Does freedom of speech exist in a National Socialist society?

I like the principles of National Socialism but I also love my freeze peach.

Other urls found in this thread:

worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>freeze peach.

Absolutely not.

free speech is subjective as are morals

you should probably read a book I wrote it's called the ego and its own it'll do away with ur pesky nationalism

t. max stirner

lol no

worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm

Short answer is no.
Saying things that would be harmful to the people of the nation, or peddling degeneracy and things like Communism would probably be illegal. I think that's a price worth paying, though.

...

wew lad

People are yearning for authoritarianism because western society is voluntarily destroying itself with great enthusiasm. But there's no reason to believe authoritarians would actually run things better, or fix what's wrong.

Ultimately the only thing which can heal the west is policy, and the only way to be sure you can guide policy is to preserve the right to vote on those who create it.

25 years ago, Hillary was calling black gang members "super-predators," now she's chastising the police who are waging the same war on crime her husband demanded they start. There's never a guarantee any person, group, or even ideological cluster will remain a good ruler/company of rulers. People are mutable and there must always be a way to hold the powerful to account. Fascism precludes that by its very nature. Together we are strong, they'll tell you! Nice sentiment. But only one stick in the Fasces gets to hold the axe-head.

If you admire something about Nazi Germany (and there are some things everyone can agree on... ambitious public infrastructure projects like the Autobahn, generous pro-family policies, a social safety net) you can enact that in a democratic system without yoking himself to a king-without-the-name. We've done that with anti-smoking programs, for instance, and yet nobody feels the urge to label that Nazism.

And don't forget that the fascists got Germany turned into a rubble-field full of orphans and rape victims in the end.

Don't be so eager to sell yourself into slavery.

kek. Nice ad hom.

Why this reply?

...

It's a shill, fresh off the boat from reddit, or just some autist Libertarian, probably.

(((voluntarily)))

Definitely a shill.

dear neo-Cred Forums stormweenies,

your time is limited

this is a board that loves liberty and freedom and you drumpfkins dead

>probably
As in you make answer from state of ignorance.

I mean, how do you know if someone using free speech is really interested in rational debate rather than deceiving and pushing an agenda? If a woman tells betas that being nice will get them pussy and women are genuinely nice instead of whores who wear makeup on both their personality and faces?If Rupert Murdoch pushes a message through his media, and I say something through my media, the weight will not be nearly the same. Is it really free speech? Or is it money speech? And special interest speech?

I'm of course in favor of absolute free speech, but this is a point of debate I ponder regularly.

Don't worry, maybe you'll grow out of it when you hit 17.

They arrested and sometimes killed members of other political parties, and even those in their own if they were too leftist. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives

The British backstabbing the Germans and breaking their promise of allying with Germany once Germany declared war on USSR turned Germany into "a rubble-field full of orphans and rape victims", not the National Socialists themselves. Goebbels fought til the bitter end. Hitler went crazy from his doctor pumping him with amphetamines.