Are there significant differences between races that can be translated on behaviour differences?

...

...

...

...

...

Why are white women so terrible at doing their eyelashes?

Also this book:

aryanism.net/downloads/books/alfred-rosenberg/myth-of-the-twentieth-century.pdf

says that the decline in scientific progress that happened in the dark ages right after the fall of the Roman Empire was caused by genetic changes in European DNA and that the Renaissance and re-discovery of ancient Greek science and philosophy was caused by another change in European DNA caused by Northern people who migrated southwards in to Italy, France, Netherlands, Russia, Great Britain and Germany.

...

Not much "by race" but by culture. And the culture dictated their evolution by large. So the big part of differences is in culture and environment. These natural instincts by culture usually don't change.

The genetic distance between Whites (British) and Blacks (Bantu) is 0.23:
genetics.org/content/105/3/767.abstract
The FST between the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus) is 0.103 which is half the White-Black difference despite the two being classified as separate species:
sciencedirect.com/scienc...18442X04700335
The FST between two gorilla species, Gorilla gorilla and Gorilla beringei is 0.04 or 1/6 the difference between Blacks and Whites:
ingentaconnect.com/conten...a?format=print
berggorilla.org/fileadmin...20-english.pdf
The FST between humans and Neanderthals is less than 0.08 or about 1/3 the Black-White difference:
sciencedirect.com/scienc...18442X04700335
pnas.org/content/100/11/6593.abstract
mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/8/1359.full
The FST between humans and homo erectus is 0.17 which is 3/4 the Black-White distance:
sciencedirect.com/scienc...18442X04700335
Thus, whites and blacks are more genetically distant than two different chimpanzee species, two different gorilla species, humans vs. Neanderthals, and humans vs. homo erectus.

No. Black people in the UK walk and talk like White people and not like the Blacks in USA.

They more than likely have European ancestors then.

>Are there significant differences between races that can be translated on behaviour differences?
are Brazilians monkeys?

>Hispanic
>Race

Can you delete that one? Kind of stupid

>Not much "by race" but by culture.

Stop repeating this fucking bullshit. Niggers EVERYWHERE turn EVERYTHING to SHIT with 100% certainty.

It does not matter where you put them.
It does not matter how you treat them.
They will turn the areas they live in into crime-ridden ghetto shitholes EVERY.SINGLE.TIME

Their fucking 'culture' is a direct result of their genetic behavioral tendencies.

Why haven't we declared subspecies yet? What defines a species is the ability to produce fertile offspring. We know africans are capable of doing so with whites in Britian, so with this much of a genetic gap identifying subspecies should be obligatory, no?

>Black people in the UK walk and talk like White people

OK

>Hispanic
>not a race
I bet you don't think Jews are a race, either

The chimpanzee IQ of 80 or 90 points is in comparison to human children. The development of the human brain does not cease in childhood - it continues to the age of 25. The development of the chimpanzee brain, on the other hand, ends quickly. Since then, the human-chimp gap widens and widens.

A similar things happens to blacks. Their early childhood scores are more similar to those of whites (see the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study), later they widen, and in adults the gap reaches 20 points. Also, the average black African IQ is not really 60 or 70 points. If you reject the samples which included e.g. children with a history of malaria or malnourished ones, samples tested with instruments which have known cultural biases etc. and focus only on the representative adult samples that use decent methodology, you'll find out that the real average IQ of an adult sub-Saharan black African is roughly 80 points… Which is still not something to be happy about:

paulcooijmans.com/intelligence/iq_ranges.html

Moreover, an average IQ of 80 points suggests an entirely genetic origin of the gap: African Americans score 85 points on average, while whites of European origin - 100 points. African Americans are roughly 1/4th white - and score 5 points higher than their pure African counterparts (5 points = 1/4th of the 20-point white European - black African gap):

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10190326

What I've just written is the greatest taboo of modern science: whites and blacks do differ in their average cognitive abilities, and the reason for the difference lies in their genes rather than in the environment.

of course, blacks are dumber

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10190326

What's great about this issue is there is a shitload of peer reviewed, purely scientific studies proving the same thing over and over and over a-fucking again and again and again with the same results EVERY.SINGLE.TIME and people just CAN'T accept it.

Nevermind that ALL anecdotal evidence matches the empirical evidence perfectly.

Nevermind that Occam's Razor dictates that the most obvious reason for the condition of blacks is their low IQ. (Any other explanation requires thousands of exceptions while low IQ relies on a single factor).

People just don't want it to be true because it hurts their stupid faggoty feelings.

God I want the revolution to come so fucking bad.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microcephalin#Evolution