Why did the explosion of New York get so few coverage? I mean it's supposed to be the centre of the western world.
They barely mention it on the newspapers and it didn't get broadcasted either. I mean it seems that they are not giving it the importance that it has
James Rivera
You mean why did it get so much coverage? It was the lead story in all major English-language media outlets and no one fucking died. The story should be a page twelve notice about the incompetence and failing standards of terrorists. ISIS are resorting to using people who couldn't even pass Terrorism 101: An Intro to Being an Asshole.
Jackson Barnes
It's not part of the plan. You can tell cause the mayor wouldn't even call it terrorism at first.
Ususally they have names and organisation ready to spew in the MSM.
This time it's a real T with personal conviction and own device.
The meme is not prepped, that's why they're all silen.
Cooper Sanders
Right, cause only english mews media purrtain to bring the truth.
He's not ISIS. Th media would've known.
Matthew Johnson
Nobody died so it's not a big enough story.
Jackson Perez
What's surprising is the ISIS claimed mall attack that got almost nil coverage everywhere all of this "happened" to occur at the same time that the US bombed Syrian Army forces which led to ISIS taking over a strategic airport, good times all round
William Bennett
They know the election is at a tipping point and Trump is close to running away with it. Terrorist attacks scare voters into supporting le racist hitlerman who wants to ban all muslims. Therefore, this won't be called terrorism and the media treats it like it was no big deal, common as rain.
Liam Long
>hes not ISIS the media would have known god i hope this is bait
Daniel Gomez
>Why did the explosion of New York get so few coverage?
the big coverage only happens for events planned by the people who control the media
Thomas Wright
theyre too busy crying about racist frog memes
also making news reports on terrorist attacks is racist
Lucas Smith
It's too close to the election now and Hillary isn't leading anymore so (((they))) can't allow for any proTrump events to be leaked into the public ear.
Noah Ward
Nobody died or was even seriously hurt in the bombings. Just being some turban with a grudge isn't really newsworthy when everyone sleeps in their own bed that night.
Besides, what's the story? They only came up with a suspect in the last few hours. Prior to that there really wasn't much to say.
The stabbings I think should have gotten a little more coverage but honestly neither is all that big of a story. Pull your head out of your ass thinking we should have 24 hour coverage of hate muslims.
Luke Morales
The (((media))) knows that if the bomber was a terrorist it would only bring more support to trump.
So they try to bury it and hope no one notices.
Christopher Taylor
Because a Terrorist attack in America is devastating to the Hillary Campaign.
She'll loose her voters if she has to confront any problems with Immigration into the US.
The MSM collaborated to play down these attacks as much as possible.
Similar to how the Rotherham Abuse scandal never get's discussed in the UK because it's the elephant in the room
Adam Carter
because ((they)) realized when muslims terrorist attacks happend Trump is gaining points
Nolan Morgan
Whatever happened to the """""accidental""""" attack that the USA carried over the Syrian base that lead to an ISIS victory and eventual city take over?
What happened to the urgent being Putin called over at the UN?
Josiah Butler
Trump is the security candidate. Terror attacks make people want to vote Trump. The (((media))) are Hilary shills. Its not that complicated.
Chase Hernandez
>there are bombs plastered all over what's considered the centre of the West and it only came down to coincidences that no one got killed >how is that newsworthy? >meanwhile, red team beat blue team 90:76; kim k. wears nude dress to party; cartoon frogs conquer the world
Jace Murphy
fucking pro muslim shills in here..
>hey lets talk about syria >why should we talk islam
yeah right..bomber achmed 2.0 runs wild but hey that's not important at all
Connor Edwards
This was just a dry planting. This guy almost certainly wasn't working alone. These bombs were most likely planted in order to test the response times, who showed up, how many, how they dealt with them, etc.
These were test plants in order to prepare for the main attacks. There was no failure, because this wasn't an attack. It was a test.
Anthony Garcia
Terrorists get butthurt when they blow up something and no one cares. They're attention whorez. If they kill 100 people our response should always be to make fun of them for not being able to kill more.