Why is selectively letting in immigrants bad exactly?

Turn your attention towards Sweden and Germany. Look at the tension between migrants and the public in Calais, France.

It's not. This is why Indian Americans are far smarter and more wealthy than Indians in general while Mexican Americans are just as shitty as normal mexicans.

Skilled whites should be able to come and go pretty easily imo. It's good for the economy, and well off whites don't want to stay unless they want to be citizens, in which case they create a lot of wealth for the country.

Doesn't bring in enough welfare dependents to vote liberal.

This is something spics will never understand. Even if a European was a laborer they were doing SKILLED labor. My Italian ancestors like many helped build the sewer systems and had "masonry" on their immigration papers.

Imagine how far back we would be if the Europeans just came here to cut grass or clean windows

>selectively
Key word right here

There was nothing selective about that process however.

Nothing. Immigration is the extremely selfish process of bolstering the quality of the average citizen in your nation by taking them from countries that desperately need them. You can't really control who gets born in your country, but you can control who comes in, meaning you can take the opportunity to increase the average.
Countries that do this have good legal immigrant populations. In the US, legal immigrants commit less crime than the citizens do.
Countries that do not do this have poor legal immigrant populations. In Sweden, immigrants commit the majority of crime. Swedes believe that immigration is a type of charity.

It's not, it's the way we've been doing it forever and only recently have the floodgates opened to the hordes of orange-carrying, pregnant mestizos.

It's not. Immigration policy should complement the labor market.

for the same reason being against ILLEGAL immigration is evil

Important detail.

Think of the damage mass migration to another country does to the country they're leaving.

I have a better question. Why is US still automatically granting citizenship to anyone born on US soil? Like, what the fuck, how does it make sense?

What's wrong with just having more children? Is stealing resources from your nations people really the answer? One immigrant is one too many.

Our immigrants were pretty good tbqh

F

because countries exist only to funnel food and consumer electronics into people for free didn't you know that's the entire point is to just give niggers everything for free that's what all those men died fighting for, that's what countless empires have been erected for to just give worthless pieces of shit free stuff.

It stops private prisons from profiting from the surge in crime.

When you only let in the top 3% of immigrants, you're draining other countries of their best people.

If that 3% of the population are white Europeans who can assimilate, things look pretty good for America, but not for Europe.

If that 3% are African doctors and engineers with western educations who can't assimilate, things don't look great for America, but spell absolute disaster for Africa.

In short, you shouldn't accept skilled immigrants from developing nations because those nations won't develop without these people.

Well keeping out niggers is pretty self evident. But if any Europeans want to come in there should be no restriction. Asians some. Hispanics less. Everyone else can fuck off. Did I mention no niggers? Yeah no niggers, in fact deport all the ones we have here on welfare and bribe their corrupt leaders to take them. Man this country would turn around over night.

the real question is.....why are we letting them in at all?

Why isn't Qatar or S. Arabia taking in these muslims

We don't have enough 3rd world illegal immigrants? We really need to be mommy and daddy to the whole fucking world?

>When you only let in the top 3% of immigrants, you're draining other countries of their best people.
you say that like its a bad thing this can be used as a weapon and a way to maintain geopolitical dominance

Fuck other countries.
Bring in only the best and kick out the worst.

Being against illegal immgration is smart you dumb ass.

THis

WE ARE LITERALLY JUST BRINGING IN LITERAL RETARDS

Oh wow so they end up in retail here what the fuck?

Europeans? The trash that slaughtered actual Americans? No thanks. There are already enough Euro trash faggot descendents here.

>you're draining other countries of their best people.

>If that 3% of the population are white Europeans who can assimilate, things look pretty good for America, but not for Europe.

If that 3% are African doctors and engineers with western educations who can't assimilate, things don't look great for America, but spell absolute disaster for Africa.

>In short, you shouldn't accept skilled immigrants from developing nations because those nations won't develop without these people.

this is how you win a immagration argument with a lefty

it isn't bad
It's just that the current immigration system of the US pretty much lumps together sandnigger dindus with university level europeans and on-top of that is waaaaaay too long-winded.

If I - a guy with a STEM degree from a proper austrian university - have to live in the US for 15 years in order to get all the citizen rights, why would I not just go to canada, where I get them after three years?

You guys should pretty much just take over their score system, if the canucks aren't good for anything else.

I guess it could be used for a political advantage to keep other countries down, but consider the weight it puts on us.
Every skilled African that we let in takes work away from an American who could have become skilled and done that job.

I agree with the "fuck other countries" sentiment, but I think a compassionate argument is good to bring the leftist "muh feels" crowd to your side.

I'm glad you think so.
I'd love to tell a lefty how much I fucking hate Africans, but this has more potential to change their vote.
Or atleast make them think.

Because it does nothing to solve the problem & makes things worse for the native population?

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Compelling argument.
It satisfies the humanitarian ideals and the nationalist ideals.

BECAUSE YOU CANT LET IN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS AND MILLIONS OF THIRD WORLDERS IN THAT WAY!!!

It's not

There is nothing wrong with this

Third-World savages are of no use to modern nations. They take resources that could be given to our own people.

BECAUSE ITS RAYCIS

There literally isn't any reason that one would accept immigrants, at least immigrants that aren't middle class. Absolutely no reason not to immediately gun down every single low class peasant that tries to cross the border like how Mexicans treat Guatemalans.

Once I become president of El Salvador the only races allowed will be:
>japanese
>Chink-taiwanese
>Korean
>Mongolian
>Coptic Christians
>Zoroastrians
>Eastern european women, No men

European men are weak faggots and their women are degenerates. No place for them in the new El Salvador.

Its not, when this action is control like in the picture you supplied. You have to control how many you receive so they can integrate and become a credit to the system, not a drain on the system. You also have to filter them so you keep the bad ones out, such as communists and mudslimes. These groups do not integrate and become a festering tumor in a healthy nation.

Yeah and turns this wild shithole into a fucking superpower. Pull your head out of your ass. Europeans made this country fucking amazing. Before it was a bunch a Indians living off the land and that was it. Europeans make life better and it's been proven time and again. The lefty liberal euro fags can stay though

Because you lose bargaining chips.

Like it or not we live in a global world where we use everybody including shit hole countries. Those shit hole countries in return for letting us do whatever demand that X amount of people get in to our countries. These demands are manipulated to say only so many poor/smart people can go over.

Combined with home politics, and you now know the secret behind immigration polices.

The people who migrated from europe to the US were already civilized. You can't compare that to the current invasion of 3rd world shitholes.

Implying anyone would want to live in that third world shithole you call country

It's not effective mean of destroying one country

>italians
>civilized

>comparing italians to muslim invaders
Italians may be weird, but they're not that bad.

I love this argument. "Legal immigrants commit less crime than the citizens do."

Take away the nigger and spic citizens please. The real citizens, whom the country was intended for are the backbone of the nation.

youtu.be/VXnAP6YUwZU
You might think that European countries are taking in refugees because they're "good" people but actually to get a a brain drain and get cheap labor from war torn Arab countries

>cheap labour
but only a itty bitty precent of the "refugees" ever work, most of them just leech off the healthcare systems that were originally made for actual citizens

Source

Jokes on you amerifat!
We are sending you all the scum that make of this beautiful country a "shithole".
Enjoy your MS13!

Anyone who thinks selectively letting in immigrants is bad and evil needs to be shown the facts that Germany, the highest population country in Europe is still less than 10% of the total population of China.

If only 1 in 10 people in China wanted to leave China for Germany, do you think German infrastructure could survive doubling it's population overnight?
The total population of Europe, including the poor former soviet block countries is still is still around half of China's population in total.

Similiar numbers can be found in India as in China.
These two countries alone, could completely crush any and every European nation's infrastructure with unrestricted immigration if they ever were inclined opening the floodgates.

Current number of Refugees worldwide is said to be around 50 million.
Now, refugees are naturally different from immigrants, there's no question about that.
However, any and all problems caused by refugees will feel like a drop in the bucket when a single percentage of either China and India's population is easily over 10 million people.

It used to be somewhat more difficult to illegally migrate here than it is now. Nowadays, global transportation is cheap and the process of acquiring a tourist Visa is easy so a 8.5 months pregnant woman from anywhere in the world who can scrape together less than $1k can come here and have her baby, giving that child legal US citizenship and providing an easy path for the rest of the family to legally immigrate to the US.

It was much more difficult when you had to spend weeks traveling across an ocean packed into the bowels of a boat like sardines.

>Take immigrants from a shitty country
>Only accept people who are:
>Not criminals
>Healthy
>Educated
>Resourceful
>Rich
>???
>Profit for us
>Shitty country becomes even shittier

It's called Brain Drain

I should've also pointed out that we don't really keep tabs on people who are here via tourist visas and basically allow them to stay as long as they want to as long as they don't commit a crime or do something else to draw attention to themselves.

Why are people so hellbent on emigrating when they can keep whatever national honor and pride they have left and fight to make their country better?

Because they've been taught that national pride is evil.

This.

>smart, strong, wealthy, independent citizens

>stupid, weak, impoverished and dependent subjects

Guess which one the government wants.

If you cant handle the immigrants at their worst, you dont deserve them at their best.

>this is how you win a immigration argument with a lefty

>they can keep whatever national honor and pride they have left and fight to make their country better?

Do you realistically think there is anything that you can say or do that will make the US better under any measurable metric? They probably just want to leave what they see as a shitty, hopeless situation and move to a "better place".

Why would someone born in a backwater bayou community in Louisiana who went on to get a PhD in High Energy / Particle Physics choose to go back and live in his/her hometown when they could move somewhere else and actually make a meaningful contribution with their knowledge/skillset? Would they be a shitty person for not going back to their hometown and spending their entire life trying to "make it better"?

>Syrians
>white

Maybe 2000 years ago, but most of them now are Arab rape babies