can be interpreted in millions of ways, it's a fucking book.

That's because liberalism comes from low self esteem which causes an obsession with out groups over in groups no matter how much cognitive dissonance it causes. It also explains why they worship Muslims despite professing to believe in feminism and gay rights. The Unabomber has a good quote about this phenomenon.

Because their presence makes Europe a worse place.

>most of them are discovered
>most aren't even completed when they're discovered
>most illegals just walk over anyways and a wall would make it more difficult for them to get in

So does retards like you but here we are, no closer to a final solution, wasting time shitposting on a chinese barbie forum.

They definitely didn't make life "better" for the Native Americans.

You could argue they made life better for Africans but honestly, they were better off without Europe.

cmon man.. that's some stupid tryhard shit u got going right there

I see nothing wrong with what happened in that case.

Yeah, they may not be up to standard but they are much more likable. They seem more human.

Honest to goodness he's actually working for Hillary Clinton's campaign. It came out in the emails that they're paying him for favorable coverage and to attack her opponents

>They definitely didn't make life "better" for the Native Americans.
The Native American population was nearly wiped out by plague before the Europeans began settling.

And, no, it wasn't "a plague brought by Europeans" because that would be smallpox, which only came after the settling on the Europeans.

Not to say the Europeans didn't do horrible things to the Native Americans, but the idea that they wiped them all out isn't historically accurate.

Thanks for the disinformation, Boris.

isn't that a federal crime?

Trolling is not a crime (yet).

most come over on buses

In the end, Europe needed them way more than they needed them.

History repeats itself. Remember when the Italians ran from Italy, came to America and literally set up a crime organization? People act as if this has never happened before. Usually if we let the refugee population live and give them the same opportunities as the average citizen, they assimilate and everything is fine.

Walls cannot stop buses.

>but the idea that they wiped them all out isn't historically accurate.

Not entirely but we white folk sure as hell tried our best. Speak nothing of what the Spaniards did further south.

True, but Europeans coming didn't make anything better for the Natives, life just got shittier for them.

you're right, transportation and any type of contact with outsiders was a mistake. everybody should isolate themselves from everyone who isn't within a mile of them, goddamn strangers might have one in a million chance of having some criminals amongst then, all you know.

Except thats fucking WRONG on all points. At least 3 of the paris attackers were confirmed migrants that had arrived that year. Besides you're not helping the pro-migrant narrative by saying "oh these people were already here", yeah well thats worse.

But America itself was improved because of it.

It's rather hard when the basic tenets and practices of their religion (mandatory prayer, dietary laws, the call to prayer, sanctification of the Arabic language, etc.) are designed to prevent assimilation.

>And, no, it wasn't "a plague brought by Europeans"
uhh
yes it was

Usually the don't come from a barbaric death cult of pedophile worshipers intent on destruction. Islam is the enemy of all civilizations.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades

We have been at war with it since its inception. Muslims do not assimilate.

...

Then how come every country with immigrants isn't filled with suicide bombers?

>The Native American population was nearly wiped out by plague before the Europeans began settling.
>And, no, it wasn't "a plague brought by Europeans" because that would be smallpox, which only came after the settling on the Europeans.
Wut

There are tons of muslims who live among the American population who aren't extremists. Actually, most muslims in the American population aren't crazed killers. If you give people a chance to live in peace they usually take it.

They are.

Not him but Injuns were slaughtering and genociding each other way before a Europeans ever set foot in North America. We just happened to be much better at it than them.

>Actually, most muslims in the American population aren't crazed killers.
You could just expand that to most Muslims. The vast majority of muslims have never killed anyone. Don't get me wrong, I dislike muslims, but they're not all murderers, bro

He just claimed that they were wiped out by a plague, and then claims that plague wasn't brought over by the Europeans

Yeah I have met plenty of these """""muslims""""", they are just like ""'""""christians""""""" who go to church once a year on christmas.

clarionproject.org/news/american-muslims-stone-christians-dearborn-michigan

So if they're not going around murdering and raping people they're not real muslims? Don't be ridiculous, just because someone doesn't fit your view of what you think they should be doesn't mean they're not authentic.

But their religious practices prevent them from fully assimilating. It just isn't possible.

Hello CTR

Which is true. Smallpox came much later.

>irregardless

>Shouldn't he have literally no credit now that it's confirmed the clinton campaign contacted him to help with their campaign?
They asked him to do a fundraiser for Bill Gates' foundation

And he didn't do it

how about you go back to studying that history book eh?

Yes actually if you eat pork and drink and do not attend mosque or adhere to the quran then you are not a real muslim. There are definitely qualifications to being part of an organized religion you dumbass. Just because a bunch of rich saudi kids that party all the time say they are """""Muslims""""" doesn't actually reflect on the true followers of the religion who actually do believe apostates should be killed and women should be stoned for not wearing a hijab in public.

The quality of life of a Native American living in modern America is greater than it was pre-Europe in every measurable way.

In the rest of the emails which right wing sites conveniently ignored

>only extremists count because I say so
epic!

It's really not. They're all a bunch of welfare junkies now.

There are definitely political dynasties in the U.S but the Obama part doesn't fit at all, he ran against Hillary in 2008.

Most Muslims who immigrated to America only made it there because they had the money to make the trip or an education that opened the door for them. The standards are much much higher than the Merkel style open door policy and lead to different results.

That's what we call making America great again.

Oh yeah because Brexit hasn't been a total fucking disaster for the UK

The majority of them manage to do it no problem. You already have the image of the violent evil muslim in your mind so you think it's impossible for them to just be normal everyday working people. This is what happens when you spend all day on Cred Forums. When people run away from war and violence the last thing they wanna do is jump back in it. It's no surprise that a lot of the terrorists are either "refugees" who were planning some shit from the jump, or idiot American-born muslims who blame America for all their problems, those fucks are the worst.

>alt-right
Nice meme

>extremists are muslims who actually practice the teachings of the quran
glad we can agree :-)

it's been like that for christianity for centuries man

It really is. They live measurably longer, are better educated, and have ready access to conveniences that we take for granted but back then would have been magic. Even the poor among them are much better off now.

Idiot

Yeah like Milo

But they have virtually no land and their culture is pretty much dead.

I don't know, living under the foot of the white man doesn't seem like that good of a trade off.

seattlepi.com/local/article/Native-American-death-rates-soar-as-most-people-1302192.php

Last time I checked the New Testament says nothing about the subjugation of women and waging war on apostates. Feel free to pull up a passage if I am wrong. In fact every crusade was a direct response to Muslim conquest. Not even a christian but that is a meme argument

when the fuck did I claim new testament stating anything like that?

but if you live like the new testament tells you to, you're an extremist. deal with it

And yet they still live longer than the pre-settler days.

Religion was never meant to be followed to the T in the first place. They're old passages that can be interpreted in hundreds of different ways. The Bible has it's fair share of fucked up shit, you can consider yourself a follower of it's teachings without having to do all the ridiculous shit in it.

>Extremist - a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.
You claimed christians were extremists. Christians follow the New Testament and there is absolutely nothing in the new testament that advocates extreme action, unless loving your neighbor as yourself if considered extremism. Islam is a completely different monster and there are actual things in the quran that call for extremist actions.

>they have virtually no land
And? "Ownership of land" has nothing to do with quality of life.

>their culture is pretty much dead
No, their culture changed into what it is today. Every culture changes. Also has nothing to do with quality of life.

>I don't know, living under the foot of the white man doesn't seem like that good of a trade off.
Then leave America and live in the middle of nowhere.

I agree, the bible does have some ridiculous things in it. The difference isn't in the semantics but rather the message as a whole. If you don't think that Mohammad wrote the Quran as a tool for mobilizing fanatics into going to war for him then you need a history lesson.

That's because the Bible is a bunch of interpretations of Jesus's teachings. The Quron is not.

>I LAUGHED so hard because I am not angery and thought I would let you know that I am laughing at you HA

>and there is absolutely nothing in the new testament that advocates extreme action
topkek

>But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me.
Luke 19:27

Your move christfag.

KKK was christian

>Hmm should I vote for the man who will continue to let workers get buttfucked by the elite or the woman who will continue to let workers get buttfucked by the elite

Good job America

I am not a christian you moron, in fact the complete opposite. I am just educated enough to know what I am arguing for.
>slay them
the strong expression is chosen as shadowing forth the completeness of the condemnation to everlasting death at the final judgment. Do some research before you start sperging out trying to defend faggot islamic shit

what parts of the bible did the KKK use to justify there actions? The part where jesus says "all niggers rot in hell?"

>buying into fearmongering

I can't fucking wait til this election is over. 15 year olds and euros will stop trump shilling. None of you retards actually care or will vote.

whatever man, that other guy already provided enough. Simply changing the meaning of words in your head does not prove anything other than your bias.

Dude my friend's been informed that all new science research is on hold at the moment, the pound's tanked, factories around here have announced they're leaving, prices have risen and we haven't even fucking properly left yet

The only fearmongering in the vote was the brexit pushers going on about the big evil eu

The only reason I'm even defending christianity is because some idiot tried to pull the 'duuuh all religions are the same' bullshit. I never said all muslims need to be banned from the U.S but you retards need to realize that it is a toxic ideology.

>the strong expression is chosen as shadowing forth the completeness of the condemnation to everlasting death at the final judgment.
wrong, he specifically says to kill non-christians, nothing about the foreshadowing

Well someone claimed that eating pork makes you a non-muslim which is just as "toxic" and full on retarded.

The KKK actually twisted a lot of scripture to justify their actions.

Just goes to show religion is bullshit and you can twist any of it to go along with extremist actions.

They're referencing the old testament where most of the crazy shit is, Jesus was literally a SJW and the Bible is full of things like loving your enemy, equality and turning the other cheek

You are retarded if you think that and have no contextual understanding of the passage. Would you like some passages from the Quran that ACTUALLY advocate violence
>Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"
>Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
>Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."

I don't give a fuck about islam, or christianity or any religion. You're the ridiculous one here who says he's not christian yet takes sides in religion wars. They're all cancer.

Go watch Jesus Camp if you don't think christians can be extreme.

pretty much this. How much cognitive dissonance does it take to believe that Jesus was as warlike as fucking mohammad?

Muslims usually just justify it with the context of the times etc.

Christians and Jews do the same with the old testament, there are similar shit in there

>Dude my friend's been informed

Oh yeah well my friend says the jews are behind everything!

In answer to your actual points all that shit apart from the pound tanking (Which anyone with half a brain knew would happen) is just tantrums and forced fear mongering to make people regret their decision, there is literally no reason why science research is on hold, factories are leaving or prices are rising. It's just companies/businesses trying to throw around their weight to scare people into wanting to take back brexit and based on your opinion it's working.

p r o o f

As long as you're not killing and raping who gives a fuck what religion you put your faith in

Who the fuck am I to tell someone they're not a real muslim because they don't do A B C or D, just don't commit violent crimes, jesus.

There will be a new wave of making fun of Americans. Before Hillary starts bombing Assad and the "refugee" stream doubles. And then the the joke will be on us.

All religions are bad. Islam is worse. I was actually in a Jesus Camp kind of place when I was a teenager (like the kind of place you have to go to church 3 times a day to listen to sermons about how evil harry potter is) so trust me I have seen the craziest batshit side of Christianity and even then they don't come even close to Muslim extremists.

>Muslims usually just justify it with the context of the times etc.
No they don't. When asked if it was OK for Mohammed to rape his 9 year old wife they go on about how it was okay because the 9 year old mentally and physically ready for his dick.

>If you like something that John's joking about, odds are you don't find it particularly funny.
why the fuck are you on Cred Forums if you cant laugh when people make fun of things you like

he just isnt funny, he could be a conservative with the same mannerisms and style of humour and still be incredibly unfunny

The difference is that Jesus the big faggot made everything in the OT null and void when he died on the cross. Everything in the quran is 100% muslim canon

>McVeigh was raised Roman Catholic.[91] During his childhood, he and his father attended Mass regularly.[92] McVeigh was confirmed at the Good Shepherd Church in Pendleton, New York, in 1985.[93] In a 1996 interview, McVeigh professed belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs."[91] In McVeigh's biography American Terrorist, released in 2002, he stated that he did not believe in a hell and that science is his religion.[94][95] In June 2001, a day before the execution, McVeigh wrote a letter to the Buffalo News identifying himself as agnostic. However, he took the Last Rites, administered by a priest, just before his execution.

No as in he's an actual fucking researcher

And there's legitimate reasons it's on hold, the majority of our research funding as a nation comes from europe

Whats your point? McVeigh was seeking revenge for Waco, it had absolutely nothing to do with religion which is made clear by the passage you posted.

>And there's legitimate reasons it's on hold, the majority of our research funding as a nation comes from europe

So you're saying it's legitimiate because we're supposedly no longer getting money from a place where we're still getting money from?

You do understand that we haven't left the EU in any way yet and nothing has changed with funding?

This video raises an interesting question. Is the "don't vote third party, it's as good as a vote for [insert candidate]" justified?

The way I see it now, a voters job is to attain the best possible outcome for the country via electing officials that will represent them, right? If so, then I see both sides. In favor of third party, you pick who you agree with, and don't vote who you disagree with. Makes sense.

However, I also understand the flip side- that picking someone who you agree with who can't win is wasting your time when a "greater threat" stands at the door.

If you could, explain where you lie. Should you lose yourself to save others, or Rorscach it out and never compromise, no matter what?

>Islam has very real and widespread cultural problems that lead to extremely high and disproportionate levels of extremist violence
>Islamic nations are the largest state sponsors of terrorism in the world
>Even among non Muslims, Fundamentalist attitudes lead to women being treated as LITERAL property and secondhand citizens, gays being thrown off rooftops and beaten in streets, prison sentences for criticizing Islam on the internet, etc.
>These practices are now being forced into Western nations because European nations are immigrating far too many people all at once that they aren't fiscally or practically able to handle and assimilate them

>but dude this one Christian killed people once lmao
>dude the WBC and its 100 members say they hate gay people
>dude hobby lobby doesn't want to give its employees birth control
>totally the same thing all faiths are bad maaaan

Fucking educate yourself, god damn.

I was saying that people raised in a Christian religion are susceptible to radicalization and can commit acts of terrorism as well.

It's not like the imam at your local mosque is telling people to blow themselves up.

>

The spying game wasn't all it was cracked up to be for Craig Monteilh, a convicted criminal recruited by the FBI to investigate the march of radical Islam into Southern California. His endless talk of violent "jihad" so alarmed worshippers at the local mosque, that they took out a restraining order against him.
>independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/fbi-plant-banned-by-mosque-ndash-because-he-was-too-extreme-2153057.html

Hell, even buddhists in Myanmar are massacring muslims.

>Even among non Muslims

*even among non-"extremist" muslims

I just wanted to clear that up before some lefty cuck said "tee hee you made a typo your whole argument is invalid :^)"

>defending christcucks

I'm not coming to the defense of Christianity. I consider myself a liberal atheist, I'm just not delusional enough to think the solution to the migrant crisis and Radical Islam is to bury our heads in the sand and ignore the problem in the name of tolerance and progressiveness.

>Hell, even buddhists in Myanmar are massacring muslims
Have you stopped and researched why they would be massacring muslims? might have something to do with
And yes, anyone raised any kind of way can always end up being a crazy person who goes off and kills a bunch of people. The difference with mass murderers raised under Islam are committing mass murders IN THE NAME OF MOHAMMAD AND ISLAM. Find me a mass murderer who blows up buildings in the name of christianity and jesus.

but the proposed solution in this thread is to go back to fucking STASI days and start chopping heads basically. And then even claim the problem is Islam when it's the economy and prejudice

>They'll change with the times because the establishment cannot go under

Not if we put a stop to it.

Jesus really was a cuck.

Agreed that chopping off heads is not the answer, but if you really think that Islam is not a major part of the problem then you are delusional.

go start over whenever you feel like it

as someone who already sent in their wasted write-in for Bernie Sanders that literally won't be counted i thought the show was mostly fair.
the premise was, people want other choices so lets look at the third party candidates... than he gave them a serious look and saw they were as flawed as the known candidates.

only way you could consider that hill shilling is if he massively threw Jill Stein under the bus (the most obvious Hill spoiler candidate being a much better choice than her) and massively hid Gary Johnson's flaws (as the Trump spoiler candidate he's gotten way more mainstream press than Jill and has higher numbers as a result).
he didnt.