Hillary can't win because only smart people support her.
Hillary is the elitist counter-culture candidate. Bernie and Drumpf are the pleb-tier candidates with inferior, low-IQ subhuman trash supporters.
You support Trump because smart people make you uncomfortable and hurt your ego and you'd much rather be surrounded by other shitcunts, because being surrounded by subhuman illiterate retards makes you feel as though everyone else is dumb and uneducated just like you, and that makes you comfy.
Supporting Hillary is difficult because it's a humbling process that constantly exposes you to complex opinions from people who are smarter than you, and that hurts your ego. It's much less stressful and challenging to be surrounded by subhuman low-IQ genetic waste like Bernie and Drumpf supporters.
democrats have the poor and rich vote (idiot who believe the republican are waciss meme)
republican have the middle class
Austin Morales
>A leaf
Sage
Aaron Long
>counter-culture Try harder next time
Angel Rodriguez
low energy post
Wyatt Wilson
>smart people >Wymin's gender studies doctor is considered "educated" Such low standards,baka. Also >leaf posting git out of muh pol
Joshua Campbell
fun fact: Hillary supporters have an IQ that's on average 10 points higher than the rest of the population
Asher Turner
you know, this is funny
even among those with a degree, 40% favour trump. even those with a postgrad, 34% favour trump. gather 3 people with a postgrad degree, and on average, one of them will prefer trump.
the question is, which ones are the actual independent thinkers?
we know colleges are liberal brainwash grounds where you can hardly afford to be openly conservative. people heckle you for wearing MAGA hats, and there are communist posters put up by communist student groups on every single surface.
so. when you take 3 people and put them in this environment, is it that 2/3 of them will become liberal and the bottom 1/3 will remain conservative? or is it that 2/3 will be brainwashed and the top 1/3 won't be?
Ayden Baker
Canada. We think Sweden got it bad but their finally standing up for themselves. But oh, Canada. You guys are going to completely disappear.
Evan Green
You know what else is funny?
The higher up you go, the more likely you are to support Hillary.
That means that if the graph kept going, the next step would have Trump at 20 and Hillary at 70, eventually you'd reach Nobel Prize Laureate with Drumpf at 1 percent and Hillary at 99, and finally, trans-dimensional being with Hillary at 100 and Drumpf at zero.
Henry Adams
sage why do you post this every day you fucking sigh
Blake Gray
But can you honestly say those supporters are actually intelligent have what's best for most people at heart. I'd really like to hear one of these PhDs explaining why they are voting for Hillary. I sincerely doubt it goes beyond "Trumps racis".
Xavier Ramirez
that's funny.
you know what's also interesting about that?
you simply cannot afford to be a conservative nobel laureate because you will be disgraced by the retarded, clearly-below-any-significantly-intelligent-IQ SJW left. there is already one example of this. if you are a highly intelligent conservative, you will be eaten alive by the barely intelligent SJW hordes who look down on republicans because they graduated with their 115 IQ and 2.6 GPA.
you know what else is pretty funny?
it's smart to say you're not a trump supporter even if you are
Jose Smith
Self education>college education. Repeating what people tell you isnt being intelligent.
Ryder Barnes
same thing could be said for obama and look how that turned out. also > A FUCKING LEAF.
Jayden Scott
>same thing could be said for obama
Not true. This is how she does compared with Obama.
Luis Ortiz
>Spending Decades in a marxist indoctrination camp makes you "more educated" Top kek
Juan Lee
Yep. I work in the valley and almost everybody likes Clintons except for the hardcore bernouts. Nobody is voting for Trump.