Is there such a thing as alt-left? Personally...

Unemployement benefits shouldn't last forever like they do.

That's because the economy left failed for the most part. The Soviets collapsed and the Chinese are moving right. The only people left advocating far left economics are the people too stupid to see the writing on the wall.

Natsoc is sorta left in a way if you imagine the political scale as a large circle Natsoc and Communism are opposite ends but still close

Welfare to those who help society and aren't degenerate druggies taking up money or welfare leeches. Businesses can't just cuck workers but workers aren't cucking the business

That is what I'm saying. It's a PRIVILEGE, not a right. There are a lot of people who can't find a job and need unemployment or people like me who need state insurance b/c my job doesn't offer shit. BUT there are a bunch of degenerates who live off of it, have 50 kids and collect the checks, or have "depression" and need $5000 a month.

I agree with you on welfare, if people aren't super greedy it works, but social security is a scam.

we had that in Italy
people would even rotate when the jobs were scarce
of course they removed it

now people with no jobs are 13% of the popolation

>Fascism is farther right and more authoritarian than national socialism

>Friedman
>econimic left

Did it work well?

Hey I never made the thing I'm just pointing out far right and far left totalitarianism share many things and Natsoc and Fascism seem like they'll fit his idea

I mentioned him as an example of a neoliberal establishement if that wasn't clear.
So everything just depends on how carefully the state regulates its beneftis

Natcom when?

Is this file name accurate? I'm two dots up

Sjw IS alt-left
Challenge: describe sjw using standard political position terms

NEVER GAS THE REDS

Cultural Marxism

SJW's are the alt-left, standard left wing is like Hillary Clinton now.

octachan.net/leftypol/

Yes, in theory. In the United States, each state is suppose to be ran by it's local government and the governor of said state. The Federal Government shouldn't be as involved as they are. The very reason states have local governments was to prevent something like a "Central Federal Government".

Hillary Clinton is trying to make "welfare" a Federal thing for her own benefit. Also, too many people are taking advantage of their own medicare and raising the taxes of their neighbors. That is why alot of people don't like welfare.

>muh horshit theory
>muh identity politics are the problem
>muh Dems r real racists
Sargon of Cuckad fags pls go

the alt-right has room for welfare, we're primarily concerned with ethnic interests, racial homogeneity in white ethno-states, and the Jewish question. Economically, we support whatever works under the circumstances; we aren't dogmatists about one form of government over another, but we are skeptical of liberalism and democracy, because they're vulnerable to subversion.

National Socialism is a very, very basic example of "third position" ideology popular on the alt-right:

>“’Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.
>Our adopted term ‘Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.”
-- Adolf Hitler 1938

>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
ub.edu/graap/EHR.pdf
>townhall.com/columnists/brucebartlett/2004/01/16/hitler_and_keynes
>jstor.org/stable/4401913?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
>mises.org/library/three-new-deals-why-nazis-and-fascists-loved-fdr
youtu.be/pKnFN8P21-0

i reported you for advertising another chan bitch

>Unironically calling yourself the alt-right

Yes, although that's mostly because National Socialism is different in ways that the test doesn't really account for.

dont be gay

...

>arguments detected: none
ummm...implying "there is no alt-right"? Is that this weeks spicy meme?

this one's better

You are a national socialist. That makes you alt-right. Welcome to the fuit basket. Don't mind the onion and the carot.

Cultural marxism is far left
It involves having a single world culture at the loss of current culture
Sjws are doing something crazier
Removal of you and only you (christian white males)
And keeping multiple separate cultures
Like a 4th reich, and you're the jew

Has anyone really called themselves alt-right in the past anyway? It kind of seems like Hillary made it up to rile up her supporters.

Fascism is more right wing then natsoc, especially in terms of economic freedom.

>alt-right
>modern age propaganda
>Russia isn't rigging our election with cartoon frogs on a Malaysian bamboo leave weaving forum.

the future is weird, huh guys?

it was a thing

Is this a case of "literally who"?

yeah

it was a thing when my father worked, so 20-30 years ago
he said that it was a good thing because even though there was less freedom for the businessmen, everyone (and for everyone i mean people that worked low-class jobs) was able to work

i dunno if for the economy was a good thing, but at the same time i cannot see it as bad
there are countries that can live well with some degree of socialism such as this, but it must not go out of hand

You might be interested to know the Wikipedia page was only created for this in January.

Now:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right

First article:
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alt-right&oldid=702509088

Really made me think...

There is an 'alt-right', but you shouldn't want to be a part of it. Cred Forums certainly isn't. It's a stupid name in the first place. Cred Forums works well because there is no name, there's no easy way to describe what happens here. That's our greatest weapon. The Jews thrive off of materialism, and the alt-right is just their attempt to materialize, quantify, and make relative what goes on here.

Ya, don't let the alt-right define what the alt-left is. SJW are alt-left and just as retarded as their mirror the alt-right.

Fake and gay

Cred Forums is just a bunch guys who like slurring

>Communism without identity politics

You do know that communism is based on the existence of identity politics, right? The fact that "equality" is forced and protected classes.

I always end up in that area and I feel like every answer I give is non-degenerate.

Basically, yeah. Richard Spencer coined the term, and a few blogs and editorial websites were part of the alt-right.

The problem is that alt-right has no leaders or a firm ideology. Neoreactionaries, paleoconservatives, white nationalists, HBD people, and even some libertarians are all arguably alt-right.

It's a chaos structure, not a hierarchy. Social capital is entirely worthless in the (((alt-right))). These are features, not bugs. There's no leadership to besmirch or villify, just a formless army of boogeymen in the shadows and a frog. A common sense societal mandate is the leader of the movement and that's not easily uprooted.