DRUMPF ABSOLUTELY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY STUMPED. HOLY FUCKING SHIT

Yep. Comments like these are absolutely unacceptable.

thanks, my record needed correcting

...

Obligatory SJWs did it first

Wow, this really fires up my electric pulse that travels down the axon until it reaches the synapses, where it then causes the release of neurotransmitters. The synapses are extremely close to the dendrites of the target neuron. This allows the neurotransmitters to diffuse across the intervening space and fit into the receptors that are located on the target neuron. This causes some action to take place in that neuron that will either decrease or increase the membrane potential of the neuron. If it increases the membrane potential (makes it more positive, or depolarizes it.) then it is exciting the neuron, and if it decreases the membrane potential (makes it more negative, or hyper-polarizes it.) then it is inhibiting the neuron. If it causes the membrane potential to pass the firing threshold then it will activate an action potential in the target neuron and send it down its axon.

the study's called WWIII and it will be fought in India

Wow!
My mind = changed
My record = corrected

You guys have won! There is no need to post on Cred Forums anymore. You changed all of our minds!!

I used to be back to back 100m hurdles national champion, but after reading this my record has been nullified and completely corrected. I now #runupthehill

>10.9 billion

how

>go ahead, eat a HANDFUL
Whores.

wtf i hate Trump now!

I guess i'm now a #shillforill

We do have ID's here
But thanks for CTR

>Image name
Kek'd, whats up with liberals and senseless numbers?

>10.3 billion muslims want to migrate to the US

I don't understand this at all.
Theres no reason to the post, its just a half complete analogy with a big ol tub of skittles.

>trump is smaller than 11,000,000,000 skittles

>10.9 billion

What's the fucking point? There aren't even that many people in the world. Or did they adjust it for number of normal Skittles for poisoned ones? But they don't say how many there were in the original picture.

This just sucks from so many different angles. Just like leftists and muslims.

I think they're saying that you'd need 10.9 billion refugees before you found one terrorist. No I'm not making this shit up.

But there aren't even 10.9 billion people in the world

what did they mean by this?

SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Dey räjjjjzziz!

Imagine diving into all those skittles

Wtf does that even mean

you're right. this skittles comment is literally worse than getting killed by islamic terrorists. It only makes sense that we let all American hating muslims in to our beautiful diverse country

Before you found 3 terrorists*

Basically 1 terrorist per 3.63333 repeating billion refugees.

WHO WOULD WIN???

DONALD TRUMP

OR

10.9 BILLION SKITTLES

>10.9 billion
wut?

>thefrogman.me

wut

Wow, they really suck at math, don't they?

It's more like a bowl of 1 billion Skittles of which several hundred thousand will kill you, and another 500,000,000 will just give you incredibly bad stomach pain and ulcers.

Can't tell if trolling or actually this stupid

Now imagine 100 million of them are poisonous to the touch

How many walls and hats have Trump?
The skittles are brown or red or a combination of all?

They strawmanned it they are comparing it to the chance that you will die by a terrorist not the chance they will be a terrorist.

My record is still corrected though.

It's amazing how the fact that women are less likely to get raped in college than in the real wolrd is deemed unimportant.

They didn't scale the amount of poison skittles with the amount of good ones

Trump has one wall and fout hats

There are all the colors of skittles but they have no bowl to protect them

They didn't even argue the point, they're arguing the numbers. How is this even a thing?

I think there's a mistake in that math somewhere down the line.

Do you remember at the end of WWII, how the Germans recruited every male between the age of 16 and 60 to join their suicidal cause, even knowing the war was already over?

It's exactly like that, except with CTR shills.

All of the shills who were worth their shekels left a long time ago. That's why shill quality is so bad these days. That's why they are reduced to such abhorrent copy/paste standards.

They don't have anything left in the tank.

earth population is 7.125 billion not 10.9 billion

>>Liberal math off by 3 and a half billion

I don't get it....

There are more refugees than humans?

What even is this?

Only because 6 billion died in the holocaust

What am I looking at

>Let’s just first clarify that analogizing refugees to nuggets of artificially flavored fruit candy is dehumanizing in every sense. The candy’s parent company, Wrigley, was quick to point this out: "Skittles are candy," wrote its spokesperson. "Refugees are people." Hundreds of others took to Twitter and posted images of refugees, alongside the caption "Not a Skittle."

>But there is at least one other major problem with Trump's visual: It insinuates that the risk posed by admitting refugees into the United States is much larger than it actually is.

>Let’s do some Skittle math!
>The image posted by Trump pictures a small bowl containing perhaps 100 Skittles. Assuming that three of said Skittles could kill you, eating a handful from this tiny bowl would, indeed, be risky.

>Here’s the thing, though: The image drastically oversells the "risk" posed by these Skittles (read: refugees).

>A report released last week by the Cato Institute measured the risk to Americans posed by refugees. The report found that an American’s chances of being killed by a refugee in a terrorist attack in any given year are 1 in 3.64 billion. America’s murder rate Eat 4.5 per 100,000 capita Eis about 163,800 times higher.

>As the Washington Post’s Philip Bump points out, adhering to Trump’s analogy, a bowl with three deadly Skittles (refugees) in it would need to contain 10.93 billion Skittles. Bump calculated this to be the equivalent of 1.5 Olympic-size swimming pools full of the candy. This would equate to a bowl of Skittles roughly 246 feet long, 123 feet high, and 9 feet deep.

They admit that some of them will be terrorists.

>10.9 billion
there are not even 7 billion on earth, are liberals just blatantly ignoring well known facts now?

If there is no bowl, Trump can easily run away of them and then eat them slowly

>pew_research.jpeg

not only that, they assume all 7 billion people are muslims.
hey wait, I think I just figured out the liberals end-game

someone got paid to Write this vox.com/2016/9/20/12986886/donald-trump-jr-terrorist-skittles-wrong

Don't forget the 10.5 billion that died trying to flee war.

>He thought liberals were realistic

Those only two terrorists must be pretty busy.

interesting question you bring up; how many jews COULD the earth take - what's the planet's critical yid?

And they don't scale it correctly. If 3 out 100 is terrorists, that means 3% of 10.9 billion would be terrorists.

And another disingenous thing is that they are using ALL refugees in the bowls instead of comparing only Muslims.

>Note: Several readers have argued that Trump Jr.'s tweet solely refers to Syrian refugees. In that case: Since October of 2015, the United States has admitted roughly 8,000 Syrian refugees. Not one has committed an act of terrorism. That's zero deadly Skittles.

How convenient of them to ignore Europe and skew the statistics to claim zero attacks.

Yep. Keep making retarteded comments like this, Trump family. You're only dividing AMERICANS and we SEE THROUGH YOUR LIES. Hope you're enjoying those polls tanking!

It's a fucking analogy you tard

I'm pretty undivided, m8

From what I gather, they based it on the one terrorist in NY out of the entire muslim population of the earth and scaled it to three (the number of skittles in the post) terrorists.

Yeah, it's retarded.

It completely ignores all the other terrorists that have already attacked, compares one attack to an entire population rather than just the immigrants the attacker came from and ignores the possibility that there could be many more terrorists that have yet to come out of hiding and commit atrocities.

How many skittles would you need before you had a whole skittle that hated women, gays and athiests. about 1.2 skittles?

We're not declining

the point is they are skittles, you dont need them anyway, dont matter the odds.. just ban them out of your diet and ban them out of inmigration!

One violent act is one too many

Or do they think one rape is okay?

Where the fuck do they even come up with this shit?

Only 3 in 10.9 billion muslims are radical terrorists? There aren't even 2 billion muslims, yet hundreds of thousands are radical, so where the fuck do they get this math? And the only reason Americans kill more Americans than terrorists do is because niggers are included in that statistic. But of course the left only brings up black on black crime when it fits their rhetoric.

And it still does NOTHING to argue against why we have to take in these refugees in the first place. It's cheaper, more logical, more resourceful, easier, and more economical to help the people there instead of bringing them here.

The equivalent would be taking all the African starving people as refugees. Yeah, it helps them, but it's easier and you help more people helping them there. And that's assuming we should help them at all.

And it also ignores the elephant in the room. Why are we against Assad and destabilizing the country in the first place?

there are 1.6 billion muzzies, there are still more christians for fuck sake

That image is so fucking retarded

>You say not all women lie about rape
>Imagine a bowl of M&M's
>10% of them are poisoned
>Go ahead. Eat a handful
>Not all M&M's are poison
>#FullOfShit

How do they say this retarded shit with a straight face? Three terrorists on 10.9 billion people, half again Earth's population? There are more terrorists than that in 10.9 million people, regardless of which population you pick.

This is fucking ridiculous. These people ought to be shot for making such a travesty of statistics. Not even kidding.

The fuck? The likely hood of dying to a terrorist is not the same as the likelihood of a given refugee being a terrorist. What an utterly false comparison.

WTF? This actually supports the message.

10.9 billion skittles and less than (lets say) 1% of them will kill you, would you eat them? Fuck it, if just one of them will kill you would you eat them?

More than half of all Muslims have radical, violent views and the vast majority of them are anti-Western, and anti-Western values.

Kill yourself.

I don't know if these people are trolls or actual newfag liberals that came here because our increased popularity. Poe's fucking law.

I'm guessing the 10.9 figure is supposed to represent all Muslims which makes absolutely know sense when there isn't even that many humans on Earth, but what Jr. is talking about is a small subset of the Muslim population (Syrians). So congrats to liberals for not understanding analogies.

My record = Corrected!

Thanks, exactly what I needed!

OHHH there comparing chances of each individual has to dieing from a Refugee instead of the ratio of refugees that are either terrorist/aid terrorist.

Holy Shit that's some tricky as fuck statistics. What absolute bullshit.

Refugees Poison Refugees Poison Refugees Posion

We will stump them this time.

Dont call all muslims terrorists call all muslims terrorists all muslims terrorists muslim terrorists

We will stump him this time.

Like a fiddle boys all too easy.

>graphic is confusing without a several paragraph text explanation
>it's still stupid even with the explanation

Should've just used a straight up terrorist:refugee comparison.

They aren't saying 3 in 10.9 billion are terrorists, they're saying that you have a 3 in 10.9 billion chance (as an American) of being killed by terrorist action.

Yes Vox is that stupid.

>Imagine diving into all those skittles

Half of those Skittles are M&Ms.

FUCKING STOP POSTING THIS SHIT LEAF
WE JUST TOLD YOU IN THE LAST THREAD
YOUR YOUTUBE NIGGER MUSIC IS NOT WANTED .

>Is there nobody on that could just ban this piece of shit into the dirt then piss into the hole?

ill ask again, are you as ashamed of yourself as your ancestors are?

that's not what im talking about you retard, i'm saying that the left is trying to say there are metric shittons of muzzies everywhere
I know full well that over half of muds are fucking radicals, what I was saying is that there are still more Christians and so we outnumber them, but these stupid cocksucking libtards act like they outnumber everyone, or there are somehow JUST SO MANY OF THEM #NOTALLMUSLIMS BUT #YESALLCHRISTIANS

In the context of refugees, even if 0 were poison I still wouldn't eat them, because there's no benefit to doing so.

>10,9 bio refugees

does this pic has comments?

Thanks

seconding, where the fuck do they get 10 billion fucking muds

Why are shills obsessed why some analogy no one gives a fuck about? It's not like it's gonna change anyone's vote. Dumb asses.

>10.9 billion skittles
>world population, including non-refugee countries is 7 billion
wait so ISIS also attacked Mars and we're now getting 3 billion refugees from Mars?

remember, it's these same idiots that made the analogy to begin with.

fuck you need to stop it.
your rap music youtube is not wanted.
you are being rejected by the fucking gutter of the internet. do you know how sad and mixed up mess of a person it takes to achieve that?

It's because Hillary is back in the news for being an incompetent criminal.

therefore skittles is a big outrage, first it was a cartoon frog, now its skittles

>3 gorillion ayy lmaos
>LMAO REDUMBLICANS WHY DON'T YOU ACCEPT SPECIES FROM OTHER PLANETS? ARE YOU A BIGOT?
you know they will do this shit

B-but there are only 7 billion people in the world. Wtf?

Fucking bad statistics. That's what the left excells at. It's honestly scary and pathetic at the same time how incredibly good they are at the mental gymnastics to the point where they reduce the world terrorist population to fucking two and a half.

That's it, boys. Pack it in. We won the war on terror, because according to the WaPo there are only 2 and a half of them left, and what's that halfman going to do, anyway?

Is anyone stupid enough to fall for this? There are only 1-2 billion muslims and they murder a lot more than .2 people per year.

and only 1.6 billion of them are muslims
they inflated it like 10x over for reasons?

>10%
It's more like .001% and I would eat a handful.

>10.9 billion
>total Earth population around 7.4 billion

>we reduced the terrorist population to Ahmed, Abdul and Muhammad the cripple

this is what liberals actually believe

you dirty whore

this canadian nigger
is going from thread to thread posting this garbage over and over. its (rap music video) and he's been socially conditioned to drink mud people cum.
>you sad faggot, i only i could put you down for the sake of your parent's dignity.

>here are 11 billion skittles
>two-thirds of them will support enslaving you under sharia law
>go ahead, eat a handful

And 160 million of them terrorists

0 is the maximum before collapse

Still wouldnt take a handful if one could kill me desu senpai

>11 billion skittles
>3 billion of them will kill you
>"see, goy, it's totally safe, take a handful"

>10.9 billion Syrian refugees.

I wish.

>what's the planet's critical yid?

>"not all ayy lmaos anal probe!"
>"ayy lmao lives matter!
>"no Mulder you're being alienist!"

>NotAllSkittles
You raycist faggot

Yeah, I got that, but that is a twisted as fuck way of presenting statistics, because that is not what the original image posted by Jr was even fucking saying.

The fucking mental gymnastics these people go through in order to feel they are in the right for destroying their own country are ridiculous...

Is this leaf gore or common core?

>160 million terrorists
terrorists yeah, but i'd wager 1.4 billion of them hold extremist views, such as honor killings, oppressing women, and killing gays

>Ahmed, Abdul and Muhammad the cripple

Honestly, it has meme potential.

oh god I read that as
>not all anal probes
at first

3/5 rule in reverse. World population is 7 billion, but every noble diverse person of colour counts for five thirds of a white cis male.

You have to love how they reduce the threat of terrorism to purely the risk of dying, but in the meantime work on hate speech laws.

good banter brit, i laughed, worst part is it's actually believable.

Inshallah, kaffir, don't forget the 11 billion!

...

so basically out of 1.6 billion muds we can assume that at least 200 million of them are terrorists
jesus fucking christ

>Since we've had zero terrorists so far that means none of the Syrian refugees will ever be terrorists
>hurr how do probabilities work

This
2HOT to handle 2COLD to hold.

>zero of them have committed crimes
uh huh yeah i'm sure
anyone have that article about how the 27 they admitted into Japan, 3 of them are in jail for rape?

read the reply dumbass

>there are 10.9 billion refugees

i am legitimately at a loss for words with how stupid this is.

>Saudi Arabia 4%
All the royals?

The chances of you dying by terrorist attack increase with the number of terrorists you let into the country.

>more terrorists = more attacks = more deaths.

Unlike with the migrant crisis, where Afghans, Libyans, and Eritreans migrants get classed as "refugees" they have chosen to to hold extremely close to the actual definition of refugee to do their calculations.

This is how progressives operate. Words mean whatever is most convenient to their current argument. Control the language and you control the debate.

>(((Cato Institute)))

who could be behind this study?

>mfw leftards are THIS fucking triggered by a silly, yet on-point analogy

And these look like low estimates, to be honest.

lmao did djr post the pol edit

yup, that is indeed the lowball, and we are not even counting the ones that won't kill us but want to oppress us anyway

I still wouldn't want to take a handful

i'd rather dump them down the garbage disposal

You agreed with each other no way. What do you want from me. Kill yourself dick I was agreeing with both of you

>10.9 billion

I don't get it. He didn't mention muslims, he only mentioned refugees coming into America. Or did I miss the memo about the US accepting 10 billion refugees.

No, u

oh shit i'm sorry

>This is how progressives operate. Words mean whatever is most convenient to their current argument. Control the language and you control the debate.

As someone who has been laughed at by socialists for the statements that Europe is socialist and that Europe is socialist, I can confirm this. Ambiguous interpretation of language is one of the main weapons in the leftist arsenal.

it also makes it fucking impossible to hold any sort of normal conversation with them, because they will get offended (another leftist tactic) at you not using those words specifically how they have in mind they ought to be used at that time.

Hence them getting ticked off for me suggesting that the social democrats and actual socialists are, in fact, socialists. Because in that context it would mean they are linked to Marxism and thus communism.

Come to think of it, US socialists do this, too. They call themselves liberals, but they're not liberal. They are in favour of big government, they are in favour of restriction of liberties to spare the feelings of the ideological majority, etc. etc. They are not liberal in any sense, except that occasionally, accidentally, they are in favour of shit like gay marriage. In fact, it's pretty much only their approach to LGBT issues that's actually liberal. In all other areas, they are social democrats according to Euro pattern. But call them "socialists" and they go mad, and call you an idiot (that feigned offensiveness again). They're actually turning around now, especially after Bernie and Merkel's madness, and saying there's nothing wrong with being socialist.

where did they get 10.9 billion from?
Their AIDS-pozzed rectum?

Jeez. I guess CTR will take anyone now. Enjoy your sinking ship.

...

...

ahahahahaha
tweet this at them

You're alright, Mexibro.

Make Mexico Great

HAHAHAHAHA

you can jump our wall anytime

I'm still not eating any.

Big risk, no real reward.

>you frantically call for help on the radio as your ship fills with water.
>Tired and defeated you lay your head down wondering where you went wrong
>As you realize help will never arrive, you sigh one last breath
>You never had a chance

5/10
Pretty half assed, in typical Mexican style.

holy shit story?

O shit dude
Didn't realize there were 10.9 billion refugees

blumhouse.com/2016/03/01/mystery-ship-found-in-the-philippines-with-a-mummified-captain-aboard/

jesus man

this, wtf? they are so out of substantial
shit to say that they have to come up with that?

NEVER FORGET THE 10.9 BILLION GOYIM

what the fuck even is this

and if only three were poison i still aint takin that risk

lifes too good

>10.9 billion
What did they mean by this?