ITT: We post redpilled films

ITT: We post redpilled films.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=GHs2coAzLJ8
youtube.com/watch?v=D0z3hmIg1Fk
youtube.com/watch?v=xtJYE-eZIY8
youtube.com/watch?v=9DOI3FqCZJE
youtube.com/watch?v=yDzX81vACRI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Did you even watch the movie? Bluepilled as fuck

Lol this faggot only ever watched the final version without the original ending.

Are you kidding, Derek was dropping redpills left and right for 1/2 of the movie until he had to change for plot development. You didn't even watch it until the end.

The problem is normies will associate those truths with le ebil skinhead man.

I can assure this is not a redpilled movie.

Holy shit I never knew about the original ending and wasnt even sure that the nigger that killed Danny was connected to the nigger derek killed. Just looked up original ending and that would have been way better and imdb says the nigger that killed danny was the little brother of the nigger derek killed

Here ha go, fag.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=GHs2coAzLJ8

good movie but not redpilled

I feel king of the hill is a million times more redpilled than that

I just watched Imperium today. Totally a redpill vehicle: main character 'infiltrates' white supremacist organizations as part of an FBI investigation. This basically allows the movie to be 90% white nationalists explaining their positions, and gives a look at the strengths and weaknesses of various aspects of the movement. There is literally not a single argument raised against anything that they say, aside from a single line at the end about "fascism stems from victimhood. You don't have to be a victim."

Whether it was intended to be or not, the movie is basically a how-to manual on fixing everything that's wrong with white nationalism as a movement.

This movie was pretty good.

Cred Forums know of any movies that depict the real shit the US does in the middle east? I could never see it flying in theaters. I cringed every time people mention that American Sniper bullshit

Good taste. There are actually many old movies from national socialist Germany to be found on YT, some even in glorious Agfacolor

youtube.com/watch?v=D0z3hmIg1Fk (Die goldene Stadt, tfw you'll never have Kristina Söderbaum as a gf)
youtube.com/watch?v=xtJYE-eZIY8 (Jud Süß, Made by Söderbaum's husband, with Kristina as the sad victim)
youtube.com/watch?v=9DOI3FqCZJE (Der ewige Jude/The eternal jew, the rat scene is especially noteworthy, as is the scene where the rise of a merchant is explained)
youtube.com/watch?v=yDzX81vACRI (Olympia, Riefenstah's account of the 1936 summer games)

Many more are to be found

That may be so, but it's most definitely meant as an attack on neonazis. The idea of that internet talk show host actually being a sad man living with his mother and just doing it for the money and the whole narrative of white supremacism movements being basically thuggish LARP-ers, combined with the idea tha ''actually the 'normal' ones are the most dangerous'', is clearly not very redpilled. Also, there was no plot to be found and the timing is very suspicious. It was clumsily thrown together as an attack and a way to raise awareness: "see? white terrorism is rising! This is all very important and you should have attention for the *real* terrorist danger!!!"

Based af

Coriolanus is pretty based and certainly the most Cred Forums Shakespeare adaptation.

...

If it was meant as an attack on neonazis, it certainly wasn't a very effective one. The majority of what could be considered "attacks" basically boiled down to them not being effective enough - there's nothing in the film that addresses the ideology, and four or five scenes of the main character basically helping the white supremacists be better. If you wanted, you could cut about 15 minutes of footage and turn the plot into "Hyper-racist Daniel Radcliffe fights the ZOG, and almost succeeds."

I don't know why you think the idea that the normal ones are the most dangerous is "clearly not redpilled." The 'normal ones' were upstanding, decent human beings motivated by sincere and mature intellectual reasons. I forget the exact quote, but he basically says "white people invented civilization - just look at Africa today," and Radcliffe's character can say nothing to refute it.

I'm not saying it was intended, but to me it should be required viewing for anyone with white nationalist leanings. It's criticism, but mostly the constructive kind.

Apocalypse Now.

The old one not the shitty new one.
The one with arnold.

This might not be a popular response (the main character is a liberal NYT (((journalist)))), but The Killing Fields was pretty red-pilled in terms of what happens when communism wins. The Khmer Rouge in general are a great group to bring up the next time someone on the left proposes revolutionary violence as the solution to their political problems.

...

...

Did Edward Norton returns being a neonazi in the end?

This movie essentially says:

"Hate leads to more hate, so you shouldn't hate anything nor fight for anything because this doesn't make your life happier."

It's not a fucking redpilled movie, it's a conformist one. At least it manages to be somewhat decent and call out niggers as well.
But still.

Lord of the Rings
>men of the west
>chinks and arabs are invaders
>orcs are literally niggers
>greedy dwarves are jews, care only about themselves, wander around, have no home anymore
>socialist elves are almost extinct, faggots
>gandalf THE WHITE
>hobbits enjoying the simple and honest life, don't like change, the true conservatives, saved the world.

I agree, that is one way to look at it and it's certainly not an incorrect one. Still, another way to look at it (and probably the way it was meant to be experienced) is that the tattooed, protest marching and openly racist/slur shouting skinheads are, although dangerous, idiotic buffoons, whilst your right-leaning white neighbour with wholesome white wife+children could be building a nuclear weapon in his shed. The narrative of the movie is ''white people are dangerous''.

Apparently originally the film ended with him in the bathroom shaving his head but they cut it out "because it was too pro-nazi"

Yeah but then a nigger killed his little brother.

I fucking LOVE the first Conan. It plays out like a game of D&D. Conan multiclasses like crazy though.

(((American History X)))

who could be behind this???

Which is exactly why they made his character so unhinged and "crazy".

Problem is, his character was so strong and the acting so good that it had the opposite effect. There's pretty much nothing that he says that the left/Jews can dispute.

I'm not sure what their goal even was. It's like the script writer trolled them and they rolled with it.

If you're going to fight for something, fight in a constructive way, not destructive.

Hate only brings the first, not the latter, monkey.

That's the message of the movie, but "dont fight for anything" is far from it. See what the negro was doing in helping out blacks in his community.

Conan is essentially a barbarian thief. He often had tools to break into places and had to sometimes use his wits in a situation that he was out matched in strength in. Like the invisible lions circling the elephant tower, smashing the large spider by flinging a chest, to using a trap to kill Tak.

mein nigga

It was as far as pointing out the problems, (no one actually refuted any of Derrick's points, they couldn't, because he was right, that's why they all just got angry and criticised his delivery, but the movie even proved him right in most cases) but it showed that going about fixing the problems the wrong way can be just as destructive. It also showed there are self-serving shit heads in every movement who don't care about making things better, they care about themselves and use the movement as their vehicle.

Let's be honest here, Neo-Nazis can be just as bad as niggers. They both walk around and fuck up random people on the street because those people aren't "them". Regardless of their valid points about why they do it, people just focus on them being skinhead shit heads. What community full of Neo Nazis is a actually better because of them?

...

This is a very good movie. It's an Israeli Jew basically being red pilled about why non-Jews look down on Jews and him agreeing with how they could develop those feelings. Watch it.

This one is still in theaters, go see it Cred Forums. If it does well, we get more redpilled movies, and affect the culture.

Everybody conceal carries in the movie. Men aren't immasculated, and masculinity isn't shown as a bad thing. The commanche and white Rangers are partners and always bullshit with racist jokes but they're great friends, just like Cred Forums.

oh yeah and its anti-banks/establishment, shows that rural white small towns are being destroyed by the powers that be, etc.

I'm pretty sure the accuracy in his character is that racism can come from logical places and isn't just some caricature of hate and ignorance. Even if you use all the rationalizing in the world, it doesn't mean anything when it's fed into the same system of action that begets more shit like violence

Guy who got curb stomped deserved it tho

This. No one in the movie could refute Derrick's points, even his old teacher indirectly agreed with the reasons for his anger, but the point was HOW you go about trying to fix the problems. Niggers have problems so they act like niggers and it makes their problems worse. Same with the Neo-Nazis.
Is there never a time for fighting? No, but know when to do it and know the best way. Just chimping out without direction makes you no better than niggers and turns people away from your message, regardless of how valid it is.

The only thing based about that movie is the coke Charlie Sheen was snorting up his nose.

watch this movie with subtitles or so, it's worth it.

...

...

Why they didn't added that in deleted scenes?

...

looks like a bunch of FUCKING WHITE MALES