Christianity is not compatible with white nationilsism

In the same way Islam isn't compatible with liberal democracy, Christianity isn't compatible with white nationalism. Christianity in it's truest form advocates equality before the eyes of god. That means that you have to treat everyone who is a believer as an equal, regardless of color. Christianity asks you to turn the other cheek and show kindness to ones enemy. All these things are contrary to white nationalist. IF you are a white nationalist and christian you are being cognitively dissonant.

Other urls found in this thread:

torontosun.com/2016/09/14/trudeau-says-canada-has-no-core-identity
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Christ Cucks BTFO

>Christianity the bloodiest religion on the entire planet
>advocates equality

They had to hold a fucking council meeting to change doctrine and creed to justify having wars.

Im Christian and a white nationalist. I love all the children of god (Christians) but i think we should divide in different cultures. You know, that White Nationalism isn't about hating everyone who isn't white? White nationalism is about loving the white race and to respect the other races and their cultures. Nationalism teaches Love, not Hate!

You should read E Michael Jones' new book, Ethnos Needs Logos

Lol. Stop talking in double speak. White nationilism at its core is based on the idea that one prefers whites over others.

>the idea that one prefers whites over others.

It's the idea that whites prefer whites over others.

Regardless it is contrary to christian doctrine.

>American talking about nationalism
A good joke. Run along, Magog. Your people are doomed.

>UK
>calling someone else doomed

Yeah. I guess we're all going to have to pick a side.

Christianity kept the Muslims out of Europe for 1400 years though so if you actually care about white nations you'd be better off putting a lid on that shit and following our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

The Pantheon stands. We remove the Christian filth and atone. Simple enough.

If the old gods are alive and well on a Mongolian throat singing forum, surely they're listening. A statue of the great mother herself was unearthed recently.

True Nationalism wants everyone live with and to love their race. True Nationalist want to build a homeland for Whites, Blacks, Asians, etc.

Disgusting Southern Euro Gods. Egyptian Gods are the true ones. KEK is a KANG god.

Only the adherents of the desert trilogy invoke the mosaic distinction -- that is, that there is only one true god. Akhenaten was nearly erased from history for trying to force Atenism on Egypt.

You guys are like jews with all this veiled language. Ethno-nationilism stems from either a hatred of either races or a view that ones is inherently superior.

civil nationalism is the only nationalism that has ever worked.

>Mongolian throat singing

kys cuck. faggot plebbitors like youself thinks irreverence to our chan culture isn't a sin.

Op is right because hitler did wanna ban religion but realized this was not a politcally good move and let it stay. He also wanted to only use the new testament because he thought the old one was to brutal. Being a nationalsocialist and believe strongly in a jewish god, with a jewish prophet is dumb.

...

>inb4 anti-canada shitposting

Civil nationalism> than all other nationalism.

Learn some history, sven.

Hitler wanted to remove christianity from Germany and he tried and tried and tried. He wanted to instill pagenism. He couldn't because though many germans weren't like strongly pro/anti NatSoc, they would organize strongly enough if the church was under attack.

>He also wanted to only use the new testament because he thought the old one was to brutal

That doesn't make sense though. The OT has all the nationalist shit that kept Jews isolated from the 'savages', and the Tower of Babylon can be seen as an example of multiculturalism failining.

The NT is much more pacified and hippyfied e in comparison

this is you proving that you need to go back. I fucking hate our new friends, le refugee from plebbit.

torontosun.com/2016/09/14/trudeau-says-canada-has-no-core-identity

>“There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada,” Trudeau said, concluding that he sees Canada as “the first post-national state.”

How is this an argument against my point in any way.

You can't have civil nationalism in a post-national state, can you.

Great. That's still not an argument against my point that civil nationilism is superior to all other forms of nationilism.

Because Sven is lying. Hitler was against christianity wholesale. Sven doesn't want to admit he suffers from such cognitive dissonance. The fact is, Hitler saw the church, christian authority, the legitimacy the theologies had, as a threat to National Socialism because there was no way, at the time in germany, to put NatSoc a tier above more legitimate than the church.

Also since theology is driven by the religious community, that community is by nature transnational, again, and voices from that community can and did offer scathing criticism of NatSoc on the grounds of it being neo-pagan. The rheoric of jews being inferior, the anti-semitism, wasn't the real hinderance of NatSoc in germany. The real threat was the whole notion that NatSoc wasn't compatible to the most legitimate belief system amongst the germans: it wasn't christian.

see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mit_brennender_Sorge

White nationalism biggest existential crisis is Christendom.

I'm an atheist and what you're saying isn't really clear. It is explicitly stated in the bible that God created the different nations and it furthermore states that there is a separation between Church and state, which means that you could have all sort of political program while still being Christian, provided you are charitable toward those THAT DESERVE IT.

So you might be wrong.

Well you can play to biology, or run your citizens through a gauntlet of propaganda to enforce notions of equality despite the dissonance that will inevitably develop as people realize that such things can't be true. One of these is easier to implement and less vulnerable to fifth columnists.

Any christian who supports an ethnostate is violating christian doctrine. Living in an ethnostate out of compulsion is one thing. Actually advocating it is where one violates doctrine.

Even if people aren't equal you can still have civic nationilism.

It's entirely possible that ethno states are more conductive of people's overall happiness and I do not see how bringing disorder, chaos, discontent and conflict to your society is in any way Christian.

The best example of a multi ethnic society in the bible is that of the Babylonian and they were cursed for their overall arrogance.

Blacks in America tell a different story. Uyghurs in China tell a different story. All rabble rousing wastes of resources.

hey, where did you find that article? did you save it on your plebbit account?

Canada has nationalism, but canadian nationalism has always been different from the looks of nationalism in america. The cuck from plebbit wont acknowledge this, because our new friend is low iq.

In canada, we were a nation of 3 peoples (injun, french and brit). Nationalism is civil because it is, again, a love for the nation as is, it can't be ethnic. And the nature of civil nationalism in canada is that, it doesn't matter on creed or whatever, but as long as you love your country, you are a canadian. It's a nationalism that depends on stewardship.

The bible said god divided people because when the people were organized by one tongue, they were building things in an affront to god. Also separation of Church and state never existed until the church power eroded in europe. The bible said we are all governed within the kingdom of God.

Swallow the Orthodox pill and grab your rope.

>strawman non-argument

>The best example of a multi ethnic society in the bible is that of the Babylonian and they were cursed for their overall arrogance.

They were only cursed because they weren't a nation under God. I think your understanding of christianity is lacking bro.

If you are a christian, the black church, the white church, you are all people equal under God's eyes. Ethnicity in china is also very different from how it is in America, another bit of evidence that you are speaking out of your asshole.

Christianity does not care about overall happiness. Most religions don't. Religions or deontological in nature not utilitarian. Christianity asks and praises self-sacrifice and the enduring of pain to follow doctrine.

Orthodox christianity can't support ethno-nationilism. Ironically the only western religion that would allow for an ethno-state is judaism. Islam and Christianity forbid division along ethnic lines.

>If you are a christian
Not even remotely.

Anyone advocating the abolition of nations in this world is a follower of the worldly religion of Babel, not Christianity.

We can all be united in Jesus Christ, but his Kingdom is not of this world.

So improve it and agree to an exception, social nationalism time is now.

And yet, Catholicism is an inherently Euro-centric religion, and has clear Pagan references an influences.

Maybe it is. The fact is that I'm not a Christian and in so far as Christianity truly advocates for a multi ethnic society it must be eliminated. Moreover, it will be anyway because it's inviting Islam in which will literally destroy any remnant of it.

You're pretty much just a public danger at this point. (Or some minority, in which case you're just playing for the other team.)

Being part of one tribe doesn't mean you hate the other tribes. But when the other tribes start fucking you up and getting in the way then it's time to do something. If all the Jews moved to Israel and didn't bother anyone, then what reason would we have to hate them? Same as if all black people stayed in Africa and so forth. if there are people within a country who do not support that country, then it is in the best interest of the country to eliminate them. Either get rid of them or force them to assimilate and become supporters

>admits to not knowing shit about christianity
>goes on to speculate about the implications of specific christianity theology details
>admits not knowing shit
>and yet speculates on shit he doesn't know
>and concludes speculation as valid?

>qualify my posts by saying that I'm not sure that what I'm saying is right
>use words like "maybe"
>acknowledge that you may be right but that if you are then it's a flaw in Christianity

Either Christianity supports the concept of nations and robust societies or it's complete garbage senpai.

Thats why Cred Forums must start claiming to be Identitarian, and not nationalsit, it's basically the same, but with the respect of all the cultures and traditions.

Islam is a good deal more bloody and yes, Christianity advocates equality

>white nationalism
(((whiteness))) is a jewish meme made to dilute ethnical, cultural and religious idenities in America's melting pot, and white nationalist movement is controled oposition carried out by useful idiots, good bye