Why don't we have leaders of each country dueling each other to death instead of sending millions of men to the field...

Why don't we have leaders of each country dueling each other to death instead of sending millions of men to the field and dying?

Other urls found in this thread:

edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/10/03/iraq.bush.duel/index.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

It would make too much sense

Thats such an ugly cut holy shit

antiquity was great in that regard, the leaders would meet and say "let's fight to death and spare these brave men lives"
then they would go "okay, but I send in my champion" then everyone would see a great fucking fight and go home in the end.

yeah? it makes my dick rock solid.

I would love to cum on her shaved head

Then they'd actually try to obtain peace.

Because then Russia would rule the world.

that was made irrelevant with guns pretty much. and what they say were hoping for with the olympics

Pls no mudshark and I agree senpai

>That fucking haircut
Degenerate and made me vomit

Fun fact: Saddam Hussein's regime offered a sword fight, either between Bush and Saddam, or Bush and his team vs Saddam and his team. The offer was put there so they could avoid war and all the death and destruction.

What's the point of having hundreds of millions of impoverished citizens unless you're going to enroll them in the military and use them to secure your investments around the globe?

Do you really think Obama could win a duel?

Why don't the CEO's of companies just do the low level work?

Why don't you just make your own computer from scratch instead of paying someone else for one they've made?

Why doesn't your mom just fuck herself instead of inviting five niggers to do it?

>As if you dont already have the answer from that Game of Thrones episode
Because they might lose, ya dingus

Against most leaders.

But not against Putin, obviously.

>tfw you've been fencing for 15 years
>no one will ever challenge you to a duel deciding the fate of a country

>fencing

What if they showed up with a real sword?

Ramsay Bolton: "[Chuckles] I keep hearing stories about you, bastard. The way people in the North talk about you, you're the greatest swordsman who ever walked. Maybe you are that good, maybe not. I don't know if I'd beat you, but I know that my army will beat yours. I have six thousand men, you have....what, half that? Not even?"

The Irish Kings had to lead the army at battle.

It's very simple;

People WANT an excuse to kill each other.
The rich and powerful may act as a catalyst, but the gun powder must be there before the trigger can fire the bullet.

...

that's interesting, did not know that.

Considering I'm doing rapier fencing they can bring whatever the fuck they want as long as it's not a ranged weapon.

Gay. Looks masculine as fuck

She did it for a film, pal. It's like saying Bale is beta male for cutting down to 100 lbs

>Why don't we have leaders of each country dueling each other to death instead of sending millions of men to the field and dying?

Because Putin would be Emperor of the planet in less than a week.

Not that watching Putin and Trudeau fight wouldn't be fucking hilarious.

Legit way to settle land disputes, m8. Canada would own the USA is this was the case.

God damn do I ever love Agamemnon.

...

>Not that watching Putin and Trudeau fight wouldn't be fucking hilarious.

God dammit that would be fucking awesome!

But...but if you kill your enemies, they win.

It's worth fuck all if it wasn't a hema rapier.

''king'' is a bold title for a village chieftain. You kinda have to lead when your army consists of 2 retainers and 2 dozen peasants.

Well that is why Canada would own USA

Then the US wouldn't be a super power anymore.

Not enough honor left in the world today, the losing country would just get butt hurt and break the deal.

>USA challenged Russia to settle disputes in a fight between Obama and Putin
>Obama wins, Russia says lolno we still have a huge army fuck you
>Putin wins, USA says lolno we still have a huge army fuck you

War works because it depletes it the enemy's fighting power, so even if they don't want to surrender they are forced to. I would love to see world politics work like that, with world leaders actually being leaders and sacrificing their lives for their countries, but I doubt that will ever come to pass.

Thailand gained independence in a boxing match iirc

faggot identified

What happens when the losing team doesn't like that they lost? War is about force, not honor.

Lol this guy is such a pussy

Because they're in charge idiot.

It's more because if that was the way we settled disputes, our leaders would be battle hardened violent psychopaths instead of money hungry greedy sociopaths.

If only leaders fighting each other were a reality

o fug i forgot

That's the point.

This.. Based Putin.

WHY DOES PRIME ARYAN PUSSY ALWAYS GET SPOILED BY THE FUCKING JEWS

REEEEEE

RREEEEEEEEE

>6 months from now
>tensions have risen since brexit has been begun to take effect
>UK and EU on the brink of all out war
>Merkel, in her desperation to save her crumbling union, barges into parliament and challenges Theresa May to single combat
>with the fury of the Empire at her back Theresa charges in
>but Merkel uses her ancient jewish majick to dispatch her with ease
>just as all hope seems lost for the Sleeping Empire the queen steps out of the shadows
>she raises a claymore over her head and absorbs the life force of all the Scottish stay voters with a mighty quickening
>With one mighty slash Merkel is defeated
>her body dissolves into several immigrants who proceed to collect benefits

not with that (lack of) chin

>this is a 11/10 in the UK

>I have a million men, killer sat, armored divisions, aircraft that flies faster than sound
>this one guy has 7 people

>he challenges me 1v1 and I lose and die
Yeah no, this is too retarded to work in the real world.

Beside, royalty in antiquity fought one another for bullshit reasons, if this guy took this other guy's wife or I dont know yeah it makes sense for the 2 of them to kill each other with pointy sticks and be done with it.
If they fought for state reasons, reasons that also included the peasants and knights and so on, than those would probably also want to fight.

tl;dr pol is being retarded right now

kek
Glad someone posted this ITT

would probably experiment with to be perfectly honest.

Anyone have a link to that pozzed music video she was in? Some beta faggot band, her husband directed it, and made her get down with a whole bunch of different dudes including making her get (((BLACKED)))

That's the "I'm ready for porn" hairstyle.

I was eating a burger, you fuck.

...

Oh shit.

Putin recently took Forbes' top spot for World's Most Powerful Man. Coincidence?

Do you carry a glove around with you at all times so you can challenge people to duels?

HAHAHAHA

Please tell me he at least had the guts to make this public. I'd actually gain some respect for Trudeau if he was candid about losing.

Although... he was beaten, so I guess that means he won?

Military confirmed for champions of men.

men being men, doing things men do.

what a strange thought.

Because of the levee en masse (spelling?)

>the ideal of politics according to Cred Forums is G-Gundam

Source?

You would get shit on by a skilled spearman

because that would be fucking awesome

I would still fuck her.

edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/10/03/iraq.bush.duel/index.html

>"I just finished All Quiet on the Western Front": the thread

Why don't we have more Katheryn Winnick threads?

>mfw putin and duterte form a wrestling team and tag against shillary and merkel

Duterte would get his shit absolutely wrecked by Trudeau though.

44 vs 71yo, yeah, it's a given.

But vs Putin I don't know.
Also, depends on the weapons, I wouldn't go in a knife-fight with a KGB agent/judo black belt/sambo champion, even if he is 63

The American political process really went to shit when they banned dueling