Can someone please explain time? Does everything happen at once and time is the experiencing of it in fragments...

Can someone please explain time? Does everything happen at once and time is the experiencing of it in fragments? And say 100 years ago or thousands is that all going on right now too? And does everything stack up like all the previous time push forward the moment? Is the future set in stone or can it go many different ways?

Attached: download.jpg (275x183, 8K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-6rWqJhDv7M
youtu.be/N3fA5uzWDU8
jstor.org/stable/25008172?seq=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Time is not a force. It's a label for a rate of movement. There is not a clock outside the snow globe of the universe. The universe is the clock.

So time keeps a clock moving at the same speed and preventing it from standing still or zooming around?

Does it have anything to do with perception?

>Time is not a force

>explain the entirety of a complex concept we've only learned a fraction about in our existance
i think not

Absolutely, otherwise you'd never miss the fly.

Attached: fly.png (800x462, 26K)

Time is not a force, a physical thing, or an energy around us. Time is a man made label for a linear process. Time cannot be taken and manipulates in order to time travel because time doesnt exist as a thing. It's simply a may to measure, same as a calorie. It's a measurement and way to think of things rather than being a thing itself

Eveything, as your are reality perceiving apparatus, and there is no way out of the seat of your conciousness, except modeling the universe more accurately with your imagination, which of course doesn't really get you out of you subjectively at all.

watch: youtube.com/watch?v=-6rWqJhDv7M

Well the time particles are different everywhere depending on the amount of gravity there is. There are holes in the universe that create gravity and pull them through so that the amount of time particles will change and its the speed at which these particles are spinning and moving simataneously.

Citation?

The time particles are around you right now you just cant see them. They are keeping things stable but sometimes there are disturbances that cause these particles to spin and move in different ways causing anomalys.

My eyes that can't see something are not a citation.

How do you know what you know sir? Which means you can't restate a foundless assertion.

Time is Dimensional

0 Instant Possibility
1 Linear extension in past present future
2 Succession (once future now past)
3 Durance - its always now!
4 Causality in time where one thing can cause another
5 Eternity - limitless actualisation
6 Hyparxis - beyond one eternity
7 Time - yes all the hyparxical eternities do not just cross bound, they also move on time axis
8 metatime - slip stuff inbetween whenever

source paul laffoley

Time is a dimension.....a measure. What a revelation.

well, of cause you know that ....

its just once you seperat and stack it like laffoley did OP will not be confused about the various "levels"

example: And does everything stack up like all the previous time push forward the moment?
answere: yes, in time dimension 3 "durance"

Is the future set in stone?
answere: only in dimension 1

can it go many different ways
answere: thats what hyparxis is for. some call it alternity

etc.

And your are stuck I'm this time here so why is any other worth discussing?

once you look at 0-8 you will always be stuck at 3

the rest is elsewhen, possibly, so are you

pic related, its the geochronomechane

Attached: 1990_Laffoley-Geochromechane-The+Time+Machine+From+Earth.jpg (750x752, 213K)

If you were to travel at light speed away from earth to a wormhole that is near it, then you could travel back in time. So, quite literally, everything has happened and will happen all at once.

suggest your klein bottle house for it

once faster than light you blueshift an octave (doppler effect like) into other light cones

Attached: 18-09-01.jpg (2448x3264, 1.47M)

Synchronicity is the thing you are looking for, it's similar to everything happens at the same time but is a more complex concept to better contain all the glorious spergetti.

Also what said. being in this clock, being a tiny part does a lot to time when in comparison to other places.

As you probably know, we experience the universe through our brain, which operates on electrical impulses. A neurological signal takes time to move along the axons from neuron to neuron like electrons through a wire.. So the reality we experience we call 'now', its actually the past. At the quantum level its even more strange. Hypothetically, Imagine if you have your finger on a switch of a light. You can switch that light on and off at anytime you like. At the quantum level, the moment you decide to switch the light off or on and carry out your action, the light has already turned on or off based on your choice before you even flip the switch.

brain isnt just electrics, its also synapto-chemical
any temporal "slice" is reverbarating in multiple instances in several locations slightly shifted.

thats your synchronicity interface - especially if you get memory involved. on laffoley that is somewhere at 4 "causality".

Dr. Who is not real life

Is there any proof that this micro effects the macro of cell function in any significant way? Especially with how diliberate the human animal is?

Is there any proof that this micro effects the macro of cell function in any significant way? Especially with how diliberate the human animal is?

youtu.be/N3fA5uzWDU8

depends what you accept as "proof".

have you tried ritual magick? or taken
visionary drugs?
or have you looked at "magick realism"?

speculate about mind physics all you want
jstor.org/stable/25008172?seq=1

if this "proof" convices any fundamentalist...
maybe no.
Real is usually just some social agreement

but ask any physicist if "topology" is a thing.
thank carefully ask chronotopology or time crystals... maybe he studied recently

Attached: full.jpg (600x615, 95K)

the paradox is that it both set in stone and has multiple paths at the same time

> Depends on what you accept...
> Proof

Just save us all some time and say "no".

No. That is a different "time", then.

in what aspect different?

ok, i make it easier for you:

the rule is participation required
if it isn't in you, you cannot see it outside

or how do you state the observer and observed are one?

Attached: [PLATE_34_1974_GET+THEE+BEHIND+ME,+SATAN].jpg (1500x1500, 948K)

The multiple paths. They are a different thing, so they have there own measure.

Time is an abstract concept. Best way to explain it is that it is a collection of positions woven into eachother, which turns to motion. We only experience the now, and time is a collection of the "now"s.

Bullshit makes nothing "easier". Ty

>Abstract

The perception of time is. The deterioration of an isotope of hydrogen at 93 millionths of a second isn't.

It is impossible to travel back in time. Time can only be squished together or stretched out but it cannot be reversed.
Plus, idk why you have to go to a black hole to experience the effects if you are already traveling at the speed of light.

Lol, okay

statically....
+- measuring uncertainty.

go decay more isotopes to understand time than. why do i even bother?

Attached: aXwzQOV_700b.jpg (700x696, 81K)

Depends on the frame of reference of the isotope and the viewer. That isotope decaying as it spirals ever closer to the event horizon of a black hole is definitely different then it decaying in a reactor on earth

The universe is a closed system. Everything has an effect on everything else. Given enough "time" every scenario can play itself out. Its like the chimp with a typewriter, given enough time the chimp will type out the complete playwright of Hamlet, eventually. Thats the realm of possibility and probability. Its seems impossible to us that Hitler could rise from the grave and take over the world, but, it is extremely remotely possible. And in some parallel universe it has played itself out in infinite versions of itself. The universe is a perfect equation that will always balance and equal itself out. The timeline you experience right now is unique to you, and yet we all play a part in it. Its fractal like that. None of us shares the same timeline, but they do overlap. Time flows art different rates for different people. In a universal scale, your "Now" slice in time can change based on your position and velocity due to the theory of relativity. Time is an illusion.

Time is measured in 24 hours in a day so humans can have structure in their life there is no time travel just the future the past and present

Cause you are a weed based not really a smart person dirtbag.

....I know, I know. Carl sagan redeems everyone of you. He did his best work.on.the ganja. Talking to dolphins and shit.

....yawn.

Under current understanding of the universe it would be possible to make a time machine with several constraints.
1) It would probably require more energy then exists in the universe
2) You would not be able to go back further than when the machine was created
3) Information going back would "clog" the channel on the machine from the time it was received in past all the way to the future when it was sent.

Of course this also breaks causality which may be an artifact of our perception anyway.

the occurences and choices layed out along the path are diverse; each has its own infinte branches. a set of laboratory-regulated measures cannot predict un accounted for influences

Hey, it is why GPS works and it is pretty spiffy. You take any of this kind of practical applications of relativity or quantum mechanics back 200 years and you are describing magic.

Indistinguishable from magic

ok - congrats - i am trolled

you fuckwit are material fundamentalist
worst of the godfucks! the one without temple

Attached: Dreadnouts.png (500x423, 237K)

The universe being a closed finite system is definitely not settled science. There are many plausible topographies it could be

That is human imagination against the very deliberate mechanics of the universe minecart you are in, and not worth talking about unless we are saving another version of the Enterprise....or not.

Again, perception. What science is here to save us from.

There is your "magic". Magical retards.

what i say does never contradict the deliberate mechanisms of the universe, not sure whos hallucinating :L

Stuff requires measurement because it exists. Measuring is by nature a reference.

I am aware that the loaf of bread is a whole but you arguing that the way I slice it is merely perception is retarded.

>Magical retards

as ususally elsewhere and elsewhen from you.
having fun.

Attached: 1471812289279.jpg (718x702, 81K)

Oh it doesn't, it just self worshipping bullshit.

Slicing is interventionist, not measurement.

There are welcome to it. Cowards. no tell me all about sacred geometry.

that the reductive approach in current physics cannot account for external unknown influences and particle behavior under these terms is not a matter of a fucking argument.

>self worshipping
again, not mine

No it is not. Slicing is an intrinsic property of the loaf. Just because we can slice the load many different ways and seemingly share the entire loaf doesn't make how it is sliced by any less important.

Slicing the loaf is part of the loaf itself, and thus the analogy breaks down.

Time is relative to velocity, though, meaning if an object were to travel at a high enough velocity, it would be experiencing "time" differently than the things around it.

something something special relativity