I get you guys might like some of his policies or something, but come on even Cred Forums is smarter than this. Or am I being trolled and is the widespread trump love here just a lulz thing? Like, you guys just want him to win for the shitstorm and not because anyone ACTUALLY thinks it's a good idea, right?
Why are you posting out of character you fucking newfaggot
Ayden Gonzalez
Hillary is worse than any candidate ever. Go kill yourself for trying to even help her.
Thomas Parker
>Or am I being trolled and is the widespread trump love here just a lulz thing?
Yes Cred Forums is satire. This is all an elaborate meme here. Don't worry about it to much.
Now leave this place and never return. Stay away from here!
Zachary Martin
Trump says a lot of off-the-script stuff. It proves he is a human, and has joy, fear, anger and resolve - just like the rest of us on this planet. Every other politician is just some fucking puppet that spews the same shit every 4 years, and this is true no matter the country. This is the one time you have the chance to change where things are heading, don't fuck it up America.
Sebastian Hall
>waterboarding >""""torture""""
Easton Clark
>newfaggot >$0.02 cents have been deposited into you're account. Thank you for correcting the record
Brayden Thomas
I mean, like, I just cannot even
Oliver Thomas
trump is a person, hillary is not problem solved, your a fag
Asher Martin
I clicked on a link saying trump said he will declare a world war. In the article all he said is that the terror attacks are happening all over the world and were at war with islamic terrorism.
Nicholas Roberts
CTR doesn't work for trump shithead.
Noah Rivera
Also just scrolling through this I can see that a lot of them are false like the Hillary Jew star meme. Including things like this means I cannot trust any of it since the poster is either brain-dead or has no integrity whatsoever, and none of the sources are trustworthy because they shill the same shit.
Michael Harris
I mean, like, I just cannot even
Ethan Martin
The problem with Trump is how much he loves to suck jew dick. Even his kids are married to jews. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is a crypto-kike.
Zachary Jenkins
I would say 50% of the Trump love is just for the lulz. I really don't think he'd make a good president, bit I'm not voting for $hillary, and I'm morbidly curious to see what will happen
Gavin Butler
>Trump says a bunch of stuff that any other president would deny, and then do anyways and try to hide it from the public
I like him even more now. Tough shit.
Jacob Kelly
>citing politifact in unironic discourse
Wyatt Adams
Refuting all of this trash is a waste of time but I will respond to the first statement about Trump calling for the murder of innocent women and children in the first link provided, which I all I was able to digest before becoming overwhelmed with nausea.
It is worth mentioning that under the Obama administration, there have been many war crimes and deaths of innocent people. The predator drone accuracy rate is something near 50 innocent (including women and children) for each enemy combatant. The president actually jokes about killing such children here:
In the link provided there is a clip of Trump saying he would be "strong" and "tough" with family members of terrorists. His example provided was one where bombs were constructed in plain sight of family members, where a reasonable person would know that they are harboring a terrorist. In such cases it is probably disingenuous to label these people "innocent". Furthermore, he did not say exactly what measures he would adopt to deter such behavior (that is conducive to terrorism), although alluded that he would not have allowed them to return to their homes in the middle east. Even if it were the case, capital punishment of people harboring terrorists that have killed civilians wouldn't be an irrational response.
Levi Morales
>half of it are great proposals >other half are liberals rags that don't even have the decency of quoting him
Levi Brooks
The amount of mental gymnastics here is deplorable.
I remember him saying to specifically go after the families of terrorists.
To equate his policy idea to a joke at a white house dinner about coming after well known celebrities is a laughable false equivalence.
In this link provided you will hear him advocating to quote "take out their families."
In fact he says it multiple times.
So you can make all the parameters you want when you say:
>In the link provided there is a clip of Trump saying he would be "strong" and "tough" with family members of terrorists. His example provided was one where bombs were constructed in plain sight of family members, where a reasonable person would know that they are harboring a terrorist. In such cases it is probably disingenuous to label these people "innocent". Furthermore, he did not say exactly what measures he would adopt to deter such behavior (that is conducive to terrorism), although alluded that he would not have allowed them to return to their homes in the middle east. Even if it were the case, capital punishment of people harboring terrorists that have killed civilians wouldn't be an irrational response.
But let's get real here. He literally said to "take out" their families.
Xavier Gomez
>muh sandnigger lives matter
Robert Watson
Nice meme.
Good rebuttal.
Caleb Allen
>((((politifact))))
Oliver Martinez
don't care to try and change your opinion, i know i wont, just remember that you literally put foreign terrorist lives above the lives of americans if you vote clinton
Ayden Baker
...
Jeremiah Baker
Hahahahaha I've never seen such a low energy sub reddit. Stuff in enough trump spam is top page with like 70 upboats, while nothing on the_donald on top page is below a couple thousand.
Xavier Stewart
Another false equivalence.
There is literally a sticky on this board laying out fallacies to stay away from.
Again, I see the true worth of your political views. Clearly you can support them with sound reasoning.
Kayden Anderson
I stated a fact about casualties of predator drones that include women and children, and that he made a joke about it.
The OP's link was different than yours, but I also said capital punishment of people harboring terrorists isn't irrational. You can argue with me about that if you like.
Before that, I would like to know what you think about the Syrian children killed in predator drone strikes under the Obama administration. Furthermore, what do you think about the president making a joke about killing children with predator drones, considering he has killed children with predator drones?
Kevin Martinez
>getting confused by Cred Forums taqiyya
Nicholas Anderson
I think the situation in Syria is a bit more complex than to solely blame the use of predator drones. However I think we need to come up with a better way of deploying these things to avoid civilian casualties.
Capital punishment for merely harboring a fugitive is tyrannical. Prosecuting and jailing? Sure. Capital punishment should be reserved for the terrorist who actually committed the act of terror, not the mother who just wants to hide her idiot son. I think it would be a bit of a stretch for the government to murder my parents if I was staying in their home while acting out a terror plot. Especially if it is homegrown terror by our citizens. It's not irrational to kill people harboring terrorists if say they are terrorists themselves. But this would have to be looked at thoroughly and to do that would require a boondoggle of a system of checks and balances amongst military personnel.
And Obama literally never joked about killing children because the Jonas Brothers were adults at this time. No where in his joke does he say we have killed kids before. He's making an overprotective dad joke at an event that is never used for in serious policy discussions.
Donald Trump literally made a proposal to kill the families of terrorists in a serious answer in an interview. There is a huge difference.
Again, false equivalence is a logical fallacy.
Also Obama never joked about murdering children.
Evan Jenkins
This picture sums it up pretty well.
Although not sure if Trump is in favor of environmental regulations as a climate change denier.
Also daily reminder Trump is anti vaccine as well.